This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3456* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.7 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461324.8456,11.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261011.3456 11.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3456 2461324.8456 10.82 05:19:57.95 +23:36:11.0
181.36658 -7.72098 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis -1 -2 2 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:57.95 +23:36:11.0: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:57.95 +23:36:11.0: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3456* 05 19 57.95 +23 36 11.0 10.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8456,10.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3456 10.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3456* 05 21 07.65 +23 38 19.9 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461324.8456,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261011.3456 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3456 2461324.8456 12.88 05:17:12.14 +21:20:00.2
182.90312 -9.52409 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:12.14 +21:20:00.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:12.14 +21:20:00.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3456* 05 17 12.14 +21 20 00.2 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8456,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3456 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461324.84591257 11.10.2026 08:17:56.846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18122
Objects passed selection criteria: 18032
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12670
Average stars matched: 12154.5 (95.9313 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243544 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 03:26:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461324.84591257 11.10.2026 08:17:56.846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 77 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137965
Objects passed selection criteria: 137593
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101549
Average stars matched: 96030.8 (94.5659 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 603828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 03:28:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.84529377
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.604 +21:59:47.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.604 +21:59:47.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0047 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.417 +22:00:18.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.417 +22:00:18.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.604 +21:59:47.52
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.417 +22:00:18.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01380 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eNendErDKB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VW7ijT5Sbd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WOJY52IL3M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OgHOJziMVL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.eNendErDKB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VW7ijT5Sbd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WOJY52IL3M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=972, bad_region=4912, passed=12462
Got 12462 stars (including 6992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4723 stars left (next iteration limit 5192)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=7.919 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.620 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.637 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.648 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.648 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.815 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.815 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4723 robust_rms_before=0.973 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.545 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.844 worst_region_rms_after=0.815 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.412 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.815
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.844 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.844 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.545 arcsec matched=4723
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits N_match=4723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.721 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1134 n_q2=1278 n_q3=834 n_q4=1477 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OgHOJziMVL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=791, bad_region=4192, passed=10780
Got 10780 stars (including 6157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4726 stars left (next iteration limit 5195)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=7.824 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.279 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.279 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.628 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.773 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.773 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.767 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.767 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4726 robust_rms_before=0.980 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.521 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.827 worst_region_rms_after=0.767 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.540 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.767
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.827 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.827 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.521 arcsec matched=4726
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits N_match=4726 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.690 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1179 n_q2=1288 n_q3=904 n_q4=1355 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits sigma_overall=0.552 worst_q_ratio=1.305
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits sigma_overall=0.532 worst_q_ratio=1.298
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271_astrometric_residuals.png (4723 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272_astrometric_residuals.png (4726 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:57.95 +23:36:11.0: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:57.95 +23:36:11.0: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:19:57.95 +23:36:11.0: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8228 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 31341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07450_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 07450_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.35 +17:54:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:19:57.95 +23:36:11.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.604 +21:59:47.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.604 +21:59:47.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0047 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.417 +22:00:18.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.417 +22:00:18.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.604 +21:59:47.52
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.417 +22:00:18.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01380 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.67JPDLhaol
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mPZeei2ZNW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R0LJgZSEMT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a597swBU5i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.67JPDLhaol (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1719 n_q2=436 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mPZeei2ZNW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R0LJgZSEMT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=8203, bad_region=31510, passed=96200
Got 96200 stars (including 59811 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 96200 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4771 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4771 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4709 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=8.048 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.796 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.796 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.623 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.525 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.525 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.827 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.827 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4709 robust_rms_before=0.969 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.514 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.841 worst_region_rms_after=0.827 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.484 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.827
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.841 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.841 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.514 arcsec matched=4709
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits N_match=4709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=1191 n_q2=1304 n_q3=804 n_q4=1410 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.a597swBU5i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=6336, bad_region=27508, passed=85661
Got 85661 stars (including 54392 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85661 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=7.838 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.072 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.072 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.762 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.762 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.868 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.868 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=0.981 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.514 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.892 worst_region_rms_after=0.868 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.612 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.868
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.892 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.514 arcsec matched=4722
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1211 n_q2=1318 n_q3=872 n_q4=1321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031845_TTUQ2b1x1_828181_0iM7M2si/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:35.19 +19:47:33.7: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:23.47 +22:12:06.2: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.10 +19:55:46.2: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:00.08 +20:05:57.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:27.77 +24:41:33.0: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:54.43 +25:35:27.8: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:46.19 +20:46:31.1: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:31.51 +22:03:05.5: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:46.19 +20:46:31.1: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:23.47 +22:12:06.2: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:00.08 +20:05:57.6: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:35.19 +19:47:33.7: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:27.77 +24:41:33.0: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.10 +19:55:46.2: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:46.19 +20:46:31.1: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7854 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:23.47 +22:12:06.2: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2910 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:35.19 +19:47:33.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0237 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:27.77 +24:41:33.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1580 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:54.43 +25:35:27.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:00.08 +20:05:57.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7148 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.10 +19:55:46.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4335 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:54.43 +25:35:27.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9591 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:11.44 +24:41:23.5: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:31.51 +22:03:05.5: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:31.51 +22:03:05.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7152 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:11.44 +24:41:23.5: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:11.44 +24:41:23.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6999 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:05.80 +18:33:51.6: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:46.63 +24:06:21.2: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:14.59 +22:44:22.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:43.40 +25:19:35.0: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:05.80 +18:33:51.6: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:05.80 +18:33:51.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2397 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:26:59.30 +20:20:14.0: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:31.72 +24:29:03.0: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:14.59 +22:44:22.2: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:46.63 +24:06:21.2: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:43.40 +25:19:35.0: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:46.63 +24:06:21.2: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6186 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:14.59 +22:44:22.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2413 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:43.40 +25:19:35.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4681 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:08.21 +22:38:17.7: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:03.29 +22:47:19.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:26:59.30 +20:20:14.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:31.72 +24:29:03.0: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:31.72 +24:29:03.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9909 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:59.30 +20:20:14.0: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7173 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:08.21 +22:38:17.7: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:08.21 +22:38:17.7: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7017 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:03.29 +22:47:19.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:03.29 +22:47:19.2: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1890 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:12.14 +21:20:00.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:12.14 +21:20:00.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:55.36 +19:03:03.8: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:55.36 +19:03:03.8: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:55.36 +19:03:03.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4968 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:29.4: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:29.4: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:29.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4073 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.3: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:14.69 +18:14:35.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.3: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4953 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:14.69 +18:14:35.6: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:14.69 +18:14:35.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6892 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:57.36 +23:43:48.5: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:43.48 +19:59:03.5: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:57.36 +23:43:48.5: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:57.36 +23:43:48.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0876 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:05.07 +20:18:41.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:43.48 +19:59:03.5: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:43.48 +19:59:03.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0631 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:05.07 +20:18:41.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:05.07 +20:18:41.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0990 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193177.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189057_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189057_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189070_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189070_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:06.55 +22:14:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189094_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189094_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189095_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189095_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189096_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189096_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:17.90 +22:36:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189115_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189115_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189119_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189119_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.56 +17:44:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189122_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189122_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.67 +19:17:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:07.04 +18:02:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189138_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189138_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189140_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189140_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:56.27 +20:14:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189148_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189148_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.02 +22:41:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189150_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189150_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.16 +18:20:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:00.16 +18:45:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189155_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189155_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:28.34 +18:24:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189159_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189159_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.65 +25:17:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189160_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189160_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:25.18 +25:17:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.66 +17:48:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 189171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:28.15 +20:53:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189938_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 189938_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.31 +26:06:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191837_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 191837_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.27 +18:59:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192047_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 192047_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.89 +18:33:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192199_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 192199_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 192202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.26 +23:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192308_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 192308_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.61 +20:46:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192514_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 192514_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.21 +18:40:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192794_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 192794_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.17 +20:53:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192977_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 192977_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.41 +18:33:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.97 +20:10:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193161_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193161_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.32 +18:52:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193177_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 193177_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.79 +23:11:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.27 +24:24:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193356_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193356_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.98 +18:33:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193453_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193453_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:03.84 +19:09:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193545_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193545_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.29 +20:45:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193626_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193626_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.15 +18:44:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193675_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193675_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:50.97 +20:15:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193773_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193773_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.61 +25:22:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193819_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 193819_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.26 +22:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194032_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194032_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:48.33 +19:03:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194192_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194192_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.55 +20:05:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194412_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194412_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:12.03 +19:49:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194526_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194526_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:05.32 +23:57:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194563_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194563_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:37.30 +23:38:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194821_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194821_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.89 +24:21:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194972_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194972_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:06.99 +24:22:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194988_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 194988_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.55 +18:46:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.50 +22:22:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.80 +21:46:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:39.84 +21:50:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195191_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195191_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.29 +20:56:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:24.96 +18:04:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.79 +19:32:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195361_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195361_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:03.23 +20:08:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195445_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195445_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:20.23 +25:31:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195475_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195475_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.59 +21:24:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195499_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195499_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195670_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195670_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:27.53 +18:02:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195765_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195765_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:44.65 +22:44:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195935_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195935_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.34 +21:47:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195976_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195976_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:39.30 +20:14:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195994_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 195994_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.90 +18:57:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196116_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196116_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.25 +25:09:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.27 +22:27:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.23 +23:07:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:56.50 +18:54:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:58.10 +20:38:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196473_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196473_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.12 +21:58:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196643_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196643_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.34 +22:06:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196922_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 196922_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:31.47 +18:39:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 197229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.10 +24:22:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 197237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:26.33 +23:40:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197601_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 197601_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197854_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 197854_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:36.79 +20:18:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197955_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 197955_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:19.08 +21:33:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198395_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 198395_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:20.53 +22:11:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 198760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198811_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 198811_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:09.09 +18:54:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 199087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.63 +17:59:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.40 +26:13:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180001_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 180001_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.34 +17:54:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91675_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 91675_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks