This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 12.86 04:08:39.60 +17:47:18.7
175.38081 -24.40891 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 -0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:39.60 +17:47:18.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:39.60 +17:47:18.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 04 08 39.60 +17 47 18.7 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 13.62 03:57:25.30 +15:26:15.7
175.27743 -27.98171 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica -0 0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:25.30 +15:26:15.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:25.30 +15:26:15.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 03 57 25.30 +15 26 15.7 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 13.61 04:52:30.88 +17:17:58.8
182.83413 -16.60704 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:30.88 +17:17:58.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:30.88 +17:17:58.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 04 52 30.88 +17 17 58.8 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 13.94 03:57:54.68 +15:29:52.6
175.31863 -27.85434 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -0 -1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:54.68 +15:29:52.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:54.68 +15:29:52.6: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 03 57 54.68 +15 29 52.6 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 14.20 04:28:04.89 +17:35:09.3
178.82210 -21.03729 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia 0 -0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:04.89 +17:35:09.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:04.89 +17:35:09.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 04 28 04.89 +17 35 09.3 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 14.53 03:57:57.14 +11:03:43.8
179.10444 -30.81912 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis 1 -1 2 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:57.14 +11:03:43.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:57.14 +11:03:43.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 03 57 57.14 +11 03 43.8 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 14.56 04:14:04.08 +13:01:18.6
180.31567 -26.54877 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda 0 0 0 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:04.08 +13:01:18.6: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:04.08 +13:01:18.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 04 14 04.08 +13 01 18.6 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3559 2461323.8559 14.83 04:00:29.03 +11:43:13.0
179.00207 -29.91900 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1055 Tynka -1 0 1 14.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:29.03 +11:43:13.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:29.03 +11:43:13.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3559* 04 00 29.03 +11 43 13.0 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8559,14.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3559 14.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461323.85627317 10.10.2026 08:32:52.002 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9558
Objects passed selection criteria: 9548
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9010
Average stars matched: 8759.75 (97.2225 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:44:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461323.85627317 10.10.2026 08:32:52.002 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57471
Objects passed selection criteria: 57351
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53087.5
Average stars matched: 51474.2 (96.9611 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:45:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.85547550
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:51.515 +13:57:52.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:51.515 +13:57:52.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:48.913 +13:58:31.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:48.913 +13:58:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0439 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:51.515 +13:57:52.49
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:48.913 +13:58:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01516 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Urv9t0soNS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ob3JwBLhXQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vUtroiBLt6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AlANIsjR1n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Urv9t0soNS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ob3JwBLhXQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vUtroiBLt6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=478, bad_region=0, passed=9264
Got 9264 stars (including 8777 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=14.025 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.352 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.688 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.456 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.456 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.196 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.482 worst_region_rms_after=0.456 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.928 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.456
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.482 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.482 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=4872
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.224 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1063 n_q2=1379 n_q3=1146 n_q4=1284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AlANIsjR1n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=464, bad_region=0, passed=9207
Got 9207 stars (including 8738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9207 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=14.131 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.694 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.694 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.743 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.743 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.470 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.209 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.516 worst_region_rms_after=0.470 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.950 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.470
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.287 arcsec matched=4872
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1063 n_q2=1378 n_q3=1144 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263
ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.257
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.180
reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:35.66 +15:49:48.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:57:47.20 +13:59:26.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:10.39 +12:12:47.5: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.4: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:11.71 +13:18:26.8: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:48.3: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.1: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:48.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:57:47.20 +13:59:26.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:11.71 +13:18:26.8: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:10.39 +12:12:47.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.4: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:35.66 +15:49:48.4: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:48.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4666 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3481 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:11.71 +13:18:26.8: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2387 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3672 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:47.20 +13:59:26.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4633 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:10.39 +12:12:47.5: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3610 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.4: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7772 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:35.66 +15:49:48.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4536 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.2: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4535 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.1: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4846 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:51.1: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:30:23.50 +14:15:26.2: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:51.1: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:30:23.50 +14:15:26.2: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:23.50 +14:15:26.2: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4986 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:51.1: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4964 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20389_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20389_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20412_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20415_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20415_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20417_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20432_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20432_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:00.06 +12:20:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20442_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20442_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20444_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20446_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20446_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20449_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20453_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20453_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20454_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20454_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20455_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20455_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.99 +14:32:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.29 +17:32:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:51.515 +13:57:52.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:51.515 +13:57:52.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:48.913 +13:58:31.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:48.913 +13:58:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0439 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:51.515 +13:57:52.49
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:48.913 +13:58:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01516 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KVZkmzJujZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tYfgcGIKn0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yaMBsP1gNl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XGrnQ9bjlJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KVZkmzJujZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tYfgcGIKn0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299
Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yaMBsP1gNl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2242, bad_region=46, passed=46923
Got 46923 stars (including 44560 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=14.247 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.270 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.688 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.457 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.186 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.497 worst_region_rms_after=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.929 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.457
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.497 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.497 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=4872
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1069 n_q2=1370 n_q3=1145 n_q4=1288 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XGrnQ9bjlJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2162, bad_region=47, passed=46589
Got 46589 stars (including 44303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46589 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=14.316 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.564 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.564 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.741 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.469 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.469 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.200 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.519 worst_region_rms_after=0.469 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.949 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.469
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.519 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.288 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1147 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-31-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035004_TTUQ1b1x1_1131398_8nSjJqrP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:51.80 +13:59:56.3: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:25.11 +16:29:25.1: 14.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:07.92 +11:54:53.6: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:44.53 +12:30:34.5: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:55.55 +16:54:45.3: 14.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.72 +11:19:31.5: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:43.55 +17:01:36.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:39.33 +14:38:40.1: 14.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:37.93 +13:31:18.6: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:37.86 +13:42:56.9: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:43.55 +17:01:36.4: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:07.92 +11:54:53.6: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:51.80 +13:59:56.3: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:44.53 +12:30:34.5: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:37.93 +13:31:18.6: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.72 +11:19:31.5: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:37.86 +13:42:56.9: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:25.11 +16:29:25.1: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:39.33 +14:38:40.1: 14.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:55.55 +16:54:45.3: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:51.80 +13:59:56.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9335 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:43.55 +17:01:36.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8417 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:07.92 +11:54:53.6: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5471 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:55.55 +16:54:45.3: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6977 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:37.86 +13:42:56.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9792 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:37.93 +13:31:18.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2313 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:25.11 +16:29:25.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8981 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.33 +14:38:40.1: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8425 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:44.53 +12:30:34.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9783 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.72 +11:19:31.5: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8182 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:25.30 +15:26:15.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:30.88 +17:17:58.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:28.49 +18:01:07.7: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:54.68 +15:29:52.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.48 +17:25:28.4: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:39.60 +17:47:18.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:31.43 +14:25:58.8: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:38.56 +17:55:21.4: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:02.26 +15:34:44.5: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:07.77 +11:18:15.8: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:39.60 +17:47:18.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:30.88 +17:17:58.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:25.30 +15:26:15.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.48 +17:25:28.4: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:28.49 +18:01:07.7: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:54.68 +15:29:52.6: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:31.43 +14:25:58.8: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.48 +17:25:28.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5051 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:28.49 +18:01:07.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9979 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:31.43 +14:25:58.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8363 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:07.77 +11:18:15.8: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:38.56 +17:55:21.4: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:02.26 +15:34:44.5: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:07.77 +11:18:15.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9814 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:38.56 +17:55:21.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0049 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:02.26 +15:34:44.5: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2045 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:57.14 +11:03:43.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:17.85 +13:40:48.3: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:04.89 +17:35:09.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:04.08 +13:01:18.6: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:21.82 +15:41:20.1: 14.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:36.60 +16:08:15.4: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:57.14 +11:03:43.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:17.85 +13:40:48.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:04.89 +17:35:09.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:17.85 +13:40:48.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3568 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:21.82 +15:41:20.1: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:04.08 +13:01:18.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:21.82 +15:41:20.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8192 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:36.60 +16:08:15.4: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:36.60 +16:08:15.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6915 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:04.73 +13:33:25.0: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:38.9: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:57:40.82 +18:27:47.5: 15.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:04.73 +13:33:25.0: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:04.73 +13:33:25.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7935 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:38.9: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:38.9: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7039 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:57:40.82 +18:27:47.5: 15.52 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:40.82 +18:27:47.5: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7074 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:38.81 +18:59:50.3: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:52.42 +14:37:06.6: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:59.97 +14:21:38.2: 15.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:38.81 +18:59:50.3: 15.65 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.81 +18:59:50.3: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0332 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:52.42 +14:37:06.6: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:52.42 +14:37:06.6: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6707 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:59.97 +14:21:38.2: 15.