This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3625 2461323.8624 13.58 04:37:48.56 +03:03:23.6
193.25097 -27.71042 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.618 Elfriede 1 0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:48.56 +03:03:23.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:48.56 +03:03:23.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3625* 04 37 48.56 +03 03 23.6 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8624,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3625 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3625 2461323.8624 13.94 04:06:00.07 +07:07:09.7
184.14205 -31.80546 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.404 Arsinoe -1 -1 2 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:06:00.07 +07:07:09.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:06:00.07 +07:07:09.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3625* 04 06 00.07 +07 07 09.7 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8624,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3625 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3625 2461323.8624 14.55 03:57:56.95 +11:03:43.5
179.10392 -30.81976 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -0 -1 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:56.95 +11:03:43.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:56.95 +11:03:43.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3625* 03 57 56.95 +11 03 43.5 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8624,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3625 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3625 2461323.8624 14.99 04:20:57.17 +09:03:16.4
184.98653 -27.69426 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1564 Srbija 0 1 1 15.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:20:57.17 +09:03:16.4: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:20:57.17 +09:03:16.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3625* 04 20 57.17 +09 03 16.4 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8624,14.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3625 14.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461323.86275497 10.10.2026 08:42:12.029 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 22
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9181
Objects passed selection criteria: 9173
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8607
Average stars matched: 8284.5 (96.253 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:56:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461323.86275497 10.10.2026 08:42:12.029 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49256
Objects passed selection criteria: 49153
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46275
Average stars matched: 44855.5 (96.9325 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 274392 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:57:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.86214434
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:24.014 +05:58:45.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:24.014 +05:58:45.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0294 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:25.970 +05:58:06.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:25.970 +05:58:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:24.014 +05:58:45.98
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:25.970 +05:58:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01359 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vq6slATgVO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qn8VVk7uMm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.emdSL0sQeK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LcMHsH5HyD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec +0.7253 to +11.3032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec 0.7253 to 11.3032 deg
Loaded 5008 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4066 out of 4298 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4298 out of 7732 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.1 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Vq6slATgVO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=654, bad_region=0, passed=8663
Got 8663 stars (including 7997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.212 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1452 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qn8VVk7uMm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=626, bad_region=0, passed=7732
Got 7732 stars (including 7100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1094 n_q3=1448 n_q4=948 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.emdSL0sQeK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, bad_region=0, passed=9137
Got 9137 stars (including 8683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9137 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=13.761 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.719 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.719 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.718 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.444 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.444 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.873 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.459 worst_region_rms_after=0.444 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.886 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.444
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.459 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.266 arcsec matched=4899
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.216 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=947 n_q2=1420 n_q3=1096 n_q4=1436 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LcMHsH5HyD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=442, bad_region=0, passed=9122
Got 9122 stars (including 8670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9122 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=13.808 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.146 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.146 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.687 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.455 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=0.864 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.461 worst_region_rms_after=0.455 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.847 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.455
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.270 arcsec matched=4902
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=956 n_q2=1417 n_q3=1096 n_q4=1433 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.251 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new1=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.219
new2=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.237
reference average sigma_overall=0.2925 worst_q_ratio=1.2545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:43.06 +06:37:25.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:44.6: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:43:44.66 +06:39:04.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:48:06.82 +06:08:52.3: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:00.79 +05:53:43.5: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:03.51 +09:26:02.2: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:51.10 +05:00:23.9: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:44.82 +08:32:02.1: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:10:21.32 +09:23:32.5: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:24:26.56 +05:10:07.6: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:43:44.66 +06:39:04.5: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:51.10 +05:00:23.9: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:48:06.82 +06:08:52.3: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:03.51 +09:26:02.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:43.06 +06:37:25.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:00.79 +05:53:43.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:44.82 +08:32:02.1: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:44.6: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:44.66 +06:39:04.5: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2760 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:06.82 +06:08:52.3: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2536 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:51.10 +05:00:23.9: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2088 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:43.06 +06:37:25.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2810 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:44.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1136 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:44.82 +08:32:02.1: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4665 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:00.79 +05:53:43.5: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3017 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:03.51 +09:26:02.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2264 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:10:21.32 +09:23:32.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:24:26.56 +05:10:07.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:21.32 +09:23:32.5: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2541 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:26.56 +05:10:07.6: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2955 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:04.63 +05:54:41.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:11:38.43 +06:43:58.8: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:18:07.52 +04:56:57.7: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:25:26.46 +07:07:38.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:16:30.44 +07:24:45.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:17:07.01 +07:23:29.