This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 00 43 02.60 +01 40 30.0 7.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,7.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 7.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 00 42 29.21 +01 38 04.4 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,10.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 10.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 00 43 02.59 +01 40 29.9 7.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,7.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 7.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 00 42 29.20 +01 38 04.4 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,10.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 10.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2501 2461322.7501 12.60 01:00:08.56 +01:40:30.9
127.43938 -61.12029 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -0 -0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:00:08.56 +01:40:30.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:00:08.56 +01:40:30.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 01 00 08.56 +01 40 30.9 12.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2501 2461322.7501 13.76 00:42:24.37 +00:26:24.4
118.06255 -62.34622 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1132 Hollandia -0 -1 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:42:24.37 +00:26:24.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:42:24.37 +00:26:24.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 00 42 24.37 +00 26 24.4 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2501 2461322.7501 13.69 01:08:48.41 +00:35:22.8
132.20278 -61.96903 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.522 Helga -0 -0 0 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:08:48.41 +00:35:22.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:08:48.41 +00:35:22.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 01 08 48.41 +00 35 22.8 13.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2501 2461322.7501 13.94 00:59:01.21 -05:24:41.1
128.02102 -68.20821 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.805 Hormuthia -0 -0 0 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:59:01.21 -05:24:41.1: 15.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:59:01.21 -05:24:41.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 00 59 01.21 -05 24 41.1 13.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2501 2461322.7501 13.97 00:52:55.44 -04:18:25.6
123.88702 -67.17610 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.155 Scylla 0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:52:55.44 -04:18:25.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:52:55.44 -04:18:25.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2501* 00 52 55.44 -04 18 25.6 14.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7501,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2501 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461322.75036509 09.10.2026 06:00:21.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5323
Objects passed selection criteria: 5299
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4169.25
Average stars matched: 3793.5 (90.9876 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231432 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 06:52:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461322.75036509 09.10.2026 06:00:21.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 174
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29065
Objects passed selection criteria: 28963
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23317
Average stars matched: 21134.8 (90.6409 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 06:53:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.74990742
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.163 -01:59:41.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.163 -01:59:41.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:24.964 -01:59:30.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:24.964 -01:59:30.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:26.163 -01:59:41.75
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:24.964 -01:59:30.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00588 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6EifjmFWuR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FeDyRTTfTp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y8pZUKiN6a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xAg5SUDHGB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.864150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.864150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3227 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3227 deg
Loaded 3971 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3212 out of 3360 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 5460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.6EifjmFWuR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=1270, passed=5517
Got 5517 stars (including 3949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 3862 stars left (next iteration limit 4248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=3862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1232 n_q2=744 n_q3=1161 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FeDyRTTfTp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=1257, passed=5460
Got 5460 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 3794 stars left (next iteration limit 4173)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=3794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1201 n_q2=734 n_q3=1146 n_q4=713 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Y8pZUKiN6a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, bad_region=1220, passed=5402
Got 5402 stars (including 3876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5402 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3796 stars left (next iteration limit 4175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3796 robust_rms=7.943 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.293 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.293 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3796 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.865 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.865 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3796 robust_rms=0.329 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.393 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3796 robust_rms_before=1.050 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.329 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.376 worst_region_rms_after=0.393 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.090 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.393
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.331 arcsec matched=3796
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits N_match=3796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1207 n_q2=656 n_q3=1240 n_q4=693 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xAg5SUDHGB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=379, bad_region=1238, passed=5392
Got 5392 stars (including 3840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5392 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 3759 stars left (next iteration limit 4134)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3759 robust_rms=7.968 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.280 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3759 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.878 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.878 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3759 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.426 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3759 robust_rms_before=1.057 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.387 worst_region_rms_after=0.426 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.102 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.426
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.387 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.331 arcsec matched=3759
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=3759 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1190 n_q2=641 n_q3=1235 n_q4=693 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.239
ref2=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.295
new1=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new2=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.173
reference average sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.267
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (3862 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (3794 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312_astrometric_residuals.png (3796 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (3759 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20187_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 20187_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 20369_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.163 -01:59:41.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.163 -01:59:41.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:24.964 -01:59:30.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:24.964 -01:59:30.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:26.163 -01:59:41.75
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:24.964 -01:59:30.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00588 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9zzxr6Y796
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FoDno2655V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W6Z6aXWw7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WF9qB8jpvK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 30077 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3182 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 30077 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 128 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9zzxr6Y796 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1068, bad_region=5575, passed=29508
Got 29508 stars (including 23045 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1604 n_q2=899 n_q3=1497 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FoDno2655V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1115, bad_region=5717, passed=30066
Got 30066 stars (including 23434 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1593 n_q2=894 n_q3=1493 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.W6Z6aXWw7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1032, bad_region=5441, passed=28198
Got 28198 stars (including 21922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4825 stars left (next iteration limit 5307)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=7.667 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.334 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.888 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.888 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.413 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4825 robust_rms_before=1.033 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.391 worst_region_rms_after=0.413 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.076 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.413
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.391 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.331 arcsec matched=4825
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits N_match=4825 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1552 n_q2=842 n_q3=1520 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WF9qB8jpvK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1075, bad_region=5454, passed=28258
Got 28258 stars (including 21935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=7.624 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.862 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.862 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.822 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.822 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.433 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4824 robust_rms_before=1.035 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.382 worst_region_rms_after=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.091 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.433
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.382 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec matched=4824
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1559 n_q2=837 n_q3=1527 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_065000_TTUQ2b1x1_804899_pJf4E7AZ/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:45:08.15 -02:05:15.7: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:44:51.49 -03:24:20.1: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:47:03.32 -02:38:02.2: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:41:02.24 -04:59:46.4: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:56:17.55 -02:24:51.6: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:00:08.56 +01:40:30.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:45:08.15 -02:05:15.7: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:41:02.24 -04:59:46.4: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:44:51.49 -03:24:20.1: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:47:03.32 -02:38:02.2: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:56:17.55 -02:24:51.6: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:41:02.24 -04:59:46.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1139 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:51.49 -03:24:20.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1630 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:03.32 -02:38:02.2: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6170 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:08.15 -02:05:15.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4984 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:17.55 -02:24:51.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4989 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:00:08.56 +01:40:30.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:07.95 -04:05:09.4: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:06:10.50 +01:57:41.7: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:07.95 -04:05:09.4: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:07.95 -04:05:09.4: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7274 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:06:10.50 +01:57:41.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:10.50 +01:57:41.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1210 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:42:24.37 +00:26:24.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:08:48.41 +00:35:22.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:59:01.21 -05:24:41.1: 15.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:08:48.41 +00:35:22.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:42:24.37 +00:26:24.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:59:01.21 -05:24:41.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:59:01.21 -05:24:41.1: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.9311 delta=1.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:52:55.44 -04:18:25.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:52:55.44 -04:18:25.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:39:35.02 +00:51:36.7: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:39:35.02 +00:51:36.7: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:35.02 +00:51:36.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4582 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:33:43.18 -02:16:56.7: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:02:51.51 -01:33:23.1: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:36:12.58 -04:51:44.0: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:00:09.90 -02:47:29.5: 15.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:33:43.18 -02:16:56.7: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:02:51.51 -01:33:23.1: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:42:49.61 -03:17:24.4: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:51.51 -01:33:23.1: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6749 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:43.18 -02:16:56.7: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8350 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:36:12.58 -04:51:44.0: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:12.58 -04:51:44.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7496 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:00:09.90 -02:47:29.5: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:09.90 -02:47:29.5: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8442 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:42:49.61 -03:17:24.4: 14.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:49.61 -03:17:24.4: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6690 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:52:33.45 -05:28:37.4: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:04:16.21 -01:01:05.6: 15.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:52:33.45 -05:28:37.4: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:33.45 -05:28:37.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9332 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:58:10.63 -00:05:01.0: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:04:16.21 -01:01:05.6: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:04:16.21 -01:01:05.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8830 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:58:10.63 -00:05:01.0: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:10.63 -00:05:01.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8893 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34769.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35005.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35215.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31862_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 31862_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31865_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 31865_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31867_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 31867_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31868_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 31868_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31869_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 31869_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31872_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 31872_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31877_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 31877_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32056_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 32056_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32145_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 32145_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32200_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 32200_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33137_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 33137_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33192_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33192_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33211_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33211_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33269_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33269_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33361_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33361_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33434_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33434_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33504_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33504_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33555_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33555_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33568_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33568_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33749_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33749_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33752_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33752_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33816_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33816_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33831_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33831_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33948_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 33948_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34057_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34057_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34168_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34168_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34173_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34173_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34235_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34235_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34248_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34248_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34296_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34296_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34350_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34350_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34369_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34369_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34380_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34380_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34478_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34478_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34542_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34542_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34546_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34546_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34585_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34585_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34593_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34593_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34626_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34626_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34670_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34670_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34737_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34737_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34757_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34757_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34769_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 34769_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34816_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 34816_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34833_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34833_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34913_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34913_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34981_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 34981_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35005_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 35005_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35006_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35006_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35102_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35102_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35106_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35106_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35109_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35109_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35111_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35111_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35112_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35112_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35161_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35161_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 35215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35362_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35362_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35395_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35395_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35476_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35476_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35497_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35497_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35518_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35518_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35547_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35547_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35722_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35722_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35876_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35876_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35885_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35885_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35897_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35897_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35923_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35923_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35939_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35939_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35997_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 35997_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36023_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36023_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36084_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36084_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36167_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36167_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36239_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36239_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36240_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36240_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36267_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36267_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36302_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36302_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36321_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36321_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36322_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36322_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36326_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36326_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36399_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36399_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36417_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36417_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36427_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36427_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36481_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36481_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36508_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36508_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36509_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36509_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36514_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36514_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36563_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36563_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36602_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36602_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36611_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36611_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36642_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36642_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36656_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36656_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36661_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36661_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36681_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36681_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36705_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36705_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36714_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36714_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36762_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36762_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36799_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36799_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36804_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36804_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36937_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36937_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36947_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36947_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36963_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36963_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36984_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 36984_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37022_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37022_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37023_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37023_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37029_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37029_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37042_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37042_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37093_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37093_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37139_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37139_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37147_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37147_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37157_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37157_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37196_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37196_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37212_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37212_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37273_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37273_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37283_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 37283_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29117_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 29117_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_01-00-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
