FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461320.85553132 07.10.2026 08:31:47.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  3642
Objects passed selection criteria:  3632
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 2601
Average stars matched: 2087 (80.2384 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230036 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Oct  7 12:37:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461320.85553132 07.10.2026 08:31:47.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  20379
Objects passed selection criteria:  20328
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 15536.5
Average stars matched: 12832 (82.5926 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   242668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Oct  6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Oct  7 12:38:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1150832 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1150832 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1418.9765
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 506.3988
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1417.7165
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 505.7746
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.616802
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     15.3800001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-07T03:31:09.1369913' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-07T08:31:09.1369913' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61320.3549668519 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-07T08:31:19.0390921' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61320.3550814698 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.998974600691 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9996485418306 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     24.9497222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     224.160277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.36007577437387 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20700 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20700 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     15.3800001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     15.3800001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits :)

Spent 0.576833 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =      15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-07T03:31:47.9069499' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-07T08:31:47.9069499' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61320.3554155789 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-07T08:31:57.8117952' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61320.3555302201 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.998974605444 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     -17.999648526701 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     24.8577777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             224.2925 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.36815524973828 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20700 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20700 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =      15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=      15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits :)

Spent 0.645436 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits



fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.85508259
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.619 -18:00:48.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.619 -18:00:48.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.094 -18:00:36.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.094 -18:00:36.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.619 -18:00:48.13
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.094 -18:00:36.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LywLEvZsZg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.76y9EqEbwZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iMx2UNBRyT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LXYamC3PEG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.33

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.33

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.3 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.3 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  11.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.LywLEvZsZg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460
Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.76y9EqEbwZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454
Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iMx2UNBRyT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=944, passed=4212
Got 4212 stars (including 3046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5851
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 2964 stars left (next iteration limit 3261)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2964 robust_rms=7.604 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.705 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.705 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2964 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.597 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.597 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2964 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.448 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2964 robust_rms_before=1.048 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.396 worst_region_rms_after=0.448 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.094 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.407
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.396 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.361 arcsec matched=2964
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits N_match=2964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=942 n_q2=557 n_q3=927 n_q4=538 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LXYamC3PEG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=944, passed=4240
Got 4240 stars (including 3071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5850 through 0 to 8.4397, gap 8.4397 to 351.5850
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2991 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5855 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5855
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 2989 stars left (next iteration limit 3287)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2989 robust_rms=7.633 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.331 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2989 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.656 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2989 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2989 robust_rms_before=1.472 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.399 worst_region_rms_after=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.555 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.402
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec matched=2989
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits N_match=2989 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=937 n_q2=564 n_q3=934 n_q4=554 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.041
reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364_astrometric_residuals.png (2964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365_astrometric_residuals.png (2989 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:56.35 -20:39:14.6:  10.80 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:26.0:  10.81 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:56.35 -20:39:14.6:  10.75 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:26.0:  10.85 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:26.0: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9360 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.35 -20:39:14.6: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9619 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    10.96    00:05:56.33 -20:39:14.7   3956 4800   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    10.96    00:05:56.37 -20:39:14.5   3957 4802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    10.94    23:55:48.61 -17:47:26.0   5390 3058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    10.93    23:55:48.59 -17:47:26.0   5391 3060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20186_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 20186_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    9.54    00:02:07.40 -14:40:36.2   4468 1181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.40 -14:40:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20468_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 20468_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    11.21    23:49:36.80 -15:50:59.6   6294 1889   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

**** FOUND  23:49:36.82 -15:50:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    7.16    23:43:49.93 -15:17:08.8   7145 1555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.92 -15:17:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.619 -18:00:48.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.619 -18:00:48.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.094 -18:00:36.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.094 -18:00:36.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.619 -18:00:48.13
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.094 -18:00:36.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FNvoAMDKrO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EBIZozbbdb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0gdmmlbc2W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MeeBWjpgwV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.46

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.46

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 58 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.5 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.5 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.2 (SNR )  13.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FNvoAMDKrO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965
Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EBIZozbbdb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162
Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0gdmmlbc2W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=841, bad_region=3779, passed=22460
Got 22460 stars (including 18069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5842 through 0 to 8.4473, gap 8.4473 to 351.5842
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4479, gap 8.4479 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=7.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.614 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.614 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.461 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4802 robust_rms_before=1.045 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.401 worst_region_rms_after=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.104 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.423
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.401 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.371 arcsec matched=4802
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1567 n_q2=901 n_q3=1500 n_q4=834 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MeeBWjpgwV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=829, bad_region=3721, passed=22292
Got 22292 stars (including 17951 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5828 through 0 to 8.4818, gap 8.4818 to 351.5828
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5834 through 0 to 8.4832, gap 8.4832 to 351.5834
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=7.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.560 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.685 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.685 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.466 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4801 robust_rms_before=1.469 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.416 worst_region_rms_after=0.466 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.603 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.416 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.367 arcsec matched=4801
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=1563 n_q2=905 n_q3=1493 n_q4=840 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:44:27.56 -16:10:40.1:  13.43 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:48.11 -19:25:09.8:  12.88 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:02:55.62 -18:47:47.8:  13.44 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:44:27.56 -16:10:40.1:  13.37 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:48.11 -19:25:09.8:  12.94 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:02:55.62 -18:47:47.8:  13.34 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:27.56 -16:10:40.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4364 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:55.62 -18:47:47.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7046 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:48.11 -19:25:09.8: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1242 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:21.26 -21:12:36.1:  13.63 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.49 -21:53:46.7:  13.96 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:33.03 -21:23:29.9:  14.03 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:19.57 -21:18:38.8:  13.86 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:41.5:  13.77 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:19.04 -21:29:12.4:  13.92 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:41.11 -18:24:03.0:  13.77 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:21.26 -21:12:36.1:  13.69 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:21.26 -21:12:36.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6825 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:33.5:  13.70 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:45.72 -22:06:57.5:  13.98 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.49 -21:53:46.7:  13.84 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.49 -21:53:46.7: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7500 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:54.32 -22:05:47.5:  14.24 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:33.03 -21:23:29.9:  14.26 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:33.03 -21:23:29.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6239 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:19.57 -21:18:38.8:  13.93 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:19.57 -21:18:38.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6625 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:41.5:  13.84 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:41.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7161 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:19.04 -21:29:12.4:  13.91 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:19.04 -21:29:12.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7593 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:41.11 -18:24:03.0:  13.91 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:41.11 -18:24:03.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7799 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:33.5:  13.68 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:45.72 -22:06:57.5:  14.09 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:33.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7568 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:45.72 -22:06:57.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7174 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:54.32 -22:05:47.5:  14.03 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:54.32 -22:05:47.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6334 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:50.23 -22:00:51.3:  13.78 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:50.23 -22:00:51.3:  13.76 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:50.23 -22:00:51.3: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7747 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20961_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 20961_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.52    23:44:27.52 -16:10:39.6   7043 2093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.38    23:44:27.60 -16:10:40.7   7044 2095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20962_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 20962_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.68    00:02:55.62 -18:47:47.5   4372 3671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.74    00:02:55.62 -18:47:48.1   4373 3673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20965_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 20965_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.18    00:05:48.09 -19:25:09.9   3966 4053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.08    00:05:48.13 -19:25:09.7   3967 4055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21207_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 21207_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    10.45    23:42:35.89 -15:53:25.0   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21324_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 21324_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    11.12    00:06:22.15 -18:03:38.7   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21955_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 21955_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.44    00:14:23.16 -21:54:10.7   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21994_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 21994_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.18    23:44:00.60 -15:16:19.7   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22104_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22104_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.52    00:10:07.10 -17:31:45.0   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22142_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22142_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.47    23:44:45.04 -21:35:22.3   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22161_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22161_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.74    00:05:16.34 -16:21:28.3   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22238_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22238_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.49    23:45:17.90 -14:20:47.2   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22357_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22357_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.92    00:04:45.83 -22:04:37.1   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22363_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22363_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.57    23:44:48.96 -14:39:09.2   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22473_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22473_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.71    23:45:04.27 -17:34:41.5   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22499_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22499_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.99    00:04:00.12 -15:14:06.2   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22520_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22520_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.84    23:47:56.17 -14:07:10.3   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22524_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22524_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.00    00:02:24.12 -21:58:06.8   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22528_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22528_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.08    00:17:46.45 -18:25:08.5   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22536_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22536_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.18    00:16:56.65 -15:59:33.8   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22639_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22639_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.09    00:06:22.03 -17:24:42.2   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22659_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22659_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    12.95    23:48:16.43 -16:07:04.2   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22713_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22713_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.11    00:11:02.77 -13:51:16.0   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22760_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22760_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.26    00:08:11.46 -22:07:25.7   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22781_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22781_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.06    23:41:52.51 -18:04:59.6   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22782_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22782_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.25    00:16:29.77 -19:03:44.4   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22831_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22831_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.26    00:09:51.29 -14:12:55.0   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22838_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22838_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.08    23:48:14.60 -18:32:27.9   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22887_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22887_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.38    00:18:03.71 -20:57:02.4   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22928_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 22928_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.06    23:48:49.73 -17:43:01.3   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23014_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23014_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.38    23:50:40.80 -19:41:08.3   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.11    23:49:34.60 -18:59:26.0   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23027_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23027_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.27    23:41:59.03 -20:25:22.0   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23047_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23047_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.30    23:50:10.44 -17:43:04.2   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23093_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23093_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.53    00:18:57.55 -21:46:26.7   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23099_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23099_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.40    23:55:59.65 -21:00:14.1   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23131_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23131_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.64    00:05:09.66 -21:36:41.4   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23162_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23162_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.61    00:18:21.27 -21:12:36.6   2203 5183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.78    00:18:21.25 -21:12:35.6   2204 5185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23211_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23211_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.54    00:11:07.99 -14:04:26.1   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23228_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23228_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.62    00:13:20.00 -18:29:41.1   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23268_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23268_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.53    00:07:23.53 -18:30:20.0   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23288_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23288_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.65    00:15:33.04 -21:23:29.9   2603 5280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.60    00:15:33.01 -21:23:30.0   2605 5282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23291_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23291_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.53    23:55:14.82 -20:25:39.2   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23315_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23315_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.70    00:17:09.49 -21:53:46.5   2384 5595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.82    00:17:09.50 -21:53:46.8   2385 5597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23318_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23318_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.43    23:45:55.68 -20:25:01.8   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23366_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23366_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.69    00:13:19.58 -21:18:38.8   2917 5221   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.64    00:13:19.55 -21:18:38.7   2919 5223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23374_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23374_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.52    23:53:44.14 -15:01:21.7   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23387_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23387_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.77    00:16:35.43 -16:00:28.9   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23391_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23391_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.72    00:15:25.36 -21:26:41.2   2622 5312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.71    00:15:25.23 -21:26:41.8   2624 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23407_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23407_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.70    00:13:41.09 -18:24:02.9   2826 3459   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.89    00:13:41.12 -18:24:03.1   2827 3461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23420_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23420_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.74    00:15:19.05 -21:29:12.7   2638 5337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.78    00:15:19.03 -21:29:12.1   2639 5339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23484_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23484_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.52    23:46:19.44 -20:14:49.4   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23516_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23516_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.74    00:06:56.44 -22:09:33.8   3827 5716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.78    00:06:56.40 -22:09:33.2   3828 5718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23728_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23728_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.70    23:47:45.69 -22:06:58.2   6520 5685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.74    23:47:45.75 -22:06:56.8   6521 5687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23834_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23834_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.72    23:48:54.31 -22:05:47.2   6359 5671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.58    23:48:54.34 -22:05:47.8   6360 5673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23862_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23862_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 07.35508    2461320.85508    13.77    23:47:50.26 -22:00:50.8   6510 5623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.78    23:47:50.20 -22:00:51.7   6511 5625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23946_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 23946_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    13.55    23:41:30.03 -16:25:30.6   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    9.73    00:02:07.41 -14:40:36.7   4468 1181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.41 -14:40:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365
The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 07.35553    2461320.85553    7.34    23:43:49.93 -15:17:08.8   7145 1555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_104810_TTUQ2b1x1_3802612_BSTGIVAv/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.91 -15:17:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461320.85508259 -observatory V36
14:20:13.72 -16:34:37.7 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:11:20.75 -21:10:33.5 Venus (-4.7mag)
08:30:27.42 +20:06:43.4 Mars (1.1mag)
09:31:42.64 +15:17:32.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:36.43 +01:44:16.3 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:28.37 +20:58:57.4 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:44.60 -00:23:03.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:14.32 -23:43:28.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:21:36.85 +09:32:39.1 Moon (-9.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct  7 12:37 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461320.85508259:
09:31:46.73 +15:17:10.9 Io (6.1mag)
09:31:45.68 +15:17:15.7 Europa (6.2mag)
09:31:33.91 +15:18:20.6 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:31:27.60 +15:18:54.5 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:31:09.44 +15:38:54.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:31:40.10 +15:17:46.2 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:30:06.67 +15:38:12.3 Elara (17.5mag)
09:34:23.38 +14:40:15.8 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:30:36.25 +15:43:35.0 Carme (18.8mag)
00:43:40.86 +01:44:28.4 Titan (8.2mag)
00:43:36.52 +01:44:17.7 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:59.54 +01:41:39.9 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:43:27.95 +01:44:36.1 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:58.08 +01:32:03.6 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct  7 12:37 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461320.85508259:
02:21:16.46 +21:11:45.1 JWST
20:23:10.18 -36:33:28.2 Chandra
12:32:08.82 -61:58:52.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct  7 12:37 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461320.85508259 -observatory V36
03:47:04.49 +20:10:28.7 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:21:13.78 -33:35:28.8 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:38:04.64 -72:08:15.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:15.40 +34:32:00.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:01:59.03 +48:20:20.8 17.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:28:30.50 +25:30:07.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:54.67 +35:15:21.2 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:06.06 +41:42:41.9 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:50.15 -13:32:04.7 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:09:38.19 +16:19:38.3 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:46:57.39 -02:22:57.0 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:26:06.78 +66:44:15.2 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:40:36.76 +43:50:11.7 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:41:46.82 +13:51:54.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1
00:36:41.16 +19:31:05.6 17.7mag 2P/Encke
22:53:54.30 -32:32:30.4 14.3mag 10P/Tempel
02:05:07.09 +39:16:41.8 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:08:31.36 -07:50:04.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:25:03.41 -08:44:06.1 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:30:14.54 +16:26:24.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:03:53.99 +14:31:25.1 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:24:12.61 +39:03:57.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:53:03.28 +15:34:21.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:32:41.23 +14:11:02.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:56:39.31 -31:03:00.2 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:47:50.43 +19:29:01.5 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:35:22.70 +00:24:10.3 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:17:11.68 -00:10:23.7 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:10:20.34 +35:38:47.5 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:08:30.60 +02:38:01.4 13.9mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:12.22 +05:06:45.5 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:56:55.28 +44:19:06.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:20:57.87 +25:44:33.9 18.0mag 266P/Christensen
09:52:06.18 +31:52:50.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct  7 12:37 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct  7 12:37 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct  7 12:37 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:02:16.840 +06:12:59.13  AT 2026acnk  2026-09-12.73 22.43
01:55:45.130 +03:07:40.80  AT 2026acnj  2026-09-19.85 21.33
01:24:27.320 +04:25:44.21  AT 2026acni  2026-08-01.82 21.33
01:52:18.810 +04:49:47.93  AT 2026acnh  2026-01-20.57 21.92
04:02:38.704 +13:01:20.61  AT 2026acng  2026-09-20.16 19.03
02:55:54.441 +46:13:54.63  SN 2026acnf  2026-09-20.08 20.03
07:34:07.033 +56:03:35.45  AT 2026acne  2026-09-16.46 19.8857
01:04:22.936 -10:28:36.24  AT 2026acnd  2026-09-18.83 19.71
08:22:10.304 -19:58:35.79  AT 2026acnc  2026-09-19.78 18.97
20:20:44.204 -62:20:19.54  AT 2026acnb  2026-09-19.43 19.2
01:48:51.954 +10:35:11.40  SN 2026acna  2026-09-20.40 20.473
04:20:45.854 +20:05:30.09  AT 2026acmz  2026-09-19.53 20.93
00:20:09.662 -17:43:21.42  AT 2026acmy  2026-09-20.36 18.7768
01:08:30.307 -10:37:33.12  AT 2026acmx  2026-09-13.51 20.95
22:05:05.148 +21:30:32.50  AT 2026acmw  2026-09-13.46 20.91
20:39:43.235 +01:26:17.57  AT 2026acmv  2026-09-16.30 21.94
20:27:32.344 +04:00:23.15  AT 2026acmu  2026-09-16.30 21.47
02:25:15.327 -05:29:45.03  AT 2026acmt  2026-09-19.55 21.16
01:43:56.117 -03:30:20.86  SN 2026acms  2026-09-16.41 20.1889
05:02:52.706 -06:20:44.84  AT 2026acmr  2026-09-17.47 20.0414
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct  7 12:37 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Oct  7 12:36:53 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 27s (0.45 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 45s (0.75 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 12 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 15s (0.25 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 30s (0.50 min)
FIELD_Cet-09-Q2b1x1: 91s (1.52 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 99s (1.65 min)
Finished: Wed Oct  7 12:38:32 CDT 2026