This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2256 2461323.7256 8.38 01:19:38.54 -14:59:07.8
152.73613 -76.19766 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2 Pallas 0 -1 1 8.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:38.54 -14:59:07.8: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:38.54 -14:59:07.8: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2256* 01 19 38.54 -14 59 07.8 8.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7256,8.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2256 8.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2256 2461323.7256 13.98 00:58:21.67 -05:32:46.2
127.60683 -68.35505 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.805 Hormuthia 0 -1 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:58:21.67 -05:32:46.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:58:21.67 -05:32:46.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2256* 00 58 21.67 -05 32 46.2 14.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7256,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2256 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461323.72584817 10.10.2026 05:25:03.282 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5095
Objects passed selection criteria: 5091
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4797.75
Average stars matched: 4678.75 (97.5197 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 02:53:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461323.72584817 10.10.2026 05:25:03.282 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 85
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25763
Objects passed selection criteria: 25699
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24113.2
Average stars matched: 23285.2 (96.5662 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 02:54:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.72528845
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:13.855 -09:56:45.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:13.855 -09:56:45.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:14.096 -09:57:15.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:14.096 -09:57:15.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0701 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:13.855 -09:56:45.56
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:14.096 -09:57:15.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00849 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pOsk9uEG3P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7kdOkGoShD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g5VBfnnmQB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RLUCmnNjjb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.898500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.898500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Loaded 3953 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3150 out of 3266 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3266 out of 5085 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.3 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.pOsk9uEG3P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=0, passed=5092
Got 5092 stars (including 4723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1250 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7kdOkGoShD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=0, passed=5085
Got 5085 stars (including 4722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1046 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1120 n_q4=1208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.g5VBfnnmQB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=256, bad_region=0, passed=4580
Got 4580 stars (including 4319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4580 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4234 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4236 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4232 stars left (next iteration limit 4653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4232 robust_rms=13.632 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.519 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.519 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4232 robust_rms=0.548 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.824 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.824 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4232 robust_rms=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.346 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.346 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4232 robust_rms_before=1.067 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.339 worst_region_rms_after=0.346 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.095 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.346
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.339 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.262 arcsec matched=4232
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=4232 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1124 n_q2=1021 n_q3=1122 n_q4=965 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RLUCmnNjjb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, bad_region=0, passed=4587
Got 4587 stars (including 4322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4587 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4236 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4234 stars left (next iteration limit 4655)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4234 robust_rms=13.586 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.043 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4234 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.625 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.625 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4234 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.378 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.364 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4234 robust_rms_before=0.985 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.265 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.351 worst_region_rms_after=0.378 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.981 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.364
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.351 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.265 arcsec matched=4234
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4234 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1130 n_q2=1021 n_q3=1117 n_q4=966 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.170
ref2=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.252 worst_q_ratio=1.229
new1=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.043
new2=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.095
reference average sigma_overall=0.259 worst_q_ratio=1.1995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (4232 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (4234 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:41.45 -09:31:46.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:38.54 -14:59:07.8: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:41.45 -09:31:46.9: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:38.54 -14:59:07.8: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:41.45 -09:31:46.9: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0995 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20243.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 20243_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20254_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20254_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20392_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:19:38.54 -14:59:07.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:13.855 -09:56:45.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:13.855 -09:56:45.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:14.096 -09:57:15.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:14.096 -09:57:15.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0701 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:13.855 -09:56:45.56
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:14.096 -09:57:15.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00849 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L31mmJUuzJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.atmjJYnsMl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fz6lHvmTr1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yEqcENRF3x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 25987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Loaded 3957 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3129 out of 3354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3354 out of 25987 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.L31mmJUuzJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1010, bad_region=3, passed=26243
Got 26243 stars (including 25198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1164 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.atmjJYnsMl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=998, bad_region=3, passed=25977
Got 25977 stars (including 24935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fz6lHvmTr1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=698, bad_region=41, passed=22479
Got 22479 stars (including 21707 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=13.558 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.453 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.547 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.872 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.872 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.348 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.065 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.337 worst_region_rms_after=0.348 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.095 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.347
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.337 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.261 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1247 n_q2=1147 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1167 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yEqcENRF3x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=696, bad_region=41, passed=22578
Got 22578 stars (including 21807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=13.371 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.950 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.950 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.382 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.987 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.341 worst_region_rms_after=0.382 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.975 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.367
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.267 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1256 n_q2=1148 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-24-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_004821_TTUQ1b1x1_2192845_pY9AxHBk/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:31:16.07 -14:24:02.9: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:41:19.39 -05:44:43.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:15.18 -12:44:35.5: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:42:18.89 -09:59:02.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:15.18 -12:44:35.5: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:31:16.07 -14:24:02.9: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:42:18.89 -09:59:02.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:15.18 -12:44:35.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3210 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:41:19.39 -05:44:43.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:18.89 -09:59:02.1: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2168 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:16.07 -14:24:02.9: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2114 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:41:19.39 -05:44:43.7: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1563 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:27.60 -08:04:22.2: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:55.91 -09:08:02.1: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:24.46 -06:32:16.2: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:27.60 -08:04:22.2: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:27.60 -08:04:22.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5354 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:03:55.91 -09:08:02.1: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:55.91 -09:08:02.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4885 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:03:24.46 -06:32:16.2: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:24.46 -06:32:16.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7416 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:58:21.67 -05:32:46.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:36:19.37 -08:28:02.4: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:58:21.67 -05:32:46.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:52.91 -06:55:57.0: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:35:55.52 -10:57:27.4: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:36:19.37 -08:28:02.4: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:19.14 -08:34:59.0: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:19.37 -08:28:02.4: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2070 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:15.43 -06:11:10.9: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:27:52.91 -06:55:57.0: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:52.91 -06:55:57.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5290 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:19.14 -08:34:59.0: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:35:55.52 -10:57:27.4: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:19.14 -08:34:59.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5716 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:55.52 -10:57:27.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5120 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:25:20.98 -08:45:40.4: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:29:50.83 -07:11:42.3: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:15.43 -06:11:10.9: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:15.43 -06:11:10.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5878 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:25:20.98 -08:45:40.4: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:20.98 -08:45:40.4: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7167 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:29:50.83 -07:11:42.3: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:50.83 -07:11:42.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7008 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32353.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31603_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31603_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31604_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31604_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31605_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31605_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31610_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31610_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:38.53 -14:59:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31620_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31620_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31654_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31654_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31655_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31655_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31715_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31715_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31754_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31754_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31817_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31817_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:59.20 -06:35:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31833_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31833_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31857_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31857_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:43:47.40 -12:02:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31861_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31861_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31869_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31869_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31889_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31889_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31891_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31891_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31899_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31899_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31901_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31901_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31907_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31907_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31922_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31922_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31930_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31930_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31933_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31933_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31934_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31939_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31939_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31963_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31963_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31970_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31970_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31981_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31981_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32004_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32004_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32018_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32018_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32020_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32020_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32044_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32044_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32065_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32065_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32069_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32069_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32079_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32079_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:33:29.50 -06:43:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32095_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32095_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32097_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32097_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32102_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32102_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32114_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32114_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32136_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32136_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32152_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32175_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:51:17.07 -08:35:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32185_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32185_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32203_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32203_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32224_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32224_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32225_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32225_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32227_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32235_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32235_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32265_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32265_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32314_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32314_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32321_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32321_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32352_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32352_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32353_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 32353_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32369_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32369_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32385_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32385_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32400_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32400_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:40:54.10 -07:13:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32401_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32401_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32409_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32409_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32418_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32418_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32437_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32437_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32439_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32439_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:33:24.59 -06:43:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32452_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32452_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32508_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32508_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32512_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32512_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32519_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32537_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32537_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32556_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32556_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32563_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32563_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32569_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32569_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32571_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32571_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32601_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32601_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32619_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32619_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32623_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32623_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32626_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32626_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32636_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32636_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32638_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32638_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32641_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32646_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32646_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32647_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32647_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32653_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32653_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32664_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32664_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32674_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 32674_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks