NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-05-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 351629 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 351629 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits

renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1355.5479 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 499.3181 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1356.6674 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 500.6099 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.35569 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T01:52:45.5303341' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T06:52:45.5303341' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.2866380787 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T06:52:55.4335503' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.2867526966 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998598516265 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997740382009 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.7647222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.60027777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.68039805463723 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 60.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits :) Spent 0.780248 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T01:53:42.9655237' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T06:53:42.9655237' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.2873028358 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T06:53:52.8694065' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.2874174654 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998598469771 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997741024601 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.7811111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.65444444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.67850735825466 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 60.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits :) Spent 0.732059 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.78675382 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:30.945 +77:31:41.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:30.945 +77:31:41.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:33.728 +77:32:13.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:33.728 +77:32:13.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:30.945 +77:31:41.41 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:33.728 +77:32:13.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00936 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Y0jdQcI6M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ba1lltKcOb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W2BSFeONn0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wvfyyucHke Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.9Y0jdQcI6M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935 Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Ba1lltKcOb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444 Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.W2BSFeONn0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=0, passed=6876 Got 6876 stars (including 6570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6876 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=13.554 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.660 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.835 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.835 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.462 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.447 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=0.949 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.398 worst_region_rms_after=0.462 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.070 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.447 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.398 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.287 arcsec matched=4894 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1121 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1507 n_q4=1244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.wvfyyucHke (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=302, bad_region=0, passed=6898 Got 6898 stars (including 6587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6898 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=13.579 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.808 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.808 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.754 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.754 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.462 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.420 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.941 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.398 worst_region_rms_after=0.462 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.064 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.420 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.398 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=4898 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1122 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1499 n_q4=1247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299 ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150 new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.228 new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.290 reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:12:56.85 +80:01:24.4: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:12:56.85 +80:01:24.4: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:56.85 +80:01:24.4: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0056 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22085_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 22085_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.28675    2461323.78675    11.97    10:12:56.66 +80:01:24.7   1977 5167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.05    10:12:57.03 +80:01:24.0   1976 5162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:30.945 +77:31:41.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:30.945 +77:31:41.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:33.728 +77:32:13.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:33.728 +77:32:13.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:30.945 +77:31:41.41 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:33.728 +77:32:13.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00936 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vSHgWlPlMm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3dvM6iDW84 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dlw4FSoGzT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8i3D5FG6qs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 99 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.6 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.vSHgWlPlMm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537 Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3dvM6iDW84 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460 Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.dlw4FSoGzT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1118, bad_region=46, passed=33517 Got 33517 stars (including 32300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33517 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=13.672 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.497 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.497 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.829 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.829 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.377 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.466 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.445 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=0.951 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.377 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.402 worst_region_rms_after=0.466 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.058 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.445 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.402 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.289 arcsec matched=4885 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1511 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.8i3D5FG6qs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1127, bad_region=46, passed=33701 Got 33701 stars (including 32473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33701 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=13.612 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.747 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.747 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.762 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.762 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.462 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.421 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.943 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.293 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.404 worst_region_rms_after=0.462 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.070 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.421 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.404 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.293 arcsec matched=4888 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1114 n_q2=1011 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:49:39.07 +77:38:09.