Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 08.4554  2461321.9554  13.11  10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2
232.98497  60.07272 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
187 Lamberta                 0      1       1  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits -crosshair 7138.35938 3210.02637 image    wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits -crosshair 7140.25293 3213.85620 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45538 10 55 52.70 +14 03 35.2          13.1 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45514 10 55 52.64 +14 03 35.0          13.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45562 10 55 52.75 +14 03 35.4          13.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 08.4554*  10 55 52.70 +14 03 35.2  13.1 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.9554,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.4554 13.11CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 08.4554  2461321.9554  13.20  10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9
229.67062  57.85857 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
42 Isis                    -1     -0       1  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9:  16.00 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits -crosshair 5469.62061 3461.84521 image    wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits -crosshair 5470.75195 3465.84766 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45538 10 44 27.48 +14 27 41.9          13.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45514 10 44 27.47 +14 27 41.5          13.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45562 10 44 27.49 +14 27 42.4          13.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 08.4554*  10 44 27.48 +14 27 41.9  13.2 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.9554,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.4554 13.20CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 08.4554  2461321.9554  13.60  10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0
226.76671  54.28485 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
94 Aurora                  -1      0       1  13.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits -crosshair 3103.94580 3378.13379 image    wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits -crosshair 3105.06128 3382.01660 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45538 10 28 17.11 +14 14 26.0          13.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45514 10 28 17.10 +14 14 25.9          13.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.45562 10 28 17.12 +14 14 26.0          13.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 08.4554*  10 28 17.11 +14 14 26.0  13.6 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.9554,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.4554 13.60CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last  image: 2461321.95561779 08.10.2026 10:55:55.377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4882
Objects passed selection criteria:  4856
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3411
Average stars matched: 3139.75 (92.0478 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   231204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  8 10:11:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last  image: 2461321.95561779 08.10.2026 10:55:55.377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  26383
Objects passed selection criteria:  26290
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 19211
Average stars matched: 17501.2 (91.1002 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   248568 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  8 10:12:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 835848 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 835848 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits_preview.png'

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits


renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits_preview.png'

Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 542.1009
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.8695
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1873.0540
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 491.4588
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1870.6864
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 493.0500
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.45518
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     14.4700002670288 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 14.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-08T05:55:13.9979379' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-08T10:55:13.9979379' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61321.4550231136 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-08T10:55:23.9004177' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61321.4551377315 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     159.996059935227 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9997578873314 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.7655555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     83.0008333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.86786156211166 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20647 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20647 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     14.4700002670288 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     14.4700002670288 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 14.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits :)

Spent 0.530657 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     14.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 14.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-08T05:55:55.3776842' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-08T10:55:55.3776842' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61321.4555020486 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-08T10:56:05.2792989' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61321.4556166553 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      159.99605990827 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9997579014013 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.9105555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     83.0936111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.83220262138134 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20647 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20647 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     14.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     14.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 14.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits :)

Spent 0.541504 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits



fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.95513885
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:49.748 +14:00:12.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:49.748 +14:00:12.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:49.300 +13:59:50.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:49.300 +13:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:39:49.748 +14:00:12.96
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:49.300 +13:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00663 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0gF6KC9IXo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F3XawVqGgh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HbuMX5qmST
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gkych91u86
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.709950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.709950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.40

