Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 08.2219  2461321.7219  11.73  23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5
 78.21142 -65.31167 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -1      0       1  11.8     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5:  15.25 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -crosshair 2133.19434 4012.53345 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -crosshair 2132.58252 4011.02661 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22188 23 42 15.75 -08 38 12.5          11.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22166 23 42 15.77 -08 38 12.3          11.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22209 23 42 15.74 -08 38 12.7          11.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 08.2219*  23 42 15.75 -08 38 12.5  11.7 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7219,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2219 11.73CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 08.2219  2461321.7219  12.62  23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7
 86.21408 -67.15783 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -0      0       0  12.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7:  15.54 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -crosshair 4370.14062 4258.45312 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -crosshair 4369.42627 4256.90186 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22188 23 57 11.20 -08 14 16.7          12.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22166 23 57 11.22 -08 14 16.4          12.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22209 23 57 11.17 -08 14 17.0          12.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 08.2219*  23 57 11.20 -08 14 16.7  12.6 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7219,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2219 12.62CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 08.2219  2461321.7219  13.89  23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8
 77.53433 -68.62934 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -1     -1       1  13.8    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -crosshair 3309.13550 2373.00195 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -crosshair 3308.56421 2371.46240 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22188 23 50 03.45 -11 21 21.8          13.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22166 23 50 03.46 -11 21 21.5          13.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 08.22209 23 50 03.43 -11 21 22.1          13.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 08.2219*  23 50 03.45 -11 21 21.8  13.9 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7219,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2219 13.89CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461321.72209109 08.10.2026 05:19:38.670   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  3660
Objects passed selection criteria:  3660
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3580
Average stars matched: 3452.75 (96.4455 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  8 06:50:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461321.72209109 08.10.2026 05:19:38.670   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 210
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  19906
Objects passed selection criteria:  19837
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 19122.8
Average stars matched: 17952 (93.8777 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   246500 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  8 06:50:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 873727 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 873727 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1373.4602
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 514.9988
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1371.9560
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 516.2036
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.7944
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-08T00:19:01.7495093' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-08T05:19:01.7495093' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61321.2215480208 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-08T05:19:11.6493225' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61321.2216626043 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999444152315 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99961886603483 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.0794444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             172.0225 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38703388581115 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits :)

Spent 0.548025 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-08T00:19:38.6707478' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-08T05:19:38.6707478' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61321.221975347 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-08T05:19:48.5749072' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61321.222089977 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      359.99944416135 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99961885526469 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.0966666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     172.234444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38663395689009 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20698 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits :)

Spent 0.551450 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.72166376
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.103 -09:59:44.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.103 -09:59:44.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0065 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.319 -09:59:36.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.319 -09:59:36.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:01.103 -09:59:44.97
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.319 -09:59:36.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00251 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i3NECcfpZ1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2dZlFwvZti
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.khmaH5ciXb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sRbwsEuoss
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.92

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.92

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.1 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.i3NECcfpZ1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2dZlFwvZti (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.khmaH5ciXb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=960, passed=4695
Got 4695 stars (including 3454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9541 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9541
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3365 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3363 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3363 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9541 through 0 to 8.0782, gap 8.0782 to 351.9541
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3365 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3362 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3362 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 3362 stars left (next iteration limit 3699)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3362 robust_rms=7.496 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3362 robust_rms=0.715 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.824 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.815 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3362 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.439 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3362 robust_rms_before=1.038 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.438 worst_region_rms_after=0.439 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.158 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.433
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.438 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.438 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec matched=3362
