This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.9 10.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461322.7266,10.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261009.2266 10.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2266 2461322.7266 11.11 05:19:04.64 +23:43:25.4
181.15041 -7.82138 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:04.64 +23:43:25.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:04.64 +23:43:25.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 19 04.64 +23 43 25.4 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7266,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2266 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2266 2461322.7266 12.08 05:05:10.26 +26:06:08.5
177.34705 -9.02236 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:10.26 +26:06:08.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:10.26 +26:06:08.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 05 10.26 +26 06 08.5 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7266,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2266 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.0 10.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461322.7266,10.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261009.2266 10.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2266 2461322.7266 13.01 05:16:28.49 +21:31:35.6
182.64460 -9.55536 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:28.49 +21:31:35.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:28.49 +21:31:35.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 16 28.49 +21 31 35.6 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7266,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2266 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2266 2461322.7266 13.93 05:02:35.03 +25:01:54.9
177.86987 -10.12713 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:35.03 +25:01:54.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:35.03 +25:01:54.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 02 35.03 +25 01 54.9 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7266,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2266 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2266 2461322.7266 12.64 06:02:28.54 +25:02:25.4
185.26077 1.26297 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 0 -0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:28.54 +25:02:25.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:28.54 +25:02:25.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7266,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2266 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2266 2461322.7266 13.46 05:32:27.36 +24:56:15.0
181.82710 -4.61082 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J053227.41+245614.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.290 r Y 0.177 r 2458376.77220 35.531937100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:27.36 +24:56:15.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:27.36 +24:56:15.0: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 32 27.36 +24 56 15.0 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J053227.41+245614.4,2461322.7266,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J053227.41+245614.4 20261009.2266 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2266 2461322.7266 13.66 05:18:23.85 +21:11:32.5
183.17979 -9.37263 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0518244+211137
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.130 r Y 0.576 r 2458450.27750 116.031845600000
The object was found in astcheck.4904 Makio 294 426 518 16.7 0 0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:32.5: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:32.5: 14.68 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2266* 05 18 23.85 +21 11 32.5 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0518244+211137,2461322.7266,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0518244+211137 20261009.2266 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461322.72705078 09.10.2026 05:26:47.187 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20367
Objects passed selection criteria: 20301
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16610.2
Average stars matched: 16379.8 (98.6123 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 00:31:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461322.72705078 09.10.2026 05:26:47.187 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 175
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 111 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151126
Objects passed selection criteria: 150754
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 117395
Average stars matched: 113706 (96.8574 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 550696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 00:34:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.72619632
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:07.944 +21:59:42.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:07.944 +21:59:42.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0451 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:09.977 +21:59:09.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:09.977 +21:59:09.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0394 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:07.944 +21:59:42.01
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:09.977 +21:59:09.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01191 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zEBgfkeTln
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Wv0pzWADs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fZH8kQbahr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uUjJ4JkkEk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.zEBgfkeTln (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4Wv0pzWADs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fZH8kQbahr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=523, bad_region=0, passed=11414
Got 11414 stars (including 10879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5196)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=9.528 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.669 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.200 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.200 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=1.755 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.505 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.776 worst_region_rms_after=0.702 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.752 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.702
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.776 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.776 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.505 arcsec matched=4727
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1314 n_q3=869 n_q4=1538 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uUjJ4JkkEk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=11526
Got 11526 stars (including 10997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11526 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4795 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4729 stars left (next iteration limit 5200)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=9.875 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.147 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.147 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.908 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.288 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.679 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4729 robust_rms_before=1.639 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.515 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.774 worst_region_rms_after=0.679 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.562 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.679
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:10.082 +21:59:08.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11526 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3506617.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.639 -> 0.477 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4729 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4484 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4484 pairs (4729 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4484 robust_rms=9.666 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.939 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.939 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4484 robust_rms=0.891 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.250 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.250 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4484 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.670 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4484 robust_rms_before=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.674 worst_region_rms_after=0.670 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.674 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.670
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:10.082 +21:59:08.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11526 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3508638.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.467 -> 0.468 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 2, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4484 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4484 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4484 pairs (4484 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: the re-match converged after 2 cycles (pair count changed by 0.0%) - keeping the current solution with these pairs
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4484 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=965 n_q2=1246 n_q3=824 n_q4=1449 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.511 worst_q_ratio=1.219
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.154
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4727 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4484 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:04.64 +23:43:25.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:10.26 +26:06:08.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:10.26 +26:06:08.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:04.64 +23:43:25.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30746.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30853.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30709_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 30709_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 30746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30853_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 30853_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 30857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.52 +23:56:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.06 +20:30:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.17 +17:53:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 17081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:10.64 +19:08:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.47 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.02 +20:10:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.11 +17:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.43 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.47 +20:22:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 18s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:19:04.64 +23:43:25.4
05:05:10.26 +26:06:08.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:07.944 +21:59:42.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:07.944 +21:59:42.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0451 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:10.082 +21:59:08.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:10.082 +21:59:08.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0392 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:07.944 +21:59:42.01
