######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 486880 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 486880 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1388.8315
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 485.9545
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1392.9335
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 486.9376
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.14958
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T21:46:51.3617468' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T02:46:51.3617468' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.1158722336 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T02:47:01.2649880' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.115986852 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.713796437607 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999625372335 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.8161111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 332.443888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.92755155293906 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits :)
Spent 0.824475 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T21:47:51.2542564' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T02:47:51.2542564' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.1165654399 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T02:48:01.1591392' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.116680081 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.71379647636 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.999962597033 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.7197222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 332.516666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.94104397700115 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits :)
Spent 0.886961 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits

fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.61598797
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:16.960 +61:59:48.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:16.960 +61:59:48.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0578 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:19.910 +62:00:27.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:19.910 +62:00:27.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0624 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:16.960 +61:59:48.67
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:19.910 +62:00:27.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WB90ZryAdt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lptbgrk1Qh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1USoqL0rDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ADsZLRF3Sz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.660400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.660400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg
Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.WB90ZryAdt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=0, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lptbgrk1Qh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1286 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1USoqL0rDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=284, bad_region=0, passed=4749
Got 4749 stars (including 4457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4749 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4356 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4350 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4350 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4356 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4351 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4351 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4351 stars left (next iteration limit 4785)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4351 robust_rms=13.012 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.544 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4351 robust_rms=0.532 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.849 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.849 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4351 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.425 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4351 robust_rms_before=0.953 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.361 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.385 worst_region_rms_after=0.425 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.957 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.420
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.385 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec matched=4351
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=4351 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1156 n_q2=1060 n_q3=1180 n_q4=955 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ADsZLRF3Sz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, bad_region=0, passed=4741
Got 4741 stars (including 4454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4741 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4353 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4348 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4348 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4352 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4347 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4347 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4347 stars left (next iteration limit 4782)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4347 robust_rms=12.958 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.372 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4347 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.824 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.824 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4347 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.431 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4347 robust_rms_before=0.951 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.415 worst_region_rms_after=0.431 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.948 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.427
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.415 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.323 arcsec matched=4347
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=4347 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1175 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.123
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.132
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.137
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.138
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098_astrometric_residuals.png (4351 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (4347 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:16.960 +61:59:48.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:16.960 +61:59:48.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0578 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:19.910 +62:00:27.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:19.910 +62:00:27.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0624 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:16.960 +61:59:48.67
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:19.910 +62:00:27.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tLLvQAQzQZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kqUljBaUpM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nQ8E6lQ4gh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P2YMONUcmC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.540000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.540000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tLLvQAQzQZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1409, bad_region=1, passed=33795
Got 33795 stars (including 32344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1311 n_q3=1124 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kqUljBaUpM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=1410, bad_region=0, passed=33603
Got 33603 stars (including 32157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1315 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nQ8E6lQ4gh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=795, bad_region=47, passed=26908
Got 26908 stars (including 26014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26908 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=12.636 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.679 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.872 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.872 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.419 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=0.954 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.386 worst_region_rms_after=0.419 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.315 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1379 n_q2=1166 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1005 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P2YMONUcmC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=755, bad_region=48, passed=26829
Got 26829 stars (including 25981 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=12.690 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.340 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.340 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.815 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.815 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.426 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=0.952 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.396 worst_region_rms_after=0.426 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.945 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.416
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.396 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.318 arcsec matched=4866
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1389 n_q2=1163 n_q3=1307 n_q4=1007 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:50:15.54 +65:51:42.7: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:36:16.17 +66:11:05.0: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:48:40.20 +64:13:43.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:27.49 +58:57:24.1: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:12:05.63 +62:21:44.7: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:39:22.52 +62:11:29.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:48:40.20 +64:13:43.3: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:50:15.54 +65:51:42.7: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:40.20 +64:13:43.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1796 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:50:15.54 +65:51:42.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8076 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:27.49 +58:57:24.1: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:27.49 +58:57:24.1: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4242 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:39:22.52 +62:11:29.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:13.11 +56:31:09.4: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:12:05.63 +62:21:44.7: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:22.52 +62:11:29.6: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6221 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:36:16.17 +66:11:05.0: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:05.63 +62:21:44.7: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7046 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:16.17 +66:11:05.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7417 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:43:40.51 +57:34:42.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:13.11 +56:31:09.4: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:13.11 +56:31:09.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7052 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:43:40.51 +57:34:42.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:43:40.51 +57:34:42.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:08.27 +59:17:27.8: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:57:23.94 +59:58:03.3: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:15:01.06 +62:58:21.5: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:08.27 +59:17:27.8: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:36:49.43 +56:40:37.5: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:08.27 +59:17:27.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0373 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:41:59.51 +59:48:33.8: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:41:59.46 +62:19:40.8: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:57:23.94 +59:58:03.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:23.94 +59:58:03.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1830 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:18:55.50 +66:41:49.3: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:42:11.33 +61:51:30.3: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:15:01.06 +62:58:21.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:37:12.78 +56:45:33.9: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:01.06 +62:58:21.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2093 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:39:26.76 +57:45:35.3: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:36:49.43 +56:40:37.5: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:49.43 +56:40:37.5: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4921 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:41:59.46 +62:19:40.8: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:41:59.51 +59:48:33.8: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:59.46 +62:19:40.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4149 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:59.51 +59:48:33.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4879 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:42:11.33 +61:51:30.3: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:11.33 +61:51:30.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5896 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:37:12.78 +56:45:33.9: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:39:26.76 +57:45:35.3: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:12.78 +56:45:33.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6514 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:26.76 +57:45:35.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6767 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:18:55.50 +66:41:49.3: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:55.50 +66:41:49.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1024 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:56.76 +58:27:28.9: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:36:36.61 +57:31:53.6: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:58:18.79 +64:52:28.4: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:39:41.01 +58:06:27.7: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:40.84 +57:45:19.3: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:35:06.03 +58:14:41.7: 15.39 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:56.76 +58:27:28.9: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:46:31.31 +60:38:12.5: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:56.76 +58:27:28.