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=3362 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=1105 n_q2=598 n_q3=1108 n_q4=551 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sRbwsEuoss (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=959, passed=4700
Got 4700 stars (including 3460 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4700 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9541 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9541
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3363 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3360 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3360 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9541 through 0 to 8.0781, gap 8.0781 to 351.9541
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3363 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3359 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3359 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 3359 stars left (next iteration limit 3696)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3359 robust_rms=7.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.101 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.101 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3359 robust_rms=0.699 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3359 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.444 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3359 robust_rms_before=1.028 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.412 worst_region_rms_after=0.444 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.205 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.429
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.412 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.346 arcsec matched=3359
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=3359 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1101 n_q2=605 n_q3=1108 n_q4=545 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.117
reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (3362 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (3359 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.6:  11.88 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5:  15.25 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.6:  11.89 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.6: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8918 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20198.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20198_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 20198_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20200_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 20200_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    11.87    23:32:49.48 -08:01:55.4   0698 4368   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    11.92    23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.7   0697 4366   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.103 -09:59:44.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.103 -09:59:44.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0065 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.319 -09:59:36.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.319 -09:59:36.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:01.103 -09:59:44.97
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.319 -09:59:36.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00251 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bIoiYeBWpC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3fnWNewtOS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.svbhNisZQc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lR0SMIdqi5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 112 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.3 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
 15.3 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.3 (SNR )  14.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bIoiYeBWpC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724
Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3fnWNewtOS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.svbhNisZQc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1031, bad_region=5091, passed=25310
Got 25310 stars (including 19388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25310 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9468 through 0 to 8.0968, gap 8.0968 to 351.9468
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9468 through 0 to 8.0972, gap 8.0972 to 351.9468
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=7.439 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.935 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.935 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.686 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.445 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.444 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4818 robust_rms_before=1.023 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.417 worst_region_rms_after=0.445 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.165 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.444
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.417 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec matched=4818
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=1572 n_q2=903 n_q3=1520 n_q4=823 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lR0SMIdqi5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1044, bad_region=5087, passed=25256
Got 25256 stars (including 19341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25256 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9464 through 0 to 8.1036, gap 8.1036 to 351.9464
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9464 through 0 to 8.1040, gap 8.1040 to 351.9464
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=7.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.160 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.160 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.669 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.940 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.940 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.456 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=1.030 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.437 worst_region_rms_after=0.456 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.212 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.455
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.437 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.437 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.361 arcsec matched=4813
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1580 n_q2=908 n_q3=1499 n_q4=826 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.59 -05:59:51.3:  13.80 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:27.03 -13:24:55.0:  13.91 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:40.38 -06:46:24.9:  14.06 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:53.97 -12:53:49.3:  12.33 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:09.53 -08:03:51.4:  13.73 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.2:  12.82 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:53.97 -12:53:49.3:  12.64 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:40.38 -06:46:24.9:  13.98 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.2:  12.87 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.59 -05:59:51.3:  13.97 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:09.53 -08:03:51.4:  13.82 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:53.97 -12:53:49.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0052 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:27.03 -13:24:55.0:  14.26 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.01 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3436 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:40.38 -06:46:24.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2547 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.59 -05:59:51.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1729 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:27.03 -13:24:55.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1178 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:09.53 -08:03:51.