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.40

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2435 deg
Loaded 4243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3504 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3504 out of 5709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 2.4 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 15.4 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.2 (SNR )  11.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.0gF6KC9IXo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=1440, passed=5744
Got 5744 stars (including 4050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3634 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3633 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 3629 stars left (next iteration limit 3993)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=3629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1157 n_q2=636 n_q3=1245 n_q4=591 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.F3XawVqGgh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=1424, passed=5709
Got 5709 stars (including 4039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3628 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3628 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 3622 stars left (next iteration limit 3987)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=3622 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1144 n_q2=651 n_q3=1241 n_q4=586 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HbuMX5qmST (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, bad_region=556, passed=3125
Got 3125 stars (including 2407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2054 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2047 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2047 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2053 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2048 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2048 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 2048 stars left (next iteration limit 2251)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2048 robust_rms=6.841 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.345 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.345 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2048 robust_rms=0.616 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.831 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2048 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.609 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.548 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2048 robust_rms_before=1.847 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.486 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.551 worst_region_rms_after=0.609 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.834 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.548
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.551 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.551 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.412 arcsec matched=2048
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits N_match=2048 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=668 n_q2=347 n_q3=667 n_q4=366 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gkych91u86 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=198, bad_region=554, passed=3113
Got 3113 stars (including 2388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2031 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2031 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2025 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2025 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Excluding outliers - 2025 stars left (next iteration limit 2226)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2025 robust_rms=7.008 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.171 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.171 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2025 robust_rms=0.626 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.955 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2025 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.663 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2025 robust_rms_before=1.907 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.424 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.535 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.533 worst_region_rms_after=0.663 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.640 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.563
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.533 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.533 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.424 arcsec matched=2025
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits N_match=2025 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.403 n_q1=664 n_q2=351 n_q3=658 n_q4=352 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.077
ref2=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.032
new1=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.089
new2=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.176
reference average sigma_overall=0.3595 worst_q_ratio=1.0545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (3629 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (3622 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586_astrometric_residuals.png (2048 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587_astrometric_residuals.png (2025 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:49.748 +14:00:12.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:49.748 +14:00:12.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:49.300 +13:59:50.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:49.300 +13:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:39:49.748 +14:00:12.96
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:49.300 +13:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00663 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mFnO5bCLRn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ldzHMmBibG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2SPCnzaDus
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zAXN9FvIgM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.581200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.581200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.55