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4901 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:46.40 +56:23:32.4: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:50.00 +58:55:50.1: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:58:18.79 +64:52:28.4: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:39:41.01 +58:06:27.7: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:35:06.03 +58:14:41.7: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:58:18.79 +64:52:28.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3556 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:41.01 +58:06:27.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7658 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:06.03 +58:14:41.7: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6969 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:35:44.51 +56:53:20.5: 15.41 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:36:36.61 +57:31:53.6: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:36.61 +57:31:53.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5288 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:50.00 +58:55:50.1: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:50.00 +58:55:50.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5635 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:40.84 +57:45:19.3: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:35:44.51 +56:53:20.5: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:40.84 +57:45:19.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7150 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:44.51 +56:53:20.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5406 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:46:31.31 +60:38:12.5: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:31.31 +60:38:12.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7775 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:46.40 +56:23:32.4: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:46.40 +56:23:32.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6806 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:48:02.37 +66:01:56.6: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:48:14.69 +65:23:31.4: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:41:43.75 +65:08:32.9: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:20:04.26 +59:19:12.4: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:48:14.69 +65:23:31.4: 15.30 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:33:45.94 +56:22:06.7: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:14.69 +65:23:31.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8715 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:24:16.85 +60:44:49.7: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:41:43.75 +65:08:32.9: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:41:43.75 +65:08:32.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2352 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:48:02.37 +66:01:56.6: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:20:04.26 +59:19:12.4: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:48:02.37 +66:01:56.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2144 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:04.26 +59:19:12.4: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7230 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:33:45.94 +56:22:06.7: 15.29 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:45.94 +56:22:06.7: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8649 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:17:44.64 +60:30:33.0: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:30:05.72 +64:39:16.7: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:24:16.85 +60:44:49.7: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:16.85 +60:44:49.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7804 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:17:44.64 +60:30:33.0: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:30:05.72 +64:39:16.7: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:44.64 +60:30:33.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7626 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:30:05.72 +64:39:16.7: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7663 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.74 | 14:36:16.19 +66:11:04.8 | 1767 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.74 | 14:36:16.14 +66:11:05.2 | 1770 0128 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52257_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52257_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.17 | 14:00:06.59 +60:10:51.2 | 3467 4171 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:00:06.34 +60:10:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52258_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52258_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.37 | 14:34:27.38 +58:57:24.6 | 0730 4386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.52 | 14:34:27.59 +58:57:23.6 | 0733 4394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52259_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 13.78 | 12:50:15.58 +65:51:43.3 | 8219 0732 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.84 | 12:50:15.50 +65:51:42.2 | 8222 0738 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52261_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52261_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.13 | 14:48:40.36 +64:13:43.0 | 0659 1023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.24 | 14:48:40.04 +64:13:43.6 | 0663 1031 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52264_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52264_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.93 | 14:17:43.31 +65:26:01.6 | 2789 0848 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:43.39 +65:26:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52265_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 13.63 | 14:12:05.53 +62:21:45.2 | 2808 2734 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.80 | 14:12:05.72 +62:21:44.2 | 2811 2741 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52267_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52267_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 12.66 | 12:39:22.49 +62:11:30.0 | 9293 2811 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 12.59 | 12:39:22.55 +62:11:29.3 | 9296 2817 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52268_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52268_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 12.15 | 14:26:57.78 +58:09:04.1 | 1191 5011 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:26:57.96 +58:09:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52417_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52417_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 12.03 | 14:15:48.81 +56:40:26.0 | 1895 6077 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:15:48.84 +56:40:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52500_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52500_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 12.83 | 14:34:36.25 +56:20:13.5 | 0299 5939 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:34:36.28 +56:20:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52697_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.60 | 14:27:41.13 +59:05:21.3 | 1270 4443 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:27:41.16 +59:05:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52728_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 12.93 | 12:43:40.57 +57:34:41.8 | 9451 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.08 | 12:43:40.45 +57:34:42.8 | 9455 5641 