This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7267,8.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2267 8.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7267,8.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2267 8.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2267 2461323.7267 12.44 23:29:31.15 -05:06:44.3
77.74022 -60.58121 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:31.15 -05:06:44.3: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:31.15 -05:06:44.3: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7267,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2267 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2267 2461323.7267 14.46 00:11:44.35 +00:25:48.2
102.22027 -60.83528 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1735 ITA -0 -0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:44.35 +00:25:48.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:44.35 +00:25:48.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7267,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2267 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2267 2461323.7267 14.38 00:26:58.90 -03:02:42.3
108.23402 -65.21658 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4212 Sansyu-Asuke 0 -0 0 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:58.90 -03:02:42.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:58.90 -03:02:42.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2267* 00 26 58.90 -03 02 42.3 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7267,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2267 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2267 2461323.7267 14.54 23:36:19.76 -04:44:51.7
80.95630 -61.33874 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa 1 -2 2 14.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:19.76 -04:44:51.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:19.76 -04:44:51.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7267,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2267 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2267 2461323.7267 14.52 00:18:48.75 -04:55:03.3
102.19837 -66.46707 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3133 Sendai -0 1 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:18:48.75 -04:55:03.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:18:48.75 -04:55:03.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7267,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2267 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461323.72708986 10.10.2026 05:26:50.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6092
Objects passed selection criteria: 6090
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5722.75
Average stars matched: 5466.25 (95.5179 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 01:51:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461323.72708986 10.10.2026 05:26:50.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30541
Objects passed selection criteria: 30450
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29315
Average stars matched: 27720.2 (94.56 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 256216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 01:52:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.72639736
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:44.996 -01:57:31.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:44.996 -01:57:31.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0791 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:42.330 -01:56:52.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:42.330 -01:56:52.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0945 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:44.996 -01:57:31.76
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:42.330 -01:56:52.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01555 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A23cJ26eMP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WGLpzspRh1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FeDCOcauA5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H0diMPrSmg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.A23cJ26eMP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WGLpzspRh1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FeDCOcauA5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=6048
Got 6048 stars (including 5686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6048 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8297 through 0 to 8.0723, gap 8.0723 to 351.8297
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8294 through 0 to 8.0730, gap 8.0730 to 351.8294
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=13.382 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.691 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.691 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.739 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.303 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.303 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=0.977 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.250 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.310 worst_region_rms_after=0.303 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.100 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.303
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.310 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.250 arcsec matched=4889
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1296 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1314 n_q4=1165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.H0diMPrSmg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6068
Got 6068 stars (including 5700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8053 through 0 to 8.0208, gap 8.0208 to 351.8053
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8049 through 0 to 8.0212, gap 8.0212 to 351.8049
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=13.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.245 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.245 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.665 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.312 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.948 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.325 worst_region_rms_after=0.312 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.022 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.312
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.325 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.259 arcsec matched=4886
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1294 n_q2=1122 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.257 worst_q_ratio=1.067
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.056
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:41.19 -01:44:55.6: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:14.05 +02:14:52.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:14.05 +02:14:52.3: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:41.19 -01:44:55.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:14.05 +02:14:52.3: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9807 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:41.19 -01:44:55.6: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8152 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.4: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1279 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0968 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.92 +00:47:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 20280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20412_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20435_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20439_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20439_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:44.44 -01:12:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20442_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20442_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20450_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20450_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:44.996 -01:57:31.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:44.996 -01:57:31.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0791 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:42.330 -01:56:52.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:42.330 -01:56:52.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0945 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:44.996 -01:57:31.76
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:42.330 -01:56:52.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01555 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LO4VAFQSJx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nDg0Bfidkz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CImbIgrpA8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.noBU21RUkq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=5.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 30046 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to +3.2772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to 3.2772 deg
Loaded 113502 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3314 out of 3546 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3546 out of 30046 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 86 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.1 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LO4VAFQSJx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1084, bad_region=0, passed=29266
Got 29266 stars (including 28140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29266 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1384 through 0 to 7.8963, gap 7.8963 to 352.1384
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1387 through 0 to 7.8962, gap 7.8962 to 352.1387
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1235 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nDg0Bfidkz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1265, bad_region=0, passed=30031
Got 30031 stars (including 28725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1258 through 0 to 7.8769, gap 7.8769 to 352.1258
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1262 through 0 to 7.8768, gap 7.8768 to 352.1262
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CImbIgrpA8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1036, bad_region=46, passed=29388
Got 29388 stars (including 28264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7932 through 0 to 8.0723, gap 8.0723 to 351.7932
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7928 through 0 to 8.0730, gap 8.0730 to 351.7928
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=13.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.260 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.260 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.788 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.788 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.302 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.971 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.245 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.301 worst_region_rms_after=0.302 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.084 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.302
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.301 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.245 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1272 n_q2=1116 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.noBU21RUkq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1048, bad_region=46, passed=29593
Got 29593 stars (including 28472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7747 through 0 to 8.0576, gap 8.0576 to 351.7747
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7743 through 0 to 8.0582, gap 8.0582 to 351.7743
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=13.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.342 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.342 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.701 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.701 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.310 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.310 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.943 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.315 worst_region_rms_after=0.310 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.015 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.310
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.315 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.257 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1115 n_q3=1312 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_004808_TTUQ1b1x1_1523985_eFGxRHVU/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:16:01.68 -05:25:02.9: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:44:30.81 -04:38:50.8: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:24:57.03 -04:17:09.1: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:42.39 +02:12:31.1: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:44:30.81 -04:38:50.8: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:16:01.68 -05:25:02.9: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:24:57.03 -04:17:09.1: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:30.81 -04:38:50.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3267 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:01.68 -05:25:02.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1645 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:42.39 +02:12:31.1: 14.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:57.03 -04:17:09.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4213 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:43.18 -00:26:11.8: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:03.08 +02:51:52.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:42.39 +02:12:31.1: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2265 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:30.84 -04:35:31.8: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:43.31 +02:31:58.4: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:34.44 -05:21:35.7: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:43.18 -00:26:11.8: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:43.18 -00:26:11.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4644 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:03.08 +02:51:52.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:03.08 +02:51:52.6: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2367 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:30.84 -04:35:31.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.84 -04:35:31.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6087 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:43.31 +02:31:58.4: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:43.31 +02:31:58.4: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4664 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:34.44 -05:21:35.7: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.44 -05:21:35.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8641 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:24.49 +01:55:17.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:45:11.97 +02:18:06.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:52.13 +00:04:17.6: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:31.15 -05:06:44.3: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:24.49 +01:55:17.7: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:24.49 +01:55:17.7: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4453 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:28.07 -03:35:35.5: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:45:11.97 +02:18:06.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:11.97 +02:18:06.4: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6881 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:31.15 -05:06:44.3: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.3: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:30.65 -07:10:03.8: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:28.07 -03:35:35.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:28.07 -03:35:35.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1858 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:06.21 +00:02:55.5: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:52.13 +00:04:17.6: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:52.13 +00:04:17.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7181 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:47:43.94 +02:02:26.7: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:30.65 -07:10:03.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:30.65 -07:10:03.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7893 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.3: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:06.21 +00:02:55.5: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.3: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9728 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:41:23.07 +00:17:20.5: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.21 +00:02:55.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8940 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:47:43.94 +02:02:26.7: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:43.94 +02:02:26.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3196 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:59.11 -06:47:20.6: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:20:00.23 -06:11:55.0: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:41:23.07 +00:17:20.5: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:23.07 +00:17:20.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8477 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:59.11 -06:47:20.6: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:27.98 +00:59:07.5: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:59.11 -06:47:20.6: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0160 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:12.09 +01:52:04.0: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:42.65 -06:02:30.0: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:48:43.23 +02:54:32.9: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:20:00.23 -06:11:55.0: 14.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:31.11 -01:09:45.6: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:00.23 -06:11:55.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1109 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:12.09 +01:52:04.0: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:42.65 -06:02:30.0: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:12.09 +01:52:04.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2029 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:42.65 -06:02:30.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1136 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:27.98 +00:59:07.5: 14.09 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:27.98 +00:59:07.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0368 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:31.11 -01:09:45.6: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:48:43.23 +02:54:32.9: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:31.11 -01:09:45.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3291 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:43.23 +02:54:32.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2639 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:34.05 -05:59:44.6: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:32.38 -01:44:27.0: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:04.07 +02:57:23.2: 14.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:34.05 -05:59:44.6: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:27.96 +01:40:47.9: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:34.05 -05:59:44.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1504 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:32.38 -01:44:27.0: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.38 -01:44:27.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4883 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:52:50.26 +02:59:48.9: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:27.96 +01:40:47.9: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:04.07 +02:57:23.2: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:23.46 +02:19:55.4: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:27.96 +01:40:47.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4025 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:04.07 +02:57:23.2: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4990 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:34.13 -04:40:49.6: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:28.27 +02:07:06.8: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:52:50.26 +02:59:48.9: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:50.26 +02:59:48.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5557 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:23.46 +02:19:55.4: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:38.42 -04:57:26.9: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:23.46 +02:19:55.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4240 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:34.13 -04:40:49.6: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:34.13 -04:40:49.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3611 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:30.14 -04:41:33.3: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:28.27 +02:07:06.8: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:28.27 +02:07:06.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4422 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:38.42 -04:57:26.9: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:44.05 +02:46:52.8: 15.06 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:38.42 -04:57:26.9: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4080 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:53.58 -04:46:59.4: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:24:55.11 -06:25:05.1: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:30.14 -04:41:33.3: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:30.14 -04:41:33.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4333 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:49.52 -01:39:09.3: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:44.05 +02:46:52.8: 14.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:44.05 +02:46:52.8: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5550 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:53.58 -04:46:59.4: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:53.58 -04:46:59.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3197 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:46.28 +01:23:49.9: 15.17 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:24:55.11 -06:25:05.1: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:55.11 -06:25:05.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4630 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:40.18 -03:09:10.9: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:49.52 -01:39:09.3: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:49.52 -01:39:09.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5355 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:56.86 +00:31:37.6: 15.35 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:46.28 +01:23:49.9: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:46.28 +01:23:49.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6328 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:44.35 +00:25:48.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:21.89 +02:28:42.9: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:40.18 -03:09:10.9: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:40.18 -03:09:10.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5164 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:44.35 +00:25:48.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:57.10 -01:37:39.2: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:56.86 +00:31:37.6: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:56.86 +00:31:37.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6647 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:56.03 -02:18:17.0: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:21.89 +02:28:42.9: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:21.89 +02:28:42.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4860 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:25.63 +00:37:56.2: 15.15 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:56.03 -02:18:17.0: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:56.03 -02:18:17.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5266 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:21.61 +01:11:07.5: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:57.10 -01:37:39.2: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:57.10 -01:37:39.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6249 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:46.02 -00:13:56.4: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:25.63 +00:37:56.2: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:25.63 +00:37:56.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6765 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:51.05 +00:51:16.4: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:21.61 +01:11:07.5: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:21.61 +01:11:07.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5201 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:28.50 -00:06:57.6: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:46.02 -00:13:56.4: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:46.02 -00:13:56.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6149 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:20.60 -04:41:05.9: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:51.05 +00:51:16.4: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:51.05 +00:51:16.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7099 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:28.50 -00:06:57.6: 14.98 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:28.50 -00:06:57.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5444 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:58.90 -03:02:42.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:36.31 -02:59:17.2: 15.16 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:20.60 -04:41:05.9: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:20.60 -04:41:05.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4444 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:43.52 +02:05:21.9: 15.08 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:00.48 +02:32:03.5: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:58.90 -03:02:42.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:36.31 -02:59:17.2: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:36.31 -02:59:17.2: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5371 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:37.03 -00:34:18.6: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:19.76 -04:44:51.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:47.38 -00:20:01.1: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:43.52 +02:05:21.9: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:43.52 +02:05:21.9: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6660 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:00.48 +02:32:03.5: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:00.48 +02:32:03.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6635 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:37.03 -00:34:18.6: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:19.76 -04:44:51.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:37.03 -00:34:18.6: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5775 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:47.38 -00:20:01.1: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:47.38 -00:20:01.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8069 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:42:16.68 +02:20:49.7: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:06.68 +01:53:58.2: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:48.73 -06:31:36.4: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:39.07 -01:21:05.6: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:42:16.68 +02:20:49.7: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:16.68 +02:20:49.7: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5878 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:08.02 -05:43:53.8: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:32.89 -02:27:59.6: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:39.07 -01:21:05.6: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:06.68 +01:53:58.2: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:48.73 -06:31:36.4: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:18:48.75 -04:55:03.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:48.73 -06:31:36.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5047 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:06.68 +01:53:58.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7233 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:39.07 -01:21:05.6: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7123 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:32.89 -02:27:59.6: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:18:48.75 -04:55:03.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:08.02 -05:43:53.8: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.89 -02:27:59.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5575 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:08.02 -05:43:53.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5831 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:22.77 -05:24:30.0: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:15.29 -05:51:24.3: 15.35 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:38.24 +01:49:55.9: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:47.26 -04:41:52.6: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:22.77 -05:24:30.0: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:22.77 -05:24:30.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4605 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:15.29 -05:51:24.3: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:15.29 -05:51:24.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6229 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:38.24 +01:49:55.9: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:38.24 +01:49:55.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6934 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:49.95 -03:03:56.1: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:08.19 -01:48:26.3: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:47.26 -04:41:52.6: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:47.26 -04:41:52.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4414 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:49.95 -03:03:56.1: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:49.95 -03:03:56.