FITS images used in this processing run:

Field For-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Field For-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Field For-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Field For-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461061.60197958 21.01.2026 02:26:41.036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461061.60197958 21.01.2026 02:26:41.036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last  image: 2461324.85288255 11.10.2026 08:27:59.052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  3815
Objects passed selection criteria:  3811
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3457.5
Average stars matched: 3369 (97.4403 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230384 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Oct  9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Oct 11 03:34:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 104 -> 60, 42.308% > 20%; fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits vs fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 275 -> 93, 66.182% > 20%; fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits vs fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: bad plate solution of the 1st new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits): the sigma of its worst quadrant is 18.54 arcsec (overall sigma 4.053 arcsec, ratio 4.575), above the 5.90 arcsec (one pixel) limit - positions in that part of the image are unreliable
ERROR: bad plate solution of the 2nd new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits): the sigma of its worst quadrant is 16.34 arcsec (overall sigma 3.360 arcsec, ratio 4.864), above the 5.90 arcsec (one pixel) limit - positions in that part of the image are unreliable
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461061.60197958 21.01.2026 02:26:41.036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461061.60197958 21.01.2026 02:26:41.036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last  image: 2461324.85288255 11.10.2026 08:27:59.052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 68
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  20497
Objects passed selection criteria:  20463
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 18481.2
Average stars matched: 17784.2 (96.2286 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   244676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Oct  9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Oct 11 03:36:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
For-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting For-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing For-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 486623 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 486623 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.png' -> 'transient_report/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits_preview.png'

For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits


renamed 'For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.png' -> 'transient_report/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits_preview.png'

For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2167.0517
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 588.1089
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3217.7685
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 969.5582
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3197.6362
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 966.0378
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.48486
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T03:27:15.7182498' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T08:27:15.7182498' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61324.3522652546 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T08:27:25.6224620' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61324.3523798841 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     46.9595846110402 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -33.9996349505106 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.3233333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     177.894722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.61752970109701 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'For-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 07 50'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             11.50092 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/d_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits :)

Spent 0.642143 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/d_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T03:27:59.0520150' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T08:27:59.0520150' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61324.3527668053 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T08:28:08.9590901' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61324.3528814698 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     46.9595845794107 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -33.9996349171001 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.3288888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     178.059722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.61692037170165 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'For-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 07 50'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             11.50092 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/d_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits :)

Spent 0.722010 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/d_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits



fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.85238100
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.8'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:52.085 -33:59:57.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 931.2'x633.0'  15.5(deg)x10.6(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.83"/pix along the X axis and 5.95"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:57.133 -34:00:18.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:07:52.085 -33:59:57.39
Second-epoch image center 03:07:57.133 -34:00:18.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0184 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 935.7'x633.9'  15.6(deg)x10.6(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.86"/pix along the X axis and 5.95"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:53.941 -34:00:41.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:07:52.085 -33:59:57.39
Second-epoch image center 03:07:53.941 -34:00:41.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0137 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  03:07:57.133 -34:00:18.73
Second-epoch second image center 03:07:53.941 -34:00:41.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01266 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hg9zENSa0U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IaOYT8jJHf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KisX1h0kaM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NLysIyj8Kh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 3824 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 37.1795 to 57.2102 deg, Dec -39.3694 to -28.1457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 37.1795 to 57.2102 deg, Dec -39.3694 to -28.1457 deg
Loaded 5353 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3095 out of 3159 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3159 out of 3824 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.700100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.700100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.69

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.69

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 3824 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 37.1795 to 57.2102 deg, Dec -39.3694 to -28.1457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 37.1795 to 57.2102 deg, Dec -39.3694 to -28.1457 deg
Loaded 5353 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3095 out of 3159 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3159 out of 3824 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 3739 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 37.1796 to 57.2104 deg, Dec -39.3870 to -28.1983 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 37.1796 to 57.2104 deg, Dec -39.3870 to -28.1983 deg
Loaded 5331 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3029 out of 3107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3107 out of 3739 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
 2.2 pix  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.7 mag.  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
 14.7 mag.  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  11.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.hg9zENSa0U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=299, bad_region=0, passed=3824
Got 3824 stars (including 3520 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3824 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3466 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3467 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 3459 stars left (next iteration limit 3804)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=3459 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=867 n_q2=850 n_q3=900 n_q4=842 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IaOYT8jJHf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, bad_region=0, passed=3739
Got 3739 stars (including 3421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3739 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3370 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3369 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3363 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3363 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 3363 stars left (next iteration limit 3700)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits N_match=3363 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=817 n_q2=828 n_q3=879 n_q4=839 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KisX1h0kaM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=212, bad_region=0, passed=3183
Got 3183 stars (including 2969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1624 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1547 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.04" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1540 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.50" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1706 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1624 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.14" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1621 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.18" 
Excluding outliers - 1621 stars left (next iteration limit 1694)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: the 1621 catalog matches do not cover the frame (32/51/736/802 per quadrant, need 101 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=1621 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.776 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.215 sigma_q4_arcsec=3.124 n_q1=32 n_q2=51 n_q3=736 n_q4=802 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=8.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NLysIyj8Kh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, bad_region=0, passed=3163
Got 3163 stars (including 2959 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 935.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 935.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012996 (46.8 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010397 (37.4 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1725 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1631 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.83" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1627 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.07" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.12" 
Excluding outliers - 1719 stars left (next iteration limit 1789)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: the 1719 catalog matches do not cover the frame (60/93/786/780 per quadrant, need 107 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=1719 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=16.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=16.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.189 sigma_q4_arcsec=3.140 n_q1=60 n_q2=93 n_q3=786 n_q4=780 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.864
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.087
ref2=For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.047
new1=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits sigma_overall=3.278 worst_q_ratio=8.049
new2=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits sigma_overall=3.360 worst_q_ratio=4.864
reference average sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.067
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits) flagged: sigma=3.278 (ref avg 0.283), ratio=8.049 (ref avg 1.067), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 2917 high-SNR stars for plate solving
 
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ 

######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388    SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2184440.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2184440.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
  log-odds ratio 44.0129 (1.3018e+19), 5 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 23 index.
  RA,Dec = (46.9392,-33.995), pixel scale 5.96753 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +----+-+--+-+(best)------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2184440.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2184440.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (46.952944, -34.004508) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (03:07:48.706, -34:00:16.230).
Field size: 15.8265 x 10.6428 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.36742 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

Inserting WCS header...  '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> 'fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 03:35 fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K Oct 11 03:35 out2184440.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01'        / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2184440.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2184440.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.8517 degrees of RA,Dec (46.954,-34.0037)
  log-odds ratio 44.0129 (1.3018e+19), 5 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 23 index.
  RA,Dec = (46.9392,-33.995), pixel scale 5.96753 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +----+-+--+-+(best)------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2184440.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2184440.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (46.952944, -34.004508) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (03:07:48.706, -34:00:16.230).
Field size: 15.8265 x 10.6428 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.36742 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 03:35 fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K Oct 11 03:35 out2184440.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02'        / astrometry.net run
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Generating wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 951.1'x632.7'  15.9(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.96"/pix along the X axis and 5.94"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:48.962 -34:00:13.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 3183 stars ###
'wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2196561.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=212, bad_region=0, passed=3183
Got 3183 stars (including 2969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 951.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 951.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013210 (47.6 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010568 (38.0 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1715 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1550 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.72" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1520 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.11" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.61" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.69" 
Excluding outliers - 1867 stars left (next iteration limit 1672)
SIP_REFIT: the 1867 catalog matches do not cover the frame (104/275/702/786 per quadrant, need 116 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=1867 sigma_overall_arcsec=4.053 sigma_q1_arcsec=18.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=8.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.377 n_q1=104 n_q2=275 n_q3=702 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.575
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 lowered the worst-quadrant sigma of 1st new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits) from 26.38 to 18.54 arcsec (overall sigma 3.278->4.053 arcsec, ratio 8.049->4.575); keeping retry result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: updated local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits with order-2 result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits) flagged: sigma=3.360 (ref avg 0.283), ratio=4.864 (ref avg 1.067), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 2904 high-SNR stars for plate solving
 
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ 

######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388    SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2198391.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2198391.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
  log-odds ratio 43.9385 (1.20849e+19), 5 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 23 index.
  RA,Dec = (46.9383,-34.0018), pixel scale 5.96755 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +----++----++(best)------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2198391.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2198391.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (46.951505, -34.011175) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (03:07:48.361, -34:00:40.230).
Field size: 15.8265 x 10.6419 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.37296 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

