NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-02-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    12.49    09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.7   2920 0835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    12.49    09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8   2915 0830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 07.4250  2461320.9250  12.49  09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8
215.78686  48.63418 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
196 Philomela               -0     -0       0  12.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8:  15.95 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8:  15.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    12.74    09:36:19.23 +21:27:22.2   0160 2722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    12.77    09:36:19.27 +21:27:22.4   0155 2718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 07.4250  2461320.9250  12.76  09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3
209.18087  45.44836 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
68 Leto                    -0     -0       0  13.0     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3:  15.79 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    12.40    10:24:49.94 +20:25:20.4   7023 2406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    12.50    10:24:50.03 +20:25:20.7   7019 2402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 07.4250  2461320.9250  12.45  10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5
216.23479  55.91979 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
471 Papagena                -0      0       0  12.1     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5:  15.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5:  15.98 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    13.44    09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.2   0856 3160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.44    09:41:13.27 +22:09:59.3   0851 3156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 07.4250  2461320.9250  13.44  09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3
208.68087  46.74367 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
87 Sylvia                  -1     -0       1  13.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3:  15.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    13.50    09:41:25.18 +18:06:33.2   0908 0694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.50    09:41:25.30 +18:06:33.7   0903 0690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 07.4250  2461320.9250  13.50  09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4
214.25119  45.49345 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
245 Vera                    -0     -1       1  13.9    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    13.80    09:52:05.34 +19:43:19.1   2427 1717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.79    09:52:05.41 +19:43:19.9   2422 1713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 07.4250  2461320.9250  13.79  09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5
213.28098  48.41384 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
134 Sophrosyne              -1     -0       1  14.1     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5:  15.98 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 6

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1166013 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1166013 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits

renamed 'Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 477.1196 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 464.9675 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1786.8225 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 525.1389 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1784.9349 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 527.2772 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.74502 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-07T05:11:22.3186483' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-07T10:11:22.3186483' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61320.4245638656 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-07T10:11:32.2235879' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61320.4246785068 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 152.305276232401 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 21.9998649530236 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.4119444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 73.7102777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.71391565932546 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 42.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits :) Spent 1.725078 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-07T05:12:10.1356670' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-07T10:12:10.1356670' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61320.4251173032 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-07T10:12:20.0371843' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61320.4252319098 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 152.305276188155 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 21.9998649731235 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.5716666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 73.8083333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.67778856751826 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 42.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits :) Spent 1.022167 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.92467961 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:13.907 +22:00:17.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:18.427 +21:59:40.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.907 +22:00:17.19 Second-epoch image center 10:09:18.427 +21:59:40.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:20.661 +22:00:04.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.907 +22:00:17.19 Second-epoch image center 10:09:20.661 +22:00:04.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0263 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:09:18.427 +21:59:40.06 Second-epoch second image center 10:09:20.661 +22:00:04.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01102 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7xZNMfy6Nd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nyI2AtRof1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rYzKSib6jL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uZEB6dQaGc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5054 to 160.9805 deg, Dec +16.5181 to +27.2611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5054 to 160.9805 deg, Dec 16.5181 to 27.2611 deg Loaded 4555 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3604 out of 3731 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3731 out of 6437 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5054 to 160.9805 deg, Dec +16.5181 to +27.2611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5054 to 160.9805 deg, Dec 16.5181 to 27.2611 deg Loaded 4555 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3604 out of 3731 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3731 out of 6437 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5056 to 160.9562 deg, Dec +16.5180 to +27.2611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5056 to 160.9562 deg, Dec 16.5180 to 27.2611 deg Loaded 4551 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3597 out of 3736 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 6417 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.5 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 2.5 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.7xZNMfy6Nd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, bad_region=0, passed=6437 Got 6437 stars (including 6029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4509 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4495 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6437 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4509 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6437 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6437 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4495 stars left (next iteration limit 4944) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=4495 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1031 n_q2=1208 n_q3=977 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.nyI2AtRof1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, bad_region=0, passed=6417 Got 6417 stars (including 6016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4515 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4499 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6417 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4516 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6417 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6417 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4499 stars left (next iteration limit 4948) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4499 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.482 n_q1=1024 n_q2=1216 n_q3=974 n_q4=1285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rYzKSib6jL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=3648 Got 3648 stars (including 3443 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3648 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3072 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3056 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3056 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3056 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3071 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3057 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3057 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 3057 stars left (next iteration limit 3361) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3057 robust_rms=11.103 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.834 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.834 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3057 robust_rms=0.689 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.236 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.789 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3057 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.734 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.495 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3057 robust_rms_before=1.494 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.549 worst_region_rms_after=0.734 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.643 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.495 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.549 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.549 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec matched=3057 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits N_match=3057 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=919 n_q2=590 n_q3=896 n_q4=652 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.uZEB6dQaGc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, bad_region=0, passed=3697 Got 3697 stars (including 3444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3697 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3067 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3697 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3067 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3697 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3697 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 3052 stars left (next iteration limit 3357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3052 robust_rms=11.167 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.658 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.658 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3052 robust_rms=0.638 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.957 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.858 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3052 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.642 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.491 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3052 robust_rms_before=1.455 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.524 worst_region_rms_after=0.642 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.546 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.491 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.524 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.361 arcsec matched=3052 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits N_match=3052 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=923 n_q2=587 n_q3=893 n_q4=649 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.453 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.113 ref2=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.110 new1=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.422 new2=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.453 reference average sigma_overall=0.4255 worst_q_ratio=1.1115 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (4495 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (4499 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500_astrometric_residuals.png (3057 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501_astrometric_residuals.png (3052 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    9.40    10:00:01.97 +21:15:44.0   3512 2685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 10:00:01.96 +21:15:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:13.907 +22:00:17.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:18.427 +21:59:40.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.907 +22:00:17.19 Second-epoch image center 10:09:18.427 +21:59:40.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:20.661 +22:00:04.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.907 +22:00:17.19 Second-epoch image center 10:09:20.661 +22:00:04.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0263 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:09:18.427 +21:59:40.06 Second-epoch second image center 10:09:20.661 +22:00:04.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01102 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4c9oowIo5m Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jBvSYOhOvQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hfMnRIA8n0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J0t2gmkwi1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5054 to 160.9804 deg, Dec +16.4875 to +27.2789 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5054 to 160.9804 deg, Dec 16.4875 to 27.2789 deg Loaded 4578 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3477 out of 3771 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3771 out of 33023 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.649300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.649300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5054 to 160.9804 deg, Dec +16.4875 to +27.2789 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5054 to 160.9804 deg, Dec 16.4875 to 27.2789 deg Loaded 4578 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3477 out of 3771 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3771 out of 33023 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=5.2) Read 33297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.4723 to 160.9684 deg, Dec +16.4862 to +27.2734 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.4723 to 160.9684 deg, Dec 16.4862 to 27.2734 deg Loaded 4585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3482 out of 3773 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3773 out of 33297 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 25 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4c9oowIo5m (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1503, bad_region=0, passed=32992 Got 32992 stars (including 31441 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32992 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4506 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4495 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32992 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4506 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32992 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32992 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4495 stars left (next iteration limit 4944) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=4495 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.468 n_q1=1013 n_q2=1215 n_q3=964 n_q4=1303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.jBvSYOhOvQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1479, bad_region=0, passed=33280 Got 33280 stars (including 31754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33280 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4509 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4498 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4510 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4498 stars left (next iteration limit 4947) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4498 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1013 n_q2=1217 n_q3=964 n_q4=1304 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.hfMnRIA8n0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=531, bad_region=43, passed=20198 Got 20198 stars (including 19596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20198 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4478 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4461 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4461 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4461 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4476 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4461 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4461 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4461 stars left (next iteration limit 4907) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4461 robust_rms=10.724 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.564 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.564 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4461 robust_rms=0.698 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.247 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.806 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4461 robust_rms=0.504 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.756 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.520 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4461 robust_rms_before=1.505 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.504 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.512 worst_region_rms_after=0.756 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.653 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.520 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.512 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.512 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.366 arcsec matched=4461 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits N_match=4461 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1368 n_q2=824 n_q3=1326 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.J0t2gmkwi1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=653, bad_region=42, passed=20249 Got 20249 stars (including 19530 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20249 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4475 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4456 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4456 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4456 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20249 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4476 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4457 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20249 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4457 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20249 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4457 stars left (next iteration limit 4901) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4457 robust_rms=10.653 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.838 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.838 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4457 robust_rms=0.639 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.975 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.859 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4457 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.675 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.511 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4457 robust_rms_before=1.459 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.485 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.499 worst_region_rms_after=0.675 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.549 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.511 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.499 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.499 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec matched=4457 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits N_match=4457 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1369 n_q2=830 n_q3=1323 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.352 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:26:11.64 +20:15:32.6: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:26:11.64 +20:15:32.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:11.64 +20:15:32.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2703 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:36:21.43 +19:27:47.9: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:36:21.43 +19:27:47.9: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:21.43 +19:27:47.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1754 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:37:03.54 +23:53:15.6: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:40:35.41 +23:26:42.5: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:37:03.54 +23:53:15.6: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:37:03.54 +23:53:15.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4226 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:36:33.05 +24:53:21.1: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:40:35.41 +23:26:42.5: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:35.41 +23:26:42.5: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5695 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:36:33.05 +24:53:21.1: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:33.05 +24:53:21.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6017 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52863.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52899.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53185.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53398.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 52570_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.16    09:39:09.15 +20:11:35.3   0565 1954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:39:09.11 +20:11:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 Preparing report for the candidate 52863_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52865_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 Preparing report for the candidate 52865_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52899_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 Preparing report for the candidate 52899_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 52900_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    12.91    09:51:55.59 +24:21:45.9   2320 4513   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:51:55.59 +24:21:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53038_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    12.92    10:23:52.05 +19:34:28.7   6923 1881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 10:23:52.06 +19:34:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53116_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 Preparing report for the candidate 53116_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53126_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53126_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.39    09:51:44.17 +20:10:32.0   2364 1985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:51:44.19 +20:10:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53142_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53142_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.57    09:36:02.27 +23:10:31.1   0112 3764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:36:02.36 +23:10:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53175_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53175_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.00    10:26:52.52 +19:22:41.7   7360 1798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 10:26:52.52 +19:22:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53185_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 Preparing report for the candidate 53185_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53206_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53206_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.49    09:50:55.84 +20:47:12.8   2240 2351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:50:55.86 +20:47:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53238_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.64    09:37:11.12 +21:24:18.4   0279 2688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:37:11.18 +21:24:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53261_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    13.26    10:26:11.58 +20:15:33.1   7223 2324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.29    10:26:11.71 +20:15:32.1   7219 2319   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53275_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53275_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.65    09:38:32.43 +19:24:48.6   0479 1478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:38:32.42 +19:24:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53299_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53299_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.52    10:20:25.35 +25:41:01.8   6165 5515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 10:20:25.36 +25:41:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53371_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53371_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.51    09:59:30.76 +21:18:00.2   3438 2704   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:59:30.75 +21:17:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53398_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 Preparing report for the candidate 53398_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53417_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53417_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    14.08    09:36:24.72 +25:19:29.2   0160 5075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:36:24.65 +25:19:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53467_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53467_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    14.12    09:36:21.45 +19:27:48.6   0167 1508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    14.28    09:36:21.42 +19:27:47.3   0161 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53561_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    14.41    09:36:28.84 +25:50:52.9   0168 5395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 09:36:28.80 +25:50:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53662_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    14.56    09:37:03.48 +23:53:16.0   0260 4202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    14.34    09:37:03.60 +23:53:15.2   0255 4198   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53671_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 53671_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    14.59    09:40:35.46 +23:26:41.5   0759 3935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    14.55    09:40:35.37 +23:26:43.4   0753 3931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06094_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 06094_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 07.42468    2461320.92468    13.65    09:36:33.03 +24:53:21.0   0185 4813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-11-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    13.56    09:36:33.07 +24:53:21.3   0180 4809   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 The candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 07.42523    2461320.92523    9.51    10:00:01.97 +21:15:44.0   3512 2685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_051257_TTUQ1b1x1_1789408_muREJROq/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_05-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits **** FOUND 10:00:01.96 +21:15:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 29s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8 09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3 10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5 09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3 09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4 09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5 ########### Completed Leo-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8 09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3 10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5 09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3 09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4 09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5 ################################################################################### 09:55:20.79 +18:14:07.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 09:36:19.25 +21:27:22.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:24:49.98 +20:25:20.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 09:41:13.26 +22:09:59.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 09:41:25.24 +18:06:33.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 09:52:05.37 +19:43:19.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461320.92467961 -observatory V36 14:20:32.56 -16:36:36.9 Mercury (-0.0mag) 14:11:18.50 -21:10:31.1 Venus (-4.7mag) 08:30:37.30 +20:06:13.7 Mars (1.1mag) 09:31:45.45 +15:17:19.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:43:35.19 +01:44:08.6 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:27.98 +20:58:56.5 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:44.17 -00:23:05.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:14.24 -23:43:28.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 10:25:25.42 +09:10:34.0 Moon (-9.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 7 11:57 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461320.92467961: 09:31:48.07 +15:17:06.2 Io (6.1mag) 09:31:49.69 +15:16:56.4 Europa (6.2mag) 09:31:35.92 +15:18:12.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:31:29.78 +15:18:45.1 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:31:12.54 +15:38:41.3 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:31:44.10 +15:17:27.5 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:30:09.65 +15:38:00.7 Elara (17.5mag) 09:34:25.94 +14:40:03.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:30:38.75 +15:43:23.5 Carme (18.8mag) 00:43:39.31 +01:44:21.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:43:34.75 +01:44:10.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:42:58.39 +01:41:31.9 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:43:26.41 +01:44:28.2 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:41:56.82 +01:31:55.8 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 7 11:57 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461320.92467961: 02:21:22.28 +21:11:34.7 JWST 01:45:01.79 -72:13:51.5 Chandra 13:32:50.54 -62:16:19.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 7 11:57 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461320.92467961 -observatory V36 03:47:03.63 +20:10:30.9 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:21:17.33 -33:35:22.7 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:38:06.52 -72:08:32.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:15.04 +34:32:07.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:01:54.99 +48:20:31.7 17.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:28:32.32 +25:30:04.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:56.88 +35:15:46.4 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:06.61 +41:42:29.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:50.61 -13:32:08.6 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:09:45.88 +16:19:17.8 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:47:01.55 -02:23:18.0 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:26:23.96 +66:42:44.8 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:40:32.08 +43:49:39.4 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:41:50.88 +13:52:18.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1 00:36:31.29 +19:30:36.3 17.7mag 2P/Encke 22:53:58.61 -32:31:38.3 14.4mag 10P/Tempel 02:05:12.54 +39:16:14.5 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:08:34.19 -07:50:24.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:25:00.58 -08:44:15.3 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:30:20.41 +16:25:57.9 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:03:50.06 +14:31:14.4 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:24:27.75 +39:05:14.1 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:53:13.36 +15:32:54.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:32:49.94 +14:10:05.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:56:49.72 -31:04:14.0 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:47:53.63 +19:28:51.0 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:35:20.54 +00:23:54.2 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 22:16:29.44 -00:06:23.9 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:10:29.80 +35:38:30.8 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:08:40.87 +02:36:59.1 13.9mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:10.38 +05:06:13.4 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:57:02.26 +44:20:05.1 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:21:04.13 +25:44:28.3 18.0mag 266P/Christensen 09:52:10.55 +31:52:34.4 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 7 11:57 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 7 11:57 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 7 11:57 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:02:16.840 +06:12:59.13 AT 2026acnk 2026-09-12.73 22.43 01:55:45.130 +03:07:40.80 AT 2026acnj 2026-09-19.85 21.33 01:24:27.320 +04:25:44.21 AT 2026acni 2026-08-01.82 21.33 01:52:18.810 +04:49:47.93 AT 2026acnh 2026-01-20.57 21.92 04:02:38.704 +13:01:20.61 AT 2026acng 2026-09-20.16 19.03 02:55:54.441 +46:13:54.63 SN 2026acnf 2026-09-20.08 20.03 07:34:07.033 +56:03:35.45 AT 2026acne 2026-09-16.46 19.8857 01:04:22.936 -10:28:36.24 AT 2026acnd 2026-09-18.83 19.71 08:22:10.304 -19:58:35.79 AT 2026acnc 2026-09-19.78 18.97 20:20:44.204 -62:20:19.54 AT 2026acnb 2026-09-19.43 19.2 01:48:51.954 +10:35:11.40 SN 2026acna 2026-09-20.40 20.473 04:20:45.854 +20:05:30.09 AT 2026acmz 2026-09-19.53 20.93 00:20:09.662 -17:43:21.42 AT 2026acmy 2026-09-20.36 18.7768 01:08:30.307 -10:37:33.12 AT 2026acmx 2026-09-13.51 20.95 22:05:05.148 +21:30:32.50 AT 2026acmw 2026-09-13.46 20.91 20:39:43.235 +01:26:17.57 AT 2026acmv 2026-09-16.30 21.94 20:27:32.344 +04:00:23.15 AT 2026acmu 2026-09-16.30 21.47 02:25:15.327 -05:29:45.03 AT 2026acmt 2026-09-19.55 21.16 01:43:56.117 -03:30:20.86 SN 2026acms 2026-09-16.41 20.1889 05:02:52.706 -06:20:44.84 AT 2026acmr 2026-09-17.47 20.0414 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 7 11:57 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C