This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3588 2461320.8588 11.38 23:06:08.39 -03:48:31.5
71.17042 -55.71246 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 0 0 11.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:06:08.39 -03:48:31.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:06:08.39 -03:48:31.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8588,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3588 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3588 2461320.8588 12.12 23:31:18.06 -04:53:36.8
78.72452 -60.68991 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:18.06 -04:53:36.8: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:18.06 -04:53:36.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8588,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3588 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3588 2461320.8588 13.32 23:19:21.09 -01:56:39.5
77.81278 -56.52288 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:19:21.09 -01:56:39.5: 15.80 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:19:21.09 -01:56:39.5: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8588,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3588 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3588 2461320.8588 13.40 23:20:04.27 -02:15:12.5
77.71100 -56.87614 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:20:04.27 -02:15:12.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:20:04.27 -02:15:12.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8588,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3588 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3588 2461320.8588 13.63 23:15:55.49 -03:57:43.6
74.20726 -57.49811 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:55.49 -03:57:43.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:55.49 -03:57:43.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8588,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3588 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3588 2461320.8588 14.34 23:14:22.86 -01:22:17.9
76.75441 -55.29044 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -1 0 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:22.86 -01:22:17.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:22.86 -01:22:17.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8588,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3588 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3588 2461320.8588 14.54 23:06:51.70 -00:27:46.2
75.31716 -53.37813 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia 0 0 0 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:06:51.70 -00:27:46.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:06:51.70 -00:27:46.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8588,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3588 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461320.85903763 07.10.2026 08:36:50.851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4675
Objects passed selection criteria: 4673
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4547.25
Average stars matched: 4466.5 (98.2242 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 10:30:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461320.85903763 07.10.2026 08:36:50.851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 336
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27900
Objects passed selection criteria: 27817
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26738
Average stars matched: 25749.2 (96.3021 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 10:32:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.85856420
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.015 -02:00:12.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.015 -02:00:12.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0047 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.717 -01:59:47.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.717 -01:59:47.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:35.015 -02:00:12.18
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:35.717 -01:59:47.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00751 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I3XutX94nc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pQGj0rZ4ZI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i3oi2AVhcU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F17X1I2FjF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.I3XutX94nc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1637, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 4478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4338 stars left (next iteration limit 4770)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4338 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1429 n_q2=758 n_q3=1353 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pQGj0rZ4ZI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=1607, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 4361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4230 stars left (next iteration limit 4653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4230 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1416 n_q2=724 n_q3=1303 n_q4=787 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.i3oi2AVhcU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=307, bad_region=1339, passed=5825
Got 5825 stars (including 4223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4096 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4096 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4089 stars left (next iteration limit 4497)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4089 robust_rms=7.805 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.958 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.958 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4089 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.951 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.951 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4089 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.503 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4089 robust_rms_before=1.012 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.458 worst_region_rms_after=0.503 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.078 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.503
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.458 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec matched=4089
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4089 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1358 n_q2=757 n_q3=1225 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.F17X1I2FjF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, bad_region=1331, passed=5734
Got 5734 stars (including 4137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4014 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4008 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4008 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4014 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4008 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4008 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4008 stars left (next iteration limit 4408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4008 robust_rms=7.763 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.983 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.983 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4008 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.749 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4008 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.459 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4008 robust_rms_before=0.985 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.454 worst_region_rms_after=0.459 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.002 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.459
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.454 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec matched=4008
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4008 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1332 n_q2=735 n_q3=1211 n_q4=730 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.040
ref2=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.048
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.065
reference average sigma_overall=0.3465 worst_q_ratio=1.0515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4338 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4230 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4089 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4008 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:06:08.39 -03:48:31.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:09:54.79 -00:33:18.3: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:08.69 -01:13:13.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:58.98 +00:24:25.2: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.7: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:18.06 -04:53:36.8: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:18.06 -04:53:36.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:09:54.79 -00:33:18.3: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:58.98 +00:24:25.2: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:08.69 -01:13:13.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:54.79 -00:33:18.3: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1330 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:08.69 -01:13:13.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1710 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:58.98 +00:24:25.2: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0333 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.7: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:06:08.39 -03:48:31.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.7: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0702 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 20224_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20226_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 20226_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20227_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 20227_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 20229_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20230_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 20230_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:06:08.39 -03:48:31.5
23:31:18.06 -04:53:36.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.015 -02:00:12.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.015 -02:00:12.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0047 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.717 -01:59:47.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.717 -01:59:47.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:35.015 -02:00:12.18
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:35.717 -01:59:47.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00751 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x7qqR7Kc3z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ks5EAVQo7z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lR48UELQa7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PQJg85lXyi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.537600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.537600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 210 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.x7qqR7Kc3z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1717, bad_region=7702, passed=35853
Got 35853 stars (including 26731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1558 n_q2=904 n_q3=1485 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ks5EAVQo7z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1465, bad_region=7825, passed=36110
Got 36110 stars (including 27137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1577 n_q2=898 n_q3=1478 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lR48UELQa7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1312, bad_region=5216, passed=30826
Got 30826 stars (including 24671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=7.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.044 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.044 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.992 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.992 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.507 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4838 robust_rms_before=1.023 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.467 worst_region_rms_after=0.507 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.087 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.507
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.467 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec matched=4838
