This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.0500 2461322.5500 12.34 18:02:23.50 -11:01:59.3
17.46613 5.63857 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra -0 0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:02:23.50 -11:01:59.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:02:23.50 -11:01:59.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.0500* 18 02 23.50 -11 01 59.3 12.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.5500,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.0500 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.0500 2461322.5500 12.38 18:20:21.70 -14:52:42.2
16.18802 -0.04622 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 -0 1 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:20:21.70 -14:52:42.2: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:20:21.70 -14:52:42.2: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.0500* 18 20 21.70 -14 52 42.2 12.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.5500,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.0500 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.0500 2461322.5500 13.31 17:29:15.33 -10:17:58.4
13.96836 13.04895 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche -0 -2 2 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:29:15.33 -10:17:58.4: 15.30 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:29:15.33 -10:17:58.4: 15.30 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.0500* 17 29 15.33 -10 17 58.4 13.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.5500,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.0500 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
First image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Last image: 2461322.55034493 09.10.2026 01:12:19.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11056
Objects passed selection criteria: 11025
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8308.75
Average stars matched: 8045.25 (96.8286 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 20:16:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
First image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Last image: 2461322.55034493 09.10.2026 01:12:19.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 132
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 100221
Objects passed selection criteria: 100059
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 83243.5
Average stars matched: 79351.8 (95.3249 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 562736 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 20:17:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.54968925
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.574 -10:00:36.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.574 -10:00:36.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.437 -09:59:57.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:03.437 -09:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.574 -10:00:36.04
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:03.437 -09:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01590 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wbbb17QCvZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T1ck5rmFFs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ZohWrxDDX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jnqPrM9uvL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Loaded 6268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4884 out of 5253 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5253 out of 11492 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.672350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.672350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Loaded 6268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4884 out of 5253 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5253 out of 11492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 11483 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9404 to 278.0994 deg, Dec -15.2281 to -4.6882 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9404 to 278.0994 deg, Dec -15.2281 to -4.6882 deg
Loaded 6246 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4876 out of 5238 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5238 out of 11483 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
15.1 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Wbbb17QCvZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1021, bad_region=0, passed=11492
Got 11492 stars (including 10449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Excluding outliers - 4724 stars left (next iteration limit 5195)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=4724 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.749 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.755 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.817 n_q1=662 n_q2=656 n_q3=2113 n_q4=1293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.T1ck5rmFFs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1012, bad_region=0, passed=11483
Got 11483 stars (including 10449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 4720 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4720 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.717 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.719 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.808 n_q1=670 n_q2=663 n_q3=2090 n_q4=1297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5ZohWrxDDX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=515, bad_region=0, passed=5117
Got 5117 stars (including 4589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4436 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4346 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4346 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4436 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4347 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4347 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4347 stars left (next iteration limit 4780)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4347 robust_rms=12.227 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.111 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.111 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4347 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.764 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.764 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4347 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.499 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.499 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4347 robust_rms_before=0.764 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.908 worst_region_rms_after=0.499 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.985 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.499
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.569 -10:00:36.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5117 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky422154.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.764 -> 0.393 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4347 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4059 pairs (4347 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4059 robust_rms=11.604 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.179 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.179 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4059 robust_rms=0.595 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.726 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4059 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.494 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4059 robust_rms_before=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.387 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.492 worst_region_rms_after=0.494 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.492 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.494
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.494 vs 0.492 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4059 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4059 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=4059 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=545 n_q2=521 n_q3=1993 n_q4=1000 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jnqPrM9uvL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=527, bad_region=0, passed=5523
Got 5523 stars (including 4984 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5523 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=12.257 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.408 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.635 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.794 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.794 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.536 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4708 robust_rms_before=0.774 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.499 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.796 worst_region_rms_after=0.536 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.061 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.536
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.433 -09:59:57.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5523 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky422203.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.774 -> 0.385 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4708 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4403 pairs (4708 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4403 robust_rms=11.467 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4403 robust_rms=0.622 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.760 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.760 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4403 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4403 robust_rms_before=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.523 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.522
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.432 -09:59:57.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5523 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky422357.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.379 -> 0.378 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4403 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4403 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 2, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4403 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4402 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4402 pairs (4403 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: the re-match converged after 2 cycles (pair count changed by 0.0%) - keeping the current solution with these pairs
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4402 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4402 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=4402 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=596 n_q2=553 n_q3=2186 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits sigma_overall=0.749 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.717 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.166