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.4: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:43.20 +03:22:05.8: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:25:26.46 +07:07:38.6: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:04.63 +05:54:41.1: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:26.46 +07:07:38.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3171 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:11:38.43 +06:43:58.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:17:07.01 +07:23:29.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:04.63 +05:54:41.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3236 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:07.01 +07:23:29.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3715 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.43 +06:43:58.8: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3525 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:18:07.52 +04:56:57.7: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.4: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:43.20 +03:22:05.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:16:30.44 +07:24:45.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:07.52 +04:56:57.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3421 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2903 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:43.20 +03:22:05.8: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3323 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:30.44 +07:24:45.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3351 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20165_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20364_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20371_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:15.46 +06:34:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20372_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20374_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20379_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20382_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20390_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20390_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20391_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20391_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:22.54 +05:07:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20395_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20396_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20396_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20398_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20398_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20400_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20401_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20403_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20403_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20406_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20408_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20408_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20409_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20409_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20414_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20414_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20415_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 20415_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.71 +09:56:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 02355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:14.45 +08:20:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:24.014 +05:58:45.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:24.014 +05:58:45.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0294 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:25.970 +05:58:06.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:25.970 +05:58:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:24.014 +05:58:45.98
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:25.970 +05:58:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01359 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PQkKmrDUKf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VI0WolDI7w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3qbSmlJfTL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xeT2YLLb25
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 48772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2863 to 72.2652 deg, Dec +0.7157 to +11.3031 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2863 to 72.2652 deg, Dec 0.7157 to 11.3031 deg
Loaded 5015 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4392 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4392 out of 48772 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
1.9 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PQkKmrDUKf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2672, bad_region=14, passed=52184
Got 52184 stars (including 49407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.215 n_q1=1397 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1447 n_q4=973 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VI0WolDI7w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2468, bad_region=1, passed=48757
Got 48757 stars (including 46206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1406 n_q2=1097 n_q3=1440 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3qbSmlJfTL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1827, bad_region=46, passed=43019
Got 43019 stars (including 41091 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43019 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=13.924 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.081 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.081 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.720 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.436 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.867 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.451 worst_region_rms_after=0.436 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.871 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.436
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.451 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.270 arcsec matched=4898
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.216 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=948 n_q2=1400 n_q3=1128 n_q4=1422 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xeT2YLLb25 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1899, bad_region=47, passed=42553
Got 42553 stars (including 40562 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42553 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=14.024 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.243 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.243 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.691 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.691 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.295 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.449 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.449 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.859 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.295 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.459 worst_region_rms_after=0.449 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.843 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.449
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.459 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.275 arcsec matched=4899
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=951 n_q2=1396 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1426 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-41-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_040208_TTUQ1b1x1_1741575_ETvbzCDq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:56:30.35 +08:25:15.3: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:16:54.66 +04:43:33.5: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:48.56 +03:03:23.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:24.88 +03:00:02.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:15:36.31 +01:47:58.1: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:46:48.51 +08:10:48.5: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:19:47.97 +06:45:32.4: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:06:28.62 +08:25:16.9: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:36:49.30 +06:13:45.9: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:06:00.07 +07:07:09.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:56:30.35 +08:25:15.3: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:15:36.31 +01:47:58.1: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:36:49.30 +06:13:45.9: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:46:48.51 +08:10:48.5: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:24.88 +03:00:02.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:06:28.62 +08:25:16.9: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:48.56 +03:03:23.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:16:54.66 +04:43:33.5: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:19:47.97 +06:45:32.4: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:49.30 +06:13:45.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1039 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:36.31 +01:47:58.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3933 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:30.35 +08:25:15.3: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8688 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:28.62 +08:25:16.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6446 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:24.88 +03:00:02.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5146 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:48.51 +08:10:48.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5878 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:47.97 +06:45:32.