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:42:04.29 +79:59:24.4: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:21:11.98 +74:53:49.8: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:49:39.07 +77:38:09.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:42:04.29 +79:59:24.4: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:49:39.07 +77:38:09.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1866 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:21:11.98 +74:53:49.8: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:42:04.29 +79:59:24.4: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6218 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:11.98 +74:53:49.8: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4787 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:32:00.68 +74:50:11.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:10:34.21 +80:57:24.9: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:49:02.32 +77:50:31.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.68 +74:50:11.3: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.68 +74:50:11.3: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4175 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:10:34.21 +80:57:24.9: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:34.21 +80:57:24.9: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8704 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:49:02.32 +77:50:31.8: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:02.32 +77:50:31.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7773 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69540_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69540_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.28675    2461323.78675    14.60    12:42:04.46 +79:59:23.6   5805 4839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.65    12:42:04.12 +79:59:25.2   5804 4834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69552_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69552_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.92    10:24:00.55 +74:53:29.7   1177 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.28675    2461323.78675    13.19    13:49:39.10 +77:38:09.8   8168 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.18    13:49:39.04 +77:38:09.5   8167 4273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.28675    2461323.78675    12.48    12:21:11.92 +74:53:49.8   5726 1703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.48    12:21:12.04 +74:53:49.9   5724 1698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69562_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69562_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    10.67    09:31:44.35 +78:54:28.9   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69593_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69593_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    10.64    09:47:14.62 +75:50:50.8   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.33    09:27:20.00 +78:05:05.8   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69691_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69691_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.39    09:33:41.76 +77:19:38.6   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69693_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69693_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.40    09:34:32.79 +77:46:22.4   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.30    10:26:41.84 +72:57:54.9   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69700_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69700_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.31    10:22:20.09 +74:39:06.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.36    10:35:08.22 +71:48:13.7   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69722_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69722_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.51    10:01:33.13 +76:20:09.3   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69724_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69724_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.53    10:23:21.24 +76:03:45.6   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69727_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69727_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.61    10:21:15.35 +75:02:01.2   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69728_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69728_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.51    10:03:28.88 +74:22:22.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69731_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69731_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.63    09:45:42.73 +76:45:34.5   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69739_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69739_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.78    09:48:09.77 +75:58:39.7   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69746_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69746_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.70    13:11:43.59 +80:27:49.3   6445 5335   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 13:11:43.56 +80:27:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69769_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69769_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.80    10:24:08.86 +73:26:30.9   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69776_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69776_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.99    10:09:49.01 +79:31:27.9   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69802_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69802_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.81    10:20:08.25 +73:26:02.6   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69820_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69820_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.91    10:32:15.97 +73:14:54.8   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.13    09:45:35.95 +78:19:55.2   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69850_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.34    09:46:21.15 +79:34:51.5   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69854_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69854_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.21    10:15:52.35 +77:30:43.8   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69855_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69855_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.24    09:47:52.79 +76:58:58.4   0482 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69859_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69859_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.17    10:33:57.16 +77:45:17.1   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69860_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69860_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.13    09:54:24.98 +75:01:13.1   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69865_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69865_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.27    10:27:44.26 +78:48:23.7   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69874_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69874_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.45    10:13:04.87 +79:58:18.7   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69882_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69882_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.51    10:24:17.07 +79:35:36.5   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69884_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69884_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.34    10:06:13.02 +78:40:52.0   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.32    10:59:45.97 +79:39:33.8   3107 4583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 10:59:45.85 +79:39:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69923_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69923_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.35    10:13:02.96 +77:22:51.5   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.37    10:06:21.56 +74:32:09.5   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69947_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69947_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.46    10:40:36.11 +74:53:00.8   1803 1935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 10:40:36.19 +74:53:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69956_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69956_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.63    10:28:31.99 +81:12:20.0   2592 5692   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 10:28:32.15 +81:12:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69977_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69977_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.64    10:57:15.28 +74:22:22.3   2378 1477   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 10:57:15.08 +74:22:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69989_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 69989_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.37    10:35:02.37 +72:15:15.4   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70008_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70008_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.73    