FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461321.71921420 08.10.2026 05:15:30.107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  2932
Objects passed selection criteria:  2925
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 2513.25
Average stars matched: 2189.25 (87.1083 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   229784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  8 07:15:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461321.71921420 08.10.2026 05:15:30.107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 189
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  16473
Objects passed selection criteria:  16425
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 14969
Average stars matched: 13397.5 (89.5016 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   241460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  8 07:16:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 865692 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 865692 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1657.4503
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 557.5318
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1658.8817
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 557.1390
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.720462
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.2299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-08T00:14:43.8534716' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-08T05:14:43.8534716' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61321.2185631134 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-08T05:14:53.7571197' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61321.2186777429 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      359.99898908297 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9998947232406 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.0113888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =              171.915 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.62131167209428 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.2299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.2299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits :)

Spent 0.481487 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.2000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-08T00:15:30.1076892' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-08T05:15:30.1076892' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61321.2190984609 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-08T05:15:40.0096467' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61321.2192130671 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.998989094719 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     -17.999894702787 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.0333333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     172.145555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.62052161467292 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.2000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.2000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits :)

Spent 0.487675 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits



fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.71867885
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.579 -18:00:05.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.579 -18:00:05.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.333 -18:00:27.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.333 -18:00:27.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:00.579 -18:00:05.40
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.333 -18:00:27.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00630 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fBpHHUiSLG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SZmARDVRL4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4rRparFkkq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jA3HAW6j0H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.33

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.33

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.3 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.3 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  11.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.fBpHHUiSLG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460
Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SZmARDVRL4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454
Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4rRparFkkq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=302, bad_region=790, passed=3906
Got 3906 stars (including 2872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3906 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5843 through 0 to 8.4412, gap 8.4412 to 351.5843
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 2802 stars left (next iteration limit 3081)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2802 robust_rms=7.635 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.312 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2802 robust_rms=0.660 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.928 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.928 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2802 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.439 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.439 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2802 robust_rms_before=1.011 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.406 worst_region_rms_after=0.439 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.330 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.439
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.358 arcsec matched=2802
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=2802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=900 n_q2=499 n_q3=899 n_q4=504 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jA3HAW6j0H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, bad_region=794, passed=3882
Got 3882 stars (including 2852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5953 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5953
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5950 through 0 to 8.4412, gap 8.4412 to 351.5950
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 2780 stars left (next iteration limit 3058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2780 robust_rms=7.825 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.272 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.272 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2780 robust_rms=0.695 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.875 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.875 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2780 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.431 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.431 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2780 robust_rms_before=1.025 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.399 worst_region_rms_after=0.431 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.266 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.431
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.358 arcsec matched=2780
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=2780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=899 n_q2=503 n_q3=886 n_q4=492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.090
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.142
reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (2802 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (2780 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:25.9:  10.81 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:56.37 -20:39:14.5:  10.80 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:56.37 -20:39:14.5:  10.74 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:25.9:  10.86 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:25.9: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9634 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.37 -20:39:14.5: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8318 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    10.95    23:55:48.62 -17:47:25.9   4186 3323   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    10.97    23:55:48.58 -17:47:25.8   4186 3327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    10.83    00:05:56.37 -20:39:14.8   5623 1585   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    10.83    00:05:56.38 -20:39:14.3   5624 1589   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20094_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20094_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    9.89    00:02:07.34 -14:40:37.7   5106 5208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.34 -14:40:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    7.16    23:43:49.89 -15:17:09.4   2430 4828   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.88 -15:17:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.579 -18:00:05.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.579 -18:00:05.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.333 -18:00:27.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.333 -18:00:27.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:00.579 -18:00:05.40