Inserting WCS header...  '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 03:35 fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K Oct 11 03:35 out2198391.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01'        / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2198391.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2198391.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.8517 degrees of RA,Dec (46.9526,-34.0104)
  log-odds ratio 43.9385 (1.20849e+19), 5 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 23 index.
  RA,Dec = (46.9383,-34.0018), pixel scale 5.96755 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +----++----++(best)------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2198391.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2198391.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (46.951505, -34.011175) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (03:07:48.361, -34:00:40.230).
Field size: 15.8265 x 10.6419 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.37296 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 03:35 fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K Oct 11 03:35 out2198391.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02'        / astrometry.net run
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Generating wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 951.1'x632.6'  15.9(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.96"/pix along the X axis and 5.94"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:48.617 -34:00:37.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 3163 stars ###
'wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2202041.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, bad_region=0, passed=3163
Got 3163 stars (including 2959 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 951.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 951.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013210 (47.6 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010568 (38.0 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1712 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1540 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.76" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1513 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.13" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.62" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.74" 
Excluding outliers - 1855 stars left (next iteration limit 1664)
SIP_REFIT: the 1855 catalog matches do not cover the frame (108/262/722/763 per quadrant, need 115 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=1855 sigma_overall_arcsec=4.128 sigma_q1_arcsec=18.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=8.229 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.507 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.479 n_q1=108 n_q2=262 n_q3=722 n_q4=763 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.434
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits): worst-quadrant sigma 16.34->18.30 arcsec, overall sigma 3.360->4.128 arcsec, ratio 4.864->4.434; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: re-stating the kept diagnostic for fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits below, so the last WCS_QUALITY_DIAG line matches the restored WCS
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=1719 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=16.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=16.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.189 sigma_q4_arcsec=3.140 n_q1=60 n_q2=93 n_q3=786 n_q4=780 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.864
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 104 -> 60, 42.308% > 20%; fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits vs fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 275 -> 93, 66.182% > 20%; fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits vs fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: bad plate solution of the 1st new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits): the sigma of its worst quadrant is 18.54 arcsec (overall sigma 4.053 arcsec, ratio 4.575), above the 5.90 arcsec (one pixel) limit - positions in that part of the image are unreliable
ERROR: bad plate solution of the 2nd new image (fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits): the sigma of its worst quadrant is 16.34 arcsec (overall sigma 3.360 arcsec, ratio 4.864), above the 5.90 arcsec (one pixel) limit - positions in that part of the image are unreliable
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=4.053 -- 14.32x the reference average (0.283); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=3.360 -- 11.87x the reference average (0.283); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.575 -- 4.29x the reference average (1.067); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.864 -- 4.56x the reference average (1.067); plate solution may be of low accuracy

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (3459 matched stars from wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065_astrometric_residuals.png (3363 matched stars from wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (1867 matched stars from wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.12 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (1719 matched stars from wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.77 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field For-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field For-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.8'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:52.085 -33:59:57.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 951.1'x632.7'  15.9(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.96"/pix along the X axis and 5.94"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:48.962 -34:00:13.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:07:52.085 -33:59:57.39
Second-epoch image center 03:07:48.962 -34:00:13.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 935.7'x633.9'  15.6(deg)x10.6(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.86"/pix along the X axis and 5.95"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:07:53.941 -34:00:41.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:07:52.085 -33:59:57.39
Second-epoch image center 03:07:53.941 -34:00:41.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0137 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  03:07:48.962 -34:00:13.39
Second-epoch second image center 03:07:53.941 -34:00:41.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01884 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wZ6qAGdF4m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A0qfYrdsqp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UO2vEHTKDi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lnJUsWMk3l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20810 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 37.1795 to 57.2807 deg, Dec -39.3728 to -28.1011 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 37.1795 to 57.2807 deg, Dec -39.3728 to -28.1011 deg
Loaded 5391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3996 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 20810 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.602650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.602650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.80

