This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2282 2461323.7282 12.10 05:39:59.02 +30:33:14.0
177.98064 -0.18908 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia -1 -0 1 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:59.02 +30:33:14.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:59.02 +30:33:14.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7282,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2282 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2282 2461323.7282 14.12 05:49:25.66 +28:45:46.1
180.57992 0.62365 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.422 Berolina 1 2 2 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:25.66 +28:45:46.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:25.66 +28:45:46.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7282,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2282 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2282 2461323.7282 13.53 05:56:48.10 +27:39:23.6
182.35818 1.46127 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 3430885060767719808
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.720 G 14.830 G F
The object was found in astcheck.214 Aschera 0 -1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:48.10 +27:39:23.6: 15.69 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:48.10 +27:39:23.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.69 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2282* 05 56 48.10 +27 39 23.6 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3430885060767719808,2461323.7282,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3430885060767719808 20261010.2282 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461323.72849635 10.10.2026 05:28:52.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22025
Objects passed selection criteria: 21890
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14952.5
Average stars matched: 13935.8 (93.2001 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246572 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 01:33:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461323.72849635 10.10.2026 05:28:52.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 105
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 157 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 174474
Objects passed selection criteria: 173976
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125400
Average stars matched: 117216 (93.4739 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 570116 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 01:37:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.72798412
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:20.238 +30:02:43.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:20.238 +30:02:43.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0857 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:21.741 +30:02:03.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:21.741 +30:02:03.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0850 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:20.238 +30:02:43.28
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:21.741 +30:02:03.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01227 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.89ENrfe8sc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KMZB9Gg7yM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M1dzx9UJjk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4HaIBOxTmf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13642 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.89ENrfe8sc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=5792, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 18877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1282 n_q2=975 n_q3=1593 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KMZB9Gg7yM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=5776, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 18855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1281 n_q2=975 n_q3=1594 n_q4=929 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.M1dzx9UJjk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=730, bad_region=1862, passed=10512
Got 10512 stars (including 8019 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10512 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=6.573 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.324 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.722 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.158 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.158 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.940 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.940 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4788 robust_rms_before=1.603 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.590 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.075 worst_region_rms_after=0.940 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.711 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.940
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:20.284 +30:02:42.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10512 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky123032.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.603 -> 0.593 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4788 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4548 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4548 pairs (4788 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4548 robust_rms=6.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.045 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.045 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4548 robust_rms=0.711 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.104 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.104 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4548 robust_rms=0.584 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.894 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4548 robust_rms_before=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.584 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.910 worst_region_rms_after=0.894 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.910 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.894
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:20.284 +30:02:42.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10512 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky128465.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.583 -> 0.584 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4548 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=1358 n_q2=787 n_q3=1654 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4HaIBOxTmf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=707, bad_region=1857, passed=10560
Got 10560 stars (including 8084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=6.708 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.196 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.196 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.701 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.155 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.155 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.590 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.945 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.945 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4792 robust_rms_before=1.644 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.587 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.590 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.063 worst_region_rms_after=0.945 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.704 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.945
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:21.784 +30:02:02.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10560 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky122454.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.644 -> 0.590 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4792 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4546 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4546 pairs (4792 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4546 robust_rms=6.554 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.280 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4546 robust_rms=0.688 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.074 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.074 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4546 robust_rms=0.580 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.913 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.913 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4546 robust_rms_before=0.580 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.580 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.580 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.911 worst_region_rms_after=0.913 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.911 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.913
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.913 vs 0.911 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4546 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4546 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=4546 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.723 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=1362 n_q2=791 n_q3=1647 n_q4=746 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.299
ref2=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.610 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.585 worst_q_ratio=1.236
reference average sigma_overall=0.4745 worst_q_ratio=1.285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4778 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (4548 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (4546 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:10.42 +32:31:18.9: 10.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:10.42 +32:31:18.9: 10.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:10.42 +32:31:18.9: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9148 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31541_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 31541_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:56.83 +29:43:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31542_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 31542_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31543_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 31543_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31544_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 31544_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.50 +29:29:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33401_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 33401_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.23 +32:03:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:20.284 +30:02:42.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:20.284 +30:02:42.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0857 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:21.784 +30:02:02.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:21.784 +30:02:02.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0850 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:20.284 +30:02:42.06
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:21.784 +30:02:02.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01228 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Y0XmydmFF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aN7zAH1HhO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h2B1iTRoBo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qijf8SJm7Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14294 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14294 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.7 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8Y0XmydmFF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=61, blended=32425, bad_region=34270, passed=212766
Got 212766 stars (including 150203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1332 n_q2=876 n_q3=1615 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aN7zAH1HhO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=32176, bad_region=34340, passed=212605
Got 212605 stars (including 150130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212605 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1324 n_q2=908 n_q3=1589 n_q4=942 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.h2B1iTRoBo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6396, bad_region=14077, passed=87820
Got 87820 stars (including 67913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=6.649 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.141 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.141 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.728 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.198 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.198 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.596 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.934 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4766 robust_rms_before=0.589 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.592 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.596 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.921 worst_region_rms_after=0.934 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.921 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.934
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.921 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.921 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.589 arcsec matched=4766
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.757 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=1486 n_q2=867 n_q3=1613 n_q4=800 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qijf8SJm7Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=6428, bad_region=14144, passed=87854
Got 87854 stars (including 67801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87854 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=6.774 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.182 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.182 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.694 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.157 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.157 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.596 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.986 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.986 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.590 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.590 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.596 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.969 worst_region_rms_after=0.986 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.969 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.986
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.969 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.969 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.590 arcsec matched=4767