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.333 -18:00:27.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00630 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0tknoNKe7f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MwLMaTyTqG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xV9laBjmwV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sxvYNozvJG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.46

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.46

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.5 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.5 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  13.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0tknoNKe7f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965
Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MwLMaTyTqG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162
Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xV9laBjmwV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=800, bad_region=4476, passed=21969
Got 21969 stars (including 16862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5647 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5647
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5642 through 0 to 8.4413, gap 8.4413 to 351.5642
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5316)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=7.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.683 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.879 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.879 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.478 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.478 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=1.001 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.470 worst_region_rms_after=0.478 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.321 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.478
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.470 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.470 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec matched=4833
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1582 n_q2=929 n_q3=1459 n_q4=863 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sxvYNozvJG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=803, bad_region=4426, passed=21910
Got 21910 stars (including 16832 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21910 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5633 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5633
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5628 through 0 to 8.4412, gap 8.4412 to 351.5628
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4832 stars left (next iteration limit 5315)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=7.548 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.195 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.195 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=0.694 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.960 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.960 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.487 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4832 robust_rms_before=1.013 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.441 worst_region_rms_after=0.487 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.322 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.487
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.441 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.389 arcsec matched=4832
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=4832 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1587 n_q2=930 n_q3=1457 n_q4=858 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:28.74 -22:12:02.3:  13.77 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:04:33.83 -20:54:14.3:  13.36 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:19.58 -21:18:39.5:  13.87 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:33.00 -21:23:29.5:  14.05 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:19:16.26 -21:53:44.8:  13.96 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:34.69 -22:03:01.7:  14.24 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:28.74 -22:12:02.3:  13.72 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:04:33.83 -20:54:14.3:  13.53 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.74 -22:12:02.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5529 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:33.83 -20:54:14.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4607 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:19.58 -21:18:39.5:  13.93 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:19.58 -21:18:39.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6749 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:33.00 -21:23:29.5:  14.26 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:33.00 -21:23:29.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6668 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:40.6:  13.74 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:30:52.89 -21:49:46.1:  13.80 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:19:16.26 -21:53:44.8:  13.84 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:34.69 -22:03:01.7:  14.18 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.21 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:34.69 -22:03:01.7: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8083 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:16.26 -21:53:44.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8375 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:06:56.43 -22:09:33.6:  13.69 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:32:28.24 -20:49:26.5:  13.63 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:31:15.75 -21:49:18.1:  13.93 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:32:52.95 -21:55:50.5:  13.71 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:30:52.89 -21:49:46.1:  13.62 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:40.6:  13.85 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:52.89 -21:49:46.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5809 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:40.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7040 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:45.76 -22:06:57.9:  13.96 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:06:56.43 -22:09:33.6:  13.68 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:56.43 -22:09:33.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7926 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:39:25.94 -21:57:07.5:  13.82 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:30:41.72 -20:54:31.1:  14.04 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:32:28.24 -20:49:26.5:  13.83 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:32:52.95 -21:55:50.5:  13.83 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:31:15.75 -21:49:18.1:  14.15 +/- 0.27  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:28.24 -20:49:26.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5651 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:52.95 -21:55:50.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6892 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.02 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:15.75 -21:49:18.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7177 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:45.76 -22:06:57.9:  14.10 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:45.76 -22:06:57.