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.55

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2611 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2611 deg
Loaded 4245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3386 out of 3596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 29453 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 2.2 pix  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
 15.5 mag.  Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  13.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mFnO5bCLRn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1176, bad_region=5538, passed=29533
Got 29533 stars (including 23167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4506 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4496 stars left (next iteration limit 4948)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4496 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1458 n_q2=789 n_q3=1504 n_q4=745 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ldzHMmBibG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1170, bad_region=5455, passed=29442
Got 29442 stars (including 23120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29442 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4493 stars left (next iteration limit 4944)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4493 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1453 n_q2=776 n_q3=1521 n_q4=743 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2SPCnzaDus (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=557, bad_region=2086, passed=16656
Got 16656 stars (including 14110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4212 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4200 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4200 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4212 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4200 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4199 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Excluding outliers - 4199 stars left (next iteration limit 4620)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4199 robust_rms=6.750 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.079 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.079 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4199 robust_rms=0.650 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.858 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4199 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.678 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.575 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4199 robust_rms_before=1.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.450 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.538 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.548 worst_region_rms_after=0.678 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.825 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.575
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.548 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.548 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.450 arcsec matched=4199
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits N_match=4199 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=1386 n_q2=655 n_q3=1401 n_q4=757 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zAXN9FvIgM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=735, bad_region=2129, passed=17079
Got 17079 stars (including 14318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4218 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4205 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4205 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4218 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4206 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4206 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Excluding outliers - 4206 stars left (next iteration limit 4625)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4206 robust_rms=6.809 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.364 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.364 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4206 robust_rms=0.662 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.006 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4206 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.710 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.597 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4206 robust_rms_before=1.927 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.566 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.565 worst_region_rms_after=0.710 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.709 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.597
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.565 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.565 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.455 arcsec matched=4206
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits N_match=4206 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1387 n_q2=666 n_q3=1399 n_q4=754 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0586.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9:  16.00 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35201.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32048_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 32048_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    10.08    10:57:07.02 +11:55:45.7   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32717_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 32717_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.11    10:25:32.29 +17:51:29.6   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32883_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 32883_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.11    10:29:54.93 +13:29:32.1   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32893_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 32893_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    11.74    10:55:46.67 +11:18:20.4   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32906_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 32906_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    11.99    10:54:30.28 +17:37:27.3   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33058_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33058_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.21    10:34:44.31 +12:19:52.9   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33116_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33116_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.46    10:34:55.22 +18:03:07.0   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33138_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33138_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.01    10:54:35.03 +10:22:27.8   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33215_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33215_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.04    10:55:02.08 +10:40:57.0   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33252_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33252_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.18    10:54:31.91 +13:36:37.4   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33301_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33301_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.74    10:22:21.68 +14:22:08.1   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33330_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33330_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.60    10:37:13.89 +17:56:57.6   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33362_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33362_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.35    10:51:59.58 +10:08:19.6   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33380_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33380_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.92    10:21:59.23 +16:54:00.3   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33509_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33509_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.81    10:23:35.43 +15:00:51.4   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33548_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33548_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.87    10:31:34.40 +18:05:28.2   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33635_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33635_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.70    10:33:36.41 +13:22:57.5   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33645_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33645_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.76    10:36:03.15 +11:12:38.4   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33751_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33751_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.84    10:43:33.30 +17:00:07.7   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33766_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33766_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.77    10:51:20.04 +14:33:46.7   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33777_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33777_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.64    10:50:49.45 +13:44:11.9   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33790_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33790_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.72    10:49:59.42 +15:00:29.2   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33821_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33821_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.87    10:29:10.38 +09:48:52.8   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33886_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33886_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.77    10:57:18.82 +16:28:03.1   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33911_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33911_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.94    10:30:19.90 +10:10:40.9   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33978_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 33978_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.76    10:51:29.88 +12:08:17.5   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34020_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34020_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.70    10:57:37.94 +14:07:37.3   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34036_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34036_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.86    10:49:30.07 +13:43:59.0   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34075_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34075_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.88    10:48:51.33 +15:41:59.2   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34091_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34091_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.09    10:34:33.53 +17:35:08.4   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34104_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34104_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.31    10:28:16.69 +16:04:02.9   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34216_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34216_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.13    10:32:32.51 +14:28:26.9   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34289_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34289_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    12.90    10:53:27.10 +16:26:50.9   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34309_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34309_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.19    10:38:51.64 +16:39:39.5   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34398_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34398_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.31    10:23:36.94 +11:57:34.2   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34485_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34485_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.48    10:26:42.88 +14:27:06.6   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34523_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34523_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.64    10:22:23.42 +16:36:04.7   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34548_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
Preparing report for the candidate 34548_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34590_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34590_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.56    10:21:36.31 +16:08:44.3   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34615_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
Preparing report for the candidate 34615_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34655_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34655_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.17    10:29:04.61 +10:02:03.1   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34679_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34679_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.82    10:29:40.60 +16:59:10.4   3359 5037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