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.771 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1481 n_q2=878 n_q3=1613 n_q4=795 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_012544_TTUQ2b1x1_3208733_4h0htXpC/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:15:48.06 +29:38:35.8: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:39.83 +27:17:09.7: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:15.81 +33:32:58.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:55.87 +28:51:06.9: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:10.04 +31:53:44.5: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:55.87 +28:51:06.9: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:15.81 +33:32:58.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:48.06 +29:38:35.8: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:55.87 +28:51:06.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0933 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:39.83 +27:17:09.7: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:15.81 +33:32:58.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5502 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:48.06 +29:38:35.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7231 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:39.83 +27:17:09.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3857 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:10.04 +31:53:44.5: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:10.04 +31:53:44.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8494 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:43:00.77 +33:31:37.8: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:43:00.77 +33:31:37.8: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:00.77 +33:31:37.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2171 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:43.43 +26:16:53.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:28.73 +28:43:30.3: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:09.06 +29:19:18.6: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:43.94 +33:42:39.3: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:43.43 +26:16:53.6: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:43.43 +26:16:53.6: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7384 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:28.73 +28:43:30.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:28.73 +28:43:30.3: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7260 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:09.06 +29:19:18.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:09.06 +29:19:18.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4984 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:43.94 +33:42:39.3: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:43.94 +33:42:39.3: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4920 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:59.02 +30:33:14.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:17.71 +33:40:01.9: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:59.02 +30:33:14.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:17.71 +33:40:01.9: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:17.71 +33:40:01.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5421 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:19:15.99 +33:31:25.8: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:19:26.07 +29:26:12.1: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:15.99 +33:31:25.8: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:15.99 +33:31:25.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0355 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:26.07 +29:26:12.1: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:45.63 +30:06:25.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:26.07 +29:26:12.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1124 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:45.63 +30:06:25.9: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:45.63 +30:06:25.9: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3482 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:12:24.93 +29:04:06.2: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:02:32.26 +28:11:36.7: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:25.66 +28:45:46.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:24.93 +29:04:06.2: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:24.93 +29:04:06.2: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6844 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:32.26 +28:11:36.7: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:25.66 +28:45:46.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:32.26 +28:11:36.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9312 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:31.51 +31:05:36.6: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:48.10 +27:39:23.6: 15.69 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:31.51 +31:05:36.6: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:31.51 +31:05:36.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2912 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:48.10 +27:39:23.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.69 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:48.10 +27:39:23.6: ref_mag=15.69 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.5313 delta=2.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out155426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242784.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out253510.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239223_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239223_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239225_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239225_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239237_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239237_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239257_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239257_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239262_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239262_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:12.65 +30:49:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239269_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239269_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239271_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239271_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:10.63 +30:44:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239272_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239272_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:22.33 +29:12:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239275_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239275_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:03.92 +32:52:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239276_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239276_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:51.83 +28:54:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:04.82 +29:12:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239284_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239284_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239286_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239286_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:59.75 +30:16:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239288_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239288_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:09.61 +28:21:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239292_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239292_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:32.76 +26:47:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239293_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239293_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:48.12 +26:06:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239304_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239304_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:11.31 +27:55:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239316_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239316_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239320_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239320_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239324_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239324_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:13.99 +29:52:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239325_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239325_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239326_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239326_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.85 +27:35:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239334_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239334_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239336_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 239336_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.58 +29:29:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241307_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 241307_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.26 +32:03:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.58 +27:35:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242784_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 242784_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243596_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 243596_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.72 +25:55:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243809_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 243809_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.63 +26:04:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244126_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 244126_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.69 +28:29:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244745_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 244745_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.79 +29:32:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244953_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 244953_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245067_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 245067_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:59.58 +26:00:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245756_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 245756_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.06 +26:41:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245773_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 245773_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.05 +29:29:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246288_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 246288_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.15 +33:06:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246305_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 246305_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.36 +31:10:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246484_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 246484_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.53 +27:35:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246514_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 246514_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.54 +32:06:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246642_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 246642_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:32.08 +27:49:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246859_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 246859_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.74 +30:30:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247104_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 247104_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:27.25 +27:37:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247431_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 247431_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.85 +31:57:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247437_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 247437_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:50.68 +27:58:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247464_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 247464_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.96 +33:02:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247492_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 247492_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.32 +25:47:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 248080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:29.02 +29:37:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248090_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 248090_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:52.98 +28:27:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248118_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 248118_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248294_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 248294_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.23 +32:38:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248658_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 248658_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248785_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 248785_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:31.49 +33:12:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248957_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 248957_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:41.24 +29:59:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249030_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 249030_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:50.83 +33:20:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249374_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 249374_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:27.12 +29:36:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249789_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 249789_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:50.08 +27:12:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249945_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 249945_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250049_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 250049_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:40.80 +28:13:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250116_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 250116_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:19.21 +30:31:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250891_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 250891_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.29 +31:02:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251242_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 251242_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:36.79 +27:09:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251252_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 251252_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:19.71 +28:02:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252003_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 252003_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:22.80 +27:05:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252258_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 252258_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.34 +32:48:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252383_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 252383_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:06.12 +32:08:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252467_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 252467_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:39.70 +30:45:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253257_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 253257_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253319_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 253319_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253386_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 253386_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:39.66 +29:21:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253510_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 253510_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253598_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 253598_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:26.44 +30:41:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253776_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 253776_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:32.89 +27:50:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:59.08 +27:29:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:16.98 +28:29:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.50 +29:32:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.64 +29:51:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-10_00-28-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks