This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3364 2461323.8364 11.57 07:03:58.45 +26:52:24.7
189.82357 14.44899 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 -0 0 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:03:58.45 +26:52:24.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:03:58.45 +26:52:24.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8364,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3364 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3364 2461323.8364 9.78 07:26:13.31 +33:22:19.1
185.30934 21.29662 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" XX Gem
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 pg 15.500 pg 2437779.00000 384.050000000000 M9-M10e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:26:13.31 +33:22:19.1: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:26:13.31 +33:22:19.1: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
XX Gem,2461323.8364,9.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
XX Gem 20261010.3364 9.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3364 2461323.8364 10.54 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5
185.08625 12.43951 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" X Gem
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.500 V 13.800 V 2443553.00000 264.160000000000 M5e-M8e(Tc:)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
X Gem,2461323.8364,10.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
X Gem 20261010.3364 10.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3364 2461323.8364 13.19 07:08:44.89 +31:28:23.8
185.82555 17.17833 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda -0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:44.89 +31:28:23.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:44.89 +31:28:23.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8364,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3364 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3364 2461323.8364 13.51 07:05:00.74 +33:24:50.2
183.63331 17.16221 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis 0 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:05:00.74 +33:24:50.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:05:00.74 +33:24:50.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8364,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3364 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461323.83674263 10.10.2026 08:04:44.563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 27
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23818
Objects passed selection criteria: 23787
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21442
Average stars matched: 20822 (97.1085 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:16:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461323.83674263 10.10.2026 08:04:44.563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 76 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 156441
Objects passed selection criteria: 156106
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 132562
Average stars matched: 127610 (96.2649 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 551876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:18:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.83614745
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.085 +29:59:51.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:01.085 +29:59:51.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:02.459 +30:00:29.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:02.459 +30:00:29.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0148 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:01.085 +29:59:51.11
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:02.459 +30:00:29.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01167 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCtvQ2kM34
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ph2gevUa4H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kWxJZYLAKR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f040yIH7zt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11976 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11976 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11976 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11976 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.oCtvQ2kM34 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=0, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ph2gevUa4H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=0, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kWxJZYLAKR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=1, passed=18942
Got 18942 stars (including 17891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18942 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=11.861 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.391 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.936 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.936 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.471 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=0.838 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.616 worst_region_rms_after=0.471 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.010 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.471
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.078 +29:59:50.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18942 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3086062.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.838 -> 0.275 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4768 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4572 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4572 pairs (4768 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4572 robust_rms=11.677 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.118 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.118 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4572 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.892 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.892 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4572 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.451 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4572 robust_rms_before=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.448 worst_region_rms_after=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.448 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.451
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.451 vs 0.448 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4572 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4572 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4572 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1441 n_q2=949 n_q3=1233 n_q4=949 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.f040yIH7zt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1080, bad_region=0, passed=19082
Got 19082 stars (including 17985 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19082 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=12.031 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.673 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.673 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.867 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.867 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.476 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=0.850 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.609 worst_region_rms_after=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.996 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.476
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:02.454 +30:00:28.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 19082 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3085857.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.850 -> 0.274 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4771 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4574 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4574 pairs (4771 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4574 robust_rms=11.809 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.295 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.295 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4574 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.846 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.846 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4574 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.458 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4574 robust_rms_before=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.459 worst_region_rms_after=0.458 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.459 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.458
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:02.454 +30:00:28.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 19082 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3095693.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.270 -> 0.270 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4574 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4574 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=4574 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1436 n_q2=947 n_q3=1231 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.250
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.142
reference average sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.267
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (4572 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.18 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407_astrometric_residuals.png (4574 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.18 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:24.18 +31:46:36.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:11.36 +33:42:57.9: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:22.73 +28:59:47.1: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:03:58.45 +26:52:24.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:33:50.78 +26:56:45.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:09.19 +29:36:28.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:56:15.18 +29:12:34.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:27.57 +30:10:29.5: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:45.16 +27:55:04.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:18.23 +29:00:29.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:03:58.45 +26:52:24.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:33:50.78 +26:56:45.6: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:22.73 +28:59:47.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:24.18 +31:46:36.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:11.36 +33:42:57.9: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:50.78 +26:56:45.6: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2287 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:22.73 +28:59:47.1: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1752 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:24.18 +31:46:36.0: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0149 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:11.36 +33:42:57.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4137 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:56:15.18 +29:12:34.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:09.19 +29:36:28.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:15.18 +29:12:34.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2778 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:27.57 +30:10:29.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:09.19 +29:36:28.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3680 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:27.57 +30:10:29.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3501 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:45.16 +27:55:04.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:45.16 +27:55:04.3: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3604 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:18.23 +29:00:29.2: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:18.23 +29:00:29.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3436 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:08.27 +28:52:26.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:05.72 +26:30:32.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:56:37.99 +30:23:44.3: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:51:10.52 +29:26:31.5: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:31.69 +34:50:15.7: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:26:13.31 +33:22:19.1: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:51:10.52 +29:26:31.5: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:05.72 +26:30:32.