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.184
reference average sigma_overall=0.733 worst_q_ratio=1.1075
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022_astrometric_residuals.png (4724 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.69 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (4720 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008_astrometric_residuals.png (4059 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (4402 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20647_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20647_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:40.15 -05:42:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20747_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20747_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.20 -13:53:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20867_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20867_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:24.33 -09:54:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06780_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 06780_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:37.70 -13:13:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.569 -10:00:36.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.569 -10:00:36.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0330 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.432 -09:59:57.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:03.432 -09:59:57.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0269 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.569 -10:00:36.49
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:03.432 -09:59:57.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01590 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.51olk0Rs8H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ATMVPBi6C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n815eEpXd4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T1KuMfLGnY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 110241 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Loaded 6276 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4437 out of 5570 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5570 out of 110241 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.499500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.499500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 110241 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Loaded 6276 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4437 out of 5570 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5570 out of 110241 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 109592 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9404 to 278.1110 deg, Dec -15.2285 to -4.6661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9404 to 278.1110 deg, Dec -15.2285 to -4.6661 deg
Loaded 6261 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4435 out of 5554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5554 out of 109592 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 114 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.1 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
15.2 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.51olk0Rs8H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=9427, bad_region=0, passed=110223
Got 110223 stars (including 100601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4739 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.748 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.775 n_q1=704 n_q2=723 n_q3=2014 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0ATMVPBi6C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=9439, bad_region=0, passed=109569
Got 109569 stars (including 99918 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4738 stars left (next iteration limit 5211)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4738 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.686 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.786 n_q1=708 n_q2=717 n_q3=2017 n_q4=1296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.n815eEpXd4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2648, bad_region=2, passed=56228
Got 56228 stars (including 53431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4743 stars left (next iteration limit 5218)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4743 robust_rms=12.374 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.548 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.548 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4743 robust_rms=0.607 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.775 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.775 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4743 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.509 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4743 robust_rms_before=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.512 worst_region_rms_after=0.509 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.512 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.512 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.512 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.395 arcsec matched=4743
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=4743 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=727 n_q2=660 n_q3=2229 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.T1KuMfLGnY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2955, bad_region=4, passed=60073
Got 60073 stars (including 56952 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60073 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4738 stars left (next iteration limit 5214)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=12.352 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.733 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.733 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.636 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.800 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.800 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.527 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.527 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4738 robust_rms_before=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.507 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.536 worst_region_rms_after=0.527 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.536 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.527
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.536 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.382 arcsec matched=4738
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=4738 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=721 n_q2=658 n_q3=2231 n_q4=1128 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.389
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_201353_TTUQ1b1x1_335468_0SwWbmPr/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:05:46.54 -13:49:44.8: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:42:05.86 -06:59:03.1: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:31:40.94 -12:26:22.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:30:40.28 -04:45:18.3: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:16:49.30 -11:13:25.5: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:51:33.95 -06:50:23.2: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:23:37.76 -10:58:05.8: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:07:29.77 -10:07:47.3: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:51:33.95 -06:50:23.2: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:16:49.30 -11:13:25.5: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:30:40.28 -04:45:18.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:42:05.86 -06:59:03.1: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:05:46.54 -13:49:44.8: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:31:40.94 -12:26:22.9: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:49.30 -11:13:25.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4719 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:05.86 -06:59:03.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5829 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:40.28 -04:45:18.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4703 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:33.95 -06:50:23.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5174 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:31:40.94 -12:26:22.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2238 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:46.54 -13:49:44.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4278 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:48:31.65 -07:16:27.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:09:37.15 -08:34:34.2: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:23:37.76 -10:58:05.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:07:29.77 -10:07:47.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:23:37.76 -10:58:05.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1431 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:29.77 -10:07:47.3: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1681 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:48:31.65 -07:16:27.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:31.65 -07:16:27.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9717 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:09:37.15 -08:34:34.2: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:37.15 -08:34:34.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0535 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:09:51.54 -15:12:28.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:53:41.23 -14:20:33.5: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:22:47.21 -11:19:15.8: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:12:11.69 -15:11:57.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:53:41.23 -14:20:33.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:09:51.54 -15:12:28.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:51.54 -15:12:28.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:41.23 -14:20:33.5: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1595 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:22:47.21 -11:19:15.8: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:22:47.21 -11:19:15.8: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8363 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:02:23.50 -11:01:59.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:12:11.69 -15:11:57.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:11.69 -15:11:57.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:20:21.70 -14:52:42.2: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:02:23.50 -11:01:59.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:19:52.38 -12:29:44.3: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:20:13.73 -14:49:58.9: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:17:55.70 -12:00:06.6: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:20:21.70 -14:52:42.2: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:17:59.49 -11:17:34.5: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:27:47.81 -14:08:27.