This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,8.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 8.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,8.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 8.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 12.24 23:30:43.93 -04:57:49.3
78.40917 -60.65619 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -1 0 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:43.93 -04:57:49.3: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:43.93 -04:57:49.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 13.57 23:58:52.27 -00:07:50.9
95.71166 -60.19462 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud -0 1 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:58:52.27 -00:07:50.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:58:52.27 -00:07:50.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 14.04 23:37:34.90 -04:38:00.6
81.62224 -61.43197 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa -2 3 4 14.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:34.90 -04:38:00.6: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:34.90 -04:38:00.6: 15.31 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.27
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 14.26 00:28:51.97 -03:08:12.8
109.28527 -65.40884 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4212 Sansyu-Asuke -0 0 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:51.97 -03:08:12.8: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:51.97 -03:08:12.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2433* 00 28 51.97 -03 08 12.8 14.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 14.21 00:13:25.19 +00:26:52.1
103.05305 -60.94810 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1735 ITA -0 -0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:13:25.19 +00:26:52.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:13:25.19 +00:26:52.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 14.40 23:42:57.77 -06:41:53.6
81.30808 -63.88844 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.864 Aase -1 0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:42:57.77 -06:41:53.6: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:42:57.77 -06:41:53.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 14.59 00:27:59.17 +02:32:09.9
111.22634 -59.80160 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2453 Wabash -1 -2 2 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:59.17 +02:32:09.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:59.17 +02:32:09.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2433* 00 27 59.17 +02 32 09.9 14.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 14.53 00:20:48.71 -04:55:42.3
103.38067 -66.63057 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3133 Sendai -1 -1 2 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:20:48.71 -04:55:42.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:20:48.71 -04:55:42.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2433 2461321.7433 14.74 00:12:59.71 +02:22:01.9
103.98667 -59.08322 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2386 Nikonov -0 1 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:12:59.71 +02:22:01.9: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:12:59.71 +02:22:01.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7433,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2433 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461321.74359966 08.10.2026 05:50:37.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6560
Objects passed selection criteria: 6557
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6062.25
Average stars matched: 5639 (93.0183 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 00:58:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461321.74359966 08.10.2026 05:50:37.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 150
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31298
Objects passed selection criteria: 31201
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30037.8
Average stars matched: 28191.2 (93.8527 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 00:59:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.74302729
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:15.929 -02:00:51.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:15.929 -02:00:51.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0652 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:16.292 -02:01:31.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:16.292 -02:01:31.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0692 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:15.929 -02:00:51.48
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:16.292 -02:01:31.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01111 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mP5py48FUx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TUzbmuuI38
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WmUqmqMexE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gsMSn6meqp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
3.0 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.mP5py48FUx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TUzbmuuI38 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WmUqmqMexE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, bad_region=0, passed=6768
Got 6768 stars (including 6397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8654 through 0 to 8.1767, gap 8.1767 to 351.8654
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8655 through 0 to 8.1772, gap 8.1772 to 351.8655
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=13.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.270 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.673 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.673 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.336 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.331 worst_region_rms_after=0.336 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.231 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.336
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.331 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.272 arcsec matched=4879
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1245 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gsMSn6meqp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=371, bad_region=0, passed=6693
Got 6693 stars (including 6313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8814 through 0 to 8.1768, gap 8.1768 to 351.8814
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8814 through 0 to 8.1773, gap 8.1773 to 351.8814
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=13.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.527 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.527 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.260 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.307 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.307 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=0.971 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.260 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.314 worst_region_rms_after=0.307 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.180 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.307
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.259 arcsec matched=4882
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1245 n_q2=1249 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.107
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.081
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-49-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005132_TTUQ1b1x1_322579_lRf0OjPX/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:14.08 +02:14:51.7: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:05:51.66 -01:44:34.3: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.2: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:05:51.66 -01:44:34.3: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:14.08 +02:14:51.7: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:51.66 -01:44:34.3: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8465 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.2: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1388 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1242 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:14.08 +02:14:51.7: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0838 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.95 +00:47:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20278_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 20278_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20454_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20454_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:44.46 -01:12:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20460_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20460_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32796_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32796_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32798_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32798_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32802_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32802_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32806_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32806_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32808_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32808_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32817_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 32817_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33044_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33044_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33057_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 33057_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33101_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33101_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33109_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33109_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33157_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33157_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:52.13 +00:04:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33431_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33431_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33465_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33465_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33470_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 33470_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33531_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33531_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33536_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33536_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:17:51.76 +00:22:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33643_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33643_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33655_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33655_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33688_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33688_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33710_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 33710_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33772_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33772_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33805_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33805_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33813_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33813_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33817_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 33817_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 33837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33853_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33853_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33861_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33861_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33864_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33864_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33866_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33866_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33880_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33880_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:57.50 -06:36:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33892_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33892_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33911_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33911_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33912_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33912_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33915_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33915_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33919_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33919_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33921_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33921_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33922_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33922_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33930_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33930_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33943_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33943_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33954_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33954_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33958_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33958_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33965_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33965_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33975_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33975_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33984_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33984_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34007_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 34007_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34010_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34010_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34021_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34021_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34024_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34024_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34027_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34027_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34030_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34030_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34048_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34048_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34049_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34049_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34057_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34057_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34064_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34064_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34070_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34070_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34077_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34077_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34080_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34080_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34085_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34088_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34088_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34092_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34092_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34097_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34097_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34103_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34103_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34119_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34119_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34126_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34126_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34127_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34127_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34134_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34134_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34150_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34150_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34152_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34152_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34154_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34154_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34156_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34156_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:23.64 -06:34:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34167_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 34167_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34180_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34180_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34181_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34181_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34183_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34183_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34192_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34192_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34193_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34193_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34199_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 34199_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34200_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34200_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34203_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34203_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34204_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34204_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34205_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34205_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34210_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34210_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34214_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34214_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34216_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34216_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34218_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34218_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34222_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34222_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34225_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34225_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34234_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34234_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34238_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34238_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34239_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34239_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34240_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34240_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34252_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34252_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34254_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34254_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34261_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34261_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34264_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34264_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34266_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34266_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34284_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34284_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34286_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34286_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34292_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34292_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34301_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34301_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34311_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34311_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34319_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34319_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34337_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34337_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34344_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34344_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34345_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34345_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34346_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34346_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34353_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34353_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34354_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34354_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34368_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34368_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34373_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34373_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34384_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 34384_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-50-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
