This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 12.48 03:28:15.36 +17:17:24.9
168.00983 -31.53093 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia 0 0 0 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:15.36 +17:17:24.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:15.36 +17:17:24.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 28 15.36 +17 17 24.9 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 13.09 03:02:32.41 +15:47:57.9
163.37028 -36.57530 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.149 Medusa -0 -0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:32.41 +15:47:57.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:32.41 +15:47:57.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 02 32.41 +15 47 57.9 13.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 13.82 03:57:38.64 +15:30:01.8
175.26683 -27.89970 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica 0 -0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:38.64 +15:30:01.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:38.64 +15:30:01.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 57 38.64 +15 30 01.8 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 13.96 03:48:19.13 +17:12:05.7
172.11702 -28.32309 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -0 0 0 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:19.13 +17:12:05.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:19.13 +17:12:05.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 48 19.13 +17 12 05.7 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 14.07 03:24:41.05 +18:55:41.7
166.00992 -30.84082 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -0 -0 0 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:24:41.05 +18:55:41.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:24:41.05 +18:55:41.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 24 41.05 +18 55 41.7 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 14.28 03:58:10.54 +11:06:48.0
179.10151 -30.74419 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -0 -1 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:10.54 +11:06:48.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:10.54 +11:06:48.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 58 10.54 +11 06 48.0 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 14.39 03:58:14.97 +15:28:50.9
175.39559 -27.80638 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -0 0 0 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:14.97 +15:28:50.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:14.97 +15:28:50.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 58 14.97 +15 28 50.9 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 14.93 03:14:14.75 +17:20:58.9
164.92243 -33.63284 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1424 Sundmania 1 0 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:14.75 +17:20:58.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:14.75 +17:20:58.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 14 14.75 +17 20 58.9 14.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,14.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 14.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3684 2461322.8684 14.96 03:35:39.26 +15:28:20.1
170.98764 -31.67938 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1336 Zeelandia -0 -1 1 15.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:35:39.26 +15:28:20.1: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:35:39.26 +15:28:20.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3684* 03 35 39.26 +15 28 20.1 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8684,14.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3684 14.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461322.86873141 09.10.2026 08:50:48.394 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8281
Objects passed selection criteria: 8273
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7883
Average stars matched: 7571.5 (96.0485 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 03:55:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461322.86873141 09.10.2026 08:50:48.394 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 50130
Objects passed selection criteria: 50021
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48028.5
Average stars matched: 45823.5 (95.409 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 268768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 03:56:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.86814944
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:09.207 +14:00:34.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:09.207 +14:00:34.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0466 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:11.881 +14:00:08.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:11.881 +14:00:08.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0346 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:09.207 +14:00:34.39
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:11.881 +14:00:08.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01299 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uG3qsU2kdB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tz4ZBlRGex
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pwMfUYLhEc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rqR5IxJEKi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.uG3qsU2kdB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=0, passed=7716
Got 7716 stars (including 7157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1203 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tz4ZBlRGex (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=0, passed=7722
Got 7722 stars (including 7177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1378 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1207 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pwMfUYLhEc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=502, bad_region=0, passed=8136
Got 8136 stars (including 7622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8136 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=13.784 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.823 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.823 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.306 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.306 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=1.086 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.319 worst_region_rms_after=0.306 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.065 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.306
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.288 arcsec matched=4897
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=995 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1399 n_q4=1339 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rqR5IxJEKi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=511, bad_region=0, passed=8150
Got 8150 stars (including 7627 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=13.791 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.772 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.670 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.315 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.315 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=1.096 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.295 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.335 worst_region_rms_after=0.315 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.087 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.315
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.335 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.295 arcsec matched=4900
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1000 n_q2=1168 n_q3=1391 n_q4=1341 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.327
ref2=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.311
new1=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.081
new2=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.069
reference average sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:23.55 +13:29:49.6: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:10.29 +13:46:02.7: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:42.81 +16:16:51.6: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:55.30 +16:23:48.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:54.86 +19:07:00.7: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:23.55 +13:29:49.6: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:55.30 +16:23:48.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:42.81 +16:16:51.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:10.29 +13:46:02.7: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:23.55 +13:29:49.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3846 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:55.30 +16:23:48.3: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3416 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:42.81 +16:16:51.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3804 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:10.29 +13:46:02.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4338 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:54.86 +19:07:00.7: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:54.86 +19:07:00.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4534 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20394_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 20394_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 20395_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20554_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 20554_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:23.45 +16:01:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 20579_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 20580_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 20589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.67 +11:24:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:09.207 +14:00:34.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:09.207 +14:00:34.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0466 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:11.881 +14:00:08.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:11.881 +14:00:08.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0346 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:09.207 +14:00:34.39
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:11.881 +14:00:08.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01299 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.at1iRS5V6K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pGCuCv1czs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dwy6bJ8OiX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pt728NyqXj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 93 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.8 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
15.8 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.8 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.at1iRS5V6K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2222, bad_region=4, passed=48568
Got 48568 stars (including 46270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1192 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pGCuCv1czs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=5, passed=48544