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2375 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7:  15.54 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.27 -09:01:11.7:  13.63 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.42 -12:23:25.5:  13.72 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.27 -09:01:11.7:  13.81 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.27 -09:01:11.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9500 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:32.56 -09:47:31.9:  14.47 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.42 -12:23:25.5:  13.99 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:20.95 -08:00:48.4:  14.38 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:09.76 -09:18:48.0:  14.39 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.42 -12:23:25.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9385 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:43.38 -06:40:24.7:  14.25 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:24.31 -07:13:36.2:  14.49 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:52.58 -06:42:22.0:  14.59 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:32.56 -09:47:31.9:  14.77 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.56 -09:47:31.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3503 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:20.95 -08:00:48.4:  14.28 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:53.88 -10:28:24.7:  14.46 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:09.76 -09:18:48.0:  14.32 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.32 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:20.95 -08:00:48.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3394 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.35 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:09.76 -09:18:48.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2499 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:43.38 -06:40:24.7:  14.17 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.21 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:43.38 -06:40:24.7: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2903 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:24.31 -07:13:36.2:  14.39 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:24.31 -07:13:36.2: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3887 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:52.58 -06:42:22.0:  14.46 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.52 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:52.58 -06:42:22.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4256 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:53.88 -10:28:24.7:  14.54 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:53.88 -10:28:24.7: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3936 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32188.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32339.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32130_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32130_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.98    00:13:04.55 -09:16:00.7   6739 3617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32131_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32131_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.28    23:56:09.52 -08:03:53.0   4216 4364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.20    23:56:09.53 -08:03:49.8   4216 4363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32132_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32132_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.22    00:06:27.06 -13:24:54.7   5728 1119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.05    00:06:27.00 -13:24:55.2   5727 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32133_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32133_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.26    23:33:40.55 -06:46:24.5   0815 5138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.25    23:33:40.20 -06:46:25.3   0813 5136   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32136_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32136_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.08    00:13:02.60 -05:59:50.1   6764 5602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.34    00:13:02.57 -05:59:52.5   6763 5601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32139_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32139_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    13.29    23:54:35.19 -07:43:45.2   3981 4567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.42    23:54:35.22 -07:43:43.2   3981 4566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32140_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32140_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    13.04    00:10:53.98 -12:53:49.3   6388 1425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.97    00:10:53.97 -12:53:49.2   6387 1424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32146_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32146_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    10.81    23:53:52.62 -09:55:48.3   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32147_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32147_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    11.21    23:34:25.47 -11:06:55.7   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32148_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32148_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    11.15    23:36:11.40 -07:03:36.1   1201 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    11.22    23:34:03.94 -13:55:36.3   0940 0773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32151_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    11.45    23:50:12.77 -10:26:40.1   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32155_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32155_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    11.76    23:42:15.74 -08:38:12.6   2133 4011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

**** FOUND  23:42:15.76 -08:38:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32156_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32156_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    11.85    23:55:25.49 -10:50:55.7   4105 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32165_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32165_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.16    23:35:22.88 -08:41:56.4   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32170_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32170_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.20    23:32:37.72 -12:24:12.0   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32179_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32179_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.45    23:46:37.06 -06:02:45.2   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32188_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 32188_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.71    23:54:51.19 -11:38:10.5   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32193_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32193_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.63    23:40:02.15 -06:09:03.0   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32194_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32194_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.73    00:14:18.04 -06:22:01.7   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32198_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32198_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.72    23:32:06.31 -11:08:56.4   0620 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32199_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32199_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.80    23:41:49.98 -08:09:12.8   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32202_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32202_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.83    23:40:16.79 -13:39:54.0   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32206_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32206_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.93    23:55:36.00 -05:55:13.0   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32209_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32209_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.84    23:40:05.34 -05:44:54.5   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32212_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32212_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.96    23:38:48.38 -06:10:39.3   1592 5505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32215_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32215_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.92    23:41:44.59 -08:04:45.6   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32228_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32228_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.06    23:57:47.84 -06:02:01.1   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32230_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32230_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.09    23:38:12.00 -11:40:53.3   1542 2156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32232_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32232_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.17    23:42:55.85 -09:29:55.9   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32233_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32233_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.10    23:41:41.75 -13:47:14.0   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32234_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32234_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.21    23:36:10.10 -07:25:08.1   1201 4745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32245_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32245_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.16    23:53:50.53 -10:34:44.2   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32246_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32246_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.27    23:34:29.15 -08:04:28.4   0951 4343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32247_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32247_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.25    23:52:24.69 -05:51:41.1   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32248_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32248_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.14    23:43:02.71 -06:58:01.5   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32256_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32256_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.36    23:48:56.99 -14:06:46.2   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32261_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32261_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.18    23:44:15.05 -08:52:03.3   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32263_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32263_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.30    23:43:22.21 -11:55:51.7   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32264_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32264_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.36    00:17:30.66 -09:50:55.7   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32265_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32265_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.19    23:36:23.73 -11:46:45.5   1272 2092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32271_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32271_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.38    23:42:19.96 -06:08:10.0   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32272_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.48    00:03:48.09 -06:59:55.0   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32273_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32273_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.55    23:38:36.36 -06:29:12.5   1564 5316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32275_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32275_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.33    23:38:21.24 -09:10:49.7   1547 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32276_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32276_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.39    23:32:34.39 -10:27:20.7   0684 2888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32277_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32277_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.61    23:41:38.59 -09:54:18.7   2047 3241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32278_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32278_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.55    23:50:10.47 -13:45:32.1   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32280_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32280_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.59    00:08:53.95 -08:18:06.5   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32282_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32282_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.43    23:36:21.12 -08:12:55.2   1236 4260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32284_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32284_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.63    23:42:31.98 -07:42:59.8   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32286_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32286_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.60    23:52:55.15 -09:28:53.2   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32289_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32289_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.36    23:34:16.37 -07:42:06.6   0915 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32296_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32296_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.52    23:55:12.54 -06:23:03.8   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32298_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32298_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.70    23:43:43.19 -11:55:07.7   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32299_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32299_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.66    23:41:06.74 -07:21:34.3   1951 4786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32302_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32302_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.67    23:34:57.78 -12:24:15.4   1062 1707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32304_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32304_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.68    23:59:15.81 -07:19:38.9   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32308_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32308_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.76    23:38:24.20 -07:19:45.7   1540 4802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32310_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32310_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.59    23:48:53.10 -13:53:33.9   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32313_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32313_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.58    23:47:12.53 -09:27:33.5   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32321_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32321_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.11    23:35:27.28 -11:27:06.1   1128 2289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32322_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32322_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.97    23:51:55.01 -13:52:53.3   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32328_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32328_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.96    00:10:08.84 -08:51:03.3   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32329_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32329_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.89    23:38:44.18 -08:41:09.6   1601 3977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32330_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32330_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    