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1637 n_q2=852 n_q3=1504 n_q4=845 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.042
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PQJg85lXyi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1323, bad_region=5216, passed=31076
Got 31076 stars (including 24931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5316)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=7.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.770 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.770 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.836 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.836 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.470 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=0.994 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.459 worst_region_rms_after=0.470 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.040 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.470
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.459 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec matched=4833
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1638 n_q2=854 n_q3=1501 n_q4=840 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_102209_TTUQ2b1x1_85333_JczD6FUj/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:22:01.62 -05:55:26.4: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:52.06 -01:03:12.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:22:01.62 -05:55:26.4: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:52.06 -01:03:12.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:01.62 -05:55:26.4: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0564 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:52.06 -01:03:12.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5794 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.3: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:19:21.09 -01:56:39.5: 15.80 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.3: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.3: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0733 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:19:21.09 -01:56:39.5: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:19:21.09 -01:56:39.5: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.3237 delta=1.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:20:04.27 -02:15:12.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:20:04.27 -02:15:12.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:55.49 -03:57:43.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:55.49 -03:57:43.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:06.22 +00:02:55.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.6: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:06.22 +00:02:55.5: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.22 +00:02:55.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0654 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.6: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0655 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:22.43 -03:24:14.3: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:22.43 -03:24:14.3: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:22.43 -03:24:14.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1492 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:59.14 +00:39:25.1: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:47.91 -01:06:20.1: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:59.14 +00:39:25.1: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:54.8: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:59.14 +00:39:25.1: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4750 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:47.91 -01:06:20.1: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:47.91 -01:06:20.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3902 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:02.73 +01:48:15.9: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:54.8: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:54.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5416 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:22.86 -01:22:17.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:02.73 +01:48:15.9: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:02.73 +01:48:15.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5299 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:22.86 -01:22:17.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:25.58 -05:14:29.0: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:23.19 -03:05:03.4: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:07.21 -01:17:43.1: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:25.58 -05:14:29.0: 15.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:25.58 -05:14:29.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6228 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.11 -05:55:30.1: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:23.19 -03:05:03.4: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:23.19 -03:05:03.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4559 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:11.98 -03:17:09.7: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:07.21 -01:17:43.1: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:07.21 -01:17:43.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3993 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.11 -05:55:30.1: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.11 -05:55:30.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5179 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:35.01 -01:39:03.7: 15.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:11.98 -03:17:09.7: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:11.98 -03:17:09.7: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7236 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:35.01 -01:39:03.7: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:35.01 -01:39:03.7: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7791 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:53.44 -01:23:37.9: 15.07 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:37.09 +00:27:45.9: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:53.44 -01:23:37.9: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:53.44 -01:23:37.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6939 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:37.09 +00:27:45.9: 15.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:37.09 +00:27:45.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6918 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:06.23 -00:53:00.5: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:06.23 -00:53:00.5: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:06.23 -00:53:00.5: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6645 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:21.57 -01:06:22.6: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:30.44 -03:53:44.8: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:10.10 -02:20:23.0: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:55.07 -04:48:04.4: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:29.93 -01:52:32.7: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:21.57 -01:06:22.6: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:21.57 -01:06:22.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6843 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:30.44 -03:53:44.8: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:30.44 -03:53:44.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7813 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:55.07 -04:48:04.4: 15.15 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:10.10 -02:20:23.0: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:55.07 -04:48:04.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7019 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:10.10 -02:20:23.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8166 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:29.93 -01:52:32.7: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:18:29.93 -01:52:32.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7199 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:00.45 +00:44:33.5: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:06:51.70 -00:27:46.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:00.45 +00:44:33.5: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:00.45 +00:44:33.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8505 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:41.16 -02:10:05.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:43.59 -02:57:42.6: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:06:51.70 -00:27:46.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:14.12 -00:00:46.0: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:35.16 -00:20:32.7: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:13.41 +01:06:17.3: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:43.59 -02:57:42.6: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:41.16 -02:10:05.2: 15.43 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:43.59 -02:57:42.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7369 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:41.16 -02:10:05.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.8471 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:14.12 -00:00:46.0: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:14.12 -00:00:46.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5798 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:35.16 -00:20:32.7: 15.27 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:13.41 +01:06:17.3: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:35.16 -00:20:32.7: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7241 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:13.41 +01:06:17.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7935 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:16.17 -02:10:46.0: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:58:38.45 -03:01:29.2: 15.49 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:16.17 -02:10:46.0: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:16.17 -02:10:46.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7606 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:20.21 -03:10:22.9: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:58:38.45 -03:01:29.2: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:57.03 -04:13:28.0: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:38.45 -03:01:29.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7413 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:52.88 -05:45:47.5: 15.07 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:12.03 -05:33:09.0: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:20.21 -03:10:22.9: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:20.21 -03:10:22.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8628 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:57.03 -04:13:28.0: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:52.88 -05:45:47.5: 15.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:57.03 -04:13:28.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8185 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:52.88 -05:45:47.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8329 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:12.03 -05:33:09.0: 15.24 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:12.03 -05:33:09.0: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8615 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52619.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52669.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52818.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52501_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52501_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52503_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52504_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52516_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52517_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52518_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52518_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:08.39 -03:48:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52524_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52525_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52534_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52534_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52535_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:31:18.06 -04:53:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52548_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52551_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52552_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52553_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52557_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52558_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52559_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52561_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52565_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52568_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52569_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52570_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52571_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52573_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52576_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52577_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52582_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52584_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52585_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52591_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52593_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52594_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52597_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52598_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52599_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52599_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52600_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52610_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52611_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52613_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52614_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52614_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52615_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 52619_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52620_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52624_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52626_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52627_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52629_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52629_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52630_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52631_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52631_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52632_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 52635_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52636_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52640_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52641_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52642_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52643_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52644_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52645_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52646_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52647_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52651_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52655_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52656_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52657_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52657_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52658_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52660_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52662_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 52669_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52670_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52673_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52675_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52677_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52678_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52679_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52682_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52685_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52686_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52687_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52692_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52693_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52694_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52695_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52697_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52700_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52706_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52706_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52709_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52710_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52713_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52713_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52714_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52718_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52724_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52725_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52726_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52730_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52733_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52734_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52738_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52738_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52739_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52741_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52744_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52747_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52751_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52752_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52755_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52756_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52757_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52760_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52762_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52762_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52763_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52765_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52769_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52771_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52771_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52772_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52773_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52775_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52776_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52779_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52780_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52781_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52781_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52783_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52784_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52786_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52787_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52787_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52789_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52790_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52794_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52795_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52795_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52796_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52798_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52798_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52801_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52804_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52805_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52806_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52807_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52809_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 52818_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52820_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52821_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52822_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52824_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52826_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52828_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52829_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52830_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52833_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52834_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52834_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52835_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52837_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52837_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52839_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52840_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52840_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52849_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52850_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52853_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52853_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52855_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52858_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52859_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52860_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52861_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52864_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52865_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52866_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52868_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52870_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52874_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52875_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52876_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52876_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52879_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52881_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52883_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52885_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52889_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52890_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52891_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52891_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52897_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52898_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52900_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52902_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52903_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52903_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52907_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52908_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52913_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52913_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52915_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52915_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52917_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 52918_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52922_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52925_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52931_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52933_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52933_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52937_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52937_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52939_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52941_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52941_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52949_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52955_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52955_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52957_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52958_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52959_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52966_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52971_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52971_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52977_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52980_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52989_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 52991_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 53020_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50205_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 50205_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17948_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371
The candidate 17948_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_03-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371 did not pass the final checks