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7727 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:38:36.09 -13:44:14.5:  13.68 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:39:25.94 -21:57:07.5:  14.17 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:30:41.72 -20:54:31.1:  13.75 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:41.72 -20:54:31.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8017 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:25.94 -21:57:07.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7751 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:36:13.50 -14:45:36.9:  14.09 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:38:36.09 -13:44:14.5:  13.69 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:36.09 -13:44:14.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7146 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:36:13.50 -14:45:36.9:  13.95 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:13.50 -14:45:36.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8291 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20985_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20985_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    10.75    00:17:48.58 -20:02:26.5   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20986_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20986_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    10.72    23:53:38.62 -17:56:24.7   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20987_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20987_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    10.90    23:33:25.32 -19:04:24.3   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20988_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    11.17    00:16:28.58 -20:40:22.2   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20989_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20989_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    10.86    23:35:31.41 -15:01:30.3   1201 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20991_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20991_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    11.37    23:49:50.10 -18:26:57.8   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20993_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20993_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    11.77    23:55:13.91 -18:51:38.4   4105 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20995_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20995_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    11.97    23:34:34.93 -16:39:39.3   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21001_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21001_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.21    23:46:16.61 -14:02:35.2   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21002_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21002_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.67    23:54:37.53 -19:38:51.4   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21007_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21007_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.63    00:14:39.94 -14:22:03.5   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21008_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21008_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.56    23:31:00.72 -19:05:48.3   0620 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21009_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21009_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.45    23:39:31.48 -14:07:47.2   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21011_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21011_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.59    23:38:15.77 -14:09:08.5   1592 5505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21012_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21012_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.80    23:39:21.24 -21:38:42.6   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21013_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21013_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.55    23:41:15.98 -16:08:17.5   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21015_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21015_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.65    23:39:36.05 -13:43:39.0   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.09    00:15:45.10 -21:17:59.3   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21017_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21017_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.68    23:41:10.67 -16:03:49.4   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21020_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21020_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.09    00:15:18.13 -21:36:36.4   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21024_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21024_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.08    23:37:18.32 -19:39:15.6   1542 2156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21027_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21027_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.82    23:55:29.18 -13:55:53.9   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21030_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21030_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.04    23:40:49.63 -21:46:19.2   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21031_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21031_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.07    23:42:19.93 -17:29:13.0   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21033_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21033_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.90    23:57:44.21 -14:02:47.9   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21036_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21036_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.10    00:15:00.20 -18:22:42.2   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21039_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21039_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.36    00:12:35.15 -21:51:31.3   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21045_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21045_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.08    23:35:25.36 -19:44:43.2   1272 2092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21052_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21052_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.68    00:09:51.90 -18:16:33.0   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21055_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21055_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.37    23:55:51.53 -20:46:31.9   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21056_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21056_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.95    23:43:43.55 -16:51:32.8   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21057_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21057_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.00    23:52:13.18 -13:52:08.5   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21058_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21058_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.88    23:35:28.70 -15:23:02.4   1201 4745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21061_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21061_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.17    23:42:34.30 -14:57:19.1   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21062_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21062_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.23    23:33:42.13 -16:01:57.9   0951 4343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21064_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21064_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.46    00:04:33.83 -20:54:14.4   5427 1436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.46    00:04:33.82 -20:54:14.2   5427 1440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21066_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21066_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.56    00:18:28.75 -22:12:02.6   7379 0603   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.55    00:18:28.73 -22:12:02.0   7380 0607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21069_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21069_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.25    23:53:35.67 -18:35:20.7   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21070_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21070_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.27    23:37:37.21 -17:09:13.5   1547 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21071_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21071_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.32    00:10:19.30 -17:00:00.2   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21073_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21073_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.28    23:38:02.37 -14:27:39.3   1564 5316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21078_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21078_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.60    00:13:19.56 -21:18:39.5   6663 1167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.77    00:13:19.59 -21:18:39.5   6663 1171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21079_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21079_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.59    23:48:24.12 -22:06:57.6   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21083_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21083_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.40    00:11:12.81 -18:16:06.8   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21084_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21084_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.33    23:55:04.70 -14:23:43.4   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21085_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21085_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.35    23:42:40.21 -19:55:14.0   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21086_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21086_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.50    23:33:53.30 -20:21:52.4   1062 1707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21087_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21087_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.66    00:15:33.03 -21:23:29.7   6977 1109   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.67    00:15:32.97 -21:23:29.4   6977 1113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21088_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21088_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.54    00:18:06.54 -17:50:32.5   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21090_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21090_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.30    23:31:33.09 -18:24:20.2   0684 2888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21093_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21093_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.28    00:03:53.92 -15:00:43.4   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21099_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21099_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.10    23:41:52.82 -14:07:19.9   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21101_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21101_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.79    00:18:34.69 -22:03:01.9   7395 0694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.85    00:18:34.69 -22:03:01.6   7396 0698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21103_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21103_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.74    00:19:16.28 -21:53:44.5   7496 0785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.99    00:19:16.25 -21:53:45.2   7497 0789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21104_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21104_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.43    23:49:41.68 -21:45:51.2   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21105_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21105_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.29    23:35:36.93 -16:10:51.8   1236 4260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21111_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21111_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.52    00:17:32.56 -15:30:24.4   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21112_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21112_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.33    23:33:30.59 -15:39:32.9   0915 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21113_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21113_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.73    00:15:25.28 -21:26:40.6   6958 1077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.68    00:15:25.31 -21:26:40.6   6958 1081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21114_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21114_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.51    23:40:58.82 -17:53:21.9   2047 3241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21117_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21117_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.58    23:30:52.93 -21:49:45.9   0658 0790   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.58    23:30:52.85 -21:49:46.2   0659 0794   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.56    00:13:42.71 -15:32:55.8   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21122_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21122_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.76    00:06:56.43 -22:09:33.5   5754 0669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.83    00:06:56.42 -22:09:33.6   5754 0673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21126_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21126_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.41    23:42:00.55 -15:42:12.2   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21136_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21136_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.67    23:32:52.96 -21:55:50.7   0947 0740   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.72    23:32:52.94 -21:55:50.4   0947 0744   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21141_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21141_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.66    23:31:15.76 -21:49:18.2   0712 0797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.81    23:31:15.74 -21:49:17.9   0713 0801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21142_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21142_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.58    23:32:28.27 -20:49:26.6   0866 1415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.55    23:32:28.22 -20:49:26.4   0867 1419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21158_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21158_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.76    23:47:45.83 -22:06:58.1   3059 0692   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.79    23:47:45.69 -22:06:57.8   3060 0695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21167_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21167_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.61    00:13:21.09 -15:43:19.1   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21168_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21168_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.75    23:39:25.96 -21:57:06.7   1880 0762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.81    23:39:25.92 -21:57:08.3   1880 0766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21179_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21179_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.42    23:37:46.94 -15:18:10.1   1540 4802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21183_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21183_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.68    23:30:41.73 -20:54:30.7   0612 1352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    14.04    23:30:41.71 -20:54:31.6   0613 1356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21188_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21188_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.50    23:52:39.70 -17:29:25.0   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21289_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21289_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.63    23:38:36.11 -13:44:15.1   1635 5756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.86    23:38:36.08 -13:44:13.9   1635 5760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21318_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21318_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.84    23:32:16.54 -16:04:20.9   0741 4313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21325_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21325_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.53    23:40:33.98 -15:20:31.2   1951 4786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21347_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21347_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.58    23:42:53.95 -15:15:32.7   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21378_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 21378_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.21868    2461321.71868    13.80    23:36:13.62 -14:45:37.6   1300 5124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-14-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    13.89    23:36:13.38 -14:45:36.1   1300 5128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    10.16    00:02:07.34 -14:40:37.6   5106 5208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.33 -14:40:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    7.39    23:43:49.88 -15:17:09.5   2430 4828   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.88 -15:17:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20235_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    11.16    23:32:50.32 -21:52:59.8   0940 0773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20158_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20158_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.21921    2461321.71921    12.11    23:31:27.42 -20:21:12.8   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_071313_TTUQ2b1x1_2515106_gAVdag4N/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-15-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461321.71867885 -observatory V36
14:24:02.67 -16:58:50.8 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:10:39.81 -21:09:23.6 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:32:29.89 +20:00:24.4 Mars (1.1mag)
09:32:17.18 +15:14:53.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:21.51 +01:42:41.1 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:23.59 +20:58:45.2 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:39.46 -00:23:36.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:13.43 -23:43:29.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:01:19.05 +04:11:58.0 Moon (-8.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct  8 07:15 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461321.71867885:
09:32:14.35 +15:15:10.1 Io (6.1mag)
09:32:27.96 +15:13:56.1 Europa (6.2mag)
09:32:01.93 +15:16:18.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:31:55.29 +15:16:52.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:31:47.75 +15:36:06.6 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:32:19.40 +15:14:43.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:30:43.46 +15:35:46.7 Elara (17.5mag)
09:34:54.92 +14:37:37.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:31:07.07 +15:41:09.7 Carme (18.8mag)
00:43:21.69 +01:42:58.4 Titan (8.2mag)
00:43:15.53 +01:42:43.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:45.64 +01:40:01.0 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:43:09.51 +01:42:57.7 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:42.66 +01:30:26.8 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct  8 07:15 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461321.71867885:
02:28:12.73 +21:14:59.7 JWST
15:49:38.73 +49:41:06.2 Chandra
05:57:30.95 +30:13:17.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct  8 07:15 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461321.71867885 -observatory V36
03:46:54.85 +20:10:52.9 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:21:57.50 -33:34:18.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:38:28.04 -72:11:38.6 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:10.95 +34:33:30.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:01:13.47 +48:22:04.2 17.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:28:53.05 +25:29:31.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:00:21.90 +35:20:30.1 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:12.68 +41:40:15.4 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:56.17 -13:32:49.9 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:11:13.21 +16:15:21.2 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:47:48.67 -02:27:17.9 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:29:37.73 +66:25:38.4 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:39:39.97 +43:43:26.8 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:42:36.56 +13:56:53.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:27:59.70 -06:07:19.4 16.2mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:34:40.19 +19:25:01.2 17.7mag 2P/Encke
22:54:50.16 -32:22:07.2 14.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:06:21.84 +39:11:00.4 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:09:06.21 -07:54:16.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:24:29.22 -08:45:59.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:31:27.49 +16:20:54.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:03:06.85 +14:29:11.0 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:27:22.05 +39:19:23.1 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:55:08.06 +15:16:11.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:34:28.59 +13:59:11.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:58:47.48 -31:18:10.2 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:48:30.43 +19:26:46.2 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:34:56.88 +00:20:52.1 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:08:36.55 +00:38:38.2 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:12:16.88 +35:35:10.0 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:10:37.53 +02:25:09.6 14.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:30:51.52 +05:00:07.4 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:58:23.89 +44:30:46.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:22:15.95 +25:43:16.8 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:53:00.02 +31:49:29.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct  8 07:15 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct  8 07:15 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct  8 07:15 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:10:59.300 +26:38:50.52  AT 2026acoo  2026-09-15.64 22.08
17:42:29.340 +37:09:15.16  AT 2026acon  2026-09-15.57 21.2
17:26:39.230 +38:04:56.15  AT 2026acom  2026-09-15.56 20.87
02:23:20.250 +43:14:55.10  AT 2026acol  2026-09-12.72 21.35
22:38:47.000 +29:45:55.05  AT 2026acok  2026-09-12.64 21.73
23:53:22.910 +27:24:39.24  AT 2026acoj  2026-09-10.72 21.26
23:17:36.215 +30:18:45.54  AT 2026acoi  2026-09-10.68 20.11
21:39:43.940 +10:13:08.41  AT 2026acoh  2026-09-10.71 20.82
00:55:37.300 +39:16:36.35  AT 2026acog  2026-09-08.69 22
17:16:02.530 +20:27:50.17  AT 2026acof  2026-09-08.67 21.05
01:09:19.170 +13:11:58.16  AT 2026acoe  2026-09-03.69 20.5
00:14:16.390 +13:38:59.32  AT 2026acod  2026-09-03.68 20.33
00:30:12.980 +25:25:52.95  AT 2026acoc  2026-08-26.73 20.66
02:16:05.440 -00:09:25.04  AT 2026acob  2026-09-19.85 23.13
02:19:56.810 +01:30:07.71  AT 2026acoa  2026-09-19.85 22.57
02:04:39.900 +04:31:25.83  AT 2026acnz  2026-09-19.85 22.05
02:09:20.030 +00:09:19.94  AT 2026acny  2026-09-19.85 22.39
01:54:18.090 +03:17:35.48  AT 2026acnx  2026-09-19.85 22.34
00:59:42.230 +05:10:20.14  AT 2026acnw  2026-09-19.83 22.8
02:26:28.840 +01:53:43.31  AT 2026acnv  2026-09-17.92 22.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct  8 07:15 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Oct  8 07:15:07 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 21s (0.35 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 1s (0.02 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 33s (0.55 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 3s (0.05 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 22s (0.37 min)
FIELD_Cet-09-Q2b1x1: 68s (1.13 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 75s (1.25 min)
Finished: Thu Oct  8 07:16:22 CDT 2026