Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4526  2461322.9526  13.49  10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9
227.20783  54.50470 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
94 Aurora                  -0     -0       1  13.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9:  15.95 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits -crosshair 3272.24731 3320.08911 image    wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits -crosshair 3274.33374 3322.34131 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45262 10 29 34.50 +14 06 42.9          13.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45238 10 29 34.47 +14 06 42.5          13.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45285 10 29 34.54 +14 06 43.3          13.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 09.4526*  10 29 34.50 +14 06 42.9  13.5 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9526,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4526 13.49CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4526  2461322.9526  13.24  10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7
230.13743  58.09205 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
42 Isis                    -1      0       1  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7:  15.92 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits -crosshair 5645.38330 3420.13574 image    wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits -crosshair 5647.55469 3422.46802 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45262 10 45 47.59 +14 21 19.7          13.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45238 10 45 47.58 +14 21 19.4          13.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45285 10 45 47.60 +14 21 20.0          13.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 09.4526*  10 45 47.59 +14 21 19.7  13.2 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9526,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4526 13.24CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4526  2461322.9526  13.59  10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3
233.74390  60.34311 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
187 Lamberta                 1      1       1  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3:  15.85 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits -crosshair 7377.62842 3122.27832 image    wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits -crosshair 7379.45166 3124.65063 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45262 10 57 37.85 +13 52 26.3          13.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45238 10 57 37.91 +13 52 26.0          13.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 09.45285 10 57 37.79 +13 52 26.5          13.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 09.4526*  10 57 37.85 +13 52 26.3  13.6 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9526,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4526 13.59CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last  image: 2461322.95284972 09.10.2026 10:51:56.216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4863
Objects passed selection criteria:  4838
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3396.25
Average stars matched: 3124.25 (91.9912 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   231204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Fri Oct  9 06:14:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last  image: 2461322.95284972 09.10.2026 10:51:56.216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  26383
Objects passed selection criteria:  26294
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 19455
Average stars matched: 17732.5 (91.1462 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   248560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Fri Oct  9 06:15:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 585468 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 585468 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits_preview.png'

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits


renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits_preview.png'

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 542.1009
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.8695
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1887.8148
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 497.3757
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1887.4576
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 499.3439
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.4824
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =      13.710000038147 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T05:51:15.9014950' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-09T10:51:15.9014950' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61322.4522673725 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-09T10:51:25.8042402' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61322.4523819908 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     159.996006274205 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9995099125175 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.7616666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     82.9983333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.86882726681307 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20658 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20658 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =      13.710000038147 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=      13.710000038147 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  9.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits :)

Spent 0.535977 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     13.6700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T05:51:56.2165056' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-09T10:51:56.2165056' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61322.4527339814 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-09T10:52:06.1182730' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61322.4528485881 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     159.996006249259 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9995099270121 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.8997222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     83.0869444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.83484356755009 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20658 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20658 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     13.6700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     13.6700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  9.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits :)

Spent 0.544260 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits



fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.95238311
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:57.403 +13:57:47.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:57.403 +13:57:47.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:56.612 +13:57:33.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:56.612 +13:57:33.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:39:57.403 +13:57:47.21
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:56.612 +13:57:33.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00492 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Twq4MFrgzB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fsO4ETiNAg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bVDhKu5IiU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MlK7YQL4vR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.709950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.709950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.40

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.40

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2435 deg
Loaded 4243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3504 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3504 out of 5709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 2.4 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 15.4 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  11.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Twq4MFrgzB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=1440, passed=5744
Got 5744 stars (including 4050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3634 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3633 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 3629 stars left (next iteration limit 3993)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=3629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1157 n_q2=636 n_q3=1245 n_q4=591 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fsO4ETiNAg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=1424, passed=5709
Got 5709 stars (including 4039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3628 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3628 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 3622 stars left (next iteration limit 3987)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=3622 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1144 n_q2=651 n_q3=1241 n_q4=586 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bVDhKu5IiU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=222, bad_region=574, passed=3108
Got 3108 stars (including 2338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1998 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1996 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 1991 stars left (next iteration limit 2190)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1991 robust_rms=6.820 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.932 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1991 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.567 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.567 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1991 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.483 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1991 robust_rms_before=1.895 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.517 worst_region_rms_after=0.483 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.742 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.483
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.517 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.406 arcsec matched=1991
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits N_match=1991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=642 n_q2=342 n_q3=645 n_q4=362 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MlK7YQL4vR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=266, bad_region=599, passed=3167
Got 3167 stars (including 2340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1996 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1995 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1990 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1990 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 1990 stars left (next iteration limit 2187)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1990 robust_rms=6.891 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.407 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1990 robust_rms=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.633 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1990 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.475 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1990 robust_rms_before=1.911 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.511 worst_region_rms_after=0.475 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.735 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.475
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.511 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.511 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.407 arcsec matched=1990
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits N_match=1990 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=634 n_q2=337 n_q3=662 n_q4=357 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.077
ref2=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.032
new1=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new2=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.188
reference average sigma_overall=0.3595 worst_q_ratio=1.0545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (3629 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (3622 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596_astrometric_residuals.png (1991 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597_astrometric_residuals.png (1990 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:57.403 +13:57:47.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:57.403 +13:57:47.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:56.612 +13:57:33.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:56.612 +13:57:33.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:39:57.403 +13:57:47.21
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:56.612 +13:57:33.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00492 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BzATDmW05q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2ubbmgarIS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0rxTJUgyuI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y64MG5iepg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.581200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.581200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.55

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.55

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2611 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2611 deg
Loaded 4245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3386 out of 3596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 29453 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 2.2 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 15.5 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  13.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BzATDmW05q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1176, bad_region=5538, passed=29533
Got 29533 stars (including 23167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4506 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4496 stars left (next iteration limit 4948)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4496 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1458 n_q2=789 n_q3=1504 n_q4=745 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2ubbmgarIS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1170, bad_region=5455, passed=29442
Got 29442 stars (including 23120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29442 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4493 stars left (next iteration limit 4944)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4493 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1453 n_q2=776 n_q3=1521 n_q4=743 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0rxTJUgyuI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=636, bad_region=2300, passed=17531
Got 17531 stars (including 14663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4233 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4232 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Excluding outliers - 4220 stars left (next iteration limit 4642)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4220 robust_rms=6.618 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.185 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.185 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4220 robust_rms=0.561 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.614 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.614 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4220 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.509 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4220 robust_rms_before=1.915 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.430 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.509 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.797 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.430 arcsec matched=4220
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits N_match=4220 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1404 n_q2=676 n_q3=1366 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Y64MG5iepg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=642, bad_region=2339, passed=17626
Got 17626 stars (including 14767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4227 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4217 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4217 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4228 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4218 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4218 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 4218 stars left (next iteration limit 4638)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4218 robust_rms=6.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.905 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.905 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4218 robust_rms=0.574 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.605 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4218 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.527 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.527 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4218 robust_rms_before=1.928 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.529 worst_region_rms_after=0.527 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.764 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.527
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.529 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.529 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.426 arcsec matched=4218
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits N_match=4218 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1408 n_q2=674 n_q3=1374 n_q4=762 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:31:01.69 +17:50:08.5:  12.20 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:31:01.69 +17:50:08.5:  12.22 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:01.69 +17:50:08.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4984 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7:  15.92 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9:  15.95 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3:  15.85 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34641.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36015.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31746_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 31746_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.89    10:39:41.14 +14:51:08.8   4762 3735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31748_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 31748_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.76    10:29:17.81 +09:46:34.2   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31749_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 31749_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 09.45238    2461322.95238    12.46    10:31:01.70 +17:50:09.0   3550 5568   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0596.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.55    10:31:01.67 +17:50:08.0   3552 5570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32030_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32030_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    10.11    10:57:14.33 +11:53:30.6   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32076_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32076_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    10.59    10:33:41.48 +13:59:37.7   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32272_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    11.15    10:30:02.26 +13:27:15.3   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32506_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32506_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    11.60    10:35:21.43 +13:05:02.4   4105 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32697_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32697_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.06    10:25:39.67 +17:49:13.5   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32791_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32791_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    11.73    10:55:53.99 +11:16:04.3   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32950_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32950_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.09    10:54:37.35 +17:35:13.9   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32999_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 32999_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    11.96    10:54:42.41 +10:20:11.4   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33036_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33036_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.27    10:34:51.73 +12:17:35.3   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33068_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33068_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.46    10:35:02.48 +18:00:51.5   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.49    10:37:21.16 +17:54:42.4   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33119_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33119_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.14    10:55:09.40 +10:38:41.0   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33125_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33125_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.57    10:22:05.17 +10:01:55.8   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33141_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33141_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.22    10:54:39.22 +13:34:21.5   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33328_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33328_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.79    10:22:06.60 +16:51:44.0   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33374_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33374_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.70    10:31:41.70 +18:03:12.4   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33382_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33382_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.81    10:23:23.56 +11:54:19.5   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33391_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33391_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.66    10:33:43.74 +13:20:41.0   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33420_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33420_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.87    10:23:42.84 +14:58:34.8   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33501_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33501_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.38    10:52:06.91 +10:06:02.8   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33538_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33538_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.69    10:36:10.55 +11:10:21.3   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33590_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33590_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.66    10:50:56.74 +13:41:56.1   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33627_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33627_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.84    10:43:40.55 +16:57:52.3   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33652_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33652_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.70    10:57:26.01 +16:25:48.8   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33688_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33688_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.83    10:30:27.36 +10:08:22.5   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33739_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33739_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.61    10:50:06.66 +14:58:14.5   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33831_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33831_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.74    10:51:27.34 +14:31:31.2   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33882_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33882_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.96    10:34:40.81 +17:32:52.6   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33939_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33939_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.09    10:32:39.85 +14:26:11.3   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33955_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33955_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.83    10:49:37.38 +13:41:43.2   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33975_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 33975_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.92    10:53:34.29 +16:24:36.4   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34018_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34018_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.82    10:57:45.21 +14:05:21.6   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34020_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34020_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.97    10:48:58.52 +15:39:44.4   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34028_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34028_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.19    10:28:24.04 +16:01:46.8   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34208_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34208_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.09    10:29:12.05 +09:59:44.6   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34230_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34230_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.24    10:26:50.30 +14:24:49.9   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34358_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34358_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.29    10:44:26.86 +16:23:25.0   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34408_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34408_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.03    10:40:23.97 +13:25:07.9   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34434_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34434_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.26    10:23:44.41 +11:55:16.7   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34476_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34476_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.46    10:22:30.82 +16:33:48.0   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34570_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.33    10:50:15.38 +15:06:41.2   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34641_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
Preparing report for the candidate 34641_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34651_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34651_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.61    10:21:43.72 +16:06:27.5   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34665_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
Preparing report for the candidate 34665_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34691_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34691_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.82    10:51:37.19 +12:06:00.9   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34717_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34717_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.40    10:58:16.39 +12:25:52.4   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34721_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34721_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.31    10:45:26.26 +18:15:42.4   5630 5788   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34774_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34774_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.59    10:32:11.63 +10:01:45.9   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34810_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34810_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.55    10:22:30.17 +11:45:06.1   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34831_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34831_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.63    10:26:27.53 +13:25:43.1   2803 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34917_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34917_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.56    10:29:32.25 +10:54:40.2   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34935_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 34935_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.11    10:46:18.92 +10:59:13.9   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35122_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35122_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.57    10:47:16.73 +16:54:18.8   5884 4962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35214_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35214_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.52    10:25:54.17 +12:51:14.7   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35256_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35256_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.27    10:56:59.73 +13:08:29.6   7285 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35361_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35361_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.64    10:28:25.79 +10:50:47.6   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35678_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35678_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.88    10:49:03.52 +17:51:59.3   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35745_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35745_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.12    10:47:05.48 +18:02:17.6   5866 5650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35828_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35828_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.72    10:47:56.29 +10:30:41.2   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35851_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35851_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.90    10:37:18.34 +17:00:53.9   4445 5049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35874_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35874_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.14    10:33:43.79 +17:13:56.3   3932 5193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35884_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35884_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.96    10:43:17.46 +16:25:35.6   5303 4678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35931_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35931_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.00    10:29:05.25 +12:14:07.6   3167 2190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35963_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35963_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.14    10:53:15.00 +14:41:17.9   6739 3617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35999_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 35999_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.04    10:48:53.80 +17:11:58.2   6120 5139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36015_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
Preparing report for the candidate 36015_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36064_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36064_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.17    10:26:58.04 +14:31:02.5   2900 3579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36078_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36078_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.11    10:39:24.28 +15:19:36.1   4727 4022   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36118_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36118_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.75    10:56:30.21 +09:46:10.6   7206 0635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36144_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36144_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.45    10:30:36.87 +12:58:53.1   3406 2635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36155_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36155_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.00    10:49:14.25 +14:24:23.6   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36159_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36159_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.21    10:40:34.77 +16:52:22.7   4916 4954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36162_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36162_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.17    10:24:35.19 +13:20:04.9   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36180_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36180_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.94    10:54:22.74 +13:02:00.5   6899 2616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36208_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36208_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.00    10:39:19.72 +12:03:47.4   4675 2052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36219_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36219_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.95    10:48:07.92 +14:13:05.0   5988 3336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

**** FOUND  10:48:08.04 +14:13:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36259_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36259_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.37    10:35:00.52 +17:47:48.8   4125 5531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36315_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36315_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.18    10:38:40.71 +13:30:55.5   4598 2931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36318_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36318_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.35    10:37:21.72 +14:57:27.9   4425 3805   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36326_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36326_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    13.87    10:34:07.80 +11:51:15.1   3905 1941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36364_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 36364_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    14.17    10:24:37.09 +10:18:10.5   2462 1036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13543_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597
The candidate 13543_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 09.45285    2461322.95285    12.61    10:22:29.11 +14:19:51.5   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_061201_TTUQ2b1x1_3755148_CMF3rYUa/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0597.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9
10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7
10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3
########### Completed Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9
10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7
10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3
###################################################################################
10:29:34.50 +14:06:42.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
10:45:47.59 +14:21:19.7  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
10:57:37.85 +13:52:26.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461322.95238311 -observatory V36
14:29:22.99 -17:31:54.2 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:09:34.33 -21:05:55.5 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:35:24.09 +19:51:21.2 Mars (1.1mag)
09:33:06.14 +15:11:09.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:00.07 +01:40:25.7 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:16.51 +20:58:27.5 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:32.11 -00:24:23.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:12.26 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:02:47.75 -03:28:05.6 Moon (-8.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct  9 06:14 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461322.95238311:
09:33:03.11 +15:11:26.7 Io (6.1mag)
09:32:59.43 +15:11:47.7 Europa (6.2mag)
09:32:56.62 +15:12:03.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:32:38.70 +15:13:38.5 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:32:42.10 +15:32:07.4 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:33:04.84 +15:11:16.9 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:31:35.65 +15:32:21.0 Elara (17.5mag)
09:35:39.48 +14:33:54.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:31:50.68 +15:37:44.5 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:54.06 +01:40:45.8 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:56.26 +01:40:10.5 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:25.96 +01:37:41.7 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:44.75 +01:40:34.3 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:20.55 +01:28:09.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct  9 06:14 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461322.95238311:
02:35:29.11 +21:19:40.4 JWST
18:24:47.58 +21:25:17.8 Chandra
14:02:10.02 -61:56:01.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct  9 06:14 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461322.95238311 -observatory V36
03:46:38.42 +20:11:23.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:23:01.05 -33:32:33.2 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:00.38 -72:16:30.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:04.01 +34:35:39.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:00:00.04 +48:24:23.6 17.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:29:24.33 +25:28:42.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:00:59.81 +35:28:01.8 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:24.06 +41:36:46.9 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:46:03.36 -13:33:53.4 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:13:29.94 +16:09:14.9 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:49:02.53 -02:33:30.3 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:34:40.55 +65:58:07.0 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:38:17.59 +43:33:32.8 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:43:47.88 +14:04:07.2 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:28:40.01 -12:02:54.0 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:31:43.46 +19:15:44.5 17.6mag 2P/Encke
22:56:09.29 -32:06:43.4 14.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:08:04.62 +39:01:43.7 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:09:56.10 -08:00:18.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:23:40.39 -08:48:34.0 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:33:10.07 +16:13:04.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:01:56.90 +14:25:53.9 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:31:52.58 +39:41:19.6 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:58:05.02 +14:50:08.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:37:01.89 +13:42:15.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:01:51.86 -31:39:39.3 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:49:26.09 +19:23:34.6 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:56:48.17 +01:46:21.3 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:15:02.08 +35:30:05.9 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:13:40.79 +02:07:02.1 14.1mag 169P/NEAT
03:30:17.99 +04:50:40.4 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
06:00:25.78 +44:47:28.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:24:06.30 +25:41:29.4 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:54:16.42 +31:44:49.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct  9 06:14 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct  9 06:14 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2  TCP J00381501+4114472  2026-10-08.5978  17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct  9 06:14 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
03:50:13.324 -35:19:48.52  AT 2026acrb  2026-09-22.31 21.9011
03:40:52.819 -34:49:11.26  AT 2026acra  2026-09-22.31 22.0744
03:20:08.542 -35:04:16.71  AT 2026acqz  2026-09-22.31 22.6351
03:34:19.381 -35:08:14.08  AT 2026acqy  2026-09-22.31 21.41
03:42:18.468 -34:14:55.59  AT 2026acqx  2026-09-22.31 22.1984
22:24:44.060 +20:59:06.05  AT 2026acqw  2026-09-16.56 20.82
21:40:02.160 +15:00:30.81  AT 2026acqv  2026-09-10.70 21.85
21:39:01.640 +18:47:42.43  AT 2026acqu  2026-09-10.70 22.23
00:12:12.410 +04:58:03.37  AT 2026acqt  2026-09-20.79 22.48
23:43:42.930 +01:57:31.27  AT 2026acqs  2026-09-20.78 22.68
23:45:18.660 +05:45:16.42  AT 2026acqr  2026-09-20.78 22.55
23:40:19.150 +05:20:07.86  AT 2026acqq  2026-09-20.78 22.43
02:13:52.020 +01:45:39.64  AT 2026acqp  2026-09-19.92 22.81
01:07:33.770 +02:42:27.03  AT 2026acqo  2026-09-19.90 22.6
02:21:01.513 +01:39:33.18  AT 2026acqn  2026-09-19.85 23.05
23:15:45.160 +04:54:53.74  AT 2026acqm  2026-09-19.81 22.59
22:47:46.190 +02:11:28.63  AT 2026acql  2026-09-19.80 22.32
23:00:11.810 +04:09:17.60  AT 2026acqk  2026-09-17.77 21.72
01:30:04.370 +00:37:22.70  AT 2026acqj  2026-09-16.84 22.86
01:11:15.050 -01:08:02.84  AT 2026acqi  2026-09-16.84 22.76
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct  9 06:14 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Fri Oct  9 06:14:00 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 24s (0.40 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 35s (0.58 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 10 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 13s (0.22 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 12s (0.20 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 36s (0.60 min)
FIELD_Leo-05-Q2b1x1: 84s (1.40 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 92s (1.53 min)
Finished: Fri Oct  9 06:15:32 CDT 2026