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:19:52.38 -12:29:44.3: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:19:52.38 -12:29:44.3: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9486 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:17:55.70 -12:00:06.6: 13.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:20:13.73 -14:49:58.9: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:55.70 -12:00:06.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0479 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:20:13.73 -14:49:58.9: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0853 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:17:59.49 -11:17:34.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:59.49 -11:17:34.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0119 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:42:15.65 -13:44:05.3: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:27:47.81 -14:08:27.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:27:47.81 -14:08:27.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:42:15.65 -13:44:05.3: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:15.65 -13:44:05.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1942 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:44:28.15 -13:03:27.3: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:14:30.03 -15:10:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:44:28.15 -13:03:27.3: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:28.15 -13:03:27.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2663 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:14:30.03 -15:10:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:30.03 -15:10:12.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:18:19.72 -13:23:49.8: 13.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:29:15.33 -10:17:58.4: 15.30 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:04:59.26 -11:30:16.0: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:18:19.72 -13:23:49.8: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:29:15.33 -10:17:58.4: 15.30 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:19.72 -13:23:49.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5629 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:29:15.33 -10:17:58.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.2645 delta=2.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:23:19.26 -09:45:39.6: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:04:59.26 -11:30:16.0: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:59.26 -11:30:16.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5420 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:24:18.82 -11:14:35.5: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:23:19.26 -09:45:39.6: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:23:19.26 -09:45:39.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4796 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:24:18.82 -11:14:35.5: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:24:18.82 -11:14:35.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5717 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:32:25.04 -06:08:03.1: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:07:00.71 -06:30:39.5: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:53:43.54 -07:32:20.1: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:32:25.04 -06:08:03.1: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:25.04 -06:08:03.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0136 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:07:00.71 -06:30:39.5: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:00.71 -06:30:39.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9172 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:53:43.54 -07:32:20.1: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:43.54 -07:32:20.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1610 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134567.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132038_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132038_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:20.16 -10:04:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132052_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132052_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132053_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132053_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:27.16 -09:44:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132059_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132059_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132060_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132060_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132061_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132061_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:12.62 -14:52:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132063_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132063_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132065_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132065_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132066_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132066_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132069_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132069_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:48.53 -13:56:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132076_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132076_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132080_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132080_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:37.89 -10:49:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132081_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132081_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132086_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132086_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132088_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132088_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132090_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132090_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132091_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132091_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:34.09 -10:14:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132096_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132096_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132099_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132099_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:16.37 -11:34:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132101_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132101_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:42.67 -04:52:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132106_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132106_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132107_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132107_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132108_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132108_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:09.97 -14:17:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132109_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132109_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:06.52 -14:49:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132438_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132438_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:36.25 -05:33:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132478_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132478_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:50.09 -13:29:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132527_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132527_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132581_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132581_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.65 -14:20:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132759_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132759_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:05.88 -13:10:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132779_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132779_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:06.72 -14:25:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132956_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132956_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:16.95 -08:11:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132970_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 132970_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132973_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 132973_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:33.59 -14:03:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133008_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 133008_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133024_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133024_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:40.32 -13:48:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133044_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133044_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:43.78 -14:26:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133233_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133233_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:48.59 -14:12:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133344_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133344_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:11.22 -09:37:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133468_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133468_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:37.15 -12:47:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133604_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133604_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133708_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133708_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:18.84 -05:30:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:50.91 -10:52:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133728_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133728_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133809_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133809_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133815_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133815_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133844_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133844_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133905_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133905_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:32.72 -11:06:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133938_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133938_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:00.45 -12:46:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133958_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133958_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:37.72 -08:24:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134035_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134035_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:05.26 -13:40:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134106_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134106_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:07.53 -13:51:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134138_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134138_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:06.81 -05:26:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134143_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134143_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:26.19 -05:36:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134190_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134190_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:32.29 -06:32:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134192_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134192_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:57.14 -13:28:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134199_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134199_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:24.86 -11:01:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134221_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134221_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:00.54 -14:10:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134245_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134245_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:31.83 -15:03:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134269_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134269_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134274_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134274_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134276_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134276_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:24.92 -14:55:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134386_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134386_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:00.98 -07:59:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134388_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134388_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:59.11 -04:52:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134477_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134477_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:31.25 -12:20:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134479_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134479_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:57.94 -07:14:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134491_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134491_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:15.46 -10:22:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134544_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134544_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:30.99 -13:42:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134557_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134557_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134567_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 134567_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134576_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134576_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:05.09 -11:54:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134588_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134588_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:14.94 -06:19:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134606_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134606_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:10.91 -06:24:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134607_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134607_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:58.24 -08:30:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134627_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134627_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134657_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134657_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:57.30 -10:22:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134663_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134663_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134678_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134678_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:30.38 -14:38:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:21.95 -05:17:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134749_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134749_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:41.03 -07:05:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134755_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134755_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:37.90 -09:21:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134772_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134772_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134802_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134802_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:18.26 -14:35:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134860_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134860_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:45.31 -07:35:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134868_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134868_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:57.01 -07:05:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134898_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134898_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:52.79 -12:12:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134900_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134900_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:14.04 -06:08:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134902_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134902_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.81 -06:59:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134943_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134943_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:04.05 -08:03:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134982_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134982_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:25.14 -13:36:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135003_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135003_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:05.27 -13:01:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135032_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135032_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:54.15 -14:37:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135041_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135041_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:17.75 -06:57:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135069_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135069_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135082_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135082_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135122_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135122_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135141_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135141_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:38.82 -10:59:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135157_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135157_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:46.61 -05:09:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135166_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 135166_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:26.75 -07:29:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03139_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 03139_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:02.76 -05:12:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126223_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 126223_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:34.56 -12:15:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41648_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 41648_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:20.09 -10:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86607_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86607_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:17.88 -12:14:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92698_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92698_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.20 -13:53:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123371_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 123371_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:11.38 -10:00:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07720_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 07720_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:16.01 -05:51:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96174_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 96174_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.35 -13:23:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 15707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:01.34 -06:54:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52185_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52185_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:12.05 -11:22:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62633_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 62633_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:01.96 -14:23:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85096_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85096_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:22.87 -13:42:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37213_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 37213_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:24.35 -09:54:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97271_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 97271_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:37.72 -13:13:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 54419_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_20-12-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks