This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 11.47 02:21:55.02 -03:11:10.3
168.93591 -57.73650 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.505 Cava -0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:21:55.02 -03:11:10.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:21:55.02 -03:11:10.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 21 55.02 -03 11 10.3 11.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 11.97 02:56:33.45 -00:30:12.7
176.59779 -49.87126 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.129 Antigone -0 0 0 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:56:33.45 -00:30:12.7: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:56:33.45 -00:30:12.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 56 33.45 +00 30 12.7 12.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 12.02 02:26:35.98 -02:30:53.7
169.78202 -56.46900 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.622 Esther -0 -0 1 12.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:26:35.98 -02:30:53.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:26:35.98 -02:30:53.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 26 35.98 -02 30 53.7 12.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 12.04 02:08:57.26 -06:00:42.7
167.53712 -61.97034 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 -0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:08:57.26 -06:00:42.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:08:57.26 -06:00:42.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 08 57.26 -06 00 42.7 12.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 12.10 02:58:21.78 +00:57:45.9
175.48568 -48.52008 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.221 Eos 0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:58:21.78 +00:57:45.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:58:21.78 +00:57:45.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 58 21.78 +00 57 45.9 12.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 13.13 02:49:15.31 -05:33:27.8
180.66627 -54.63424 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:49:15.31 -05:33:27.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:49:15.31 -05:33:27.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:49:15.31 -05:33:27.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 49 15.31 -05 33 27.8 13.1 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461322.8931,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261009.3931 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 13.32 02:46:07.97 +02:15:05.7
170.73311 -49.66988 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.489 Comacina -0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:46:07.97 +02:15:05.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:46:07.97 +02:15:05.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 46 07.97 +02 15 05.7 13.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 14.36 02:08:09.07 -01:05:21.5
161.38047 -58.11513 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3066 McFadden 0 -0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:08:09.07 -01:05:21.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:08:09.07 -01:05:21.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 08 09.07 -01 05 21.5 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 14.62 02:13:45.87 +01:55:07.9
160.51916 -54.83000 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.638 Moira 0 -0 0 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:13:45.87 +01:55:07.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:13:45.87 +01:55:07.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 13 45.87 +01 55 07.9 14.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 14.47 02:11:40.06 -02:52:58.3
164.73726 -59.07993 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1903 Adzhimushkaj -0 1 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:11:40.06 -02:52:58.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:11:40.06 -02:52:58.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 11 40.06 -02 52 58.3 14.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8931,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3931 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3931 2461322.8931 13.16 02:49:24.60 -05:33:26.3
180.70926 -54.60483 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:49:24.60 -05:33:26.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:49:24.60 -05:33:26.3: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:49:24.60 -05:33:26.3: 15.62 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3931* 02 49 24.60 -05 33 26.3 13.2 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461322.8931,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261009.3931 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
First image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Last image: 2461322.89340644 09.10.2026 09:26:20.316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6915
Objects passed selection criteria: 6911
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6549
Average stars matched: 6282 (95.923 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 04:29:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
First image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Last image: 2461322.89340644 09.10.2026 09:26:20.316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 36133
Objects passed selection criteria: 36033
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34622.8
Average stars matched: 32936.2 (95.1289 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 04:30:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.89282104
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:12.708 -02:00:43.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:12.708 -02:00:43.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:14.777 -02:00:13.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:14.777 -02:00:13.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:12.708 -02:00:43.38
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:14.777 -02:00:13.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01205 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DW11bUP5ZK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j3NWOPgodA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fm30Qy0vgC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HXlWCuvfY5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to +3.3180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to 3.3180 deg
Loaded 4175 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3371 out of 3568 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3568 out of 6487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to +3.3180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to 3.3180 deg
Loaded 4175 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3371 out of 3568 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3568 out of 6487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6467 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6622 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3144 to +3.3098 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6622 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3144 to 3.3098 deg
Loaded 4174 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3349 out of 3556 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3556 out of 6467 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
2.0 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
15.5 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.DW11bUP5ZK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, bad_region=0, passed=6487
Got 6487 stars (including 5966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1325 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1146 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.438
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.j3NWOPgodA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, bad_region=0, passed=6467
Got 6467 stars (including 5936 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1208 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fm30Qy0vgC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=497, bad_region=0, passed=6718
Got 6718 stars (including 6211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=13.722 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.988 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.988 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.646 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.646 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.326 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.291 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.970 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.328 worst_region_rms_after=0.326 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.029 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.291
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.328 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4870
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=1347 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1202 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HXlWCuvfY5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=0, passed=6747
