This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3563 2461323.8563 13.21 04:37:44.40 +25:17:32.9
174.10359 -14.38461 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:44.40 +25:17:32.9: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:44.40 +25:17:32.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3563* 04 37 44.40 +25 17 32.9 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8563,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3563 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3563 2461323.8563 13.78 04:33:15.82 +25:48:10.2
173.02648 -14.82446 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:15.82 +25:48:10.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:15.82 +25:48:10.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3563* 04 33 15.82 +25 48 10.2 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8563,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3563 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3563 2461323.8563 14.36 04:53:59.74 +21:31:16.4
179.53903 -13.80784 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula 0 -0 1 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.74 +21:31:16.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.74 +21:31:16.4: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3563* 04 53 59.74 +21 31 16.4 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8563,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3563 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3563 2461323.8563 14.49 04:18:47.41 +23:59:27.4
172.16794 -18.48189 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California -1 0 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:47.41 +23:59:27.4: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:47.41 +23:59:27.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3563* 04 18 47.41 +23 59 27.4 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8563,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3563 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3563 2461323.8563 14.74 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.9
178.93050 -16.28756 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 1 -1 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3563* 04 44 02.10 +20 28 37.9 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8563,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3563 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461323.85664027 10.10.2026 08:33:23.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10596
Objects passed selection criteria: 10551
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8102
Average stars matched: 7458.25 (92.0544 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235576 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 05:10:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461323.85664027 10.10.2026 08:33:23.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 76622
Objects passed selection criteria: 76413
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59697
Average stars matched: 54954.8 (92.0561 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 288928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 05:11:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.85592796
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.644 +22:00:00.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.644 +22:00:00.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:53.068 +22:00:52.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:53.068 +22:00:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.644 +22:00:00.58
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:53.068 +22:00:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01749 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FFKmxZ6yXP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EUa57VAQwv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4APjkQb8ij
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7uTZK6RfHC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.FFKmxZ6yXP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EUa57VAQwv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4APjkQb8ij (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=666, bad_region=3144, passed=10451
Got 10451 stars (including 6830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=8.107 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.152 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.152 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.766 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.766 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.546 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.104 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.568 worst_region_rms_after=0.546 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.214 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.546
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.568 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.568 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.392 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=1437 n_q2=1125 n_q3=1499 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7uTZK6RfHC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=673, bad_region=3152, passed=10389
Got 10389 stars (including 6732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10389 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=8.068 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.139 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.139 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.739 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.526 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.110 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.569 worst_region_rms_after=0.526 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.183 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.526
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.569 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.569 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec matched=4872
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1127 n_q3=1489 n_q4=823 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.178
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:03.69 +21:55:13.6: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:26.23 +22:23:30.3: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.8: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.27 +21:57:43.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:28.79 +23:49:06.8: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:23.99 +17:53:04.3: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:32.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:51.99 +22:50:29.6: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:59.99 +23:58:08.8: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:15.05 +20:48:48.0: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:32.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:03.69 +21:55:13.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.8: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:28.79 +23:49:06.8: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:23.99 +17:53:04.3: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:26.23 +22:23:30.3: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.27 +21:57:43.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:51.99 +22:50:29.6: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:32.9: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4663 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:03.69 +21:55:13.6: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5394 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5083 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:28.79 +23:49:06.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5638 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:23.99 +17:53:04.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4288 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:26.23 +22:23:30.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5577 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.27 +21:57:43.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3885 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:51.99 +22:50:29.6: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3079 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:59.99 +23:58:08.8: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:59.99 +23:58:08.8: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5579 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:15.05 +20:48:48.0: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:15.05 +20:48:48.0: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5652 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20268_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 20268_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.09 +22:54:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20722_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 20722_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.27 +17:54:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21726_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 21726_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21850_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 21850_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21902_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 21902_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21991_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 21991_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22032_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 22032_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22074_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 22074_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22080_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 22080_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 22082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22086_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 22086_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22092_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 22092_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.55 +20:15:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.644 +22:00:00.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.644 +22:00:00.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:53.068 +22:00:52.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:53.068 +22:00:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.644 +22:00:00.58
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:53.068 +22:00:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01749 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qd6UtDfA1b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4h3M7s6Cyv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gwHx9F2avp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CXvfvNP9QB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qd6UtDfA1b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4h3M7s6Cyv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gwHx9F2avp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4137, bad_region=15101, passed=64913
Got 64913 stars (including 47096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64913 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=8.136 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.885 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.775 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.775 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.545 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.545 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.101 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.565 worst_region_rms_after=0.545 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.209 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.545
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.565 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.565 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.392 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1466 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1499 n_q4=825 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CXvfvNP9QB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4304, bad_region=15351, passed=65906