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52733_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 13.64 | 14:34:13.19 +56:31:09.2 | 0356 5831 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.79 | 14:34:13.03 +56:31:09.6 | 0360 5839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52740_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 12.90 | 12:30:20.90 +66:04:45.6 | 9426 0373 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 12:30:21.02 +66:04:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52779_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.49 | 14:13:31.54 +58:29:47.0 | 2286 5020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:13:31.66 +58:29:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52790_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.64 | 14:32:46.94 +66:13:25.9 | 1983 0163 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:32:46.91 +66:13:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52895_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.93 | 14:24:29.42 +60:16:21.8 | 1675 3799 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:24:29.35 +60:16:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52931_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.01 | 14:23:08.34 +59:17:27.1 | 1641 4394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.07 | 14:23:08.19 +59:17:28.4 | 1644 4402 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53035_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 13.92 | 14:33:12.89 +58:17:42.9 | 0724 4808 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 14:33:12.91 +58:17:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53045_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53045_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.10 | 13:57:23.91 +59:58:04.2 | 3650 4316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.45 | 13:57:23.98 +59:58:02.5 | 3653 4324 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53086_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.22 | 14:15:01.06 +62:58:21.4 | 2675 2335 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.20 | 14:15:01.05 +62:58:21.6 | 2678 2342 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53100_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.46 | 14:41:59.54 +59:48:33.2 | 0307 3730 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.52 | 14:41:59.48 +59:48:34.4 | 0310 3738 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53114_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53114_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.44 | 14:41:59.44 +62:19:41.6 | 0752 2264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.39 | 14:41:59.49 +62:19:40.0 | 0754 2272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53132_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53132_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.47 | 14:36:49.50 +56:40:37.2 | 0169 5682 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.51 | 14:36:49.35 +56:40:37.7 | 0173 5690 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53150_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53150_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.56 | 14:37:12.78 +56:45:35.1 | 0151 5625 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.94 | 14:37:12.78 +56:45:32.7 | 0155 5633 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53155_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53155_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.09 | 13:18:55.47 +66:41:48.9 | 6432 0388 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.12 | 13:18:55.53 +66:41:49.7 | 6434 0394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53164_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53164_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.52 | 14:42:11.23 +61:51:31.3 | 0655 2533 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.69 | 14:42:11.43 +61:51:29.4 | 0658 2541 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53193_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53193_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.66 | 14:39:26.86 +57:45:35.6 | 0143 4986 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.72 | 14:39:26.65 +57:45:35.0 | 0146 4994 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53203_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53203_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.49 | 14:23:56.76 +58:27:29.8 | 1467 4874 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.49 | 14:23:56.77 +58:27:28.0 | 1470 4882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53209_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.59 | 14:36:36.65 +57:31:53.3 | 0329 5181 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.48 | 14:36:36.57 +57:31:53.9 | 0333 5189 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53227_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.36 | 13:58:18.80 +64:52:28.6 | 3947 1375 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.35 | 13:58:18.78 +64:52:28.3 | 3950 1382 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53230_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.61 | 14:35:06.02 +58:14:41.0 | 0566 4792 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.84 | 14:35:06.05 +58:14:42.3 | 0569 4800 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53247_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53247_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.71 | 14:46:31.38 +60:38:12.8 | 0126 3149 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.88 | 14:46:31.24 +60:38:12.1 | 0130 3156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53254_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53254_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.65 | 14:34:40.71 +57:45:19.7 | 0519 5089 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.81 | 14:34:40.97 +57:45:18.9 | 0523 5097 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53257_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.69 | 14:39:41.25 +58:06:24.9 | 0184 4777 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.88 | 14:39:40.77 +58:06:30.4 | 0188 4784 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53279_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53279_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.70 | 14:35:44.57 +56:53:21.6 | 0292 5579 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.45 | 14:35:44.44 +56:53:19.4 | 0296 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53301_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53301_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.64 | 14:23:50.11 +58:55:50.4 | 1539 4596 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.51 | 14:23:49.89 +58:55:49.7 | 1543 4604 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53319_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53319_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.68 | 14:34:46.22 +56:23:30.6 | 0290 5895 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.68 | 14:34:46.59 +56:23:34.1 | 0294 5902 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53330_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53330_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.84 | 14:48:14.88 +65:23:31.9 | 0907 0359 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.91 | 14:48:14.50 +65:23:31.0 | 0910 0367 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53348_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53348_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.72 | 14:20:04.27 +59:19:11.7 | 1877 4426 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.72 | 14:20:04.25 +59:19:13.1 | 1880 4433 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53357_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53357_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.24 | 12:41:43.62 +65:08:34.9 | 8822 1075 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.23 | 12:41:43.88 +65:08:31.0 | 8824 1082 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53366_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53366_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.19 | 12:48:02.44 +66:01:57.0 | 8342 0608 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.23 | 12:48:02.30 +66:01:56.3 | 8344 0614 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53367_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53367_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.86 | 14:33:45.91 +56:22:07.2 | 0370 5930 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.87 | 14:33:45.97 +56:22:06.2 | 0373 5938 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53370_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53370_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.77 | 14:24:16.95 +60:44:50.6 | 1751 3515 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.80 | 14:24:16.75 +60:44:48.7 | 1755 3523 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53427_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.82 | 14:17:44.72 +60:30:33.2 | 2197 3756 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.72 | 14:17:44.56 +60:30:32.8 | 2200 3764 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 53517_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.11599 | 2461323.61599 | 14.77 | 13:30:05.77 +64:39:16.5 | 5744 1631 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-46-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 14.77 | 13:30:05.66 +64:39:17.0 | 5747 1638 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.11668 | 2461323.61668 | 9.80 | 12:37:46.09 +65:33:20.4 | 9030 0786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_221011_TTUQ1b1x1_1046145_dNDjzapr/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_21-47-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits |
**** FOUND 12:37:46.09 +65:33:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.61598797 -observatory V36
14:32:09.91 -17:48:56.2 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:08:49.61 -21:03:15.6 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:36:57.01 +19:46:22.9 Mars (1.0mag)
09:33:32.07 +15:09:09.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:48.72 +01:39:13.3 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:12.60 +20:58:17.3 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:28.23 -00:24:48.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:11.77 -23:43:30.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:28:25.60 -07:27:30.9 Moon (-8.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 9 23:07 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.61598797:
09:33:31.89 +15:09:11.2 Io (6.1mag)
09:33:23.25 +15:09:57.8 Europa (6.2mag)
09:33:31.22 +15:09:15.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:33:04.13 +15:11:41.1 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:33:10.99 +15:29:58.2 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:33:30.51 +15:09:18.1 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:32:03.37 +15:30:30.4 Elara (17.5mag)
09:36:03.03 +14:31:55.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:32:13.78 +15:35:54.4 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:39.71 +01:39:32.3 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:50.01 +01:38:53.5 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:15.69 +01:36:27.8 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:32.58 +01:39:16.4 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:08.83 +01:26:55.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 9 23:07 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.61598797:
02:41:29.68 +21:17:22.3 JWST
07:37:41.91 -12:55:18.6 Chandra
03:41:19.20 +57:51:41.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 9 23:07 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.61598797 -observatory V36
03:46:29.15 +20:11:35.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:23:35.65 -33:31:39.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:17.34 -72:19:06.1 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:00.07 +34:36:48.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:29:40.65 +25:28:16.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:19.52 +35:32:06.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:30.92 +41:34:59.8 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
19:51:31.49 +46:19:52.8 17.3mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:46:06.78 -13:34:24.8 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:14:43.43 +16:05:57.6 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:49:42.20 -02:36:50.4 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:37:23.56 +65:43:04.1 15.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:37:33.56 +43:28:03.5 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:44:25.96 +14:08:02.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:28:54.81 -15:08:16.2 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:30:08.30 +19:10:29.5 16.4mag 2P/Encke
22:56:53.76 -31:58:23.1 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:09:06.22 +38:56:18.9 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:10:22.73 -08:03:32.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:23:14.79 -08:49:53.1 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:34:04.40 +16:08:47.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
03:01:19.12 +14:24:03.2 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:34:19.93 +39:52:47.0 16.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:59:39.18 +14:36:00.0 15.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:38:23.79 +13:33:08.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:03:30.94 -31:51:08.3 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:49:55.39 +19:21:49.3 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:50:43.20 +02:21:32.2 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:16:29.72 +35:27:20.7 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:15:18.91 +01:57:23.5 14.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:59.63 +04:45:35.6 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
06:01:30.71 +44:56:10.9 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:25:45.41 +25:38:59.7 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:54:56.98 +31:42:18.4 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 9 23:07 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 9 23:07 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 9 23:07 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:08:25.890 +17:23:34.90 AT 2026actu 2026-09-08.70 20.92
23:26:01.650 +04:42:51.59 AT 2026actt 2026-09-20.77 22.65
01:25:10.470 +05:14:45.08 AT 2026acts 2026-09-19.91 22.5
23:54:52.550 +03:52:17.36 AT 2026actr 2026-09-19.82 22.65
01:13:11.200 +04:25:46.09 AT 2026actq 2026-09-19.83 22.51
02:12:52.180 +06:15:33.28 AT 2026actp 2026-09-17.85 22.41
01:15:33.580 +00:34:39.51 AT 2026acto 2026-09-13.84 22.45
01:15:50.690 +03:06:14.05 AT 2026actn 2026-09-13.84 22.42
02:21:01.320 +03:23:34.05 AT 2026actm 2026-09-10.91 22.41
00:57:53.520 +00:50:47.48 AT 2026actl 2026-09-12.89 22.5
02:06:55.930 +05:22:05.89 AT 2026actk 2026-09-19.85 22.99
02:04:41.170 -01:21:54.37 AT 2026actj 2026-09-08.84 22.36
22:01:32.858 -26:38:25.05 AT 2026acti 2026-09-03.36 21.44
02:32:20.592 -10:31:38.74 AT 2026acth 2026-09-04.58 21.21
00:39:45.493 +14:47:16.68 AT 2026actg 2026-09-03.39 20.78
20:11:33.332 -30:13:43.37 AT 2026actf 2026-09-04.28 20.96
01:32:44.768 +14:24:25.19 AT 2026acte 2026-09-05.46 21.25
00:14:46.636 +24:14:59.45 AT 2026actd 2026-09-10.40 22.13
02:56:51.320 -12:00:54.88 AT 2026actc 2026-09-04.58 21.37
21:08:58.911 -11:09:15.04 AT 2026actb 2026-09-09.34 21.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 9 23:07 tns_transients_list.txt