This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2233* 05 21 07.61 +23 38 20.1 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461323.7233,11.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261010.2233 11.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2233 2461323.7233 11.08 05:19:30.93 +23:40:04.6
181.25392 -7.76985 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:30.93 +23:40:04.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:30.93 +23:40:04.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2233* 05 19 30.93 +23 40 04.6 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7233,11.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2233 11.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2233 2461323.7233 11.97 05:05:32.42 +26:06:53.6
177.38649 -8.94811 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 1 -0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:32.42 +26:06:53.6: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:32.42 +26:06:53.6: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2233* 05 05 32.42 +26 06 53.6 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7233,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2233 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2233* 05 21 07.61 +23 38 20.2 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461323.7233,11.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261010.2233 11.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2233 2461323.7233 12.84 05:16:50.15 +21:26:11.5
182.76800 -9.53665 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula 1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:50.15 +21:26:11.5: 15.52 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:50.15 +21:26:11.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2233* 05 16 50.15 +21 26 11.5 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7233,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2233 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2233 2461323.7233 13.96 05:02:52.64 +25:00:22.5
177.93097 -10.08891 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia 0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:52.64 +25:00:22.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:52.64 +25:00:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2233* 05 02 52.64 +25 00 22.5 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7233,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2233 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2233 2461323.7233 13.53 05:44:23.31 +19:36:16.7
187.83346 -5.09460 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla -1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:23.31 +19:36:16.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:23.31 +19:36:16.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2233* 05 44 23.31 +19 36 16.7 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7233,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2233 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461323.72357709 10.10.2026 05:21:47.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20325
Objects passed selection criteria: 20253
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15724
Average stars matched: 15504.2 (98.6025 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 01:33:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461323.72357709 10.10.2026 05:21:47.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 130
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 131 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151136
Objects passed selection criteria: 150772
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 117908
Average stars matched: 114223 (96.8745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 01:37:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.72292394
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:08.610 +22:02:54.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:08.610 +22:02:54.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:11.274 +22:03:00.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:11.274 +22:03:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:08.610 +22:02:54.82
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:11.274 +22:03:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01040 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DSuCPGAAnO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8SN976Tqzw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nxB8fM6zUT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X7vBKiaGsD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.DSuCPGAAnO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8SN976Tqzw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nxB8fM6zUT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, bad_region=1, passed=9639
Got 9639 stars (including 9121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9639 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4734 stars left (next iteration limit 5206)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=9.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.935 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.935 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=0.957 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.329 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.651 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.649 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4734 robust_rms_before=1.927 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.488 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.544 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.680 worst_region_rms_after=0.651 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.678 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.649
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.680 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.680 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.488 arcsec matched=4734
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4734 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=1013 n_q2=1334 n_q3=869 n_q4=1518 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.X7vBKiaGsD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, bad_region=0, passed=9734
Got 9734 stars (including 9218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4724 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=9.579 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.874 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.874 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=1.059 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.506 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.635 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4724 robust_rms_before=1.681 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.506 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.692 worst_region_rms_after=0.652 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.377 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.635
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.692 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.692 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.471 arcsec matched=4724
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4724 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=1024 n_q2=1327 n_q3=851 n_q4=1522 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.260
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.277
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4734 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4724 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:32.42 +26:06:53.6: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:30.93 +23:40:04.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:32.42 +26:06:53.6: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:30.93 +23:40:04.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:05:32.42 +26:06:53.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.9743 delta=2.67 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30831.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 30742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 30744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 30831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.56 +17:54:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.17 +17:53:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.00 +20:30:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.03 +20:10:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.42 +23:51:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:19:30.93 +23:40:04.6
05:05:32.42 +26:06:53.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:08.610 +22:02:54.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:08.610 +22:02:54.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:11.274 +22:03:00.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:11.274 +22:03:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:08.610 +22:02:54.82
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:11.274 +22:03:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01040 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z35t6dEGdf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vJ1ArsXx8N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.68fh8BjAtJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g4G2pB08Vn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 123 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z35t6dEGdf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vJ1ArsXx8N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.68fh8BjAtJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3753, bad_region=37, passed=70954
Got 70954 stars (including 67044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70954 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=9.946 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.359 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.949 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.275 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.649 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4721 robust_rms_before=1.901 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.663 worst_region_rms_after=0.649 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.606 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.640
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.663 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.663 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.471 arcsec matched=4721
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.469 n_q1=1036 n_q2=1312 n_q3=861 n_q4=1512 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.g4G2pB08Vn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3872, bad_region=36, passed=72517
Got 72517 stars (including 68508 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4723 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=9.725 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.962 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.962 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=1.072 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.366 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.659 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.624 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4723 robust_rms_before=1.669 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.451 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.663 worst_region_rms_after=0.659 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.337 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.624
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.663 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.663 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.451 arcsec matched=4723
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1301 n_q3=853 n_q4=1532 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-20-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003549_TTUQ1b1x1_3730248_yyF5iPn4/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:32.92 +23:43:20.2: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 04:59:21.66 +24:25:17.4: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:18.83 +24:43:19.1: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:17.36 +23:41:16.1: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:39.35 +19:13:24.2: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:39.35 +19:13:24.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:18.83 +24:43:19.1: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 04:59:21.66 +24:25:17.4: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:39.35 +19:13:24.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2633 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:18.83 +24:43:19.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3732 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:32.92 +23:43:20.2: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:21.66 +24:25:17.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5776 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:17.36 +23:41:16.1: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:32.92 +23:43:20.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2472 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:17.36 +23:41:16.1: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2651 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:56.29 +20:14:28.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:56.29 +20:14:28.4: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:56.29 +20:14:28.4: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0134 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:50.15 +21:26:11.5: 15.52 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:50.15 +21:26:11.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:16:50.15 +21:26:11.5: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=12.8435 delta=2.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:24.06 +26:25:35.2: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.8: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2159 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:24.06 +26:25:35.2: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:24.06 +26:25:35.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8699 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:31.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:04.68 +16:37:32.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:40.24 +23:12:55.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:31.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:31.2: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9375 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:40.24 +23:12:55.7: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:58:56.24 +26:13:10.5: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:04.68 +16:37:32.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:04.68 +16:37:32.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:40.24 +23:12:55.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0775 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:56.24 +26:13:10.5: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:56.24 +26:13:10.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0409 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:52.50 +27:10:50.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:44.15 +26:10:37.0: 15.53 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:52.50 +27:10:50.5: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:52.50 +27:10:50.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:44.15 +26:10:37.0: 16.00 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:19:44.15 +26:10:37.0: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6119 delta=2.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:40.15 +21:42:13.7: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:40.15 +21:42:13.7: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:40.15 +21:42:13.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4663 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:00.43 +20:57:17.3: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:03.6: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:00.43 +20:57:17.3: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:00.43 +20:57:17.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6416 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.17 +21:09:52.8: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:03.6: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:03.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7720 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:52.64 +25:00:22.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.17 +21:09:52.8: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.17 +21:09:52.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6010 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:23.31 +19:36:16.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:52.64 +25:00:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:23.31 +19:36:16.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out191688.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191153.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192065.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192126.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:06.90 +21:31:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:37.26 +19:47:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190575_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190575_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:20.63 +18:14:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.26 +18:25:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.18 +18:20:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:11.94 +18:29:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.05 +22:41:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:16.08 +17:13:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:12.84 +24:49:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190673_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190673_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.95 +26:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:30.87 +23:40:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 190680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.04 +19:58:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.11 +22:38:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.80 +25:55:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.86 +23:48:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 190990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:46.01 +26:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191044_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191044_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.72 +23:02:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191053_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191053_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.94 +18:33:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191116_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191116_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.56 +21:37:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.65 +20:46:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.19 +18:59:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191153_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 191153_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191171_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191171_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.38 +18:52:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.98 +20:10:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191208_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191208_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.40 +18:33:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191279_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191279_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.75 +22:40:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191302_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191302_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.11 +26:25:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191335_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191335_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.73 +18:25:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.28 +22:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191349_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191349_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.59 +21:46:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191370_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191370_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.79 +25:24:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.20 +23:00:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191376_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191376_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.23 +20:53:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.51 +18:29:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191384_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191384_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.60 +20:02:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:33.97 +18:37:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191388_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191388_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.17 +25:24:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191401_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191401_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.63 +25:09:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.94 +19:35:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191409_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191409_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191416_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191416_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.31 +25:47:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191424_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191424_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.31 +26:25:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.91 +17:11:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.02 +18:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191481_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191481_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.81 +19:32:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191499_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191499_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:57.39 +19:43:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.51 +24:25:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.34 +18:40:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191510_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191510_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.57 +20:26:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191520_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191520_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191533_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191533_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.42 +25:08:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.53 +20:05:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.32 +20:09:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.80 +23:11:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.67 +22:45:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:58.75 +25:07:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.08 +25:25:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191652_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191652_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.61 +25:22:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.30 +23:07:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:44.15 +26:10:37.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.068 3421065631655041024 079.93250055586 +26.17642461832 12.1278 10.2903 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.068#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.25 +24:57:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191733_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191733_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:23.33 +25:19:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.38 +20:56:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:36.90 +24:06:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191759_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191759_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.52 +21:47:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191769_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191769_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191774_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191774_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.54 +20:26:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191822_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191822_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.17 +25:14:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191823_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191823_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.60 +18:46:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191855_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191855_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.69 +20:00:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191884_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191884_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191899_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191899_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.09 +22:58:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191903_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191903_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.62 +21:24:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.15 +22:06:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191981_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 191981_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:20.54 +17:15:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192019_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 192019_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192042_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 192042_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.67 +17:59:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192065_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 192065_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 192110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.78 +21:19:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 192126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.41 +23:51:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.51 +20:22:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.28 +25:59:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:25.33 +17:43:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.36 +24:45:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.17 +24:10:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.47 +26:13:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.57 +19:30:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15069_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 15069_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:32.40 +26:06:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.07 +24:59:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.77 +23:10:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.08 +24:53:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 62545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:29.39 +22:03:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.29 +25:40:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 09484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.35 +20:19:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 95132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 138591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.74 +19:21:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.74 +22:47:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.12 +20:22:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.53 +17:54:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.17 +17:53:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 06000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.16 +21:51:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.89 +21:13:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.01 +20:10:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