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:10.082 +21:59:08.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01251 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cSZLjCV8Nb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xdWcAtZbsc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YbAEh1EPWx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P9sFICCyjB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 163 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cSZLjCV8Nb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xdWcAtZbsc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YbAEh1EPWx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4150, bad_region=37, passed=70379
Got 70379 stars (including 66092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70379 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4718 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=9.986 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.751 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.751 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.672 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.134 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.134 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.696 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.696 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4718 robust_rms_before=1.737 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.781 worst_region_rms_after=0.696 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.751 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.696
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.737 -> 0.518 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4718 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4487 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4487 pairs (4718 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4487 robust_rms=9.692 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.643 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.643 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4487 robust_rms=0.661 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.127 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.127 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4487 robust_rms=0.512 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.684 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.684 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4487 robust_rms_before=0.513 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.513 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.512 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.684 worst_region_rms_after=0.684 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.684 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.684
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.684 vs 0.684 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4487 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4487 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4487 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=982 n_q2=1187 n_q3=864 n_q4=1454 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P9sFICCyjB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4155, bad_region=38, passed=71136
Got 71136 stars (including 66864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71136 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=10.225 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.311 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.895 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.288 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.690 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.690 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.692 worst_region_rms_after=0.690 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.692 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.690
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.692 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.692 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.478 arcsec matched=4722
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=1022 n_q2=1269 n_q3=891 n_q4=1540 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_002745_TTUQ1b1x1_3237260_N5nIxuAa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:58.76 +16:40:06.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:04.46 +22:02:00.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:49.05 +18:33:09.4: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:49.05 +18:33:09.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:58.76 +16:40:06.4: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:04.46 +22:02:00.7: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:58.76 +16:40:06.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6772 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:49.05 +18:33:09.4: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9195 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:04.46 +22:02:00.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8956 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:28.49 +21:31:35.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:28.49 +21:31:35.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.3: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.3: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.3: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2094 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.80 +22:34:29.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:35.03 +25:01:54.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:40:00.74 +26:43:47.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.80 +22:34:29.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:25:10.53 +26:28:52.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.80 +22:34:29.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1116 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:35.03 +25:01:54.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:00.74 +26:43:47.4: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:00.74 +26:43:47.4: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5755 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:10.53 +26:28:52.2: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:10.53 +26:28:52.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5708 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.9: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.08 +21:09:56.8: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:39.37 +20:14:48.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.9: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8520 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:39.37 +20:14:48.1: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.08 +21:09:56.8: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:39.37 +20:14:48.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5352 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.08 +21:09:56.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7418 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:59:15.32 +22:50:20.9: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:58.88 +22:54:40.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:15.32 +22:50:20.9: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:15.32 +22:50:20.9: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0032 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:58.88 +22:54:40.6: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:58.88 +22:54:40.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2190 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:44.78 +21:08:55.4: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:44.78 +21:08:55.4: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:44.78 +21:08:55.4: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3006 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:28.54 +25:02:25.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:28.54 +25:02:25.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.52 +21:13:24.7: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.52 +21:13:24.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.52 +21:13:24.7: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3252 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:27.36 +24:56:15.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:27.36 +24:56:15.0: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:32:27.36 +24:56:15.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4464 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:32.5: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:56.06 +22:51:49.7: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:32.5: 14.68 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:32.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6492 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:56.06 +22:51:49.7: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:56.06 +22:51:49.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9261 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:26.59 +21:00:14.2: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:26.59 +21:00:14.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:26.59 +21:00:14.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7939 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out184491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191814.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95211.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:30.62 +20:35:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.17 +17:57:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:20.62 +18:14:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.35 +18:25:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.88 +23:00:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.66 +16:41:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190671_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190671_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.92 +26:19:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:04.64 +23:43:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190784_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190784_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:10.26 +26:06:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.13 +22:38:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190925_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190925_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.88 +25:55:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.86 +23:48:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.70 +22:27:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190969_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 190969_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.97 +26:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191006_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191006_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.73 +23:02:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.76 +26:45:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191033_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191033_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.00 +18:33:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191059_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191059_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.76 +19:34:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.92 +23:48:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.09 +24:36:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.17 +18:59:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191228_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 191228_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.96 +20:10:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.26 +18:33:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191290_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191290_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.73 +22:40:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.11 +23:12:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.16 +23:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191327_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191327_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.12 +25:24:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.80 +25:24:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191354_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191354_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.27 +22:45:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.68 +21:46:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191374_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191374_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.64 +20:02:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.45 +24:25:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191388_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191388_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.00 +19:35:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191398_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191398_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.08 +18:34:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191406_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191406_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.66 +19:32:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191408_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191408_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.54 +18:29:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.24 +20:53:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191421_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191421_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.28 +25:47:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.75 +18:25:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.38 +25:08:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191467_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191467_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.66 +25:09:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.57 +22:22:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191491_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191491_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.96 +26:10:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.19 +18:40:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.13 +25:25:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191518_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191518_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.20 +18:11:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191531_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191531_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.37 +20:26:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191549_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191549_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.54 +20:05:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.56 +26:44:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:18.03 +23:13:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.23 +23:07:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.87 +23:11:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.04 +24:24:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.39 +20:09:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191631_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191631_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:58.85 +25:07:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.60 +25:40:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.40 +26:18:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:39.96 +22:58:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:23.39 +25:20:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.67 +25:22:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191690_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191690_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:46.03 +17:11:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.38 +24:22:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.32 +20:56:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191750_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191750_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.63 +17:59:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191757_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191757_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.81 +24:21:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191775_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191775_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191791_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191791_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.15 +24:06:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191814_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 191814_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191868_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191868_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.19 +22:06:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191869_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191869_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.02 +20:15:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.19 +24:57:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191894_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191894_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:06.94 +24:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191901_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191901_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.66 +22:39:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.32 +20:26:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191911_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191911_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:06.34 +24:25:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191912_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191912_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:43.95 +24:00:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191926_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191926_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.56 +21:24:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.35 +22:27:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191947_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191947_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191995_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 191995_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.93 +21:26:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 192030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 192086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.83 +21:19:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192118_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 192118_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126659_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 126659_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:35.26 +18:20:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.82 +25:25:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 64768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.13 +24:51:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.47 +17:54:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.21 +25:59:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.44 +24:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68249_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 68249_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:25.25 +22:44:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179682_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 179682_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 36662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:14.12 +24:28:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.77 +23:22:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.50 +21:45:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.52 +19:30:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.65 +19:35:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.31 +20:16:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.16 +24:59:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.43 +26:13:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:57.89 +22:13:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.00 +24:53:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.85 +23:10:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184879_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 184879_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184491_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 184491_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:59.75 +22:30:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.02 +22:46:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:29.19 +22:03:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.21 +24:10:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.15 +17:07:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.35 +25:40:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.41 +20:19:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.43 +21:44:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.80 +19:21:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.17 +17:59:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73025_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 73025_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:05.15 +22:25:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.71 +22:47:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.52 +23:56:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34200_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 34200_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:25.38 +17:43:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:10.64 +19:08:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.14 +20:22:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 62999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:49.40 +23:06:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.44 +25:01:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46819_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 46819_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.49 +20:22:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.10 +17:45:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.35 +23:16:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.82 +22:48:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.45 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.16 +17:53:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 141266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:03.72 +19:11:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.42 +22:16:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95211_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 95211_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 70425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:36.11 +22:25:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.82 +16:57:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.09 +21:51:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 113322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.06 +20:06:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.42 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 66907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:18.38 +22:39:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.49 +19:44:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:58.88 +23:30:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.86 +21:13:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.52 +20:28:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 94587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.01 +20:10:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.67 +25:00:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.37 +20:16:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.00 +23:15:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.06 +20:08:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-26-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