Got 48544 stars (including 46257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1201 n_q4=986 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dwy6bJ8OiX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2042, bad_region=46, passed=48011
Got 48011 stars (including 45847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=13.676 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.326 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.729 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.729 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.308 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.308 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=1.067 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.319 worst_region_rms_after=0.308 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.057 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.308
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.279 arcsec matched=4888
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1022 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1383 n_q4=1327 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pt728NyqXj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2058, bad_region=46, passed=48187
Got 48187 stars (including 45994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=13.774 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.738 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.738 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.319 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.075 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.332 worst_region_rms_after=0.319 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.080 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.319
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.288 arcsec matched=4886
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1032 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1383 n_q4=1321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-49-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_035315_TTUQ1b1x1_451465_tAddd5CT/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:38.63 +12:10:34.0: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:04.12 +18:55:12.6: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:19.39 +11:34:29.2: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:22.11 +18:28:40.1: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:27.02 +08:43:33.5: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:37.79 +11:05:06.3: 14.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:57.38 +16:12:54.7: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:49.86 +10:59:18.8: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:43.38 +12:35:08.9: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:30:26.24 +10:06:12.7: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:57.38 +16:12:54.7: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:49.86 +10:59:18.8: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:27.02 +08:43:33.5: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:43.38 +12:35:08.9: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:22.11 +18:28:40.1: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:04.12 +18:55:12.6: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:38.63 +12:10:34.0: 15.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:19.39 +11:34:29.2: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:49.86 +10:59:18.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7883 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:57.38 +16:12:54.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9108 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:30:26.24 +10:06:12.7: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:37.79 +11:05:06.3: 14.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:27.02 +08:43:33.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7570 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:22.11 +18:28:40.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0441 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:43.38 +12:35:08.9: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7139 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:04.12 +18:55:12.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8948 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:19.39 +11:34:29.2: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8051 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:38.63 +12:10:34.0: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8155 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:26.24 +10:06:12.7: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4692 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:37.79 +11:05:06.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7122 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:04:12.68 +11:39:22.5: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:32.41 +15:47:57.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:05.73 +10:01:28.7: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:28.29 +13:27:56.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:45.00 +14:04:33.9: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:09.90 +17:40:36.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:15.36 +17:17:24.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:31.70 +14:18:56.7: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:34.62 +11:30:40.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:32.41 +15:47:57.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:04:12.68 +11:39:22.5: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:05.73 +10:01:28.7: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:12.68 +11:39:22.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9680 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:15.36 +17:17:24.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:05.73 +10:01:28.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6726 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:28.29 +13:27:56.3: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:09.90 +17:40:36.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:31.70 +14:18:56.7: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:45.00 +14:04:33.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:09.90 +17:40:36.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6231 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:28.29 +13:27:56.3: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7772 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:31.70 +14:18:56.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5265 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:45.00 +14:04:33.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6920 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:38.64 +15:30:01.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:34.62 +11:30:40.7: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:34.62 +11:30:40.7: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9087 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:01:34.11 +12:57:59.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:38.64 +15:30:01.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:10.54 +11:06:48.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:19.13 +17:12:05.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:30.51 +17:10:26.2: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:24:41.05 +18:55:41.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:01:34.11 +12:57:59.8: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:34.11 +12:57:59.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9663 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:10.54 +11:06:48.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:19.13 +17:12:05.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:30.51 +17:10:26.2: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:24:41.05 +18:55:41.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:30.51 +17:10:26.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2698 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:59:51.89 +15:08:55.9: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:14.97 +15:28:50.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:59:51.89 +15:08:55.9: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:51.89 +15:08:55.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3848 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:14.97 +15:28:50.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:18.79 +10:38:20.6: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:24.39 +14:19:15.3: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:18.79 +10:38:20.6: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:18.79 +10:38:20.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5662 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:24.39 +14:19:15.3: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:24.39 +14:19:15.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5596 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:42.70 +12:53:46.2: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:42.70 +12:53:46.2: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:42.70 +12:53:46.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6938 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:01:45.16 +13:13:22.0: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:38.27 +09:37:08.5: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:38.27 +09:37:08.5: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:01:45.16 +13:13:22.0: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:45.16 +13:13:22.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8321 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:38.27 +09:37:08.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8381 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:06.09 +08:57:48.9: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:06.09 +08:57:48.9: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:06.09 +08:57:48.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8074 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:36.61 +14:40:19.0: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:37.51 +14:16:59.3: 15.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:36.61 +14:40:19.0: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:37.51 +14:16:59.3: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:36.61 +14:40:19.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7562 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:37.51 +14:16:59.3: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8567 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:23.71 +17:28:14.8: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:04.81 +10:00:15.4: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:46:53.25 +11:10:09.4: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:23.71 +17:28:14.8: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:04.81 +10:00:15.4: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:23.71 +17:28:14.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7939 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:04.81 +10:00:15.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8100 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:46:53.25 +11:10:09.4: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:53.25 +11:10:09.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7329 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:15.62 +10:19:11.4: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:14.75 +17:20:58.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:15.62 +10:19:11.4: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:15.62 +10:19:11.4: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0726 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:14.75 +17:20:58.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:04:02.47 +17:24:46.9: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:04:02.47 +17:24:46.9: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:02.47 +17:24:46.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9354 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:51.75 +14:26:21.3: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:51.75 +14:26:21.3: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:51.75 +14:26:21.3: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0016 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:41.74 +10:32:14.1: 15.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:41.74 +10:32:14.1: 15.56 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:41.74 +10:32:14.1: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0366 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:52.14 +14:15:29.6: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:16:10.80 +14:30:25.0: 15.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:52.14 +14:15:29.6: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:52.14 +14:15:29.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6748 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:16:10.80 +14:30:25.0: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:10.80 +14:30:25.0: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0717 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:06.03 +11:30:51.7: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:13.53 +12:46:11.8: 15.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:12:24.86 +13:36:00.8: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:06.03 +11:30:51.7: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:06.03 +11:30:51.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9727 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:16.39 +14:45:52.8: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:13.53 +12:46:11.8: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:13.53 +12:46:11.8: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0899 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:35:39.26 +15:28:20.1: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:40:09.10 +15:17:48.5: 14.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:12:24.86 +13:36:00.8: 15.38 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:24.86 +13:36:00.8: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0944 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:36.52 +09:21:15.2: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:16.39 +14:45:52.8: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:16.39 +14:45:52.8: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0025 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:35:39.26 +15:28:20.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:40:09.10 +15:17:48.5: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:09.10 +15:17:48.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9914 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:57.36 +19:07:17.9: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:36.52 +09:21:15.2: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:36.52 +09:21:15.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9263 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:32.68 +10:52:40.8: 15.72 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:15.70 +13:06:22.7: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:01.85 +09:14:56.8: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:57.36 +19:07:17.9: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:57.36 +19:07:17.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0573 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:16.84 +15:01:17.0: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:32.68 +10:52:40.8: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:32.68 +10:52:40.8: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9617 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:15.70 +13:06:22.7: 15.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:15.70 +13:06:22.7: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0747 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:22:25.30 +17:43:14.3: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:01.85 +09:14:56.8: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:01.85 +09:14:56.8: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0014 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:41.51 +15:36:14.6: 15.46 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:16.84 +15:01:17.0: 15.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:16.84 +15:01:17.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9126 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:49.95 +09:39:56.4: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:22:25.30 +17:43:14.3: 15.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:25.30 +17:43:14.3: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0039 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:41.51 +15:36:14.6: 15.33 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:41.51 +15:36:14.6: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0996 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:49.95 +09:39:56.4: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:44.00 +15:31:04.4: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:49.95 +09:39:56.4: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2243 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:22.69 +14:15:38.6: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:13.61 +12:56:18.3: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:45.18 +12:19:45.5: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:44.00 +15:31:04.4: 14.85 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:44.00 +15:31:04.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9609 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:56.99 +14:54:03.3: 15.54 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:22.69 +14:15:38.6: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:13.61 +12:56:18.3: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:22.69 +14:15:38.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9378 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:13.61 +12:56:18.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0495 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:18.75 +12:28:30.3: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:45.18 +12:19:45.5: 15.39 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:00.34 +15:36:40.5: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:45.18 +12:19:45.5: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0646 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:05.97 +15:13:44.9: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:59.77 +10:50:08.5: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:56.99 +14:54:03.3: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:56.99 +14:54:03.3: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1344 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:18.75 +12:28:30.3: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:18.75 +12:28:30.3: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2134 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:00.34 +15:36:40.5: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:00.34 +15:36:40.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1235 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:05.97 +15:13:44.9: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:05.97 +15:13:44.9: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0444 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:59.77 +10:50:08.5: 15.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:59.77 +10:50:08.5: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1113 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:43.64 +16:56:30.9: 15.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:57.09 +14:36:15.5: 15.59 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:03:59.30 +11:49:26.2: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:07.49 +10:12:22.0: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:43.64 +16:56:30.9: 15.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:43.64 +16:56:30.9: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0513 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:57.09 +14:36:15.5: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:03:59.30 +11:49:26.2: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:57.09 +14:36:15.5: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1746 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:59.30 +11:49:26.2: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0090 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:57.75 +18:09:54.6: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:00:57.40 +13:39:35.0: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:04.1: 15.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:50:13.92 +17:34:40.5: 15.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:07.49 +10:12:22.0: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:07.49 +10:12:22.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9567 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:29.67 +15:25:22.1: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:57.75 +18:09:54.6: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:57.75 +18:09:54.6: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2629 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:00:57.40 +13:39:35.0: 15.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:57.40 +13:39:35.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9136 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:04.1: 14.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:50:13.92 +17:34:40.5: 15.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:04.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.1072 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:13.92 +17:34:40.5: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1247 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:29.67 +15:25:22.1: 15.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:29.67 +15:25:22.1: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1721 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:37:57.21 +10:21:46.0: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:13.49 +09:04:03.8: 15.58 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:47.72 +11:04:49.0: 15.39 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:05:20.85 +15:53:09.1: 15.