######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 220067 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 220067 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits

renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2912.8108
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 700.6571
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3099.6917
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 756.6948
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.46866
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.074
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 14.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 14.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T06:40:38.0177420' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T11:40:38.0177420' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.4865511227 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T11:40:47.9183847' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.4866657178 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 173.330006054919 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9999605041246 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.7875 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.0247222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.86242143949509 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20651 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20651 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 51.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits :)
Spent 0.537520 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 14.3500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 14.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T06:41:38.3033571' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T11:41:38.3033571' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.4872488775 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T11:41:48.2070008' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.487363507 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 173.330006028092 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9999605291979 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9941666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.1572222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.81194431178903 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20651 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20651 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.3500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.3500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 51.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits :)
Spent 0.532179 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits

fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.98666686
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:29.235 +14:04:31.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:29.235 +14:04:31.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0817 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:29.260 +14:04:04.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:29.260 +14:04:04.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:29.235 +14:04:31.48
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:29.260 +14:04:04.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00762 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.acDgg8NyG8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TgvNmwGYrD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8nYuQrd1Ao
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CcQEG32kRu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec +8.4838 to +19.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec 8.4838 to 19.3109 deg
Loaded 3828 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2954 out of 3142 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3142 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec +8.4838 to +19.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec 8.4838 to 19.3109 deg
Loaded 3828 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2954 out of 3142 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3142 out of 5845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9318 to 181.4974 deg, Dec +8.5224 to +19.3315 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9318 to 181.4974 deg, Dec 8.5224 to 19.3315 deg
Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2961 out of 3138 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3138 out of 5851 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.6 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.acDgg8NyG8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, bad_region=1273, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 4213 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4077 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4077 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4072 stars left (next iteration limit 4479)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4072 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1316 n_q2=794 n_q3=1253 n_q4=709 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TgvNmwGYrD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, bad_region=1280, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 4231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4100 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4091 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4091 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4099 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4091 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4091 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4091 stars left (next iteration limit 4500)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=4091 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1318 n_q2=812 n_q3=1250 n_q4=711 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8nYuQrd1Ao (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=263, bad_region=306, passed=2274
Got 2274 stars (including 1717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1667 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1662 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1662 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1662 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1662 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 1662 stars left (next iteration limit 1828)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1662 robust_rms=6.986 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.594 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.108 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1662 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.678 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1662 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.536 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1662 robust_rms_before=1.793 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.607 worst_region_rms_after=0.536 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.885 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.536
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Image size: 941.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:29.289 +14:04:29.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2274 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2245912.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.793 -> 0.403 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1662 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1564 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 1564 pairs (1662 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1564 robust_rms=6.935 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.865 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.130 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1564 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.677 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1564 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.540 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1564 robust_rms_before=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.539 worst_region_rms_after=0.540 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.539 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.540
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.540 vs 0.539 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1564 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1564 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits N_match=1564 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=551 n_q2=269 n_q3=503 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CcQEG32kRu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=230, bad_region=308, passed=2145
Got 2145 stars (including 1620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2145 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1570 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1568 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1568 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1570 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1567 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1567 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 1567 stars left (next iteration limit 1724)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1567 robust_rms=7.058 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.435 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.435 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1567 robust_rms=0.560 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.696 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1567 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.535 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.535 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1567 robust_rms_before=1.704 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.556 worst_region_rms_after=0.535 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.724 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.535
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.556 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.556 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.378 arcsec matched=1567
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits N_match=1567 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=554 n_q2=275 n_q3=494 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.038
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.143
ref2=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new1=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new2=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.038
reference average sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.1405
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4072 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (4091 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638_astrometric_residuals.png (1564 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639_astrometric_residuals.png (1567 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 9.42 | 11:23:40.18 +16:51:04.4 | 3402 4911 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
**** FOUND 11:23:40.17 +16:51:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Image size: 941.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:29.289 +14:04:29.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:29.289 +14:04:29.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0814 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:29.260 +14:04:04.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:29.260 +14:04:04.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:29.289 +14:04:29.88
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:29.260 +14:04:04.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00717 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ebTQyw9DTQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vpbVqyKHVI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4nVM3OqHAF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FhDBzLlFx1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec +8.4654 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec 8.4654 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 3842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2861 out of 3168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3168 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.797100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.797100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec +8.4654 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec 8.4654 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 3842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2861 out of 3168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3168 out of 30089 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9319 to 181.5116 deg, Dec +8.4745 to +19.3345 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9319 to 181.5116 deg, Dec 8.4745 to 19.3345 deg
Loaded 3841 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2873 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.6 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.8 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ebTQyw9DTQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1260, bad_region=5753, passed=30075
Got 30075 stars (including 23293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30075 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1581 n_q2=912 n_q3=1544 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vpbVqyKHVI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1200, bad_region=5773, passed=30101
Got 30101 stars (including 23348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.403 n_q1=1586 n_q2=905 n_q3=1542 n_q4=822 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4nVM3OqHAF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=550, bad_region=1284, passed=11637
Got 11637 stars (including 9840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4795 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=6.630 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.938 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.938 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.676 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.905 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.734 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.541 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.677 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.677 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=0.547 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.496 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.541 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.665 worst_region_rms_after=0.677 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.670 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.677
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.665 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.665 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.496 arcsec matched=4784
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=1669 n_q2=722 n_q3=1642 n_q4=751 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FhDBzLlFx1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=417, bad_region=1382, passed=11764
Got 11764 stars (including 10089 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11764 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5276)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=6.744 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.735 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.735 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.638 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.908 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.691 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.663 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.613 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=1.738 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.473 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.521 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.603 worst_region_rms_after=0.663 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.710 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.613
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.603 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.603 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.473 arcsec matched=4799
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.451 n_q1=1678 n_q2=715 n_q3=1643 n_q4=763 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-40-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51678_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51678_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.95 | 11:19:37.45 +17:38:58.8 | 2832 5415 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51685_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51685_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 10.11 | 11:50:46.99 +11:59:52.7 | 7319 1924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51686_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51686_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 10.65 | 11:27:13.98 +14:06:10.6 | 3875 3235 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51692_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51692_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 10.56 | 11:49:26.51 +11:22:28.2 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51694_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51694_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 11.07 | 11:07:46.51 +12:43:03.1 | 0970 2491 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51709_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51709_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 11.74 | 11:08:33.89 +16:47:30.8 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51731_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51731_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 11.89 | 11:08:07.47 +09:54:19.8 | 0940 0773 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51738_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51738_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 11.91 | 11:06:18.61 +11:24:17.8 | 0711 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51740_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51740_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.21 | 11:08:08.31 +15:08:38.5 | 1093 3964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51749_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51749_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 11.99 | 11:19:12.31 +17:55:48.2 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51761_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51761_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.40 | 11:12:21.05 +17:45:06.5 | 1779 5522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51767_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51767_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.48 | 11:05:27.18 +12:38:56.1 | 0620 2464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51769_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51769_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.42 | 11:14:38.04 +15:46:23.3 | 2065 4304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51772_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51772_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.22 | 11:23:34.59 +13:33:49.8 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51773_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51773_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.10 | 11:28:53.85 +13:11:34.6 | 4105 2680 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51780_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51780_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.24 | 11:48:10.88 +17:41:36.5 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51782_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51782_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.41 | 11:28:24.01 +12:24:08.5 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51783_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51783_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.47 | 11:14:11.64 +10:14:54.5 | 1865 0953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51787_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51787_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.55 | 11:12:19.07 +18:09:16.0 | 1784 5768 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51790_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51790_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.70 | 11:14:31.60 +15:50:46.6 | 2051 4349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51792_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51792_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.71 | 11:11:04.43 +17:42:33.0 | 1592 5505 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51808_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51808_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.47 | 11:28:35.46 +18:07:22.7 | 4133 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51845_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51845_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.90 | 11:08:39.20 +17:13:20.8 | 1226 5226 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
**** FOUND 11:08:39.20 +17:13:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51856_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51856_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.93 | 11:11:41.88 +12:12:14.8 | 1542 2156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51858_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51858_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.68 | 11:15:37.03 +10:08:33.3 | 2076 0882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51860_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51860_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.84 | 11:09:54.80 +12:04:57.1 | 1272 2092 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51879_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51879_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.94 | 11:15:56.22 +12:49:00.9 | 2188 2506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
**** FOUND 11:15:56.22 +12:49:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51884_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51884_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.98 | 11:08:37.86 +16:25:59.8 | 1201 4745 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51894_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51894_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.80 | 11:16:01.39 +14:26:28.6 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51897_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51897_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.67 | 11:48:41.82 +10:45:04.4 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51899_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51899_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.68 | 11:30:54.19 +18:01:12.7 | 4464 5593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51906_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51906_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.44 | 11:48:14.80 +10:26:35.0 | 6939 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51953_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51953_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.98 | 11:15:39.05 +16:58:20.3 | 2241 5026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51971_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51971_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.96 | 11:17:15.17 +15:05:10.7 | 2433 3873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51975_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.62 | 11:48:12.02 +13:40:45.9 | 6941 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 51987_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.85 | 11:27:16.11 +13:27:14.3 | 3870 2843 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52010_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52010_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.25 | 11:11:17.43 +14:42:15.5 | 1547 3676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52018_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52018_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.00 | 11:25:14.57 +18:09:44.8 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52055_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52055_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.12 | 11:14:44.72 +17:47:39.5 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52077_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52077_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.04 | 11:16:55.59 +12:00:56.3 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52084_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52084_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.99 | 11:29:42.76 +11:16:53.6 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52088_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52088_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.48 | 11:08:38.06 +11:26:18.6 | 1062 1707 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52092_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52092_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.03 | 11:37:13.62 +17:04:20.4 | 5364 5003 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52097_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52097_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.92 | 11:45:39.22 +10:12:28.6 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52098_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52098_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.26 | 11:18:56.35 +10:11:22.4 | 2575 0897 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
**** FOUND 11:18:56.41 +10:11:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52103_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.51 | 11:10:56.17 +17:23:52.3 | 1564 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52108_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52108_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.17 | 11:44:29.57 +13:48:21.4 | 6397 3020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52109_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52109_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.49 | 11:14:47.62 +14:01:14.7 | 2047 3241 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52110_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52110_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.24 | 11:22:49.74 +09:53:09.9 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52111_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52111_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.36 | 11:09:00.88 +15:38:26.7 | 1236 4260 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52112_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52112_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.10 | 11:38:02.07 +12:59:07.1 | 5444 2532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
**** FOUND 11:38:02.12 +12:59:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52113_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52113_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.55 | 11:10:55.19 +16:33:12.7 | 1540 4802 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52114_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52114_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.37 | 11:07:03.71 +15:45:14.8 | 0951 4343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52116_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52116_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.45 | 11:05:44.27 +13:20:53.2 | 0684 2888 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52119_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52119_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.32 | 11:21:56.58 +16:08:20.8 | 3139 4487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52120_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52120_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.15 | 11:45:00.29 +14:37:56.1 | 6476 3519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52123_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.15 | 11:43:39.62 +15:04:39.8 | 6282 3789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52128_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52128_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.40 | 11:28:13.73 +17:39:24.2 | 4074 5381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52131_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52131_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.36 | 11:42:31.57 +15:46:10.1 | 6121 4208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52134_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52134_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.15 | 11:23:59.34 +10:14:57.8 | 3330 0914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52139_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52139_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.43 | 11:50:59.45 +16:32:09.9 | 7355 4673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52140_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52140_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.51 | 11:25:43.61 +10:08:21.1 | 3587 0841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52141_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52141_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.59 | 11:26:12.25 +14:32:44.2 | 3732 3506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52144_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52144_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.57 | 11:20:22.64 +14:31:25.2 | 2879 3517 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52145_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.66 | 11:51:18.31 +14:11:44.2 | 7398 3255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52150_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52150_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.70 | 11:13:43.69 +16:33:28.3 | 1951 4786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52153_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52153_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.88 | 11:16:03.30 +16:40:24.5 | 2293 4842 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52155_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52155_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 14.14 | 11:05:39.27 +15:41:14.0 | 0741 4313 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52160_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52160_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.39 | 11:47:07.58 +16:31:00.3 | 6793 4659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52163_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52163_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.83 | 11:11:34.20 +15:12:11.0 | 1601 3977 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52169_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52169_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.62 | 11:32:31.83 +16:43:54.1 | 4682 4807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52171_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52171_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.58 | 11:43:10.16 +13:48:10.3 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52175_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 52175_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 13.95 | 11:30:45.88 +16:58:04.8 | 4430 4955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17507_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 17507_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 12.16 | 11:09:18.26 +14:37:02.1 | 1251 3636 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
**** FOUND 11:09:18.27 +14:37:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.48736 | 2461323.98736 | 9.66 | 11:23:40.16 +16:51:04.5 | 3402 4911 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_074946_TTUQ2b1x1_2006143_BnEwclpO/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_06-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits |
**** FOUND 11:23:40.15 +16:51:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.98666686 -observatory V36
14:33:43.07 -17:58:10.3 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:08:27.81 -21:01:24.8 Venus (-4.5mag)
08:37:49.11 +19:43:39.6 Mars (1.0mag)
09:33:46.66 +15:08:03.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:42.21 +01:38:32.9 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:10.36 +20:58:12.0 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:26.00 -00:25:02.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:11.45 -23:43:30.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:51:35.40 -09:40:42.6 Moon (99.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 10 07:54 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.98666686:
09:33:53.34 +15:07:27.1 Io (6.1mag)
09:33:42.15 +15:08:27.3 Europa (6.2mag)
09:33:51.04 +15:07:40.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:33:19.17 +15:10:32.4 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:33:27.19 +15:28:46.9 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:33:48.62 +15:07:53.2 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:32:18.92 +15:29:29.6 Elara (17.5mag)
09:36:16.23 +14:30:50.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:32:26.73 +15:34:54.0 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:31.75 +01:38:50.6 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:45.71 +01:38:14.8 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:09.83 +01:35:46.9 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:25.94 +01:38:32.7 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:02.14 +01:26:15.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 10 07:54 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.98666686:
02:42:17.03 +21:20:21.5 JWST
14:23:00.65 +54:35:09.4 Chandra
07:15:53.08 -16:18:28.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 10 07:54 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.98666686 -observatory V36
03:46:23.02 +20:11:42.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:23:55.22 -33:31:05.7 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:26.67 -72:20:34.6 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:57.73 +34:37:28.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:29:49.65 +25:28:03.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:30.53 +35:34:26.1 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:35.13 +41:33:57.1 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
19:51:16.02 +46:17:20.2 17.3mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:46:08.34 -13:34:43.1 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:15:24.97 +16:04:08.0 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:50:04.67 -02:38:42.1 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:38:55.06 +65:34:22.4 15.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:37:08.27 +43:24:58.7 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:44:47.57 +14:10:15.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:29:04.70 -16:49:19.9 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:29:13.45 +19:07:27.0 16.3mag 2P/Encke
22:57:16.93 -31:53:31.4 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:09:34.99 +38:53:04.2 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:10:37.78 -08:05:21.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:23:00.08 -08:50:35.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:34:34.55 +16:06:27.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
03:00:56.94 +14:23:02.0 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:35:41.20 +39:59:21.7 16.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:00:31.88 +14:28:07.8 15.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:39:09.91 +13:28:03.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:04:26.96 -31:57:30.8 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:50:11.48 +19:20:52.9 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:47:22.48 +02:40:45.1 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:17:18.92 +35:25:52.5 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:16:14.80 +01:52:02.8 14.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:47.80 +04:42:46.6 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
06:02:05.39 +45:01:15.3 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:26:18.20 +25:38:28.4 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:55:19.74 +31:40:56.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 10 07:54 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 10 07:54 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 10 07:54 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:07:54.049 +19:15:34.49 AT 2026acwn 2026-09-22.52 18.45
21:47:18.820 -13:28:28.70 AT 2026acwm 2026-09-20.60 18.9
10:22:42.936 +19:52:35.40 AT 2026acwl 2026-09-22.00 16.6
12:32:56.280 +02:20:44.16 AT 2026acwk 2026-09-22.00 17.1
13:25:49.608 -05:40:44.04 AT 2026acwj 2026-09-22.00 16.85
10:49:22.944 +11:14:04.20 AT 2026acwi 2026-09-22.00 16.45
12:58:10.368 +23:07:28.20 AT 2026acwh 2026-09-22.00 16.75
12:08:29.616 +04:34:04.08 AT 2026acwg 2026-09-22.00 17.15
05:03:43.381 -03:13:29.20 AT 2026acwf 2026-09-18.50 20.2378
05:01:32.468 -16:09:55.69 SN 2026acwe 2026-09-20.68 19.56
00:32:31.123 +20:31:52.34 AT 2026acwd 2026-09-22.40 20.1165
03:51:00.244 -15:55:10.74 AT 2026acwc 2026-09-24.42 20.0723
03:24:08.838 +04:45:48.58 AT 2026acwb 2026-09-22.50 20.5887
00:56:14.620 +21:03:49.66 AT 2026acwa 2026-09-15.67 21.34
01:04:22.570 +17:24:06.08 AT 2026acvz 2026-09-15.67 21.77
00:36:48.120 +16:29:56.39 AT 2026acvy 2026-09-15.67 21.53
00:35:45.700 +13:42:49.24 AT 2026acvx 2026-09-15.66 21.09
23:43:46.544 +13:43:31.94 AT 2026acvw 2026-09-15.65 21.56
00:41:03.360 +21:24:38.51 AT 2026acvv 2026-09-03.70 19.59
23:28:55.610 +02:07:43.06 AT 2026acvu 2026-07-15.86 22.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 10 07:54 tns_transients_list.txt