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:08.27 +28:52:26.9: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:10.52 +29:26:31.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3791 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:05.72 +26:30:32.1: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4160 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:56:37.99 +30:23:44.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:08.27 +28:52:26.9: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4259 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:37.99 +30:23:44.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3964 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:31.69 +34:50:15.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:31.69 +34:50:15.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4099 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:26:13.31 +33:22:19.1: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:26:13.31 +33:22:19.1: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.7754 delta=2.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5371 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13804.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19966.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31821.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31382_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31382_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31384_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31384_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.59 +25:21:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31790_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31790_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.47 +33:55:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31821_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 31821_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31823_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31823_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.58 +33:41:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31845_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31845_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.54 +31:35:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32081_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32081_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32121_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32121_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:29.35 +27:12:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32124_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:58.16 +26:55:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32151_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32164_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32178_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32178_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32179_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32179_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32205_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32205_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32220_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32220_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32266_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32266_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 32272_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 11915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:05.86 +29:37:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.26 +27:57:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.01 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08974_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 08974_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.59 +27:45:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5
07:26:13.31 +33:22:19.1
07:03:58.45 +26:52:24.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.078 +29:59:50.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:01.078 +29:59:50.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:02.454 +30:00:28.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:02.454 +30:00:28.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:01.078 +29:59:50.43
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:02.454 +30:00:28.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01165 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3nmMpU3boq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fDO2R7g6st
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LbsNkh2dcQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CILvrZvtBy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 107 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.7 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3nmMpU3boq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, bad_region=1, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fDO2R7g6st (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, bad_region=3, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LbsNkh2dcQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=8223, bad_region=47, passed=98806
Got 98806 stars (including 90428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4769 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=12.098 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.359 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.871 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.871 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.276 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.276 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.466 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.466 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.466 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.277 arcsec matched=4769
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4769 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1494 n_q2=972 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1022 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CILvrZvtBy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=8463, bad_region=45, passed=100202
Got 100202 stars (including 91586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=12.032 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.528 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.867 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.867 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.471 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4764 robust_rms_before=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.470 worst_region_rms_after=0.471 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.470 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.471
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.470 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.470 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.274 arcsec matched=4764
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1495 n_q2=968 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1027 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-03-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_032534_TTUQ1b1x1_2927849_nwXgtK1o/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:25.89 +30:30:33.4: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:29:53.66 +32:53:17.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:22.24 +31:43:37.4: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:16.01 +26:02:49.4: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:56:52.83 +28:08:56.7: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:24:52.04 +28:09:20.2: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:29:53.66 +32:53:17.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:25.89 +30:30:33.4: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:19.28 +27:02:25.2: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:53.66 +32:53:17.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0781 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:25.89 +30:30:33.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8806 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:16.01 +26:02:49.4: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:56:52.83 +28:08:56.7: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:33.14 +27:21:56.5: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:22.24 +31:43:37.4: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:16.01 +26:02:49.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0114 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:52.83 +28:08:56.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0633 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:22.24 +31:43:37.4: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1151 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:24:52.04 +28:09:20.2: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:52.04 +28:09:20.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9542 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:19.28 +27:02:25.2: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:33.14 +27:21:56.5: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:19.28 +27:02:25.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9256 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:33.14 +27:21:56.5: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6262 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:44.89 +31:28:23.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:05:00.74 +33:24:50.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:44.89 +31:28:23.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:49:13.65 +28:32:39.5: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:05:00.74 +33:24:50.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:49:13.65 +28:32:39.5: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:13.65 +28:32:39.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4080 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:35:54.03 +31:29:43.0: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:35:54.03 +31:29:43.0: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:54.03 +31:29:43.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8989 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:04.11 +32:52:19.6: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:05.98 +29:53:48.5: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:05.98 +29:53:48.5: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:04.11 +32:52:19.6: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:05.98 +29:53:48.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2320 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:04.11 +32:52:19.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3012 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193811.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194198.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191897_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191897_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:19.29 +34:05:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191904_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191904_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:29.81 +32:45:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191907_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191907_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:56.61 +29:27:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191924_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191924_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:37.71 +30:23:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191932_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191932_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:27.60 +31:09:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191941_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191941_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:57.27 +27:55:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191947_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191947_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:27.26 +33:36:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.92 +31:14:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191998_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 191998_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.52 +25:21:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192050_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 192050_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.59 +24:47:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192395_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 192395_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:58.47 +26:52:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192577_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 192577_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.50 +27:49:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192860_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 192860_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.21 +27:38:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193244_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193244_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.58 +27:12:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193251_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193251_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.30 +26:03:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193411_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193411_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.84 +25:27:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.15 +27:58:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193475_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193475_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.05 +30:18:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193631_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193631_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.23 +32:38:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193635_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193635_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.22 +33:08:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193681_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193681_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.07 +32:21:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193810_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193810_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:17.82 +25:23:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193811_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 193811_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193905_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193905_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.16 +31:07:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 193955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.34 +30:38:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194032_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194032_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.64 +30:33:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.84 +32:10:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194100_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194100_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.71 +30:31:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194114_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194114_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.05 +34:14:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194131_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194131_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.17 +27:02:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194189_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194189_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.90 +30:56:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194198_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 194198_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194201_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194201_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.88 +25:10:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194244_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194244_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.07 +25:18:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:05.30 +29:15:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194285_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194285_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194356_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194356_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:13.80 +30:24:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194401_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194401_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:04.62 +27:25:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194420_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194420_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.81 +26:58:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194421_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194421_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.60 +26:19:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194440_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194440_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:39.62 +28:14:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194477_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194477_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:52.00 +27:10:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194506_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194506_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:49.92 +33:34:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194530_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194530_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.25 +26:04:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194548_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194548_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.05 +32:38:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194550_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194550_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:49.18 +33:27:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194562_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194562_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:13.77 +25:34:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.43 +26:47:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194648_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194648_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:13.01 +30:35:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194666_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194666_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.52 +28:12:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194688_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194688_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.61 +26:19:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:29.79 +29:19:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194780_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194780_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.48 +25:50:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194831_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194831_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194844_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194844_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:43.90 +25:38:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194877_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194877_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.75 +24:59:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194893_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 194893_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:41.37 +27:39:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195018_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195018_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:57.72 +30:51:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.03 +31:28:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195110_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195110_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.36 +32:46:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195189_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195189_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.63 +27:40:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195197_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195197_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:45.19 +31:48:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195215_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195215_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:20.42 +34:50:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:50.10 +27:27:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195273_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195273_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:36.02 +31:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195311_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195311_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:09.75 +30:26:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.66 +31:36:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195476_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195476_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:41.61 +30:10:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195553_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195553_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:07.91 +32:34:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:44.27 +26:17:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195772_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195772_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:50.48 +29:39:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195949_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195949_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.08 +29:53:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195980_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 195980_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196048_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 196048_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:47.73 +28:30:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196089_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 196089_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196194_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 196194_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:26.77 +28:39:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.78 +27:15:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56983_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 56983_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:47.72 +28:07:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 188699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.60 +28:38:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 130975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:20.10 +32:56:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15166_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 15166_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:14.16 +29:06:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180506_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 180506_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136807_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 136807_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.60 +31:35:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56056_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 56056_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40035_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 40035_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.61 +27:45:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 129942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81982_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 81982_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:05.84 +29:37:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.28 +33:22:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.00 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.11 +30:16:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82500_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 82500_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:46.07 +29:29:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.24 +27:57:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:55.01 +29:40:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24929_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 24929_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15222_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 15222_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-04-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