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:35.54 +16:50:07.0: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:47.72 +11:04:49.0: 15.58 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:13.49 +09:04:03.8: 15.46 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:37:57.21 +10:21:46.0: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:47.72 +11:04:49.0: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0734 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:13.49 +09:04:03.8: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1617 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:57.21 +10:21:46.0: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0334 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:03:31.97 +11:02:43.4: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:05:20.85 +15:53:09.1: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:20.85 +15:53:09.1: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0060 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:35.54 +16:50:07.0: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:35.54 +16:50:07.0: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0644 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:03:31.97 +11:02:43.4: 15.46 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:31.97 +11:02:43.4: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1117 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53824.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53941.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54396.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54455.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54597.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55066.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55143.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53569_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53569_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53570_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53570_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53576_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53578_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53583_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53583_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53585_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53585_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53586_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53586_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53592_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53592_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53596_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53596_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:01.98 +18:05:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53606_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53606_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53607_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53611_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53611_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:32.73 +15:13:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53612_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53824_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 53824_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53865_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53941_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 53941_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53943_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 53943_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:47.27 +09:11:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54336_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 54336_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54344_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54344_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54396_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 54396_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54419_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:55.07 +16:03:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54455_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 54455_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54597_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 54597_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54615_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54615_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:00.29 +15:36:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54680_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54680_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:15.97 +17:57:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54748_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54748_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54794_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 54794_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54802_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54802_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54823_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54823_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54886_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54886_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54925_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54925_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54934_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54934_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54954_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54954_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54979_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54979_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54981_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54981_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54984_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54984_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54987_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54987_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54989_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 54989_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55065_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55065_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55066_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 55066_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55068_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55068_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55071_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55071_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55072_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55072_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55073_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55073_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55099_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55099_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55101_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55101_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55112_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55112_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55113_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55113_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55114_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55114_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55122_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55122_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55143_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 55143_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55145_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55145_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55147_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55147_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55155_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55155_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55169_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55169_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55173_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55173_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55175_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55175_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55178_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55178_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55191_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55191_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55195_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55195_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55206_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55206_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55211_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55211_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55224_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55224_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55225_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55225_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55226_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55226_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55236_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55236_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55247_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55247_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55253_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55253_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55272_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55272_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55277_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55277_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55279_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55279_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55288_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55288_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55313_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55313_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55314_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55314_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55318_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55318_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55366_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55366_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55371_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55371_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55377_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55377_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55378_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55378_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55379_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55379_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55409_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55409_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55429_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55429_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55492_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55492_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55497_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55497_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55498_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 55498_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.67 +11:24:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-50-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