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7973 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:54.66 +04:43:33.5: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6417 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:06:00.07 +07:07:09.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:56.95 +11:03:43.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:33.38 +07:04:39.3: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:56:39.74 +08:43:31.1: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:49:07.66 +06:46:39.5: 15.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:48:56.16 +10:22:45.7: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:38:58.18 +09:53:32.5: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:21.88 +07:57:56.2: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:48:47.28 +09:46:14.7: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:56.95 +11:03:43.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:48:56.16 +10:22:45.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:56.16 +10:22:45.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:49:07.66 +06:46:39.5: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:38:58.18 +09:53:32.5: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:07.66 +06:46:39.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5548 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:56:39.74 +08:43:31.1: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:33.38 +07:04:39.3: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:48:47.28 +09:46:14.7: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:58.18 +09:53:32.5: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2971 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:21.88 +07:57:56.2: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:39.74 +08:43:31.1: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4420 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:33.38 +07:04:39.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4343 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:47.28 +09:46:14.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1338 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:21.88 +07:57:56.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1097 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:52:11.39 +02:53:41.2: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:56:04.23 +06:52:30.4: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:52:22.80 +04:22:14.6: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:47:05.87 +10:12:37.7: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:53.15 +10:46:51.5: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:54:01.16 +08:52:32.5: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:49:41.34 +05:36:37.3: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:52:11.39 +02:53:41.2: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:47:05.87 +10:12:37.7: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:11.39 +02:53:41.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5102 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:53.15 +10:46:51.5: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:56:04.23 +06:52:30.4: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:05.87 +10:12:37.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7878 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:53.15 +10:46:51.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8495 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:04.23 +06:52:30.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5552 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:52:22.80 +04:22:14.6: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:49:41.34 +05:36:37.3: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:54:01.16 +08:52:32.5: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:22.80 +04:22:14.6: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7293 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:41.34 +05:36:37.3: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7155 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:01.16 +08:52:32.5: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6404 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:51.12 +10:17:09.2: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:47.21 +10:08:27.1: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:21:52.76 +06:12:39.2: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:17:08.41 +00:53:17.2: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:43:07.18 +09:48:43.6: 15.51 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:47:28.80 +07:15:19.7: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:00.16 +10:42:05.5: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:51.12 +10:17:09.2: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:51.12 +10:17:09.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8526 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:17:08.41 +00:53:17.2: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:47.21 +10:08:27.1: 15.37 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:47:28.80 +07:15:19.7: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:00.16 +10:42:05.5: 15.22 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:08.41 +00:53:17.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6448 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:47.21 +10:08:27.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8354 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:21:52.76 +06:12:39.2: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:28.80 +07:15:19.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7783 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:43:07.18 +09:48:43.6: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:00.16 +10:42:05.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8345 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:52.76 +06:12:39.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6948 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:07.18 +09:48:43.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7545 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:02:53.93 +08:25:10.7: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:26.59 +05:24:41.4: 15.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:54:39.70 +05:27:09.4: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:32:14.96 +10:13:56.6: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:43.88 +09:42:34.5: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:36.53 +10:25:44.1: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:51:01.44 +05:29:57.2: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:26.59 +05:24:41.4: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:26.59 +05:24:41.4: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7063 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:02:53.93 +08:25:10.7: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:51:01.44 +05:29:57.2: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:54:39.70 +05:27:09.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:53.93 +08:25:10.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7120 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:43.88 +09:42:34.5: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:32:14.96 +10:13:56.6: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:36.53 +10:25:44.1: 15.16 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:01.44 +05:29:57.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8219 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:43.88 +09:42:34.5: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7369 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:39.70 +05:27:09.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8194 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:14.96 +10:13:56.6: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8973 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:36.53 +10:25:44.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6925 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:52:04.76 +09:19:30.8: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:17.97 +09:21:34.2: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:55:25.61 +08:14:42.9: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:55:05.60 +06:56:05.6: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:16:31.28 +09:05:27.8: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:39:27.48 +08:32:09.3: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:58:27.37 +10:05:15.4: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:58:27.37 +10:05:15.4: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:52:04.76 +09:19:30.8: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:39:27.48 +08:32:09.3: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:17.97 +09:21:34.2: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:55:25.61 +08:14:42.9: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:16:31.28 +09:05:27.8: 15.44 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:27.37 +10:05:15.4: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8582 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:04.76 +09:19:30.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9727 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:17.97 +09:21:34.2: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8135 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:27.48 +08:32:09.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7044 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:25.61 +08:14:42.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9077 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:31.28 +09:05:27.8: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9408 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:55:05.60 +06:56:05.6: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:05.60 +06:56:05.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8490 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:47.25 +05:33:00.0: 15.38 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:14.20 +09:02:57.5: 15.62 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:10:48.56 +09:00:07.6: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:16:15.03 +06:23:16.1: 15.