This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 12 22.08 +20 58 40.1 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,7.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 7.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 12.09 05:04:49.62 +26:05:29.1
177.30967 -9.09108 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 1 1 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:04:49.62 +26:05:29.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:04:49.62 +26:05:29.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 05 04 49.62 +26 05 29.1 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 15.12 04:48:08.93 +23:01:38.9
177.45985 -13.96357 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1219 Britta 0 -0 0 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:08.93 +23:01:38.9: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:08.93 +23:01:38.9: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 48 08.93 +23 01 38.9 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,15.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 15.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 12 22.07 +20 58 40.1 7.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,7.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 7.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 12.93 04:08:50.08 +17:49:21.0
175.38382 -24.35529 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 -0 1 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:50.08 +17:49:21.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:50.08 +17:49:21.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 08 50.08 +17 49 21.0 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 13.23 04:38:23.57 +25:08:21.1
174.32275 -14.36953 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:23.57 +25:08:21.1: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:23.57 +25:08:21.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 38 23.57 +25 08 21.1 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 13.67 04:33:13.43 +25:45:10.0
173.05970 -14.86389 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 -0 1 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:13.43 +25:45:10.0: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:13.43 +25:45:10.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 33 13.43 +25 45 10.0 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 14.05 04:14:03.97 +23:23:25.5
171.85794 -19.68371 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -0 0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:03.97 +23:23:25.5: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:03.97 +23:23:25.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 14 03.97 +23 23 25.5 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 13.84 04:52:19.16 +17:31:50.1
182.61117 -16.50793 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina 1 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:19.16 +17:31:50.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:19.16 +17:31:50.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 52 19.16 +17 31 50.1 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 14.02 05:02:18.11 +25:03:11.9
177.81380 -10.16574 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia 0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:02:18.11 +25:03:11.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:02:18.11 +25:03:11.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 05 02 18.11 +25 03 11.9 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 14.48 04:53:59.53 +21:28:49.0
179.57220 -13.83312 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula -0 1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.53 +21:28:49.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.53 +21:28:49.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 53 59.53 +21 28 49.0 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 15.01 04:19:08.40 +23:52:10.7
172.31923 -18.50468 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California -0 1 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:08.40 +23:52:10.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:08.40 +23:52:10.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 19 08.40 +23 52 10.7 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,15.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 15.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 14.87 04:44:03.14 +20:28:13.3
178.93871 -16.28857 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 0 2 2 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:03.14 +20:28:13.3: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:03.14 +20:28:13.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 44 03.14 +20 28 13.3 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3638 2461321.8638 13.07 04:10:47.76 +23:32:05.8
171.19902 -20.13034 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:10:47.76 +23:32:05.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:10:47.76 +23:32:05.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3638* 04 10 47.76 +23 32 05.8 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8638,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3638 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461321.86411631 08.10.2026 08:44:09.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 36
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12581
Objects passed selection criteria: 12574
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11925.8
Average stars matched: 11475.8 (96.2267 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 03:49:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461321.86411631 08.10.2026 08:44:09.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 142
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 79917
Objects passed selection criteria: 79787
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74810.2
Average stars matched: 72621 (97.0736 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 487136 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 03:50:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.86346613
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.667 +22:00:06.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.667 +22:00:06.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:53.382 +21:59:23.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:53.382 +21:59:23.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.667 +22:00:06.13
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:53.382 +21:59:23.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01467 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RQCndI39qw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bL6XK6FLwE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lhZEr6kccK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UhKha6DM3W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.RQCndI39qw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bL6XK6FLwE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lhZEr6kccK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=712, bad_region=1, passed=12488
Got 12488 stars (including 11764 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4837 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=14.776 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.329 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.769 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.769 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.550 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.550 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4837 robust_rms_before=1.053 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.602 worst_region_rms_after=0.550 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.070 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.550
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.602 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.602 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.351 arcsec matched=4837
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits N_match=4837 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=1058 n_q2=1353 n_q3=1100 n_q4=1326 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UhKha6DM3W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=0, passed=12522
Got 12522 stars (including 11780 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=14.638 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.329 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.753 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.753 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.551 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=1.071 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.600 worst_region_rms_after=0.551 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.086 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.551
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.600 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.600 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec matched=4841
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1070 n_q2=1353 n_q3=1104 n_q4=1314 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.242
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (4837 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415_astrometric_residuals.png (4841 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034502_TTUQ1b1x1_987526_yjBNg6kG/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:59.48 +23:14:28.1: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:13.72 +21:11:51.1: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:43.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:53.36 +25:20:21.2: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:04:49.62 +26:05:29.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:50.06 +22:54:24.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:11.75 +21:37:59.6: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:58:36.39 +22:59:50.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.3: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:13.72 +21:11:51.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:59.48 +23:14:28.1: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:43.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:04:49.62 +26:05:29.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:13.72 +21:11:51.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4877 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:53.36 +25:20:21.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:59.48 +23:14:28.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5129 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:43.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4171 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:53.36 +25:20:21.2: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4494 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:50.06 +22:54:24.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:11.75 +21:37:59.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:50.06 +22:54:24.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4730 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:11.75 +21:37:59.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4655 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:58:36.39 +22:59:50.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:36.39 +22:59:50.2: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4433 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.3: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4714 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.6: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.65 +22:12:43.4: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:23.41 +22:52:16.5: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:06.87 +21:51:25.3: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:28.81 +23:49:07.2: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:32.9: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:39.72 +21:26:26.7: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.6: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.65 +22:12:43.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5065 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.65 +22:12:43.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5064 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:06.87 +21:51:25.3: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:23.41 +22:52:16.5: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:06.87 +21:51:25.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5651 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:23.41 +22:52:16.5: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5388 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5162 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:32.9: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:28.81 +23:49:07.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:32.9: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5191 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:28.81 +23:49:07.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5523 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:39.72 +21:26:26.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:39.72 +21:26:26.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5539 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:22.40 +23:30:41.4: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:29.49 +21:39:35.3: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:14.98 +20:48:46.6: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:26.21 +22:23:30.0: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:24.76 +22:49:12.8: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:01.89 +24:47:26.9: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:50.48 +22:34:37.3: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:42.20 +19:19:08.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:22.40 +23:30:41.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:22.40 +23:30:41.4: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5795 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:29.49 +21:39:35.3: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:14.98 +20:48:46.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:14.98 +20:48:46.6: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5651 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:26.21 +22:23:30.0: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:29.49 +21:39:35.3: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5781 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:26.21 +22:23:30.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5813 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:24.76 +22:49:12.8: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:24.76 +22:49:12.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5803 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:01.89 +24:47:26.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:01.89 +24:47:26.9: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5263 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:50.48 +22:34:37.3: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:50.48 +22:34:37.3: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5697 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:42.20 +19:19:08.5: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:42.20 +19:19:08.5: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5483 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:06:06.10 +22:56:51.8: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:10:33.32 +24:48:34.0: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:06:06.10 +22:56:51.8: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:06.10 +22:56:51.8: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5781 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:10:33.32 +24:48:34.0: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:33.32 +24:48:34.0: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5716 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20512.