13.93    00:00:47.27 -09:01:12.1   4906 3784   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.97    00:00:47.28 -09:01:11.4   4906 3783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32332_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32332_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.12    23:46:02.01 -11:00:31.3   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32333_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32333_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.83    23:33:06.24 -08:07:12.2   0741 4313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32337_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32337_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.74    23:39:03.29 -08:16:07.6   1646 4231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32339_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 32339_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32343_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32343_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.96    23:42:27.20 -12:04:29.5   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32344_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32344_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.97    23:48:58.59 -07:51:31.4   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32345_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.25    23:36:34.21 -12:16:09.5   1302 1794   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32347_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32347_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.86    00:06:13.32 -12:58:27.3   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32348_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32348_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.78    23:32:29.77 -12:56:08.7   0696 1374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32349_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32349_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.26    23:34:49.97 -11:23:35.2   1034 2323   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32350_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32350_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.27    23:44:48.85 -10:30:57.5   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32352_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32352_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.00    23:33:10.21 -12:23:26.5   0793 1711   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.89    23:33:10.63 -12:23:24.5   0793 1710   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32353_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32353_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.79    00:16:49.25 -10:47:56.9   7285 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32354_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32354_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.85    23:43:22.61 -07:16:11.6   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32356_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32356_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.93    00:07:50.71 -13:26:56.7   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32358_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32358_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.22    23:42:36.60 -13:26:23.1   2210 1096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32359_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32359_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.01    00:18:07.58 -11:30:08.0   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32367_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32367_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.10    23:49:21.47 -12:58:51.7   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32369_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32369_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.98    23:48:14.09 -13:02:11.4   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32371_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32371_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.43    00:08:49.29 -06:45:57.1   6120 5139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32373_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32373_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.79    00:00:26.07 -10:32:04.6   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32377_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32377_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.24    23:53:57.20 -06:29:43.2   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32379_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32379_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.88    23:46:58.41 -06:19:47.9   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32382_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32382_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.26    23:32:32.67 -09:47:31.1   0674 3294   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.61    23:32:32.45 -09:47:32.8   0672 3292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32385_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32385_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.05    00:07:15.94 -07:03:37.5   5884 4962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32389_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32389_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.25    23:33:38.36 -12:58:00.8   0868 1359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32396_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32396_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.25    23:54:09.78 -09:18:48.6   3918 3609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.25    23:54:09.74 -09:18:47.5   3917 3608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32400_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32400_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.24    00:07:05.96 -05:55:41.8   5866 5650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32401_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32401_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.33    23:33:20.95 -08:00:49.7   0778 4380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.36    23:33:20.94 -08:00:47.1   0777 4379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.34    23:59:16.96 -11:53:10.1   4675 2052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32404_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32404_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.29    23:52:43.45 -06:40:25.5   3701 5207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.29    23:52:43.31 -06:40:24.0   3700 5206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32405_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32405_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.34    23:40:24.30 -07:13:36.0   1843 4868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.47    23:40:24.33 -07:13:36.4   1843 4866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.31    23:32:52.64 -06:42:21.6   0692 5178   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.63    23:32:52.53 -06:42:22.4   0691 5177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32409_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32409_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 08.22166    2461321.72166    14.35    23:35:53.96 -10:28:23.8   1187 2887   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.47    23:35:53.81 -10:28:25.5   1187 2885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.26    00:09:09.34 -09:33:23.4   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32413_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32413_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.27    23:50:11.41 -13:49:45.9   3332 0871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

**** FOUND  23:50:11.43 -13:49:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32415_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32415_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.21    23:54:15.89 -06:41:40.2   3932 5193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.35    23:54:04.60 -12:04:14.4   3905 1941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32419_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32419_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.32    