**** FOUND  10:29:40.64 +16:59:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34818_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34818_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.25    10:40:16.64 +13:27:24.4   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34988_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 34988_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.71    10:25:57.46 +17:34:39.6   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35090_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35090_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.69    10:22:22.71 +11:47:23.6   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35100_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35100_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.85    10:25:46.78 +12:53:32.0   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35156_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35156_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.26    10:56:52.45 +13:10:44.2   7285 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35162_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35162_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.24    10:46:11.55 +11:01:31.3   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35201_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
Preparing report for the candidate 35201_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35208_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35208_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.59    10:29:24.84 +10:56:58.3   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35214_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35214_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.24    10:58:09.13 +12:28:07.6   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35257_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35257_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.56    10:47:48.85 +10:32:59.3   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35313_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35313_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.66    10:32:04.20 +10:04:04.6   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35358_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35358_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.15    10:26:50.60 +14:33:19.3   2900 3579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35398_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35398_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.82    10:48:46.62 +17:14:13.3   6120 5139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35420_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35420_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.67    10:49:07.01 +14:26:39.6   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35539_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35539_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.63    10:26:20.20 +13:27:59.7   2803 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35663_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35663_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.69    10:47:09.51 +16:56:34.5   5884 4962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35717_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35717_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.78    10:28:18.35 +10:53:05.6   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35798_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35798_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.83    10:28:57.89 +12:16:23.8   3167 2190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35831_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35831_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.73    10:35:14.11 +13:07:18.6   4105 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35856_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35856_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.94    10:37:11.08 +17:03:09.4   4445 5049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35866_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35866_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.81    10:24:27.88 +13:22:20.7   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35899_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35899_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.08    10:36:39.83 +17:42:33.6   4379 5449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35923_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35923_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.14    10:23:29.59 +10:25:35.1   2314 1092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35951_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 35951_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.35    10:43:10.22 +16:27:52.0   5303 4678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36093_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36093_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.91    10:46:58.31 +18:04:32.0   5866 5650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36112_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36112_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.90    10:39:12.38 +12:06:04.4   4675 2052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36137_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36137_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.14    10:22:47.89 +10:25:40.5   2210 1096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36148_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36148_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.22    10:26:28.93 +09:55:39.2   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36190_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36190_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.94    10:56:24.63 +16:41:51.3   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36199_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36199_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.21    10:25:54.10 +11:32:03.9   2698 1755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36202_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36202_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.77    10:53:07.62 +14:43:33.9   6739 3617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36263_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36263_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.95    10:37:05.72 +16:53:49.2   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36267_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36267_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.02    10:39:33.82 +14:53:25.0   4762 3735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36268_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36268_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.06    10:39:17.03 +15:21:51.9   4727 4022   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36272_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36272_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.01    10:56:03.09 +16:27:46.1   7171 4669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36275_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36275_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.19    10:42:11.90 +16:48:29.0   5166 4888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36277_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36277_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.36    10:33:36.49 +17:16:12.2   3932 5193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36278_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36278_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.31    10:34:00.39 +11:53:34.6   3905 1941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36297_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36297_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.12    10:40:27.59 +16:54:37.7   4916 4954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36315_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 36315_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    14.15    10:37:14.43 +14:59:44.2   4425 3805   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14619_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 14619_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    10.56    10:33:34.15 +14:01:53.4   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11352_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587
The candidate 11352_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.45562    2461321.95562    13.60    10:50:08.15 +15:08:56.0   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_100912_TTUQ2b1x1_2150914_vumAuTKF/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_05-55-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0587.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2
10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9
10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0
########### Completed Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2
10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9
10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0
###################################################################################
10:55:52.70 +14:03:35.2  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
10:44:27.48 +14:27:41.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
10:28:17.11 +14:14:26.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461321.95513885 -observatory V36
14:25:05.34 -17:05:19.2 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:10:30.14 -21:08:53.5 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:33:03.42 +19:58:42.5 Mars (1.1mag)
09:32:26.66 +15:14:10.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:17.33 +01:42:15.0 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:22.24 +20:58:42.0 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:38.03 -00:23:45.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:13.17 -23:43:29.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:15:37.02 +02:46:07.6 Moon (-8.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct  8 10:11 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461321.95513885:
09:32:28.97 +15:13:59.1 Io (6.1mag)
09:32:35.73 +15:13:22.9 Europa (6.2mag)
09:32:11.10 +15:15:37.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:32:03.27 +15:16:17.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:31:58.24 +15:35:21.1 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:32:28.88 +15:13:59.8 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:30:53.54 +15:35:07.5 Elara (17.5mag)
09:35:03.55 +14:36:54.8 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:31:15.50 +15:40:30.5 Carme (18.8mag)
00:43:16.31 +01:42:33.3 Titan (8.2mag)
00:43:10.56 +01:42:15.1 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:41.78 +01:39:34.1 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:43:04.53 +01:42:30.4 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:38.36 +01:30:00.4 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct  8 10:11 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461321.95513885:
02:28:34.00 +21:16:25.0 JWST
16:44:26.06 +44:22:00.3 Chandra
07:10:39.25 -11:50:46.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct  8 10:11 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461321.95513885 -observatory V36
03:46:51.60 +20:10:59.9 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:22:09.67 -33:33:57.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:38:34.32 -72:12:35.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:09.64 +34:33:55.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:00:59.01 +48:22:39.6 17.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:28:59.11 +25:29:22.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:00:29.29 +35:21:57.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:14.79 +41:39:33.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:57.58 -13:33:02.7 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:11:39.49 +16:14:11.3 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:48:02.89 -02:28:29.3 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:30:36.00 +66:20:22.6 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:39:23.99 +43:41:34.6 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:42:50.35 +13:58:16.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:28:09.64 -07:16:20.4 16.2mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:34:06.08 +19:23:16.6 17.7mag 2P/Encke
22:55:04.68 -32:19:07.7 14.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:06:40.23 +39:09:19.9 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:09:15.85 -07:55:26.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:24:19.64 -08:46:30.0 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:31:47.25 +16:19:25.3 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:02:53.24 +14:28:34.1 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:28:13.75 +39:23:41.5 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:55:42.18 +15:11:14.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:34:58.16 +13:55:56.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:59:22.97 -31:22:18.3 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:48:41.15 +19:26:10.4 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:34:49.65 +00:19:58.2 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:06:17.59 +00:51:50.3 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:12:48.83 +35:34:13.2 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:11:12.85 +02:21:40.1 14.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:30:44.85 +04:58:18.8 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:58:47.21 +44:34:03.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:22:37.14 +25:42:57.9 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:53:14.78 +31:48:36.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct  8 10:11 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct  8 10:11 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct  8 10:11 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
02:49:39.972 +09:01:02.57  SN 2026acow  2026-09-20.46 19.1942
09:39:37.926 +74:00:49.83  SN 2026acov  2026-09-17.48 18.2616
08:05:29.322 +05:14:06.98  SN 2026acou  2026-09-18.52 18.4141
17:56:10.210 +27:02:17.88  AT 2026acot  2026-09-16.66 20.54
00:31:47.220 +23:03:04.49  AT 2026acos  2026-09-15.68 21.76
00:51:52.260 +23:30:45.55  AT 2026acor  2026-09-15.67 21.43
00:19:18.999 +13:01:53.93  SN 2026acoq  2026-09-15.66 21.77
00:25:53.210 +10:32:15.56  AT 2026acop  2026-09-15.66 20.85
00:10:59.300 +26:38:50.52  AT 2026acoo  2026-09-15.64 22.08
17:42:29.340 +37:09:15.16  AT 2026acon  2026-09-15.57 21.2
17:26:39.230 +38:04:56.15  AT 2026acom  2026-09-15.56 20.87
02:23:20.250 +43:14:55.10  AT 2026acol  2026-09-12.72 21.35
22:38:47.000 +29:45:55.05  AT 2026acok  2026-09-12.64 21.73
23:53:22.910 +27:24:39.24  AT 2026acoj  2026-09-10.72 21.26
23:17:36.215 +30:18:45.54  AT 2026acoi  2026-09-10.68 20.11
21:39:43.940 +10:13:08.41  AT 2026acoh  2026-09-10.71 20.82
00:55:37.300 +39:16:36.35  AT 2026acog  2026-09-08.69 22
17:16:02.530 +20:27:50.17  AT 2026acof  2026-09-08.67 21.05
01:09:19.170 +13:11:58.16  AT 2026acoe  2026-09-03.69 20.5
00:14:16.390 +13:38:59.32  AT 2026acod  2026-09-03.68 20.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct  8 10:11 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Oct  8 10:11:12 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 25s (0.42 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 42s (0.70 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 13 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 16s (0.27 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 10s (0.17 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 37s (0.62 min)
FIELD_Leo-05-Q2b1x1: 93s (1.55 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 100s (1.67 min)
Finished: Thu Oct  8 10:12:52 CDT 2026