10:08:34.70 +76:55:49.9   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70014_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70014_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.28675    2461323.78675    13.42    12:32:00.57 +74:50:11.6   6151 1740   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.42    12:32:00.79 +74:50:10.9   6150 1734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70032_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70032_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.67    10:03:19.40 +79:41:15.2   1657 5082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70073_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70073_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.98    10:55:46.84 +77:05:43.9   2671 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 10:55:47.16 +77:05:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70074_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70074_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.80    10:34:23.66 +78:45:21.2   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70076_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70076_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.69    09:56:06.59 +77:52:38.8   0981 4191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70083_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70083_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.71    10:05:42.84 +77:48:18.7   1241 4018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70085_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70085_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.70    12:48:59.77 +79:11:59.6   6106 4421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 12:49:00.03 +79:11:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70103_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70103_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.28675    2461323.78675    13.89    11:10:33.80 +80:57:25.9   3514 5312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.85    11:10:34.62 +80:57:23.9   3513 5306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70106_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70106_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.28675    2461323.78675    13.93    09:49:02.39 +77:50:31.3   0770 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-52-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.69    09:49:02.24 +77:50:32.4   0769 4278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70110_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70110_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.85    09:57:12.85 +77:21:57.8   0873 3898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70122_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70122_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.69    12:34:34.92 +76:02:07.7   6101 2461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 12:34:34.91 +76:02:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70126_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70126_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.01    10:32:06.24 +77:49:20.5   2035 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70128_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70128_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.87    10:17:46.72 +72:51:06.0   0482 1068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70133_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70133_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.11    11:15:45.65 +78:15:57.5   3426 3680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 11:15:45.59 +78:15:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70138_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70138_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.04    10:35:22.95 +74:54:59.8   1610 2012   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70145_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70145_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.06    10:21:10.15 +80:43:34.7   2328 5479   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70148_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70148_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.13    09:42:35.02 +77:37:18.7   0519 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70153_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70153_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.85    12:20:09.05 +79:11:40.4   5310 4249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 12:20:08.63 +79:11:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70164_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70164_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.01    10:24:29.76 +80:01:03.0   2258 5047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70168_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70168_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.26    09:50:01.05 +77:32:34.8   0710 4103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70185_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70185_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.89    10:34:06.48 +72:31:07.4   1116 0635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70205_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70205_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.19    10:34:57.99 +78:03:29.5   2165 3829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70208_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70208_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.23    10:09:45.48 +80:13:40.1   1948 5309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70210_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70210_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.78    10:19:53.67 +72:52:19.6   0576 1046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70212_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70212_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.88    13:03:06.13 +76:29:41.7   7013 2997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 13:03:06.07 +76:29:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70216_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70216_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.99    12:13:36.87 +78:24:57.6   5182 3760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 12:13:36.88 +78:24:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70223_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70223_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.35    09:55:38.48 +76:40:56.8   0636 3552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70235_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70235_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.19    10:30:46.00 +74:22:11.9   1330 1752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70239_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70239_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.05    10:29:23.03 +73:57:51.6   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70258_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70258_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.25    10:29:42.85 +78:07:47.9   2022 3921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70266_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70266_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.20    10:23:54.98 +78:40:22.3   1964 4289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70282_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70282_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.70    10:15:59.57 +79:01:27.9   1823 4571   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70285_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70285_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.23    09:49:41.65 +76:51:32.3   0501 3743   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70290_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70290_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.07    10:26:23.81 +74:53:39.1   1267 2109   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70298_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70298_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.94    10:34:10.07 +78:11:40.4   2166 3915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70307_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70307_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.15    10:05:13.35 +76:09:00.2   0805 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70313_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70313_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.40    10:11:06.23 +74:12:23.6   0532 1941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70315_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70315_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.25    10:25:46.18 +73:24:02.3   0935 1261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70320_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70320_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.32    10:31:12.62 +79:23:07.7   2305 4626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70321_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70321_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.37    09:45:58.26 +78:15:06.6   0805 4542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70333_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70333_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.72    09:43:57.93 +78:27:26.6   0813 