00:00:49.14 -07:04:59.8   4916 4954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32425_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 32425_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    14.75    23:42:10.49 -13:10:18.7   2144 1258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11066_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 11066_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.91    00:14:29.48 -10:22:40.0   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03619_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 03619_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.83    00:14:39.86 -13:36:34.1   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30437_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 30437_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.13    00:12:03.54 -13:51:10.7   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11335_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 11335_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    13.29    00:10:50.31 -10:15:40.9   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04351_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 04351_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 08.22209    2461321.72209    12.89    00:15:06.39 -13:18:00.6   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_064707_TTUQ2b1x1_1763758_1I3B7hPV/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5
23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7
23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8
########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5
23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7
23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8
###################################################################################
23:42:15.75 -08:38:12.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:57:11.20 -08:14:16.7  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:50:03.45 -11:21:21.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461321.72166376 -observatory V36
14:24:03.46 -16:58:55.7 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:10:39.69 -21:09:23.2 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:32:30.32 +20:00:23.1 Mars (1.1mag)
09:32:17.30 +15:14:53.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:21.45 +01:42:40.7 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:23.58 +20:58:45.1 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:39.45 -00:23:36.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:13.43 -23:43:29.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:01:31.17 +04:10:51.9 Moon (-8.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct  8 06:50 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461321.72166376:
09:32:14.53 +15:15:09.2 Io (6.1mag)
09:32:28.07 +15:13:55.6 Europa (6.2mag)
09:32:02.04 +15:16:17.6 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:31:55.39 +15:16:52.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:31:47.88 +15:36:06.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:32:19.61 +15:14:42.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:30:43.59 +15:35:46.2 Elara (17.5mag)
09:34:55.03 +14:37:36.8 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:31:07.17 +15:41:09.2 Carme (18.8mag)
00:43:21.62 +01:42:58.1 Titan (8.2mag)
00:43:15.47 +01:42:43.2 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:45.59 +01:40:00.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:43:09.45 +01:42:57.3 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:42.61 +01:30:26.5 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct  8 06:50 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461321.72166376:
02:28:13.23 +21:15:04.4 JWST
15:50:22.78 +49:36:12.8 Chandra
05:59:26.49 +29:28:26.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct  8 06:50 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461321.72166376 -observatory V36
03:46:54.81 +20:10:53.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:21:57.65 -33:34:17.7 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:38:28.12 -72:11:39.4 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:10.93 +34:33:30.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:01:13.30 +48:22:04.7 17.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:28:53.13 +25:29:31.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:00:21.99 +35:20:31.2 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:12.71 +41:40:14.9 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:56.19 -13:32:50.1 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:11:13.55 +16:15:20.3 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:47:48.85 -02:27:18.8 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:29:38.45 +66:25:34.4 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:39:39.77 +43:43:25.4 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:42:36.73 +13:56:54.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:27:59.82 -06:08:11.8 16.2mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:34:39.76 +19:24:59.9 17.7mag 2P/Encke
22:54:50.34 -32:22:05.0 14.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:06:22.08 +39:10:59.2 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:09:06.33 -07:54:17.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:24:29.10 -08:46:00.3 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:31:27.74 +16:20:53.1 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:03:06.68 +14:29:10.6 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:27:22.71 +39:19:26.4 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:55:08.50 +15:16:08.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:34:28.97 +13:59:08.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:58:47.92 -31:18:13.3 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:48:30.56 +19:26:45.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:34:56.78 +00:20:51.5 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:08:34.78 +00:38:48.3 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:12:17.28 +35:35:09.3 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:10:37.98 +02:25:06.9 14.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:30:51.44 +05:00:06.0 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:58:24.19 +44:30:48.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:22:16.22 +25:43:16.6 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:53:00.20 +31:49:28.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct  8 06:50 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct  8 06:50 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct  8 06:50 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:10:59.300 +26:38:50.52  AT 2026acoo  2026-09-15.64 22.08
17:42:29.340 +37:09:15.16  AT 2026acon  2026-09-15.57 21.2
17:26:39.230 +38:04:56.15  AT 2026acom  2026-09-15.56 20.87
02:23:20.250 +43:14:55.10  AT 2026acol  2026-09-12.72 21.35
22:38:47.000 +29:45:55.05  AT 2026acok  2026-09-12.64 21.73
23:53:22.910 +27:24:39.24  AT 2026acoj  2026-09-10.72 21.26
23:17:36.215 +30:18:45.54  AT 2026acoi  2026-09-10.68 20.11
21:39:43.940 +10:13:08.41  AT 2026acoh  2026-09-10.71 20.82
00:55:37.300 +39:16:36.35  AT 2026acog  2026-09-08.69 22
17:16:02.530 +20:27:50.17  AT 2026acof  2026-09-08.67 21.05
01:09:19.170 +13:11:58.16  AT 2026acoe  2026-09-03.69 20.5
00:14:16.390 +13:38:59.32  AT 2026acod  2026-09-03.68 20.33
00:30:12.980 +25:25:52.95  AT 2026acoc  2026-08-26.73 20.66
02:16:05.440 -00:09:25.04  AT 2026acob  2026-09-19.85 23.13
02:19:56.810 +01:30:07.71  AT 2026acoa  2026-09-19.85 22.57
02:04:39.900 +04:31:25.83  AT 2026acnz  2026-09-19.85 22.05
02:09:20.030 +00:09:19.94  AT 2026acny  2026-09-19.85 22.39
01:54:18.090 +03:17:35.48  AT 2026acnx  2026-09-19.85 22.34
00:59:42.230 +05:10:20.14  AT 2026acnw  2026-09-19.83 22.8
02:26:28.840 +01:53:43.31  AT 2026acnv  2026-09-17.92 22.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct  8 06:50 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Oct  8 06:49:35 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 43s (0.72 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 3s (0.05 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 3s (0.05 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 11s (0.18 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 33s (0.55 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q2b1x1: 89s (1.48 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 98s (1.63 min)
Finished: Thu Oct  8 06:51:13 CDT 2026