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20372_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.82 +24:18:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20374_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20512_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20512_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.63 +21:56:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.10 +25:24:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20558_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20558_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.02 +21:09:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20574_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20574_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20591_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20591_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20593_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20593_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20595_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20595_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20596_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20599_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20604_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20607_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20607_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20618_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20619_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20619_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20620_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20620_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20623_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20623_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20646_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20654_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20654_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 07318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:16.00 +20:38:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.46 +20:15:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101199_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 101199_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101211_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101211_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101216_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101216_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101248_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101248_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:02.19 +24:43:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101260_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101260_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:52.77 +26:43:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101263_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101263_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101264_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101264_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:16.45 +23:17:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.40 +22:04:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.81 +24:18:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 101272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101340_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101340_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.69 +19:10:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101409_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101409_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.62 +26:05:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101528_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101528_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.13 +22:48:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101547_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101547_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.88 +18:26:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.37 +22:42:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 101597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101634_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101634_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:57.01 +23:57:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101687_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 101687_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101795_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101795_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.04 +21:45:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101816_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101816_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.89 +21:31:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101843_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101843_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.41 +24:06:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101861_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101861_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.78 +25:48:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101904_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 101904_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101995_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 101995_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.46 +24:25:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102096_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102096_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102110_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 102110_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102122_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102122_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102144_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 102144_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102172_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 102172_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:03.67 +20:29:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102214_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102214_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.89 +21:03:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:44.55 +21:50:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:53.28 +24:49:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102333_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102333_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102334_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102334_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102371_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102371_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102387_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102387_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102439_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102439_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102493_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102493_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102510_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102510_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102513_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102513_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.75 +20:33:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102543_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102543_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102544_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102544_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102592_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102592_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102636_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102636_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102646_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 102646_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102648_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102648_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102674_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102674_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102720_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102720_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102784_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102784_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102799_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102799_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102836_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102836_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102837_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102837_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102858_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102858_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102863_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102863_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102868_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102868_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102877_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102877_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102883_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102883_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102889_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102889_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102893_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102893_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102897_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102897_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102915_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102915_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102923_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102923_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.14 +22:53:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102924_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102924_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102942_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102942_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102944_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102944_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102950_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102950_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:39.05 +23:58:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102967_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102967_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102972_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102972_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102992_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 102992_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103007_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103007_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103019_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103019_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103021_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103021_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103033_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103033_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103038_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103038_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103054_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103054_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103058_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103058_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103064_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103064_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103070_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103070_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103083_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103083_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103084_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 103084_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103088_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103088_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103116_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103116_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103117_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103117_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103120_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103120_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103126_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103126_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103129_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103129_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103131_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103131_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103132_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103132_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103135_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103135_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103140_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103140_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103147_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103147_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103150_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103150_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103152_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103152_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103165_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103165_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103169_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103169_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103170_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103170_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103172_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103172_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103178_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103178_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 103200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103202_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103202_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103206_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103206_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103228_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103228_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103289_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103289_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 103348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.54 +18:37:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28481_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 28481_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37500_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 37500_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:48.11 +22:39:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 42047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.61 +21:56:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 35380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:21.53 +22:50:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 64223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:16.00 +20:38:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.02 +26:08:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.46 +20:15:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 08727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.08 +25:58:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-44-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