4681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70335_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70335_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.33    10:07:36.24 +77:40:55.2   1266 3925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70366_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70366_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.47    09:44:18.43 +77:49:17.6   0629 4341   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70390_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70390_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.74    10:11:35.07 +74:18:13.3   0574 1988   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70396_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70396_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.47    10:26:09.96 +80:20:11.7   2364 5214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70405_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70405_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.47    10:26:00.77 +73:31:36.0   0971 1330   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70416_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70416_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.17    10:33:45.57 +75:49:29.8   1717 2555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70417_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70417_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.54    10:11:20.94 +75:16:48.3   0801 2538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70446_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70446_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.13    10:32:12.41 +72:14:01.4   0978 0495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70450_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70450_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.89    09:46:51.67 +76:25:52.6   0286 3563   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70466_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70466_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.39    10:07:41.86 +74:57:30.8   0590 2415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70471_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70471_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.81    10:54:17.66 +78:09:26.8   2763 3731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70507_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 70507_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    14.83    10:19:32.97 +78:21:12.9   1772 4155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22720_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 22720_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.20    10:15:18.38 +73:41:41.8   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02006_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 02006_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    11.98    11:55:54.27 +72:25:41.5   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 15116_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 15116_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.44    11:43:44.83 +75:18:11.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01160_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 01160_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    12.71    13:17:21.18 +72:57:35.1   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 The candidate 19696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 10.28742    2461323.78742    13.28    12:46:19.46 +77:06:30.0   6353 3184   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021314_TTUQ1b1x1_435002_GiXVMnFM/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_01-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits **** FOUND 12:46:19.43 +77:06:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.78675382 -observatory V36 14:32:52.85 -17:53:11.6 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:08:39.49 -21:02:20.8 Venus (-4.6mag) 08:37:21.21 +19:45:07.4 Mars (1.0mag) 09:33:38.84 +15:08:38.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:45.72 +01:38:54.7 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:11.59 +20:58:14.9 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:27.21 -00:24:55.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:11.61 -23:43:30.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:39:25.33 -08:25:14.7 Moon (-8.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 10 03:14 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.78675382: 09:33:42.44 +15:08:19.7 Io (6.1mag) 09:33:31.60 +15:09:18.2 Europa (6.2mag) 09:33:40.41 +15:08:31.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:33:11.04 +15:11:09.7 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:33:18.50 +15:29:25.2 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:33:42.14 +15:08:22.2 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:32:10.59 +15:30:02.2 Elara (17.5mag) 09:36:09.16 +14:31:25.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:32:19.80 +15:35:26.4 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:36.01 +01:39:13.1 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:48.15 +01:38:35.3 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:42:12.98 +01:36:08.9 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:29.48 +01:38:56.3 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:41:05.74 +01:26:37.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 10 03:14 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.78675382: 02:42:03.28 +21:21:32.9 JWST 11:43:14.95 +47:32:40.1 Chandra 06:32:30.75 +13:52:56.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 10 03:14 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.78675382 -observatory V36 03:46:26.45 +20:11:39.3 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:23:44.56 -33:31:23.5 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:21.72 -72:19:46.8 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:59.03 +34:37:06.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:29:44.87 +25:28:10.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:24.68 +35:33:10.2 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:32.73 +41:34:30.7 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 19:51:24.25 +46:18:42.6 17.3mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:46:07.59 -13:34:33.4 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:15:02.58 +16:05:06.8 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:49:52.54 -02:37:41.8 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:38:05.32 +65:39:04.0 15.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:37:21.96 +43:26:39.5 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:44:35.93 +14:09:03.3 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:28:58.80 -15:55:00.3 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:29:43.00 +19:09:07.3 16.4mag 2P/Encke 22:57:04.14 -31:56:11.5 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:09:19.64 +38:54:55.7 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:10:29.68 -08:04:22.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:23:07.98 -08:50:13.0 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:34:18.46 +16:07:43.2 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 03:01:09.01 +14:23:35.7 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:34:57.72 +39:55:49.0 16.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:00:03.64 +14:32:22.4 15.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:38:45.09 +13:30:47.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:03:56.71 -31:54:03.8 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:50:02.93 +19:21:23.4 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:49:09.87 +02:30:25.9 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:16:52.52 +35:26:39.3 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:15:44.88 +01:54:55.5 14.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:54.37 +04:44:18.1 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 06:01:47.13 +44:58:32.4 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 07:26:00.68 +25:38:45.3 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:55:07.53 +31:41:40.4 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 10 03:14 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 10 03:14 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 10 03:14 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 21:26:02.840 +18:32:35.45 AT 2026acua 2026-09-19.63 21.51 23:01:29.050 +13:26:28.84 AT 2026actz 2026-09-16.57 21.6 23:11:56.220 +13:00:12.92 AT 2026acty 2026-09-16.57 21.25 21:27:19.340 +14:52:36.51 AT 2026actx 2026-09-10.70 20.74 23:13:00.900 +27:43:18.56 AT 2026actw 2026-09-10.67 21.38 22:48:58.670 +25:17:22.66 AT 2026actv 2026-09-10.67 20.85 23:08:25.890 +17:23:34.90 AT 2026actu 2026-09-08.70 20.92 23:26:01.650 +04:42:51.59 AT 2026actt 2026-09-20.77 22.65 01:25:10.470 +05:14:45.08 AT 2026acts 2026-09-19.91 22.5 23:54:52.550 +03:52:17.36 AT 2026actr 2026-09-19.82 22.65 01:13:11.200 +04:25:46.09 AT 2026actq 2026-09-19.83 22.51 02:12:52.180 +06:15:33.28 AT 2026actp 2026-09-17.85 22.41 01:15:33.580 +00:34:39.51 AT 2026acto 2026-09-13.84 22.45 01:15:50.690 +03:06:14.05 AT 2026actn 2026-09-13.84 22.42 02:21:01.320 +03:23:34.05 AT 2026actm 2026-09-10.91 22.41 00:57:53.520 +00:50:47.48 AT 2026actl 2026-09-12.89 22.5 02:06:55.930 +05:22:05.89 AT 2026actk 2026-09-19.85 22.99 02:04:41.170 -01:21:54.37 AT 2026actj 2026-09-08.84 22.36 22:01:32.858 -26:38:25.05 AT 2026acti 2026-09-03.36 21.44 02:32:20.592 -10:31:38.74 AT 2026acth 2026-09-04.58 21.21 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 10 03:14 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C