This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3628 2461323.8628 12.88 04:08:39.51 +17:47:19.0
175.38048 -24.40912 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 1 1 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:39.51 +17:47:19.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:39.51 +17:47:19.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3628* 04 08 39.51 +17 47 19.0 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8628,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3628 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3628 2461323.8628 14.20 04:28:04.84 +17:35:09.8
178.82185 -21.03735 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -1 0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:04.84 +17:35:09.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:04.84 +17:35:09.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3628* 04 28 04.84 +17 35 09.8 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8628,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3628 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3628 2461323.8628 14.46 04:14:03.98 +13:01:18.9
180.31530 -26.54903 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda 0 0 0 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:03.98 +13:01:18.9: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:03.98 +13:01:18.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3628* 04 14 03.98 +13 01 18.9 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8628,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3628 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461323.86302692 10.10.2026 08:42:35.526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8304
Objects passed selection criteria: 8284
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6416.5
Average stars matched: 5928 (92.3868 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 05:30:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461323.86302692 10.10.2026 08:42:35.526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 46
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55698
Objects passed selection criteria: 55546
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43634.8
Average stars matched: 40112.8 (91.9285 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 271748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 05:31:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.86247794
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.919 +14:00:09.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:39.919 +14:00:09.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.447 +14:00:52.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.447 +14:00:52.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:39.919 +14:00:09.19
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:40.447 +14:00:52.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.25XyTqNLgW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vKBuO657GY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G3lYLrJu20
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OubB1n1Aag
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.25XyTqNLgW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=1955, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 6757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1649 n_q2=740 n_q3=1787 n_q4=698 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vKBuO657GY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1868, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 6040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1626 n_q2=774 n_q3=1759 n_q4=714 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.G3lYLrJu20 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, bad_region=2530, passed=8438
Got 8438 stars (including 5531 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=8.038 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.547 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.547 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.947 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.947 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.492 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=1.214 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.512 worst_region_rms_after=0.492 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.984 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.492
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.512 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.512 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.361 arcsec matched=4885
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1447 n_q2=985 n_q3=1508 n_q4=945 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OubB1n1Aag (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=2523, passed=8458
Got 8458 stars (including 5558 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=8.087 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.502 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.502 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.971 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.498 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.180 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.501 worst_region_rms_after=0.498 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.036 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.498
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.501 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.362 arcsec matched=4886
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1446 n_q2=992 n_q3=1493 n_q4=955 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.242
ref2=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.402
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.076
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.114
reference average sigma_overall=0.3245 worst_q_ratio=1.322
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.84 +15:19:05.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.0: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.84 +15:19:05.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.0: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.1: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4358 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.84 +15:19:05.2: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3813 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.0: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2463 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20116_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 20116_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:51.56 +10:00:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21274_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 21274_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 21390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21467_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 21467_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.22 +16:33:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.919 +14:00:09.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:39.919 +14:00:09.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.447 +14:00:52.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.447 +14:00:52.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:39.919 +14:00:09.19
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:40.447 +14:00:52.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aIpJMvIMQ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZLYgaxUFPp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0aV1e23Xfc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8zpqFxy0uj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.838400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.838400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aIpJMvIMQ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3506, bad_region=10392, passed=62254
Got 62254 stars (including 48728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1625 n_q2=733 n_q3=1802 n_q4=721 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZLYgaxUFPp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3080, bad_region=9253, passed=58303
Got 58303 stars (including 46293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1612 n_q2=760 n_q3=1786 n_q4=722 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0aV1e23Xfc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2562, bad_region=11444, passed=48778
Got 48778 stars (including 35626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48778 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=8.025 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.215 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.215 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.971 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.500 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.500 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=1.199 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.518 worst_region_rms_after=0.500 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.983 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.500
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.518 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.518 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.356 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1482 n_q2=967 n_q3=1490 n_q4=942 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8zpqFxy0uj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2548, bad_region=11494, passed=48966
Got 48966 stars (including 35778 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48966 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=8.050 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.502 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.502 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.960 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.960 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.507 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=1.164 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.516 worst_region_rms_after=0.507 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.034 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.507
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec matched=4877
