######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-03-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-03-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-03-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 661122 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 661122 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits_preview.png'
UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits

renamed 'UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits_preview.png'
UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 501.7858
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 543.6529
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1493.0281
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 479.5744
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1487.8861
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 479.7718
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.97543
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.6199998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T02:31:58.0630311' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-09T07:31:58.0630311' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61322.31386647 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-09T07:32:07.9676943' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61322.3139810995 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 154.288115919409 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9998929579814 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1377777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.3769444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.77765481533492 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20705 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20705 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.6199998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.6199998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.18 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 344.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/d_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits :)
Spent 0.555042 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/d_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T02:33:01.6365550' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-09T07:33:01.6365550' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61322.3146022684 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-09T07:33:11.5397061' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61322.3147168867 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 154.288115828566 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9998930118618 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2261111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.47 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.75687547727285 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20705 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20705 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.18 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 344.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/d_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits :)
Spent 0.557839 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/d_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits

fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.81398221
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Image size: 940.1'x625.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:12.128 +61:59:57.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:12.128 +61:59:57.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0172 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Image size: 940.1'x625.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:16.451 +61:59:51.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:16.451 +61:59:51.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0258 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:12.128 +61:59:57.42
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:16.451 +61:59:51.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00864 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E6FLJu5hxs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NkKes6JsER
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9dj8pexrft
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ruN8MMh1Jv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec +55.2223 to +67.4795 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec 55.2223 to 67.4795 deg
Loaded 7307 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4357 out of 4609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4609 out of 7662 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.872100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.872100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec +55.2223 to +67.4795 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec 55.2223 to 67.4795 deg
Loaded 7307 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4357 out of 4609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4609 out of 7662 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8236 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1789 to 172.7561 deg, Dec +55.2223 to +67.4795 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1789 to 172.7561 deg, Dec 55.2223 to 67.4795 deg
Loaded 7307 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4375 out of 4641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4641 out of 8236 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.2 pix UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
15.7 mag. UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.E6FLJu5hxs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=562, bad_region=1731, passed=7662
Got 7662 stars (including 5493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1545 n_q2=846 n_q3=1565 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NkKes6JsER (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=598, bad_region=1845, passed=8236
Got 8236 stars (including 5924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1572 n_q2=834 n_q3=1564 n_q4=931 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9dj8pexrft (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=280, bad_region=785, passed=3801
Got 3801 stars (including 2834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 2782 stars left (next iteration limit 3059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2782 robust_rms=6.881 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.392 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2782 robust_rms=0.731 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.826 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2782 robust_rms=0.484 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.563 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.552 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2782 robust_rms_before=1.910 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.418 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.484 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.524 worst_region_rms_after=0.563 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.406 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.552
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.524 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.418 arcsec matched=2782
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits N_match=2782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=932 n_q2=396 n_q3=925 n_q4=529 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ruN8MMh1Jv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=237, bad_region=727, passed=3752
Got 3752 stars (including 2837 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 2784 stars left (next iteration limit 3062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2784 robust_rms=6.933 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.336 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2784 robust_rms=0.744 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.832 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.750 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2784 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.532 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2784 robust_rms_before=1.918 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.544 worst_region_rms_after=0.532 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.376 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.532
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.544 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.544 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.412 arcsec matched=2784
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits N_match=2784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=934 n_q2=399 n_q3=924 n_q4=527 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.279
ref2=UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.168
new1=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.176
new2=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.152
reference average sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.2235