Got 65906 stars (including 47742 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65906 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=8.054 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.898 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.898 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.778 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.778 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.528 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.105 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.528 worst_region_rms_after=0.528 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.167 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.528
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.528 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.528 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.390 arcsec matched=4875
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1464 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1502 n_q4=830 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_050739_TTUQ2b1x1_2394429_zrBrx3fL/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:58.80 +23:37:02.5: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:24.88 +21:42:25.0: 14.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:18.87 +24:06:26.9: 15.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:26.49 +21:02:45.2: 15.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:01.51 +24:13:01.9: 15.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:59.44 +24:13:59.7: 15.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:44.45 +19:48:21.4: 14.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:41.35 +25:30:53.5: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:20.35 +21:31:11.1: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:41.35 +25:30:53.5: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:59.44 +24:13:59.7: 15.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:44.45 +19:48:21.4: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:01.51 +24:13:01.9: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:58.80 +23:37:02.5: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:18.87 +24:06:26.9: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:26.49 +21:02:45.2: 15.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:24.88 +21:42:25.0: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:59.44 +24:13:59.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8844 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:58.80 +23:37:02.5: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6047 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:41.35 +25:30:53.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1529 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:01.51 +24:13:01.9: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2800 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:44.45 +19:48:21.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3774 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:18.87 +24:06:26.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9312 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:24.88 +21:42:25.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7252 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:26.49 +21:02:45.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1164 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:20.35 +21:31:11.1: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:20.35 +21:31:11.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8971 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:15.82 +25:48:10.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:44.40 +25:17:32.9: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.22 +22:58:08.3: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:27.04 +23:15:08.3: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:12.04 +18:28:58.1: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:17.96 +24:00:01.4: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:15.82 +25:48:10.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:44.40 +25:17:32.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.25 +26:03:39.3: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.22 +22:58:08.3: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.22 +22:58:08.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8430 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.39 +19:42:38.3: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.40 +19:20:16.3: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:27.04 +23:15:08.3: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:12.04 +18:28:58.1: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:27.04 +23:15:08.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9210 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:12.04 +18:28:58.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9468 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:17.96 +24:00:01.4: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.96 +24:00:01.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0382 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.25 +26:03:39.3: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.25 +26:03:39.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2485 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.39 +19:42:38.3: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.39 +19:42:38.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3664 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.40 +19:20:16.3: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.40 +19:20:16.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3419 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:25.25 +17:51:20.8: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.74 +21:31:16.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:14.69 +23:46:24.8: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:55.0: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:47.41 +23:59:27.4: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:25.25 +17:51:20.8: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:25.25 +17:51:20.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4575 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.81 +23:02:02.2: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.74 +21:31:16.4: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:55.0: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:14.64 +20:33:17.8: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:14.69 +23:46:24.8: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:47.41 +23:59:27.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:55.0: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2869 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:14.69 +23:46:24.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4277 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.54 +17:44:04.1: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.81 +23:02:02.2: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.81 +23:02:02.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4885 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:14.64 +20:33:17.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:14.64 +20:33:17.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3916 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.54 +17:44:04.1: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:03.54 +17:44:04.1: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4429 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:31.27 +19:04:17.4: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:54.48 +20:03:34.3: 14.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:50.98 +22:09:14.0: 14.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:31.27 +19:04:17.4: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:31.27 +19:04:17.4: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3704 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:54.48 +20:03:34.3: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:54.48 +20:03:34.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4828 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:50.98 +22:09:14.0: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:50.98 +22:09:14.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7203 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:10.45 +20:42:16.7: 14.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:41.60 +19:51:09.7: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:10.45 +20:42:16.7: 14.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:10.45 +20:42:16.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7911 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:41.60 +19:51:09.7: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:41.60 +19:51:09.7: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6586 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:54.99 +21:36:57.0: 15.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:08.56 +20:39:43.1: 15.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:06.14 +21:25:43.8: 15.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:08.56 +20:39:43.1: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:54.99 +21:36:57.0: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:08.56 +20:39:43.1: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8748 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:54.99 +21:36:57.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9508 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:06.14 +21:25:43.8: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.14 +21:25:43.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9630 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:36.01 +22:48:20.9: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:38.11 +22:23:11.0: 15.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:36.01 +22:48:20.9: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:36.01 +22:48:20.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7871 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:38.11 +22:23:11.0: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:38.11 +22:23:11.0: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0777 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:36.54 +22:16:22.4: 15.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.45 +20:35:37.3: 15.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:58.65 +24:51:23.5: 15.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:36.54 +22:16:22.4: 15.52 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:36.54 +22:16:22.4: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1212 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.45 +20:35:37.3: 15.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.45 +20:35:37.3: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9660 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:58.65 +24:51:23.5: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:58.65 +24:51:23.5: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0113 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:20.93 +22:26:41.2: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:00.77 +24:25:11.5: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:20.93 +22:26:41.2: 15.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:20.93 +22:26:41.2: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0495 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:00.77 +24:25:11.5: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:00.77 +24:25:11.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9720 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:37.93 +20:05:46.5: 15.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:00.65 +19:12:13.8: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:50.31 +26:12:35.1: 15.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:37.93 +20:05:46.5: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:37.93 +20:05:46.5: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1345 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:00.65 +19:12:13.8: 15.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:00.65 +19:12:13.8: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1385 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:50.31 +26:12:35.1: 15.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:50.31 +26:12:35.1: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0476 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:02.28 +23:40:01.3: 15.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:13.08 +18:57:11.1: 15.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:13.08 +18:57:11.1: 15.50 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:02.28 +23:40:01.3: 16.06 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:13.08 +18:57:11.1: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1457 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:02.28 +23:40:01.3: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1914 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:31.22 +25:47:59.0: 15.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:31.78 +21:15:42.8: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:02.07 +25:53:05.2: 15.63 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:31.22 +25:47:59.0: 15.61 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.70 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:31.22 +25:47:59.0: ref_mag=15.70 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.2968 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:31.78 +21:15:42.8: 14.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:31.78 +21:15:42.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0741 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:02.07 +25:53:05.2: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:02.07 +25:53:05.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0559 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:19.87 +20:58:26.0: 15.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:17.33 +22:34:00.5: 15.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:19.87 +20:58:26.0: 15.72 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:19.87 +20:58:26.0: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2420 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:17.33 +22:34:00.5: 15.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:05.06 +21:36:49.4: 15.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:17.33 +22:34:00.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0298 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:21.24 +18:04:36.7: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:05.51 +17:47:20.2: 15.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:05.06 +21:36:49.4: 15.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:05.06 +21:36:49.4: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1065 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:21.24 +18:04:36.7: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:21.24 +18:04:36.7: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1510 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:05.51 +17:47:20.2: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:05.51 +17:47:20.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.3288 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.37 +22:52:34.9: 15.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.37 +22:52:34.9: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.37 +22:52:34.9: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1074 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103489.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105094.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100434_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100434_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100437_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100437_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100445_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100445_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100465_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100465_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100469_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100469_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:02.09 +24:43:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:03.44 +22:25:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.29 +25:22:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100952_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 100952_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.27 +17:54:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101160_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 101160_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.72 +19:10:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102139_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 102139_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103489_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 103489_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103769_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 103769_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.69 +22:56:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104004_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 104004_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.25 +19:58:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104330_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 104330_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.90 +21:31:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104849_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 104849_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.07 +21:45:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104862_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 104862_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.49 +18:42:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105094_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 105094_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105213_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 105213_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.58 +21:52:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105838_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 105838_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105988_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 105988_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:43.00 +22:12:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106038_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 106038_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106144_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 106144_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106496_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 106496_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:53.18 +19:30:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106549_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 106549_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:37.21 +19:15:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106764_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 106764_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.41 +23:36:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106783_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 106783_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106944_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 106944_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107243_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 107243_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.04 +20:19:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107964_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 107964_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107978_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 107978_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108083_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 108083_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.35 +21:44:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108143_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 108143_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108146_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 108146_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108286_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 108286_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108371_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 108371_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108429_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 108429_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108590_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 108590_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108762_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 108762_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.83 +20:33:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108813_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 108813_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109152_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 109152_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109158_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 109158_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:26.58 +23:36:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109298_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 109298_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109340_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 109340_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109436_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 109436_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109504_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 109504_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:37.12 +22:38:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110203_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 110203_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.11 +22:53:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110342_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 110342_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110425_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 110425_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 110440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111090_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111090_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111239_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111239_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111325_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111325_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111333_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111333_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111561_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111561_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111623_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111623_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111641_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111641_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111735_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111735_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111800_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111800_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111892_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111892_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111916_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111916_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111943_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111943_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 111989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112010_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112010_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112144_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112144_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112165_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112165_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112187_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112187_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112234_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112234_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112348_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112348_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112363_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112363_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112598_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112598_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112605_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 112605_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.55 +20:15:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.42 +24:28:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_03-33-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