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=1461 n_q2=986 n_q3=1479 n_q4=951 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0484.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_052409_TTUQ2b1x1_3357106_eYokYjiF/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:37.55 +11:58:59.6: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:39.51 +17:47:19.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:04.84 +17:35:09.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:17:30.98 +10:25:56.7: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:24:40.60 +10:44:53.7: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:37.8: 15.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:03.98 +13:01:18.9: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:55.38 +14:05:11.3: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:24:40.60 +10:44:53.7: 14.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:37.8: 15.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:37.55 +11:58:59.6: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:39.51 +17:47:19.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:17:30.98 +10:25:56.7: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:04.84 +17:35:09.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:40.60 +10:44:53.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5376 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:37.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7632 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:37.55 +11:58:59.6: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0517 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:30.98 +10:25:56.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2204 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:01.72 +13:39:26.2: 14.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:03.98 +13:01:18.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:55.38 +14:05:11.3: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:55.38 +14:05:11.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4918 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.80 +17:39:38.9: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:01.72 +13:39:26.2: 14.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:01.72 +13:39:26.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6296 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:05.85 +18:15:51.8: 14.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:21.36 +16:37:05.2: 15.31 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:24:37.61 +18:02:25.9: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:53.01 +15:55:44.6: 14.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.80 +17:39:38.9: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.80 +17:39:38.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8334 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:29.48 +17:56:07.0: 15.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:21.36 +16:37:05.2: 15.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:53.01 +15:55:44.6: 14.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:05.85 +18:15:51.8: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:24:37.61 +18:02:25.9: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:21.36 +16:37:05.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0976 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:05.85 +18:15:51.8: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7923 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:53.01 +15:55:44.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8497 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:37.61 +18:02:25.9: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0741 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:52.66 +16:39:45.8: 15.50 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:29.48 +17:56:07.0: 15.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:29.48 +17:56:07.0: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0236 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:27.29 +12:39:06.4: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:52.66 +16:39:45.8: 15.46 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:52.66 +16:39:45.8: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0869 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:40:37.90 +18:09:11.4: 15.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:58.36 +11:41:21.8: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:23:36.41 +16:47:39.3: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:46.45 +11:11:43.5: 15.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:27.29 +12:39:06.4: 15.59 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:27.29 +12:39:06.4: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0836 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:38.78 +13:40:37.5: 15.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:23:36.41 +16:47:39.3: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:58.36 +11:41:21.8: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:40:37.90 +18:09:11.4: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:46.45 +11:11:43.5: 15.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:36.41 +16:47:39.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1351 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:58.36 +11:41:21.8: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0994 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:37.90 +18:09:11.4: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0913 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:46.45 +11:11:43.5: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0506 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:37.1: 15.34 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:38.78 +13:40:37.5: 15.82 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.78 +13:40:37.5: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2132 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:37.96 +13:04:04.3: 15.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:37.1: 15.70 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:37.1: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0826 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:03.79 +15:48:46.6: 15.64 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:21.62 +11:12:28.9: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:53.90 +13:51:17.6: 16.04 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:15:06.08 +10:29:57.9: 15.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:37.96 +13:04:04.3: 15.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:37.96 +13:04:04.3: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2039 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:03.79 +15:48:46.6: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:53.90 +13:51:17.6: 15.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:26:02.79 +11:26:49.8: 15.59 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:03.79 +15:48:46.6: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2032 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:21.62 +11:12:28.9: 15.70 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:53.90 +13:51:17.6: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1015 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:15:06.08 +10:29:57.9: 15.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:21.62 +11:12:28.9: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0272 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:06.08 +10:29:57.9: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1511 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:14.04 +16:03:45.5: 15.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:26:02.79 +11:26:49.8: 15.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:02.79 +11:26:49.8: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1291 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:44.02 +11:44:41.0: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:25.78 +13:30:07.6: 15.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:14.04 +16:03:45.5: 15.75 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:14.04 +16:03:45.5: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1792 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:44.02 +11:44:41.0: 15.53 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:25.78 +13:30:07.6: 15.70 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:44.02 +11:44:41.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2146 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:25.78 +13:30:07.6: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2899 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77158.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81774.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75342_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 75342_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75354_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 75354_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75359_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 75359_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75363_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 75363_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77158_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
Preparing report for the candidate 77158_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78159_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 78159_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.62 +14:06:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78920_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 78920_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:52.70 +13:15:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79400_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 79400_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:31.40 +14:25:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79761_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 79761_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.45 +17:55:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80464_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
Preparing report for the candidate 80464_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81052_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 81052_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:13.30 +16:26:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81540_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 81540_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:59.12 +18:07:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81717_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 81717_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81774_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
Preparing report for the candidate 81774_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82041_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 82041_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:27.16 +16:22:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83242_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 83242_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83497_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 83497_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83672_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 83672_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83735_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 83735_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83814_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 83814_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83834_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 83834_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83880_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 83880_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84026_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84026_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84073_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84073_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84132_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84132_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84144_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84144_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84152_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84152_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84211_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84211_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84214_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84214_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84267_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84267_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84273_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84273_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84274_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84274_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84305_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84305_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84319_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84319_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84336_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84336_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84339_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84339_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84348_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84348_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84366_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84366_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84389_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 84389_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0485 did not pass the final checks