This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 04 12 21.74 +20 58 40.2 7.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,7.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 7.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 11.95 03:40:15.52 +21:30:50.8
167.22403 -26.49362 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -0 1 11.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:15.52 +21:30:50.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:15.52 +21:30:50.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 40 15.52 +21 30 50.8 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 12.40 03:28:42.35 +17:22:20.8
168.04072 -31.39832 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia 0 -1 1 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:42.35 +17:22:20.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:42.35 +17:22:20.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 28 42.35 +17 22 20.8 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 04 12 21.74 +20 58 40.2 7.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,7.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 7.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 12.94 04:10:47.79 +23:32:05.5
171.19917 -20.13031 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:47.79 +23:32:05.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:47.79 +23:32:05.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 04 10 47.79 +23 32 05.5 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 12.90 04:08:50.17 +17:49:20.4
175.38421 -24.35514 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 1 -1 1 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:50.17 +17:49:20.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:50.17 +17:49:20.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 04 08 50.17 +17 49 20.4 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 13.79 03:25:17.39 +23:29:57.4
162.82850 -27.21026 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana 0 -0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:17.39 +23:29:57.4: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:17.39 +23:29:57.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 25 17.39 +23 29 57.4 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 13.97 03:25:05.47 +18:57:33.9
166.07239 -30.75507 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla 0 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:05.47 +18:57:33.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:05.47 +18:57:33.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 25 05.47 +18 57 33.9 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 13.85 03:48:42.22 +17:12:30.2
172.18554 -28.25343 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala 1 -1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:42.22 +17:12:30.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:42.22 +17:12:30.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 48 42.22 +17 12 30.2 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 13.98 04:14:04.04 +23:23:24.1
171.85844 -19.68378 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia 1 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:14:04.04 +23:23:24.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:14:04.04 +23:23:24.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 04 14 04.04 +23 23 24.1 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 14.36 03:46:29.49 +23:11:51.6
167.15420 -24.27847 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah -1 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:29.49 +23:11:51.6: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:29.49 +23:11:51.6: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 46 29.49 +23 11 51.6 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 14.54 03:14:46.22 +17:20:35.1
165.04474 -33.55983 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1424 Sundmania -0 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:46.22 +17:20:35.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:46.22 +17:20:35.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 14 46.22 +17 20 35.1 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 14.61 03:13:55.49 +22:19:54.2
161.27880 -29.73140 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.640 Brambilla -0 -0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:13:55.49 +22:19:54.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:13:55.49 +22:19:54.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 13 55.49 +22 19 54.2 14.6 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 14.81 03:47:23.66 +24:37:25.5
166.27176 -23.08546 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe 0 -0 0 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:23.66 +24:37:25.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:23.66 +24:37:25.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 47 23.66 +24 37 25.5 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8624,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3624 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3624 2461321.8624 12.06 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6
170.79258 -26.03201 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J035135+1939.5
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 V 13.800 V 2454852.00000 151.900000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3624* 03 51 34.51 +19 39 33.6 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J035135+1939.5,2461321.8624,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J035135+1939.5 20261008.3624 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461321.86274604 08.10.2026 08:42:11.258 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 22
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12594
Objects passed selection criteria: 12583
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11940.8
Average stars matched: 11351.5 (95.0652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237592 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 03:44:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461321.86274604 08.10.2026 08:42:11.258 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 69335
Objects passed selection criteria: 69171
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65611
Average stars matched: 63289.2 (96.4613 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 539860 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 03:46:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.86214134
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.788 +21:59:58.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:45.788 +21:59:58.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0484 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.775 +22:00:29.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:45.775 +22:00:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0494 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:45.788 +21:59:58.89
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:45.775 +22:00:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00852 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nrxneeRblL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wcxvpW8SJr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zztA9TYl3J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JQJK04v0JL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.nrxneeRblL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wcxvpW8SJr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zztA9TYl3J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=676, bad_region=0, passed=12667
Got 12667 stars (including 11985 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12667 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=12.024 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.746 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.920 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.920 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.470 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=1.248 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.524 worst_region_rms_after=0.470 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.053 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.470
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.810 +21:59:57.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12667 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky877211.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.248 -> 0.293 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4918 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4733 pairs (4918 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=11.867 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.532 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.885 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.460 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4733 robust_rms_before=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.457 worst_region_rms_after=0.460 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.460
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.460 vs 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=4733 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1051 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1211 n_q4=1471 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JQJK04v0JL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=660, bad_region=0, passed=12702
Got 12702 stars (including 12031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12702 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=12.027 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.460 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.858 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.858 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.479 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=1.252 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.530 worst_region_rms_after=0.479 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.010 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.479
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.530 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.530 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.304 arcsec matched=4920
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1080 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1543 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.219
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.200
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412_astrometric_residuals.png (4733 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.99 +20:05:27.9: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:15.52 +21:30:50.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:36.74 +25:43:26.5: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:55.07 +23:27:15.5: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:49.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:42.35 +17:22:20.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.99 +20:05:27.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:15.52 +21:30:50.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0327 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3037 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.99 +20:05:27.9: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3340 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3390 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:36.74 +25:43:26.5: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:36.74 +25:43:26.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3950 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:42.35 +17:22:20.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:49.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:49.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3458 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:55.07 +23:27:15.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:55.07 +23:27:15.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4044 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:07.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:43.07 +22:39:50.0: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.0: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.45 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:34.31 +17:48:02.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:07.5: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:07.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4465 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:43.07 +22:39:50.0: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4087 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:43.07 +22:39:50.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4397 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.0: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4461 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.45 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.45 +20:11:23.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4807 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:34.31 +17:48:02.7: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:34.31 +17:48:02.7: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4881 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20698.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20643_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20643_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.59 +24:42:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 20698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20711_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20711_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20726_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20726_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:05.01 +25:42:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20728_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20728_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.03 +18:01:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20736_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20736_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20737_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20737_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20739_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20739_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:00.84 +21:22:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20753_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20753_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 20757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:13.41 +23:04:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20767_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20767_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.86 +23:09:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20787_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20787_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:40:15.52 +21:30:50.8
03:28:42.35 +17:22:20.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.810 +21:59:57.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:45.810 +21:59:57.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0484 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.775 +22:00:29.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:45.775 +22:00:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0494 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:45.810 +21:59:57.47
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:45.775 +22:00:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00891 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E8dw2zzvRh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4tUlVqnCgT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y4RHU1oyHn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.USbBYZglwK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E8dw2zzvRh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4312, bad_region=7, passed=71155
Got 71155 stars (including 66715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4932 stars left (next iteration limit 5425)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1106 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4tUlVqnCgT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4374, bad_region=8, passed=71475
Got 71475 stars (including 66975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Y4RHU1oyHn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3405, bad_region=46, passed=60669
Got 60669 stars (including 57128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60669 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=12.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.935 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.935 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.874 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.874 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.461 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4924 robust_rms_before=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.461 worst_region_rms_after=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.290 arcsec matched=4924
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1110 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1482 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.USbBYZglwK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3415, bad_region=49, passed=60811
Got 60811 stars (including 57270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4925 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4925 robust_rms=12.266 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.505 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4925 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.837 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.837 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4925 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.458 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4925 robust_rms_before=1.233 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.508 worst_region_rms_after=0.458 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.012 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.458
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.297 arcsec matched=4925
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=4925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1098 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1292 n_q4=1491 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034302_TTUQ1b1x1_834856_wLjzkpYG/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:45.59 +24:39:26.8: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:48.86 +26:02:33.0: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:21.71 +19:45:57.0: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:29.20 +23:20:44.2: 14.97 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:12:02.01 +22:58:37.4: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:36.23 +23:12:30.4: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:17.92 +26:12:31.3: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:36.45 +26:04:48.9: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:42.44 +23:40:06.0: 15.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:08.73 +23:23:00.1: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:12:02.01 +22:58:37.4: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:21.71 +19:45:57.0: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:29.20 +23:20:44.2: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:02.01 +22:58:37.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7219 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.71 +19:45:57.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8039 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:36.23 +23:12:30.4: 15.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:29.20 +23:20:44.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0204 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:36.23 +23:12:30.4: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7487 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:17.92 +26:12:31.3: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:17.92 +26:12:31.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9732 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:36.45 +26:04:48.9: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:36.45 +26:04:48.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9510 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:48.86 +26:02:33.0: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:08.73 +23:23:00.1: 14.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:48.86 +26:02:33.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9600 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:08.73 +23:23:00.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7835 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:45.59 +24:39:26.8: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:45.59 +24:39:26.8: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8142 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:42.44 +23:40:06.0: 15.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:42.44 +23:40:06.0: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9609 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:30.03 +24:28:11.7: 14.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:46.50 +22:43:43.2: 14.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:54.08 +25:45:37.9: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:34.16 +27:09:55.4: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:30.03 +24:28:11.7: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:30.03 +24:28:11.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5139 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:46.50 +22:43:43.2: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:46.50 +22:43:43.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4037 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:54.08 +25:45:37.9: 14.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:54.08 +25:45:37.9: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6985 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:34.16 +27:09:55.4: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:34.16 +27:09:55.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0441 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:54.43 +23:50:00.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:16:44.89 +26:19:53.3: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:47.79 +23:32:05.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:54.43 +23:50:00.9: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.43 +23:50:00.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3444 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:50.17 +17:49:20.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:05.70 +26:52:36.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:50.31 +24:29:30.0: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:16:44.89 +26:19:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.89 +26:19:53.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:55:12.97 +23:36:01.2: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:17.39 +23:29:57.4: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:47.79 +23:32:05.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:50.17 +17:49:20.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:50.31 +24:29:30.0: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:55:12.97 +23:36:01.2: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:50.31 +24:29:30.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4377 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:12.97 +23:36:01.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2886 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:05.70 +26:52:36.6: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:05.70 +26:52:36.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5083 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:17.39 +23:29:57.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:12.87 +25:15:29.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:12.87 +25:15:29.6: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:12.87 +25:15:29.6: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7776 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:05.47 +18:57:33.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:42.22 +17:12:30.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:14:04.04 +23:23:24.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:16:21.07 +25:21:02.2: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:05.47 +18:57:33.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:42.22 +17:12:30.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:06.32 +19:52:18.5: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:16:21.07 +25:21:02.2: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:14:04.04 +23:23:24.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:11.64 +19:18:45.6: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:21.07 +25:21:02.2: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2709 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:06.32 +19:52:18.5: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:37.23 +24:35:16.0: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:06.32 +19:52:18.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2974 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:11.64 +19:18:45.6: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:11.64 +19:18:45.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0744 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:37.23 +24:35:16.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:37.23 +24:35:16.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2234 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:27.03 +18:35:17.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:49.20 +25:53:23.8: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:27.03 +18:35:17.2: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:29.49 +23:11:51.6: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:27.03 +18:35:17.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2704 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:49.20 +25:53:23.8: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:49.20 +25:53:23.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3396 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:07.36 +21:12:57.5: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:29.49 +23:11:51.6: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:07.36 +21:12:57.5: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:07.36 +21:12:57.5: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3573 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:46.22 +17:20:35.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:46.22 +17:20:35.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:46.34 +26:26:03.3: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:46.34 +26:26:03.3: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:46.34 +26:26:03.3: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3870 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:19.66 +24:34:20.9: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:19.66 +24:34:20.9: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:19.66 +24:34:20.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5730 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:52.80 +21:09:09.2: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:10.88 +23:00:52.2: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:52.80 +21:09:09.2: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:52.80 +21:09:09.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4912 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:10.88 +23:00:52.2: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:10.88 +23:00:52.2: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5543 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:41.71 +23:51:22.6: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:38.82 +19:58:00.8: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:41.71 +23:51:22.6: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:41.71 +23:51:22.6: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2841 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:38.82 +19:58:00.8: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:38.82 +19:58:00.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5658 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:25.12 +24:45:31.9: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:13:55.49 +22:19:54.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:54.04 +22:17:59.4: 14.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:39.49 +24:58:32.7: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:25.12 +24:45:31.9: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:16:31.36 +18:46:19.1: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:13:55.49 +22:19:54.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:25.12 +24:45:31.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6924 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:54.04 +22:17:59.4: 14.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:54.04 +22:17:59.4: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6877 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:39.49 +24:58:32.7: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:39.49 +24:58:32.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8025 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:16:31.36 +18:46:19.1: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:31.36 +18:46:19.1: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8387 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:13:37.79 +19:12:18.2: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:24.74 +24:46:05.3: 14.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:23.79 +23:01:41.0: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:13:37.79 +19:12:18.2: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:12.87 +24:49:24.7: 15.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:37.79 +19:12:18.2: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9067 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:24.74 +24:46:05.3: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:24.74 +24:46:05.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8176 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:54.47 +23:21:16.1: 14.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:41.65 +22:14:17.7: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:23.79 +23:01:41.0: 15.55 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:23.79 +23:01:41.0: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9599 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:12.87 +24:49:24.7: 15.65 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:29.74 +27:12:24.8: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:12.87 +24:49:24.7: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8977 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:54.47 +23:21:16.1: 15.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:54.47 +23:21:16.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8531 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:36.22 +26:49:00.2: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:23.66 +24:37:25.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:56.99 +25:58:00.2: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:41.65 +22:14:17.7: 15.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:29.74 +27:12:24.8: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:41.65 +22:14:17.7: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9366 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:29.74 +27:12:24.8: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0365 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:51.48 +24:21:46.3: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:36.22 +26:49:00.2: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:36.22 +26:49:00.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8784 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:07.92 +24:07:40.3: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:56.99 +25:58:00.2: 15.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:23.66 +24:37:25.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:24:56.99 +25:58:00.2: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0081 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:51.48 +24:21:46.3: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:51.48 +24:21:46.3: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1030 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:13:56.81 +25:20:59.2: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:07.92 +24:07:40.3: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:07.92 +24:07:40.3: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9496 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:58.55 +21:22:01.7: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:59.44 +20:40:13.0: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:20:39.82 +22:07:59.3: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:33.12 +23:49:18.2: 15.86 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:13:56.81 +25:20:59.2: 15.33 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:56.81 +25:20:59.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9861 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:26.99 +26:15:13.9: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:58.55 +21:22:01.7: 15.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:59.44 +20:40:13.0: 15.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:58.55 +21:22:01.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9410 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.44 +20:40:13.0: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9464 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:05.55 +24:49:26.7: 15.53 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:33.12 +23:49:18.2: 15.71 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:20:39.82 +22:07:59.3: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.78 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:33.12 +23:49:18.2: ref_mag=15.78 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=15.0241 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:39.82 +22:07:59.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9973 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:48.33 +20:36:44.5: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:26.99 +26:15:13.9: 15.72 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:26.99 +26:15:13.9: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0486 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:05.55 +24:49:26.7: 15.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:05.55 +24:49:26.7: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0914 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:37.47 +24:19:53.7: 15.85 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:48.33 +20:36:44.5: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:48.33 +20:36:44.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9821 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:33:16.02 +22:44:06.8: 16.00 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:39.20 +26:12:57.4: 15.48 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:58.63 +19:28:52.4: 15.65 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:37.47 +24:19:53.7: 15.58 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:58.19 +25:23:46.1: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.68 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:37.47 +24:19:53.7: ref_mag=15.68 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0796 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:33:16.02 +22:44:06.8: 15.79 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.88 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:16.02 +22:44:06.8: ref_mag=15.88 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.1702 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:39.20 +26:12:57.4: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:39.20 +26:12:57.4: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0342 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:58.63 +19:28:52.4: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:58.63 +19:28:52.4: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0781 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:58.19 +25:23:46.1: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:58.19 +25:23:46.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8239 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0615 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64079.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87595.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87760.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88015.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88048.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88542.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86911_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86911_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86922_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86922_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86930_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86930_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86931_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86931_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86951_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86951_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:54.63 +18:15:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86961_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 86961_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86976_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 86976_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87040_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87040_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.59 +24:42:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87062_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87062_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.15 +24:32:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87146_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87146_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:42.35 +17:22:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87221_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87221_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87243_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87243_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87318_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 87318_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87326_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 87326_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.95 +26:10:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87439_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87439_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87450_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87450_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 87595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.38 +24:53:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87626_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87626_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87707_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87707_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:06.95 +26:34:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 87760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87768_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 87768_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87816_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 87816_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87878_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87878_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87882_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87882_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87911_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87911_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88001_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88001_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88002_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88002_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88015_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 88015_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88048_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 88048_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88093_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88093_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.37 +24:18:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88141_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88141_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88208_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88208_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:44.86 +24:28:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88218_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88218_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88226_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88226_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88231_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88231_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88290_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88290_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88291_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88291_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88295_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 88295_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88358_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88358_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88394_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88394_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88415_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88415_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88437_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88437_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88463_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88463_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88489_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88489_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88500_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88500_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88540_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88540_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88542_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 88542_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88548_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88548_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88554_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88554_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88573_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88573_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88581_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88581_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88591_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88591_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88612_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88612_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88625_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88625_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88632_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88632_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88643_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88643_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88652_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88652_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88670_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88670_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88716_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88716_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88730_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88730_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 43725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:15.52 +21:30:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 64079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 32046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.38 +26:16:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61439_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 61439_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31663_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 31663_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40325_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 40325_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