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.80

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20810 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 37.1795 to 57.2807 deg, Dec -39.3728 to -28.1011 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 37.1795 to 57.2807 deg, Dec -39.3728 to -28.1011 deg
Loaded 5391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3996 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 20810 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 21268 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 37.1796 to 57.2813 deg, Dec -39.3869 to -28.1699 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 37.1796 to 57.2813 deg, Dec -39.3869 to -28.1699 deg
Loaded 5365 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3994 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 21268 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
 2.1 pix  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.8 mag.  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
 14.8 mag.  For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  13.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wZ6qAGdF4m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=668, bad_region=17, passed=20808
Got 20808 stars (including 20080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1303 n_q2=1168 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1149 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A0qfYrdsqp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=643, bad_region=10, passed=21259
Got 21259 stars (including 20568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21259 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1288 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030
The image catalog is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UO2vEHTKDi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=474, bad_region=14, passed=16122
Got 16122 stars (including 15615 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16122 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 951.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 951.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013210 (47.6 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010568 (38.0 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2669 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.14" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2607 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.62" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3354 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3216 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.31" 
Excluding outliers - 3211 stars left (next iteration limit 2867)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: the 3211 catalog matches do not cover the frame (172/461/1230/1348 per quadrant, need 200 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=3211 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.600 sigma_q1_arcsec=17.955 sigma_q2_arcsec=7.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.253 n_q1=172 n_q2=461 n_q3=1230 n_q4=1348 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.988
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lnJUsWMk3l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=441, bad_region=14, passed=16264
Got 16264 stars (including 15790 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 935.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 935.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012996 (46.8 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010397 (37.4 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.95" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3137 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2995 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.65" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95" 
Excluding outliers - 2988 stars left (next iteration limit 3082)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: the 2988 catalog matches do not cover the frame (92/175/1334/1387 per quadrant, need 186 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=2988 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=15.225 sigma_q2_arcsec=14.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=3.220 n_q1=92 n_q2=175 n_q3=1334 n_q4=1387 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/wcs_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field For-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 03:17:13.24 -32:34:35.0:  13.70 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 02:39:08.20 -30:44:32.6:  14.20 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-26-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 02:35:53.47 -29:06:30.5:  14.01 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits at 03:17:13.24 -32:34:35.0:  13.67 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.68 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:13.24 -32:34:35.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5578 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits at 02:35:53.47 -29:06:30.5:  14.05 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:35:53.47 -29:06:30.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8525 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-27-41_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits at 02:39:08.20 -30:44:32.6:  14.39 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:39:08.20 -30:44:32.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9238 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31874_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31874_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    10.63    02:31:09.52 -33:09:25.4   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31876_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31876_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    10.69    02:37:02.50 -30:14:22.3   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31894_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31894_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    10.88    03:02:14.87 -32:36:57.4   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31901_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31901_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    10.94    03:32:22.46 -30:55:14.3   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31950_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31950_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    11.42    03:03:22.36 -36:14:01.9   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (468.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31981_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31981_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    11.64    03:09:06.05 -36:51:34.1   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (589.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31983_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31983_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    11.67    03:10:29.49 -38:25:33.9   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1247.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31995_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 31995_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    11.81    03:27:32.16 -37:58:08.2   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (867.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32024_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32024_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.08    03:15:25.82 -36:34:05.9   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (451.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32034_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32034_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.32    03:13:01.70 -30:21:39.4   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32052_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32052_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.29    03:19:28.13 -31:46:14.2   6203 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32054_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32054_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.29    02:32:30.82 -38:28:00.2   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2132.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32097_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32097_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.51    02:38:25.56 -36:14:33.2   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (823.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32115_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32115_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.75    02:36:55.22 -34:34:06.3   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (366.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32120_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32120_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.61    03:00:58.48 -30:56:24.8   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32137_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32137_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.80    03:02:36.03 -31:02:38.0   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32155_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32155_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.72    03:08:34.97 -39:12:00.8   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1731.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32162_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32162_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.60    03:35:48.24 -36:58:51.0   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (490.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32165_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32165_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.85    02:37:26.53 -35:51:33.5   1062 1748   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (701.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32172_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32172_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.02    02:38:21.87 -29:43:08.2   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32174_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32174_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.97    02:34:08.95 -31:11:59.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32181_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.97    02:33:46.14 -30:43:02.2   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32192_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32192_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.04    02:38:19.41 -30:10:21.5   0804 5167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