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:59.97 +14:21:38.2: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0186 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:52.44 +16:13:28.2: 15.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:29.03 +15:42:25.0: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:16.09 +18:37:10.3: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:52.44 +16:13:28.2: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:52.44 +16:13:28.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9476 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:29.03 +15:42:25.0: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:29.03 +15:42:25.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9984 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:16.09 +18:37:10.3: 15.76 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:16.09 +18:37:10.3: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0095 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:43.94 +14:44:44.8: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:45.06 +12:10:44.2: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:29.03 +11:43:13.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:45.06 +12:10:44.2: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:45.06 +12:10:44.2: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1059 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:43.94 +14:44:44.8: 15.40 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:43.94 +14:44:44.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0579 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:29.03 +11:43:13.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:58.14 +12:39:03.9: 15.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:05.74 +16:20:55.0: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:58.14 +12:39:03.9: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:05.74 +16:20:55.0: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:58.14 +12:39:03.9: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0840 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:05.74 +16:20:55.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0645 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:12.54 +17:54:24.0: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:05:58.58 +18:51:42.8: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:12.54 +17:54:24.0: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:12.54 +17:54:24.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9352 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:05:58.58 +18:51:42.8: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:58.58 +18:51:42.8: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1344 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:01.17 +13:20:45.2: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:40.57 +16:06:08.3: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:01.17 +13:20:45.2: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:01.17 +13:20:45.2: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1209 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:40.57 +16:06:08.3: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:40.57 +16:06:08.3: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8289 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:29.59 +17:56:07.3: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:16.45 +17:30:55.9: 15.56 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:52.67 +16:39:46.1: 15.51 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:29.59 +17:56:07.3: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:16.45 +17:30:55.9: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:29.59 +17:56:07.3: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0287 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:16.45 +17:30:55.9: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9701 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:52.67 +16:39:46.1: 15.44 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:52.67 +16:39:46.1: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0865 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76028.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76602.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76828.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77142.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77487.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75633_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75633_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75634_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75634_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75655_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75655_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75669_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75669_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75674_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75674_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75675_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75675_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75679_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75679_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75681_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 75681_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76028_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 76028_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76043_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76043_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.88 +18:26:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76205_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76205_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:41.97 +10:53:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76271_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76271_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.63 +14:06:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76326_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 76326_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76338_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76338_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76402_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 76402_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76572_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76572_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76579_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76579_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 76602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76623_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76623_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76745_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 76745_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76828_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 76828_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77037_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 77037_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77108_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77108_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77142_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 77142_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77172_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77172_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77239_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77239_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77276_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77276_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77327_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77327_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77348_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77348_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:58.30 +10:13:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77378_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77378_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77392_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77392_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77409_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77409_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77423_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77423_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77448_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77448_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77455_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77455_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77468_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77468_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77482_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77482_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77487_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 77487_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77502_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77502_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77511_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77511_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77512_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77512_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77530_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77530_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77531_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77531_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77542_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77542_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77545_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77545_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77551_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77551_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77589_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 77589_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.42 +18:37:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.47 +11:10:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.30 +17:32:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06604_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 06604_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-32-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