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404_astrometric_residuals.png (2782 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (2784 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Image size: 940.1'x625.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:12.128 +61:59:57.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:12.128 +61:59:57.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0172 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Image size: 940.1'x625.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:16.451 +61:59:51.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:16.451 +61:59:51.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0258 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:12.128 +61:59:57.42
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:16.451 +61:59:51.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00864 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cOJkxl99p0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vBSNLmGfya
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kCxtxYG1hs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZXV42Sflja
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec +55.2066 to +67.4896 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec 55.2066 to 67.4896 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4149 out of 4659 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4659 out of 42564 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.753000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.753000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec +55.2066 to +67.4896 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec 55.2066 to 67.4896 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4149 out of 4659 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4659 out of 42564 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 43256 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1789 to 172.8802 deg, Dec +55.2070 to +67.4875 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1789 to 172.8802 deg, Dec 55.2070 to 67.4875 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4110 out of 4664 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4664 out of 43256 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.0 pix UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
15.8 mag. UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cOJkxl99p0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1976, bad_region=7480, passed=42551
Got 42551 stars (including 33430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1515 n_q2=834 n_q3=1604 n_q4=944 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vBSNLmGfya (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2194, bad_region=7722, passed=43242
Got 43242 stars (including 33674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1520 n_q2=828 n_q3=1602 n_q4=948 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kCxtxYG1hs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=770, bad_region=4123, passed=21754
Got 21754 stars (including 17014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21754 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=6.791 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.749 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.812 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.802 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.512 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.637 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=1.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.452 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.512 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.628 worst_region_rms_after=0.637 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.460 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.637
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.628 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.628 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.452 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1640 n_q2=794 n_q3=1501 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZXV42Sflja (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=746, bad_region=4091, passed=21833
Got 21833 stars (including 17098 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=6.865 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.397 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.766 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.848 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.848 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.617 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.617 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=1.949 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.450 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.499 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.600 worst_region_rms_after=0.617 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.440 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.617
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.600 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.600 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.450 arcsec matched=4858
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1628 n_q2=793 n_q3=1510 n_q4=927 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:48:20.15 +59:03:28.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 09:48:20.15 +59:03:28.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:48:20.15 +59:03:28.5: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0558 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52672_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.44 | 10:17:58.09 +64:55:00.5 | 4916 4954 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52673_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.47 | 10:17:51.66 +59:41:52.9 | 4768 1808 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 10:17:51.90 +59:41:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52679_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 09.31398 | 2461322.81398 | 12.04 | 09:48:20.11 +59:03:28.5 | 2472 1640 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0404.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.07 | 09:48:20.19 +59:03:28.5 | 2467 1642 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52721_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 10.65 | 09:21:45.58 +63:59:31.4 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52801_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 11.76 | 09:43:19.10 +65:33:55.1 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52826_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.01 | 09:28:11.10 +65:06:57.0 | 1779 5522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52851_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52851_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.13 | 10:50:09.70 +65:31:57.4 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52865_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.40 | 09:25:26.26 +65:00:50.7 | 1592 5505 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52871_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52871_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.35 | 10:04:44.81 +65:59:43.4 | 4133 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52899_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.45 | 09:36:46.37 +64:29:18.2 | 2241 5026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52936_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.60 | 09:56:55.70 +65:58:05.4 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52945_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.56 | 09:33:27.10 +65:15:45.2 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 52996_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.78 | 10:24:57.10 +65:01:05.3 | 5364 5003 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53010_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.83 | 10:04:14.07 +65:31:25.5 | 4074 5381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53018_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.07 | 10:46:55.08 +64:22:40.6 | 6793 4659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53021_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.90 | 10:55:27.06 +64:19:01.5 | 7355 4673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53030_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.00 | 09:24:44.91 +64:40:30.9 | 1498 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53046_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.96 | 10:36:28.44 +63:41:29.5 | 6121 4208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53049_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.83 | 09:25:43.51 +64:42:07.9 | 1564 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53051_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.95 | 09:27:13.66 +63:52:24.3 | 1540 4802 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53069_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.05 | 09:37:04.16 +63:43:42.6 | 2168 4570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53078_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.06 | 09:38:05.97 +64:12:31.6 | 2293 4842 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53101_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.50 | 10:18:55.43 +64:40:04.3 | 4971 4801 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53104_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.00 | 10:14:27.09 +64:39:19.7 | 4682 4807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53108_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53108_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.08 | 09:33:14.56 +64:00:06.5 | 1951 4786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53122_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53122_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.02 | 09:51:32.92 +63:52:17.4 | 3139 4487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53148_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.17 | 09:44:38.84 +65:18:04.6 | 2832 5415 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53157_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.04 | 10:29:05.95 +66:18:50.3 | 5630 5788 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53184_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.28 | 10:47:52.50 +65:28:26.4 | 6809 5327 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 10:47:52.53 +65:28:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53205_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53205_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.79 | 09:13:24.84 +64:18:46.5 | 0716 5307 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53230_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.44 | 10:33:05.34 +64:56:52.7 | 5884 4962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53235_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.71 | 10:01:21.03 +65:22:55.8 | 3885 5314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53261_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.74 | 10:09:00.09 +65:40:45.5 | 4379 5449 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53308_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53308_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.67 | 10:32:56.78 +66:04:57.0 | 5866 5650 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53311_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53311_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.52 | 10:02:17.48 +65:11:31.3 | 3932 5193 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53331_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53331_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.88 | 10:09:00.77 +66:11:29.2 | 4404 5759 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53346_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53346_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.72 | 10:21:54.07 +64:49:18.6 | 5166 4888 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53348_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53348_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.85 | 10:10:23.74 +64:52:23.1 | 4430 4955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53352_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53352_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.94 | 09:13:47.58 +65:05:51.9 | 0878 5759 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53375_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53375_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.90 | 09:25:02.86 +64:02:42.0 | 1423 4939 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53389_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53389_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.95 | 10:32:03.11 +65:34:06.9 | 5814 5337 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53416_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53416_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 13.99 | 10:04:49.15 +65:46:40.2 | 4125 5531 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 53436_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 14.34 | 10:19:25.59 +62:09:11.5 | 4945 3283 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18372_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 18372_fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 09.31472 | 2461322.81472 | 12.76 | 10:37:10.48 +61:43:03.3 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_032159_TTUQ2b1x1_1136708_ms71ZbBF/fd_UMa-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_02-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-03-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461322.81398221 -observatory V36
14:28:47.22 -17:28:16.8 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:09:41.20 -21:06:22.8 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:35:04.65 +19:52:21.4 Mars (1.1mag)
09:33:00.67 +15:11:34.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:02.51 +01:40:40.9 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:17.33 +20:58:29.4 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:32.95 -00:24:18.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:12.40 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:54:38.64 -02:35:14.1 Moon (-8.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 9 03:27 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461322.81398221:
09:33:00.57 +15:11:35.5 Io (6.1mag)
09:32:55.91 +15:12:02.1 Europa (6.2mag)
09:32:49.71 +15:12:35.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:32:33.57 +15:14:01.4 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:32:36.04 +15:32:34.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:32:58.13 +15:11:47.9 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:31:29.82 +15:32:43.7 Elara (17.5mag)
09:35:34.51 +14:34:19.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:31:45.82 +15:38:07.2 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:57.16 +01:41:00.9 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:57.75 +01:40:27.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:28.18 +01:37:57.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:47.44 +01:40:50.5 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:23.06 +01:28:24.7 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 9 03:27 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461322.81398221:
02:35:20.00 +21:20:15.1 JWST
18:04:05.95 +26:29:36.6 Chandra
12:02:40.57 -61:22:59.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 9 03:27 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461322.81398221 -observatory V36
03:46:40.59 +20:11:20.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:22:53.78 -33:32:45.5 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:38:56.85 -72:15:57.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:04.85 +34:35:25.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:00:09.43 +48:24:07.4 17.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:29:20.92 +25:28:47.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:00:55.64 +35:27:10.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:22.59 +41:37:10.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:46:02.71 -13:33:46.3 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:13:14.50 +16:09:55.7 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:48:54.17 -02:32:48.5 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:34:06.19 +66:01:16.8 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:38:27.02 +43:34:40.8 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:43:39.82 +14:03:18.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:28:34.93 -11:23:40.8 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:32:03.67 +19:16:50.1 17.6mag 2P/Encke
22:56:00.55 -32:08:32.0 14.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:07:53.96 +39:02:52.9 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:09:50.48 -07:59:37.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:23:45.92 -08:48:17.4 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:32:58.75 +16:13:56.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:02:05.09 +14:26:16.5 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:31:22.46 +39:38:50.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:57:45.30 +14:53:03.2 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:36:44.66 +13:44:09.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:01:31.00 -31:37:14.9 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:49:20.01 +19:23:55.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:58:05.92 +01:38:54.7 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:14:43.62 +35:30:38.6 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:13:20.12 +02:09:03.1 14.1mag 169P/NEAT
03:30:22.26 +04:51:43.9 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
06:00:12.71 +44:45:34.5 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:23:54.09 +25:41:40.6 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:54:07.89 +31:45:19.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 9 03:27 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 9 03:27 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 9 03:27 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:24:44.060 +20:59:06.05 AT 2026acqw 2026-09-16.56 20.82
21:40:02.160 +15:00:30.81 AT 2026acqv 2026-09-10.70 21.85
21:39:01.640 +18:47:42.43 AT 2026acqu 2026-09-10.70 22.23
00:12:12.410 +04:58:03.37 AT 2026acqt 2026-09-20.79 22.48
23:43:42.930 +01:57:31.27 AT 2026acqs 2026-09-20.78 22.68
23:45:18.660 +05:45:16.42 AT 2026acqr 2026-09-20.78 22.55
23:40:19.150 +05:20:07.86 AT 2026acqq 2026-09-20.78 22.43
02:13:52.020 +01:45:39.64 AT 2026acqp 2026-09-19.92 22.81
01:07:33.770 +02:42:27.03 AT 2026acqo 2026-09-19.90 22.6
02:21:01.513 +01:39:33.18 AT 2026acqn 2026-09-19.85 23.05
23:15:45.160 +04:54:53.74 AT 2026acqm 2026-09-19.81 22.59
22:47:46.190 +02:11:28.63 AT 2026acql 2026-09-19.80 22.32
23:00:11.810 +04:09:17.60 AT 2026acqk 2026-09-17.77 21.72
01:30:04.370 +00:37:22.70 AT 2026acqj 2026-09-16.84 22.86
01:11:15.050 -01:08:02.84 AT 2026acqi 2026-09-16.84 22.76
02:33:50.189 -03:13:56.07 AT 2026acqh 2026-09-20.46 19.6063
01:43:57.599 +47:09:31.90 AT 2026acqg 2026-09-10.37 20.388
03:10:06.275 -19:55:57.44 AT 2026acqf 2026-09-16.48 19.3629
01:19:04.385 +50:34:09.14 AT 2026acqe 2026-09-16.31 20.2313
00:18:20.732 +38:12:40.21 AT 2026acqd 2026-09-18.37 20.9171
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 9 03:27 tns_transients_list.txt