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:10.09 +09:37:40.4: 15.60 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:48.98 +10:43:38.7: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:06:03.56 +09:51:25.2: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:48.98 +10:43:38.7: 15.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:16:15.03 +06:23:16.1: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:10.09 +09:37:40.4: 15.52 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:47.25 +05:33:00.0: 15.35 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:14.20 +09:02:57.5: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:10:48.56 +09:00:07.6: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:06:03.56 +09:51:25.2: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:15.03 +06:23:16.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7577 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:48.98 +10:43:38.7: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7700 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:47.25 +05:33:00.0: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9092 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:10.09 +09:37:40.4: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9822 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:14.20 +09:02:57.5: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9119 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:48.56 +09:00:07.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8993 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:03.56 +09:51:25.2: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9174 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:34.30 +06:59:37.4: 15.39 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:31:15.14 +05:52:05.3: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:20:57.17 +09:03:16.4: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:40:42.77 +09:39:51.6: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:34.30 +06:59:37.4: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:20:57.17 +09:03:16.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:31:15.14 +05:52:05.3: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:15.14 +05:52:05.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7929 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:34.30 +06:59:37.4: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8659 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:40:42.77 +09:39:51.6: 15.44 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:42.77 +09:39:51.6: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9617 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65708.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66032.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66510.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64768_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64768_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64771_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64771_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64775_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64775_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64776_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64776_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64780_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64780_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:40.86 +09:44:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64782_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64782_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64788_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64788_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64789_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 64789_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65525_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 65525_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65596_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 65596_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65708_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 65708_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65859_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 65859_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65867_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 65867_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65898_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 65898_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65967_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 65967_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65968_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 65968_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66032_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 66032_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66051_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66051_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66109_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66109_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66134_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66134_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66171_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66171_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66173_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66173_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66202_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66202_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66219_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66219_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66241_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66241_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66248_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66248_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66255_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66255_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66268_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66268_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66287_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66287_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66305_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66305_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66307_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66307_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66312_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66312_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66321_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66321_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66323_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66323_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66324_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66324_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66331_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66331_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66337_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66337_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66356_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66356_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66363_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66363_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66375_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66375_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66386_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66386_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66389_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66389_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66391_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66391_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66393_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66393_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66396_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66396_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66403_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66403_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66416_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66416_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66440_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66440_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66442_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66442_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66446_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66446_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66454_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66454_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66458_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66458_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66466_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66466_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66467_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66467_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66470_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66470_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66510_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 66510_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66534_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66534_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66557_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 66557_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24664_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 24664_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:23.92 +06:34:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12986_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447
The candidate 12986_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-42-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0447 did not pass the final checks