######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319941 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319941 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits

renamed 'UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.8971
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.6277
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1766.8623
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 525.0304
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1761.2693
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 524.7195
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.00743
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 14.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T02:54:00.1185007' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T07:54:00.1185007' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.3291680324 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T07:54:10.0229115' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.3292826619 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 148.233493573851 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9994609613558 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.8472222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 34.125 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.84769485925441 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20655 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20655 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 59.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits :)
Spent 0.595411 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 14.8900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T02:54:41.2180548' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T07:54:41.2180548' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.3296437268 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T07:54:51.1183019' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.3297583102 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 148.233493519713 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9994609942552 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9291666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 34.1905555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82767427808133 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20655 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20655 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.8900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.8900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 59.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits :)
Spent 0.562549 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits

fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.82928377
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.728 +53:59:29.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:52:59.728 +53:59:29.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.989 +53:59:01.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:00.989 +53:59:01.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0058 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:52:59.728 +53:59:29.41
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:00.989 +53:59:01.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00838 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.unD13sji8k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tgk5kRpNPI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3O65G8vTVB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bMAQs1JVqe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.917400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.917400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3304 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3304 deg
Loaded 6199 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4177 out of 4398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4398 out of 8505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.7 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.unD13sji8k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=2239, passed=8427
Got 8427 stars (including 5769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1479 n_q2=945 n_q3=1495 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tgk5kRpNPI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, bad_region=2242, passed=8505
Got 8505 stars (including 5837 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1469 n_q2=954 n_q3=1488 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3O65G8vTVB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=528, passed=3497
Got 3497 stars (including 2781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3497 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2731 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2732 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 2728 stars left (next iteration limit 3000)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2728 robust_rms=6.729 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.531 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2728 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.635 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.635 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2728 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.503 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2728 robust_rms_before=1.608 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.380 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.412 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.517 worst_region_rms_after=0.503 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.429 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.503
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.517 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.380 arcsec matched=2728
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits N_match=2728 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=916 n_q2=410 n_q3=946 n_q4=456 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bMAQs1JVqe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=197, bad_region=521, passed=3514
Got 3514 stars (including 2815 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2770 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 2767 stars left (next iteration limit 3042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2767 robust_rms=6.754 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.492 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.339 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2767 robust_rms=0.589 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.686 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2767 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.541 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2767 robust_rms_before=1.609 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.537 worst_region_rms_after=0.541 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.474 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.541
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.537 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.537 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec matched=2767
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits N_match=2767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=937 n_q2=408 n_q3=958 n_q4=464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.228
ref2=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.193
new1=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.140
new2=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.096
reference average sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.2105
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436_astrometric_residuals.png (2728 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437_astrometric_residuals.png (2767 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.728 +53:59:29.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:52:59.728 +53:59:29.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.989 +53:59:01.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:00.989 +53:59:01.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0058 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:52:59.728 +53:59:29.41
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:00.989 +53:59:01.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00838 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K5WYFC9bno
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W3YSG0mH7t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XkKfsjJYCp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q4eWsgUVsg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.801700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.801700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3417 deg
Loaded 6244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3916 out of 4420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4420 out of 43456 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.9 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.K5WYFC9bno (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2121, bad_region=9846, passed=43380
Got 43380 stars (including 31901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43380 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1498 n_q2=941 n_q3=1493 n_q4=963 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.W3YSG0mH7t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2172, bad_region=9869, passed=43435
Got 43435 stars (including 31893 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=1495 n_q2=944 n_q3=1487 n_q4=969 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XkKfsjJYCp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=566, bad_region=2310, passed=19792
Got 19792 stars (including 16944 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=6.566 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.578 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.650 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.532 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.625 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.513 worst_region_rms_after=0.532 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.398 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.515
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.513 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.513 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.395 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1656 n_q2=679 n_q3=1681 n_q4=853 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Q4eWsgUVsg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=576, bad_region=2275, passed=19664
Got 19664 stars (including 16847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19664 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=6.626 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.440 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.170 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.613 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.698 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.698 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.558 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=1.634 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.535 worst_region_rms_after=0.558 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.421 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.557
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.535 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.394 arcsec matched=4860
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1636 n_q2=683 n_q3=1683 n_q4=858 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 52615_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 10.04 | 10:20:38.16 +51:48:56.8 | 7319 1924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 52729_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 10.39 | 10:18:17.80 +51:12:42.7 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53897_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 53897_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.12 | 09:23:55.17 +49:53:23.9 | 1865 0953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 53904_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.23 | 09:45:05.16 +52:16:57.7 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 53948_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.06 | 10:18:39.11 +57:32:31.0 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54025_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.00 | 10:16:08.37 +50:17:47.5 | 6939 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54098_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54098_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.28 | 09:26:08.71 +49:49:05.1 | 2076 0882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54143_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54143_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.39 | 09:29:07.13 +50:00:38.5 | 2380 0964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:29:07.17 +50:00:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54151_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54151_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.01 | 10:16:55.90 +50:35:55.9 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54235_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54235_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.54 | 09:38:28.83 +49:52:16.9 | 3282 0791 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:38:28.86 +49:52:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54510_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54510_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.35 | 10:12:05.96 +50:05:19.8 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54584_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54584_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.60 | 09:47:25.24 +51:10:25.6 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54650_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.68 | 09:59:37.69 +56:47:40.7 | 5398 4880 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:59:37.80 +56:47:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54701_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54701_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.53 | 10:11:48.21 +52:05:34.4 | 6488 2053 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54785_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54785_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.67 | 10:12:09.07 +54:31:08.9 | 6476 3519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54919_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54919_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.72 | 10:23:01.06 +56:20:36.5 | 7355 4673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54935_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54935_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.72 | 09:37:13.77 +49:41:57.0 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54949_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54949_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.74 | 09:38:51.81 +50:04:44.0 | 3330 0914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54951_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 54951_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.69 | 10:11:05.97 +53:41:51.4 | 6397 3020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55012_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55012_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.68 | 10:10:00.58 +54:58:34.1 | 6282 3789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55139_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55139_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.78 | 10:08:55.84 +53:42:15.9 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55164_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55164_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.77 | 10:22:25.01 +54:00:07.1 | 7398 3255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55323_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55323_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.91 | 10:08:13.97 +55:40:33.2 | 6121 4208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55647_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55647_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.94 | 10:16:20.32 +56:22:48.3 | 6793 4659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55717_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55717_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.22 | 09:41:33.53 +49:59:28.8 | 3587 0841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55774_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55774_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 12.90 | 09:36:59.90 +49:55:00.9 | 3140 0831 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55804_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55804_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.22 | 09:53:49.24 +53:26:41.0 | 4849 2868 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55878_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 55878_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.42 | 09:36:47.38 +56:59:20.1 | 3523 5096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:36:47.38 +56:59:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56097_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56097_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.40 | 10:10:17.20 +55:06:56.5 | 6304 3874 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56231_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56231_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.52 | 09:40:37.55 +53:20:27.1 | 3661 2870 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:40:37.51 +53:20:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56271_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56271_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.37 | 09:29:59.17 +55:45:11.5 | 2876 4412 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:29:59.32 +55:45:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56283_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56283_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.37 | 09:24:02.92 +50:55:41.7 | 1966 1578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:24:02.85 +50:55:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56351_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56351_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.59 | 09:37:36.79 +57:54:51.0 | 3641 5649 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:37:36.89 +57:54:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56715_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56715_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.27 | 10:20:45.78 +53:04:03.1 | 7285 2681 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56817_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56817_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.45 | 09:37:09.51 +50:50:09.9 | 3208 1386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56879_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 56879_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.21 | 10:03:16.37 +51:00:43.6 | 5696 1386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57062_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57062_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.74 | 09:27:12.93 +50:11:33.7 | 2210 1096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57135_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57135_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.64 | 10:05:30.61 +56:55:42.8 | 5884 4962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57155_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57155_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.29 | 09:35:28.08 +50:45:15.2 | 3042 1351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57242_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57242_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.62 | 09:44:57.02 +52:01:03.9 | 3997 2045 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
**** FOUND 09:44:57.02 +52:01:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57373_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57373_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.25 | 10:22:30.33 +52:20:16.6 | 7473 2251 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57529_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57529_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.74 | 10:21:34.21 +56:35:17.4 | 7224 4812 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57612_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57612_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.83 | 10:15:11.47 +54:39:50.5 | 6739 3617 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57655_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57655_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.98 | 09:58:31.61 +56:27:32.8 | 5303 4678 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57703_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57703_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.80 | 09:38:02.76 +52:55:09.0 | 3406 2635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57735_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57735_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.49 | 10:05:44.67 +50:31:45.8 | 5933 1095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57772_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57772_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 14.01 | 10:08:59.96 +55:35:45.5 | 6187 4161 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57853_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57853_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.75 | 10:15:37.88 +56:12:48.0 | 6738 4555 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57936_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57936_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.92 | 09:48:33.32 +54:58:03.9 | 4425 3805 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57940_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57940_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 14.11 | 09:47:53.19 +56:52:05.3 | 4430 4955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57988_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 57988_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 14.04 | 09:47:00.73 +58:11:18.4 | 4404 5759 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14123_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 14123_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.32976 | 2461323.82976 | 13.20 | 09:32:57.31 +55:55:32.2 | 3139 4487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_040743_TTUQ2b1x1_2516089_EBUZrqTm/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_02-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.82928377 -observatory V36
14:33:03.57 -17:54:15.1 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:08:37.08 -21:02:08.0 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:37:27.19 +19:44:48.7 Mars (1.0mag)
09:33:40.51 +15:08:31.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:44.97 +01:38:50.1 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:11.33 +20:58:14.3 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:26.95 -00:24:56.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:11.57 -23:43:30.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:42:13.53 -08:40:33.8 Moon (-8.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 10 04:10 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.82928377:
09:33:44.95 +15:08:07.5 Io (6.1mag)
09:33:33.78 +15:09:07.8 Europa (6.2mag)
09:33:42.69 +15:08:20.4 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:33:12.77 +15:11:01.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:33:20.36 +15:29:17.1 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:33:44.47 +15:08:11.2 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:32:12.37 +15:29:55.3 Elara (17.5mag)
09:36:10.68 +14:31:18.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:32:21.29 +15:35:19.5 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:35.10 +01:39:08.4 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:47.65 +01:38:30.9 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:12.30 +01:36:04.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:28.72 +01:38:51.2 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:04.97 +01:26:32.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 10 04:10 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.82928377:
02:42:05.47 +21:21:55.3 JWST
12:26:25.88 +50:44:26.5 Chandra
06:45:45.14 +06:01:55.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 10 04:10 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.82928377 -observatory V36
03:46:25.74 +20:11:40.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:23:46.81 -33:31:19.6 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:22.79 -72:19:57.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:58.76 +34:37:11.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:29:45.90 +25:28:08.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:25.95 +35:33:26.3 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:33.22 +41:34:23.4 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
19:51:22.48 +46:18:25.0 17.3mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:46:07.76 -13:34:35.5 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:15:07.36 +16:04:54.2 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:49:55.12 -02:37:54.6 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:38:15.83 +65:38:03.9 15.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:37:19.04 +43:26:18.3 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:44:38.41 +14:09:18.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:29:00.01 -16:06:35.6 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:29:36.68 +19:08:46.2 16.3mag 2P/Encke
22:57:06.77 -31:55:37.8 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:09:22.87 +38:54:33.4 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:10:31.41 -08:04:35.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:23:06.28 -08:50:17.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:34:21.92 +16:07:27.2 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
03:01:06.45 +14:23:28.7 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:35:07.04 +39:56:34.5 16.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:00:09.69 +14:31:28.2 15.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:38:50.39 +13:30:12.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:04:03.15 -31:54:47.7 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:50:04.78 +19:21:17.0 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:48:46.83 +02:32:38.1 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:16:58.17 +35:26:29.2 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:15:51.31 +01:54:18.7 14.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:52.98 +04:43:58.7 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
06:01:51.09 +44:59:07.5 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:26:04.44 +25:38:41.8 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:55:10.15 +31:41:31.1 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 10 04:10 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 10 04:10 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 10 04:10 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:16:29.636 +19:10:17.48 AT 2026acub 2026-09-19.63 21.25
21:26:02.840 +18:32:35.45 AT 2026acua 2026-09-19.63 21.51
23:01:29.050 +13:26:28.84 AT 2026actz 2026-09-16.57 21.6
23:11:56.220 +13:00:12.92 AT 2026acty 2026-09-16.57 21.25
21:27:19.340 +14:52:36.51 AT 2026actx 2026-09-10.70 20.74
23:13:00.900 +27:43:18.56 AT 2026actw 2026-09-10.67 21.38
22:48:58.670 +25:17:22.66 AT 2026actv 2026-09-10.67 20.85
23:08:25.890 +17:23:34.90 AT 2026actu 2026-09-08.70 20.92
23:26:01.650 +04:42:51.59 AT 2026actt 2026-09-20.77 22.65
01:25:10.470 +05:14:45.08 AT 2026acts 2026-09-19.91 22.5
23:54:52.550 +03:52:17.36 AT 2026actr 2026-09-19.82 22.65
01:13:11.200 +04:25:46.09 AT 2026actq 2026-09-19.83 22.51
02:12:52.180 +06:15:33.28 AT 2026actp 2026-09-17.85 22.41
01:15:33.580 +00:34:39.51 AT 2026acto 2026-09-13.84 22.45
01:15:50.690 +03:06:14.05 AT 2026actn 2026-09-13.84 22.42
02:21:01.320 +03:23:34.05 AT 2026actm 2026-09-10.91 22.41
00:57:53.520 +00:50:47.48 AT 2026actl 2026-09-12.89 22.5
02:06:55.930 +05:22:05.89 AT 2026actk 2026-09-19.85 22.99
02:04:41.170 -01:21:54.37 AT 2026actj 2026-09-08.84 22.36
22:01:32.858 -26:38:25.05 AT 2026acti 2026-09-03.36 21.44
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 10 04:10 tns_transients_list.txt