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5797 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:08.19 -01:48:26.3: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:08.19 -01:48:26.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4825 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:28.05 -06:59:51.8: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:08.40 -03:40:52.0: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:51.35 -01:12:41.6: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:19:53.93 -06:17:22.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:18:13.55 -05:32:02.6: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:47.33 -03:40:25.9: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:51.35 -01:12:41.6: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:10:35.34 -05:25:10.5: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:28.05 -06:59:51.8: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:51.35 -01:12:41.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7328 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:28.05 -06:59:51.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4222 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:08.40 -03:40:52.0: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:08.40 -03:40:52.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6745 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:19:53.93 -06:17:22.7: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:53.93 -06:17:22.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5202 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:47.33 -03:40:25.9: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:47.33 -03:40:25.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4182 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:18:13.55 -05:32:02.6: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:13.55 -05:32:02.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5344 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:10:35.34 -05:25:10.5: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:35.34 -05:25:10.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6886 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:29.49 -04:23:12.7: 15.36 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:16:16.64 -07:11:04.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:29.49 -04:23:12.7: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:29.49 -04:23:12.7: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6355 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:16:16.64 -07:11:04.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:16.64 -07:11:04.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33969.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34074.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32794_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32794_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32797_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32797_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32803_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32803_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32806_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32806_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 32819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33051_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 33051_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33083_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33083_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33111_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33111_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33264_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33264_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33519_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33519_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33552_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33552_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33566_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33566_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33587_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33587_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33714_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33714_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33725_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33725_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33735_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33735_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33752_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33752_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33758_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33763_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33763_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33764_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33764_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33771_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33771_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33874_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33874_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33880_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33880_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33883_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33883_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33887_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33887_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33891_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33891_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33903_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33903_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33920_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33920_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33945_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33945_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33947_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33947_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33953_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33953_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33968_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33968_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33975_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33975_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33978_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33978_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33982_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33982_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33991_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33991_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33997_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33997_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34001_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34001_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34013_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34013_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34017_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34017_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34019_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34019_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34020_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34020_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34036_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34036_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34039_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34039_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34041_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 34041_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34043_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34043_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34045_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34045_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:02.78 -04:31:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34048_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34048_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34052_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34052_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34053_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34053_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34058_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34058_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34073_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34073_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34074_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 34074_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34085_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:04.49 +01:31:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34086_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34086_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34090_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34090_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34110_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34110_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34148_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34148_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34153_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34153_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34168_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34168_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34203_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34203_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34234_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34234_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34237_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34237_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34239_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34239_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34242_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34242_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34249_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34249_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34254_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34254_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-26-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