**** FOUND  02:38:19.38 -30:10:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32222_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32222_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.06    02:32:38.43 -31:30:40.5   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32232_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32232_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.19    02:35:04.32 -29:18:51.0   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32252_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32252_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    12.97    03:41:09.16 -37:36:13.1   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (647.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32313_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32313_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.29    03:40:17.26 -29:20:23.5   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32329_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32329_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.26    02:35:51.02 -33:15:05.5   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32334_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32334_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.32    02:59:59.62 -32:03:56.8   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32338_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32338_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.10    02:45:02.24 -37:18:20.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1120.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32344_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32344_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.36    02:33:26.28 -32:22:31.5   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32347_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32347_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.68    02:31:33.75 -35:00:07.2   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (574.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32354_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32354_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.78    02:48:40.81 -31:57:35.9   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32355_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32355_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.15    03:42:22.06 -33:36:36.3   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32362_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32362_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.58    02:56:27.39 -29:47:18.1   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32373_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32373_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.62    02:31:44.28 -33:05:09.5   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32375_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32375_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 11.35238    2461324.85238    13.49    03:17:13.15 -32:34:35.2   5930 4104   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.66    03:17:13.33 -32:34:34.8   5931 4108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32388_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32388_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.27    02:35:47.65 -37:04:35.4   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1234.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32395_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32395_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.36    02:37:34.35 -35:23:51.9   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (567.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32406_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32406_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.41    03:21:38.10 -35:52:54.1   6494 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (247.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32412_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32412_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.75    02:30:25.16 -36:08:42.9   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (973.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32414_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32414_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.88    02:37:20.21 -29:32:08.2   0623 5537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32415_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32415_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.57    03:10:42.92 -36:27:37.4   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (458.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32426_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32426_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.39    03:42:47.17 -35:46:51.4   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (160.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32432_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32432_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.46    03:12:22.29 -30:06:40.8   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32439_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32439_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    14.08    02:36:49.48 -32:41:36.0   0810 3623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32440_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32440_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.49    02:38:01.85 -35:01:19.3   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (450.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32442_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32442_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.87    03:35:09.38 -29:46:42.9   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32447_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32447_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.65    03:42:10.82 -29:30:55.4   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32448_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32448_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.55    03:29:35.22 -38:57:10.9   7308 0309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1351.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32457_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.55    02:42:34.15 -37:12:39.7   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1130.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32459_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 11.35238    2461324.85238    13.82    02:39:08.25 -30:44:34.1   0955 4831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    14.11    02:39:08.16 -30:44:31.2   0955 4835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32465_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32465_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    14.00    03:34:42.66 -32:20:35.8   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32469_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32469_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.50    02:40:43.22 -34:08:54.4   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (177.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32490_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32490_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 11.35238    2461324.85238    13.95    02:35:53.47 -29:06:30.2   0395 5769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.79    02:35:53.47 -29:06:30.9   0395 5773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32493_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32493_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.61    02:34:32.09 -36:25:26.2   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (989.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32507_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32507_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.83    03:41:49.51 -32:36:52.4   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32514_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32514_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.96    02:46:43.17 -29:37:50.7   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32517_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32517_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.52    02:36:59.76 -38:27:23.3   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1972.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32535_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32535_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    14.42    03:26:25.55 -30:22:11.7   7090 5469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32541_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 32541_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    13.93    03:42:13.10 -33:51:58.8   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10527_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250
The candidate 10527_fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 11.35288    2461324.85288    10.22    02:42:35.61 -33:46:04.3   1620 3068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_For-04-Q1b1x1_032952_TTUQ1b1x1_1987394_UXXbg6NW/fd_For-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (72.5") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field For-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed For-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.85238100 -observatory V36
14:37:14.05 -18:19:03.9 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:07:23.95 -20:56:22.8 Venus (-4.5mag)
08:39:50.00 +19:37:08.6 Mars (1.0mag)
09:34:20.23 +15:05:28.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:27.34 +01:36:59.1 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:05.10 +20:57:58.5 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:20.94 -00:25:35.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:10.87 -23:43:30.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:30:50.21 -14:19:56.8 Moon (-8.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 03:34 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.85238100:
09:34:15.23 +15:05:56.3 Io (6.1mag)
09:34:29.63 +15:04:36.6 Europa (6.2mag)
09:34:34.61 +15:04:09.6 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:33:55.99 +15:07:40.0 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:34:04.63 +15:25:59.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:34:17.53 +15:05:42.7 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:32:54.85 +15:27:06.8 Elara (17.5mag)
09:36:46.63 +14:28:18.0 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:32:56.60 +15:32:32.1 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:14.26 +01:37:11.7 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:30.77 +01:36:53.1 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:41:56.57 +01:34:12.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:11.60 +01:36:50.8 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:40:46.81 +01:24:39.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 03:34 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.85238100:
02:48:38.87 +21:21:48.5 JWST
17:07:14.49 +39:58:16.8 Chandra
12:38:52.16 -62:03:01.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 03:34 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.85238100 -observatory V36
03:46:09.06 +20:11:55.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:24:41.02 -33:29:52.2 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:48.03 -72:23:59.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:52.15 +34:38:58.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:30:10.32 +25:27:31.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:55.60 +35:39:51.3 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:45.34 +41:31:38.4 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:46:11.81 -13:35:22.4 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:17:01.59 +15:59:50.9 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:50:56.85 -02:43:02.7 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:42:27.89 +65:14:01.3 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:36:10.10 +43:17:38.5 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:45:37.46 +14:15:26.2 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:29:17.88 -20:38:23.4 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:27:06.61 +19:00:10.7 17.6mag 2P/Encke
22:58:14.11 -31:42:19.3 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:10:44.48 +38:44:42.4 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:11:12.60 -08:09:35.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:22:26.78 -08:52:12.2 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:35:44.40 +16:00:54.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
03:00:06.11 +14:20:35.1 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:38:49.39 +40:14:17.6 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:02:33.94 +14:09:36.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:40:56.73 +13:16:09.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:06:37.09 -32:12:19.8 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:50:48.71 +19:18:37.0 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:39:48.94 +03:24:28.0 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:18:24.04 +01:39:38.5 14.3mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:21.24 +04:36:11.9 14.8mag 220P/McNaught
06:03:25.68 +45:12:40.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:27:34.44 +25:37:07.9 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:56:12.25 +31:37:44.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 03:34 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70  ASASSN-26fk  2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00  SN 2026adfy  2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70  AT2026adgn  2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40  ASASSN-26fj  2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 03:34 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2  TCP J00381501+4114472  2026-10-08.5978  17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 03:34 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30  AT 2026acxz  2026-09-22.18 19.7418
18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31  AT 2026acxy  2026-09-26.14 19.507
17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69  AT 2026acxx  2026-09-18.17 19.9857
18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16  AT 2026acxw  2026-09-22.17 19.6863
03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16  AT 2026acxv  2026-09-24.50 20.55
05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19  AT 2026acxu  2026-09-22.43 20.8781
08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06  AT 2026acxt  2026-09-24.51 19.9945
08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92  AT 2026acxs  2026-09-24.52 18.9046
08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21  AT 2026acxr  2026-09-16.52 20.3455
09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85  AT 2026acxq  2026-09-24.52 18.9887
10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54  AT 2026acxp  2026-09-24.53 18.7327
10:46:46.678 +35:46:40.03  AT 2026acxo  2026-09-24.53 18.7833
07:54:42.514 -01:42:07.85  AT 2026acxn  2026-09-24.52 20.2449
08:05:13.593 +06:17:43.23  AT 2026acxm  2026-09-24.52 19.4626
08:21:28.246 +03:46:33.77  AT 2026acxl  2026-09-24.52 19.7999
04:46:32.556 +00:05:47.64  AT 2026acxk  2026-09-22.48 20.2187
03:43:52.593 +21:51:56.00  AT 2026acxj  2026-07-06.48 19.0551
07:17:54.475 +23:18:27.43  AT 2026acxi  2026-09-25.47 19.7261
05:06:29.004 +73:49:45.19  AT 2026acxh  2026-09-16.43 20.0492
02:06:05.697 -18:58:51.46  AT 2026acxg  2026-09-24.55 20.61
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 03:34 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Oct 11 03:34:18 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 37s (0.62 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 12s (0.20 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 24s (0.40 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 77s (1.28 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 8 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 12s (0.20 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 12s (0.20 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 29s (0.48 min)
FIELD_For-04-Q1b1x1: 125s (2.08 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 131s (2.18 min)
Finished: Sun Oct 11 03:36:29 CDT 2026