This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 11.48 23:05:12.53 -04:08:53.2
70.45286 -55.78992 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 0 0 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:05:12.53 -04:08:53.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:05:12.53 -04:08:53.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 14.03 23:19:41.67 -06:35:33.4
72.06509 -60.06114 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula 0 1 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:19:41.67 -06:35:33.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:19:41.67 -06:35:33.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 13.48 23:18:37.86 -02:26:33.9
76.98354 -56.79328 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 -0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:37.86 -02:26:33.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:37.86 -02:26:33.9: 15.69 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.69 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 12.59 23:29:31.67 -05:06:40.7
77.74491 -60.58180 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -1 -0 1 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:31.67 -05:06:40.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:31.67 -05:06:40.7: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 12.77 23:00:10.30 +02:36:23.9
76.49539 -49.95991 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.338 Budrosa -1 0 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:00:10.30 +02:36:23.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:00:10.30 +02:36:23.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 13.48 23:17:19.31 -01:58:00.9
77.07947 -56.21833 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:19.31 -01:58:00.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:19.31 -01:58:00.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 13.68 23:14:34.07 -04:16:22.0
73.35235 -57.49895 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina 0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:34.07 -04:16:22.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:34.07 -04:16:22.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 14.47 23:12:48.98 -01:36:08.5
75.96930 -55.21364 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda 0 0 0 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:12:48.98 -01:36:08.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:12:48.98 -01:36:08.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2127 2461323.7127 14.47 23:05:17.43 -00:32:32.4
74.73610 -53.17842 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia 0 0 0 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:05:17.43 -00:32:32.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:05:17.43 -00:32:32.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7127,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2127 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461323.71299551 10.10.2026 05:06:32.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6529
Objects passed selection criteria: 6522
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6155
Average stars matched: 5968.5 (96.9699 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232648 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 02:54:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461323.71299551 10.10.2026 05:06:32.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 125
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37677
Objects passed selection criteria: 37558
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36032.8
Average stars matched: 34009.5 (94.385 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 260364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 02:55:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.71245429
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:52.160 -02:00:08.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:52.160 -02:00:08.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0734 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:54.260 -01:59:50.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:54.260 -01:59:50.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0826 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:52.160 -02:00:08.46
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:54.260 -01:59:50.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01004 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EPI0dBQarc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OHA92EOqAA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FxJqW4wBbh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nSCyKQxCfB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.EPI0dBQarc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 6023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4745 stars left (next iteration limit 5219)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4745 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1149 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OHA92EOqAA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 5889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4739 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1216 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FxJqW4wBbh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=1, passed=6084
Got 6084 stars (including 5647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6084 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4735 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4735 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4736 stars left (next iteration limit 5208)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=13.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.747 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.673 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.673 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.354 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.263 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4736 robust_rms_before=1.029 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.370 worst_region_rms_after=0.354 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.972 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.263
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.370 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.302 arcsec matched=4736
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4736 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1109 n_q3=1195 n_q4=1214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nSCyKQxCfB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=419, bad_region=0, passed=6104
Got 6104 stars (including 5677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4741 stars left (next iteration limit 5215)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=13.517 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.314 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.314 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.359 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4741 robust_rms_before=1.024 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.370 worst_region_rms_after=0.359 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.965 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.270
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.370 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4741
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1215 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1206 n_q4=1214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.133
ref2=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.122
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.176
reference average sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.1275
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4745 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4739 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4736 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4741 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-05-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002409_TTUQ1b1x1_1177990_bqVN1G6B/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:35.50 -06:36:08.6: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:53:33.55 -02:17:36.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:05:12.53 -04:08:53.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:08.65 -01:13:13.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:35.50 -06:36:08.6: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:53:33.55 -02:17:36.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:05:12.53 -04:08:53.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:35.50 -06:36:08.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1949 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:53:33.55 -02:17:36.4: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9872 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:08.65 -01:13:13.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:08.65 -01:13:13.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1915 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20307_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20307_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.94 +01:01:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 20436_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20497_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20497_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:41:31.49 -06:28:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20514_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20514_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20519_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20519_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53234_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53236_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53236_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53242_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 53244_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53246_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53248_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53248_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53253_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 53253_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53256_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53259_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53259_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.96 +01:01:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53394_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53394_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:05:12.53 -04:08:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53553_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 53553_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53617_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 53617_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53873_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 53873_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53947_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 53947_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54091_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54163_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54163_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54194_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54194_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54196_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54196_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54255_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54255_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54321_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54321_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54359_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54359_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54376_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54376_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54389_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54389_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54400_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54400_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54427_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54427_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54456_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54456_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54463_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54463_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54492_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54492_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54520_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54520_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54530_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54553_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54553_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54555_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54555_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54558_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54558_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54561_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54561_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54564_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54564_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54568_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54568_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54571_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54571_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54574_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54574_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54582_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54585_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54585_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54592_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54592_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54593_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54593_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54595_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54595_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54611_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54611_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54624_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54624_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54626_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54626_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54640_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54640_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54641_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54641_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54646_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54646_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54650_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54659_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54659_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54681_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54681_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54684_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54684_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54685_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54685_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54687_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54687_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54688_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54688_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54690_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54690_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54700_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54700_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54705_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54705_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54706_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54706_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54711_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54711_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54716_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54716_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54721_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54721_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54731_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54731_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54734_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54734_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54739_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54739_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54747_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54747_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54748_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54748_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54749_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54749_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54750_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54750_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54753_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54753_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54756_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54756_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54759_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54759_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54768_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54768_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54769_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54769_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54775_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54775_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54790_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54790_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54794_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54794_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54798_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54798_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54800_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54800_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54804_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54804_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54817_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54817_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54821_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54821_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54825_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54825_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54835_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54835_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54837_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54837_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54843_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54843_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54880_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54880_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:55:33.55 -06:05:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54882_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54882_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54893_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54893_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54894_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54894_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54899_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54899_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54917_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54917_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54938_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54938_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54941_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54941_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54968_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54968_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54976_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54976_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54979_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54979_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54983_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54983_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55008_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55008_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-06-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