Got 6747 stars (including 6262 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6747 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=13.778 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.617 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.617 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.704 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.704 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.303 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=0.974 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.310 worst_region_rms_after=0.303 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.019 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.275
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.310 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.272 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.231 n_q1=1352 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1208 n_q4=1140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.438
ref2=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.409
new1=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.103
new2=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.163
reference average sigma_overall=0.3095 worst_q_ratio=1.4235
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:56:33.45 -00:30:12.7: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:38:41.13 -00:50:20.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 03:03:26.82 -04:57:25.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:34:30.24 -02:48:08.8: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:26:35.98 -02:30:53.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:58:21.78 +00:57:45.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:08:57.26 -06:00:42.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:21:55.02 -03:11:10.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:33:55.61 -03:24:01.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:40:40.60 -01:51:48.3: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 03:03:26.82 -04:57:25.5: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:58:21.78 +00:57:45.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:26:35.98 -02:30:53.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:08:57.26 -06:00:42.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:34:30.24 -02:48:08.8: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:21:55.02 -03:11:10.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:38:41.13 -00:50:20.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:56:33.45 -00:30:12.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:26.82 -04:57:25.5: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0484 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:38:41.13 -00:50:20.1: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2027 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:30.24 -02:48:08.8: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9913 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:33:55.61 -03:24:01.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:33:55.61 -03:24:01.8: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1936 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:40:40.60 -01:51:48.3: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:40:40.60 -01:51:48.3: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2038 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:35:43.67 -02:54:02.1: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:35:43.67 -02:54:02.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:35:43.67 -02:54:02.1: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2477 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20406.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20461.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20315_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20315_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20323_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:28.46 -02:57:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 20406_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20461_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 20461_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20462_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20462_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20472_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 20472_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20474_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 20474_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20478_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 20478_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20484_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20484_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:42:35.96 -03:04:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20492_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20492_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20496_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20496_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20499_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20499_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20507_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20507_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20509_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20509_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:06.16 -05:56:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:21:55.02 -03:11:10.3
02:56:33.45 -00:30:12.7
02:26:35.98 -02:30:53.7
02:08:57.26 -06:00:42.7
02:58:21.78 +00:57:45.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:12.708 -02:00:43.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:12.708 -02:00:43.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:14.777 -02:00:13.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:14.777 -02:00:13.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:12.708 -02:00:43.38
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:14.777 -02:00:13.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01205 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zvtM0zqpNi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zwByWkhuBq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LiXyVI5zOG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xLcPCdSiIG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34731 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3218 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3218 deg
Loaded 4180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3259 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 34731 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34731 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3218 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3218 deg
Loaded 4180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3259 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 34731 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 34698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6560 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3181 to +3.3098 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6560 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3181 to 3.3098 deg
Loaded 4177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3247 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 34698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
1.9 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zvtM0zqpNi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1492, bad_region=2, passed=34715
Got 34715 stars (including 33157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1307 n_q2=1219 n_q3=1195 n_q4=1162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zwByWkhuBq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1502, bad_region=1, passed=34688
Got 34688 stars (including 33135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34688 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1192 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LiXyVI5zOG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1467, bad_region=47, passed=35217
Got 35217 stars (including 33640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=13.805 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.239 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.239 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.644 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.318 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.290 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4861 robust_rms_before=0.974 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.335 worst_region_rms_after=0.318 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.030 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.290
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.335 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4861
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=1350 n_q2=1187 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xLcPCdSiIG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1443, bad_region=47, passed=34794
Got 34794 stars (including 33240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34794 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=13.798 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.588 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.707 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.707 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.264 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.296 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=0.979 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.264 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.311 worst_region_rms_after=0.296 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.025 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.274
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.311 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.275 arcsec matched=4865
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1339 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1202 n_q4=1135 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042715_TTUQ1b1x1_386731_eAaPIlyV/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:24:12.18 +01:47:49.7: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:49:26.60 +00:30:12.4: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 03:04:57.92 +00:12:34.2: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:32:02.35 -01:47:46.8: 14.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:44:03.13 -04:48:56.0: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 03:03:36.94 -02:35:50.0: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:34:10.80 +02:14:12.2: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:50:27.44 +01:57:58.6: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:17:57.67 +02:17:39.9: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:18:08.17 +03:10:46.3: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:44:03.13 -04:48:56.0: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:34:10.80 +02:14:12.2: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:24:12.18 +01:47:49.7: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 03:03:36.94 -02:35:50.0: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:17:57.67 +02:17:39.9: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:50:27.44 +01:57:58.6: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:49:26.60 +00:30:12.4: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:32:02.35 -01:47:46.8: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:44:03.13 -04:48:56.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7642 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 03:04:57.92 +00:12:34.2: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:10.80 +02:14:12.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9514 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:24:12.18 +01:47:49.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1414 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:17:57.67 +02:17:39.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9661 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:50:27.44 +01:57:58.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9365 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:36.94 -02:35:50.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9082 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:18:08.17 +03:10:46.3: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:49:26.60 +00:30:12.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5375 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:32:02.35 -01:47:46.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7246 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:57.92 +00:12:34.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6237 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:08.17 +03:10:46.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6466 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:41:12.35 -04:35:51.6: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:45:38.66 -01:09:29.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:49:15.31 -05:33:27.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:17:06.41 -00:30:06.6: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:46:07.97 +02:15:05.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:57:53.39 -02:20:39.3: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:45:38.66 -01:09:29.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:41:12.35 -04:35:51.6: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:41:12.35 -04:35:51.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7512 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:38.66 -01:09:29.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6577 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:08:09.07 -01:05:21.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:26:59.02 +02:25:06.0: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:13:45.87 +01:55:07.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:34:24.21 -04:29:25.4: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:49:15.31 -05:33:27.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:17:06.41 -00:30:06.6: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:46:07.97 +02:15:05.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:57:53.39 -02:20:39.3: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:17:06.41 -00:30:06.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1177 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:53.39 -02:20:39.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2106 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:08:09.07 -01:05:21.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:26:59.02 +02:25:06.0: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:59.02 +02:25:06.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5365 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:13:45.87 +01:55:07.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:34:24.21 -04:29:25.4: 14.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:24.21 -04:29:25.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6990 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:11:40.06 -02:52:58.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:07:31.81 -01:48:29.7: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 03:02:57.93 -04:39:31.0: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:12:55.12 -02:58:06.5: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:11:40.06 -02:52:58.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:07:31.81 -01:48:29.7: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:31.81 -01:48:29.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7147 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:13:36.95 -06:18:45.6: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:13:32.64 -05:28:55.9: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 03:02:57.93 -04:39:31.0: 15.46 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:57.93 -04:39:31.0: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8811 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:12:55.12 -02:58:06.5: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:55.12 -02:58:06.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7992 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:13:36.95 -06:18:45.6: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:13:32.64 -05:28:55.9: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:36.95 -06:18:45.6: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8412 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:32.64 -05:28:55.9: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8059 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:17:11.92 +01:53:11.7: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:49:40.89 -00:31:22.4: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:05:34.60 -06:29:36.5: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:17:11.92 +01:53:11.7: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:17:11.92 +01:53:11.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7890 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:07:49.99 -04:19:29.4: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:16:40.49 -06:50:04.9: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:49:40.89 -00:31:22.4: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:05:34.60 -06:29:36.5: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:49:40.89 -00:31:22.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7689 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:34.60 -06:29:36.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8857 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:16:40.49 -06:50:04.9: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:16:40.49 -06:50:04.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8187 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:07:49.99 -04:19:29.4: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:49.99 -04:19:29.4: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7417 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:05:56.26 +03:08:58.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:12:58.60 -01:45:40.4: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:06:41.37 -02:40:54.8: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:07:31.39 -01:06:28.3: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:05:56.26 +03:08:58.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:56.26 +03:08:58.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:19:28.69 -05:56:00.0: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:06:41.37 -02:40:54.8: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:41.37 -02:40:54.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7635 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:12:58.60 -01:45:40.4: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:58.60 -01:45:40.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8838 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:19:28.69 -05:56:00.0: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:28.69 -05:56:00.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9691 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:07:31.39 -01:06:28.3: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:31.39 -01:06:28.3: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9224 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:03:27.37 -06:04:39.0: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:11:04.28 -05:48:49.1: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:18:53.83 +01:05:32.2: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:03:27.37 -06:04:39.0: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:27.37 -06:04:39.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6819 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:16:53.91 +02:12:11.3: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:11:04.28 -05:48:49.1: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:06:02.46 +00:24:34.6: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:11:04.28 -05:48:49.1: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9347 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:18:53.83 +01:05:32.2: 15.58 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:53.83 +01:05:32.2: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9299 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:16:53.91 +02:12:11.3: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:16:53.91 +02:12:11.3: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9171 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:06:02.46 +00:24:34.6: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:02.46 +00:24:34.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9659 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:19:16.30 +02:42:13.1: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:24:17.76 -05:50:42.8: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:07:33.70 +01:59:10.5: 15.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:19:16.30 +02:42:13.1: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:16.30 +02:42:13.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8718 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:05:31.18 -04:14:06.4: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:24:17.76 -05:50:42.8: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:24:17.76 -05:50:42.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9160 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:07:33.70 +01:59:10.5: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:33.70 +01:59:10.5: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0101 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:05:31.18 -04:14:06.4: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:31.18 -04:14:06.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7790 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:49:24.60 -05:33:26.3: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:49:24.60 -05:33:26.3: 15.62 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:49:24.60 -05:33:26.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.1641 delta=1.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27425.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52818.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52898.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53672.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52353_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52355_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52355_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52359_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52362_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52363_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52364_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52371_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52374_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52375_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52379_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52379_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52380_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52380_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52381_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52381_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52385_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:38.48 -02:03:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52394_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:28.45 -02:57:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52478_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:55.02 -03:11:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52542_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:33.45 -00:30:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52553_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:35.98 -02:30:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52557_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:57.26 -06:00:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52562_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:58:21.78 +00:57:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52811_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 52818_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52834_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52834_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52859_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:23.81 +01:20:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 52898_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53268_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:48.90 -03:02:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53293_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53355_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53355_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:05.63 +00:22:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53363_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53516_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 53516_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53599_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53672_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 53672_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53740_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53760_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53760_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53767_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 53767_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53798_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53798_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53827_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53827_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53833_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53833_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53849_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53849_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53852_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53852_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53861_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53861_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53878_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53878_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53888_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53890_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53890_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53896_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53901_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53911_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53911_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53920_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53920_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53921_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53921_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53926_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53931_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53939_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53939_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53945_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53945_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53956_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53956_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53962_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53964_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53964_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53980_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53980_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 53982_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27425_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 27425_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24779_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 24779_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-26-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
