This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2617* 00 43 19.52 +01 42 28.2 6.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,6.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 6.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2617* 00 42 44.93 +01 39 56.0 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2617* 00 43 19.52 +01 42 28.3 7.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,7.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 7.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2617* 00 42 44.93 +01 39 56.0 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2617 2461321.7617 12.70 00:50:31.44 +07:52:38.9
122.53739 -54.99358 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.510 Mabella -0 -0 0 12.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:50:31.44 +07:52:38.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:50:31.44 +07:52:38.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2617 2461321.7617 12.77 00:26:52.88 +10:51:22.1
113.20756 -51.55136 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.392 Wilhelmina -0 -0 0 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:26:52.88 +10:51:22.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:26:52.88 +10:51:22.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2617 2461321.7617 12.65 01:00:56.32 +01:46:54.9
127.83324 -60.99939 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -0 -0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:00:56.32 +01:46:54.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:00:56.32 +01:46:54.9: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2617* 01 00 56.32 +01 46 54.9 12.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2617 2461321.7617 13.48 00:57:04.74 +09:20:13.2
125.27233 -53.50911 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1235 Schorria -0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:57:04.74 +09:20:13.2: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:57:04.74 +09:20:13.2: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2617 2461321.7617 14.13 00:59:10.47 +05:43:05.9
126.47662 -57.10019 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2251 Tikhov 1 0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:59:10.47 +05:43:05.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:59:10.47 +05:43:05.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2617 2461321.7617 14.77 01:16:18.93 +08:22:16.2
133.43655 -53.99240 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.822 Lalage -0 2 2 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:18.93 +08:22:16.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:18.93 +08:22:16.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7617,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2617 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461321.76198539 08.10.2026 06:17:05.538 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7045
Objects passed selection criteria: 7037
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6387.25
Average stars matched: 5898.75 (92.352 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 01:19:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461321.76198539 08.10.2026 06:17:05.538 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 161
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30462
Objects passed selection criteria: 30378
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29043.8
Average stars matched: 27511 (94.7226 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 01:20:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.76142816
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:04.320 +06:00:21.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:04.320 +06:00:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:06.223 +06:00:41.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:06.223 +06:00:41.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0844 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:04.320 +06:00:21.97
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:06.223 +06:00:41.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00959 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A4VDBLqQWJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CTbPZhtnNW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ddZnBmNRy8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OBFduU2FMw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.625400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.625400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec +0.7135 to +11.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec 0.7135 to 11.2815 deg
Loaded 4441 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 5640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
3.6 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
3.6 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.A4VDBLqQWJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CTbPZhtnNW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ddZnBmNRy8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, bad_region=0, passed=7153
Got 7153 stars (including 6864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7153 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=13.120 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.421 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.421 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.665 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.389 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4914 robust_rms_before=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.397 worst_region_rms_after=0.389 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.039 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.389
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.397 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.277 arcsec matched=4914
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1280 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1261 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OBFduU2FMw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=7186
Got 7186 stars (including 6901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=13.096 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.510 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.662 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.662 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.393 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4916 robust_rms_before=0.874 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.405 worst_region_rms_after=0.393 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.122 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.393
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.405 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.284 arcsec matched=4916
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1278 n_q2=1218 n_q3=1266 n_q4=1154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.230
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.282 worst_q_ratio=1.183
reference average sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4916 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-16-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011802_TTUQ1b1x1_181844_xnaM66Y7/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:35.96 +07:49:01.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:43:41.92 +06:37:16.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:58:17.63 +06:49:19.0: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:49:06.93 +05:59:29.5: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:30:08.24 +04:52:55.4: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:08.35 +05:12:38.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:30.81 +05:48:30.9: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:08.35 +05:12:38.9: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:30.81 +05:48:30.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:58:17.63 +06:49:19.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:30:08.24 +04:52:55.4: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:35.96 +07:49:01.0: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:43:41.92 +06:37:16.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:08.35 +05:12:38.9: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1106 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:30.81 +05:48:30.9: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0663 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:17.63 +06:49:19.0: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0325 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:49:06.93 +05:59:29.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.6: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:08.24 +04:52:55.4: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1128 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:35.96 +07:49:01.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1287 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:41.92 +06:37:16.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0829 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0500 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:06.93 +05:59:29.5: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1169 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20193_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 20193_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20226_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 20226_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32461_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32461_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:49.28 +00:53:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32507_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32507_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32722_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32722_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32743_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32743_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32748_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32748_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32774_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32774_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32965_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32965_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32980_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32980_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33238_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33238_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33324_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33324_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:24.62 +09:00:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33334_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33334_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33352_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33352_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33398_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33398_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33411_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33411_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33424_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33424_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33427_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33427_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33438_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33438_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33441_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33441_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33444_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33444_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33459_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33459_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33485_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33485_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33508_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33508_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33509_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33509_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33511_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 33511_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33519_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33519_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33534_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33534_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33562_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33562_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33563_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33563_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33566_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33566_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33572_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33572_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33578_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33578_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33586_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33586_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33587_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33587_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33592_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33592_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:46.55 +01:27:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33601_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33601_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33612_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33612_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33622_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33622_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33640_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33640_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33646_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33646_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33650_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33650_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33652_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33652_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33663_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33663_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33669_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33669_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33670_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33670_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33697_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33697_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33700_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33700_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33707_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33707_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33709_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33709_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33710_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33710_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33720_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33720_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33723_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33723_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33733_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33733_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33737_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33737_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33744_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33744_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33749_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33749_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33756_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33756_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33765_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33765_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33770_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33770_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33774_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33774_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33775_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33775_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33781_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33781_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33787_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33787_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33790_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33790_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33792_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33792_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33800_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33800_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33804_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33804_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33806_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 33806_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33813_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33813_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33827_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33827_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33828_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33828_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:50.25 +01:05:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33830_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33830_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33841_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33841_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33845_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33845_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33846_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33846_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33865_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33865_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33877_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33877_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33892_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33892_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33901_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33901_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33904_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33904_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:15.84 +01:23:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33923_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33923_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33930_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33930_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33941_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33941_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33962_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33962_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33988_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33989_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33989_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33991_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33991_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33992_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33992_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34010_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34010_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34052_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34052_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34061_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34061_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34062_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34062_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34067_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34067_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34132_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34132_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10824_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 10824_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_01-17-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
