This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.1846 2461324.6846 12.10 05:05:51.91 +26:07:33.5
177.42106 -8.88274 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:51.91 +26:07:33.5: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:51.91 +26:07:33.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.1845* 05 05 51.91 +26 07 33.5 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.6846,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.1846 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.1846 2461324.6846 12.98 04:37:26.12 +25:21:18.0
174.00847 -14.39723 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -1 -0 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:37:26.12 +25:21:18.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:37:26.12 +25:21:18.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.1845* 04 37 26.12 +25 21 18.0 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.6846,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.1846 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.1846 2461324.6846 13.43 04:33:14.52 +25:49:16.7
173.00870 -14.81611 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:33:14.52 +25:49:16.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:33:14.52 +25:49:16.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.1845* 04 33 14.52 +25 49 16.7 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.6846,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.1846 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.1846 2461324.6846 13.99 04:44:37.38 +34:54:26.9
167.60076 -7.04349 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha 1 -0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:37.38 +34:54:26.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:37.38 +34:54:26.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.6846,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.1846 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.1846 2461324.6846 13.06 04:39:12.81 +29:09:19.5
171.29076 -11.64226 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana 0 -3 3 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:12.81 +29:09:19.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:12.81 +29:09:19.5: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.1845* 04 39 12.81 +29 09 19.5 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.6846,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.1846 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461324.68492623 11.10.2026 04:26:07.626 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15267
Objects passed selection criteria: 15207
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11950.2
Average stars matched: 11631.5 (97.3327 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240804 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 00:37:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461324.68492623 11.10.2026 04:26:07.626 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 123
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116973
Objects passed selection criteria: 116729
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88140.2
Average stars matched: 84792 (96.2012 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578496 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 00:38:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.68417753
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:42.544 +30:02:07.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:42.544 +30:02:07.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:45.574 +30:01:48.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:45.574 +30:01:48.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0663 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:42.544 +30:02:07.95
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:45.574 +30:01:48.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01220 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xKKC4MFVGM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wyh7TNTLtZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9KC8zz2Okn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.laLcONLDnZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.xKKC4MFVGM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Wyh7TNTLtZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9KC8zz2Okn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=293, bad_region=0, passed=7704
Got 7704 stars (including 7402 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=10.230 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.498 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.663 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.952 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.952 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.711 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.448 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.716 worst_region_rms_after=0.711 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.832 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.711
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.716 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.716 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.448 arcsec matched=4771
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=782 n_q2=833 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1967 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.laLcONLDnZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=7765
Got 7765 stars (including 7439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=10.267 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.600 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.711 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.125 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.125 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.829 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.829 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.397 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.460 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.537 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.728 worst_region_rms_after=0.829 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.944 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.829
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.728 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.728 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.460 arcsec matched=4774
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=773 n_q2=838 n_q3=1185 n_q4=1978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.319
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (4771 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197_astrometric_residuals.png (4774 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.61 +30:10:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.38 +35:13:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21175_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21175_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.21 +31:27:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21206_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21206_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.48 +28:42:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.26 +32:10:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.51 +27:22:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20856_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 20856_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.98 +31:53:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.39 +35:03:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.39 +26:08:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.38 +34:08:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.63 +30:42:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.40 +28:36:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:42.544 +30:02:07.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:42.544 +30:02:07.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:45.574 +30:01:48.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:45.574 +30:01:48.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0663 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:42.544 +30:02:07.95
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:45.574 +30:01:48.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01220 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eT3Dp7msxT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.48aISw4yj1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ydfgK4gCsC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HPa5yuZiLn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6879 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6879 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 115 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eT3Dp7msxT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.48aISw4yj1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ydfgK4gCsC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2398, bad_region=33, passed=48409
Got 48409 stars (including 45925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=10.271 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.655 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.941 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.941 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.484 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.689 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.438 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.437 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.484 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.681 worst_region_rms_after=0.689 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.817 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.689
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.681 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.681 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.437 arcsec matched=4771
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=800 n_q2=815 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1917 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HPa5yuZiLn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2422, bad_region=32, passed=48652
Got 48652 stars (including 46140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48652 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=10.402 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.743 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.743 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.702 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.092 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.092 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.807 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.807 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.386 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.702 worst_region_rms_after=0.807 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.918 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.807
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.702 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.702 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.446 arcsec matched=4771
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.469 n_q1=788 n_q2=820 n_q3=1242 n_q4=1921 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-25-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233959_TTUQ1b1x1_1338667_X2xEN2va/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:35.67 +32:25:56.8: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:51.91 +26:07:33.5: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:35.67 +32:25:56.8: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:35.67 +32:25:56.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3255 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:37:26.12 +25:21:18.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:59.22 +35:15:29.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:51.91 +26:07:33.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:33:14.52 +25:49:16.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:37:26.12 +25:21:18.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:59.22 +35:15:29.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:59.22 +35:15:29.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:33:14.52 +25:49:16.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.09 +29:58:35.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:49:42.12 +28:20:16.3: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:37.38 +34:54:26.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.09 +29:58:35.7: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.09 +29:58:35.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3398 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:49:42.12 +28:20:16.3: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:42.12 +28:20:16.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6739 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:37.38 +34:54:26.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:12.81 +29:09:19.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:12.81 +29:09:19.5: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:39:12.81 +29:09:19.5: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.0583 delta=2.45 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151532.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152007.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89123.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:36.89 +33:23:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.38 +35:13:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.83 +33:05:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.49 +34:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.16 +34:07:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.15 +33:47:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151288_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151288_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.85 +34:09:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.90 +33:06:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.71 +32:42:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.55 +34:49:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151359_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 151359_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.87 +26:55:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.07 +28:37:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.62 +32:33:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.45 +31:23:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.09 +28:31:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.72 +34:23:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151497_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151497_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.98 +26:25:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151525_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151525_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.35 +34:06:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151532_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 151532_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151543_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151543_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.51 +33:11:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.74 +26:10:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151563_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151563_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:54.94 +32:26:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151584_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151584_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.56 +33:12:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151586_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151586_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.30 +31:44:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.88 +29:47:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151611_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151611_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.63 +30:33:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.77 +29:45:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.43 +31:09:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151659_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 151659_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:36.00 +31:24:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151719_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151719_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.60 +34:00:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151760_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151760_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:27.99 +30:16:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151774_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151774_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:18.01 +33:11:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151778_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151778_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.24 +31:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151796_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151796_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:51.83 +32:26:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.22 +31:04:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:17.16 +33:06:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151824_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151824_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151831_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151831_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:56.64 +33:57:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151832_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151832_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.24 +29:33:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151898_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151898_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152007_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 152007_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.28 +32:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.56 +31:18:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 53243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:50.99 +26:46:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.20 +30:48:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 120278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:18.29 +27:30:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 142137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:02.72 +30:45:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.49 +26:45:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.29 +32:02:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.99 +29:15:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 141054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.61 +30:06:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140765_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 140765_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.75 +30:10:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.57 +34:32:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:41.72 +26:45:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:57.83 +27:26:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:09.06 +25:22:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.70 +28:10:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12037_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 12037_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122862_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 122862_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.31 +25:24:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.53 +28:39:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.27 +27:01:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:45.68 +26:37:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.57 +29:52:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:08.84 +32:28:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.49 +28:42:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.51 +28:00:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.42 +33:50:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.72 +27:26:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:27.10 +32:51:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 58752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:25.71 +31:09:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 03816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:12.90 +34:57:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 33363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:41.24 +32:46:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 89123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:05.11 +32:51:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.00 +31:53:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.43 +25:58:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:17.56 +32:11:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.39 +35:03:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.81 +29:00:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.38 +26:08:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:20.50 +29:14:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:36.66 +25:59:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.95 +30:05:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.45 +27:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.19 +31:29:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:23.10 +29:29:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 110419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:52.42 +27:07:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.31 +27:03:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:58.80 +25:08:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:57.04 +27:27:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:56.00 +30:38:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.72 +24:38:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 128910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:18.62 +28:34:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:04.98 +27:11:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:15.21 +26:43:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.58 +34:37:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:42.62 +30:32:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:22.54 +27:44:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.37 +29:42:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.77 +29:20:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.41 +34:08:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.63 +30:42:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 96324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:23.90 +25:15:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:20.00 +34:08:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.77 +32:28:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.45 +25:08:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.41 +28:36:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_23-26-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
