This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3765 2461320.8765 8.66 00:11:07.02 +08:43:17.5
106.28794 -52.84229 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa 0 0 0 8.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:11:07.02 +08:43:17.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:11:07.02 +08:43:17.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8765,8.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3765 8.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3765 2461320.8765 13.46 00:12:25.90 +07:00:08.2
106.06686 -54.58720 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -0 -0 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:12:25.90 +07:00:08.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:12:25.90 +07:00:08.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8765,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3765 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3765 2461320.8765 13.51 23:55:28.97 +09:05:12.6
100.47391 -51.32854 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.701 Oriola 0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:55:28.97 +09:05:12.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:55:28.97 +09:05:12.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8765,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3765 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3765 2461320.8765 14.71 00:13:45.37 +02:23:13.6
104.35242 -59.11859 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2386 Nikonov -1 0 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:13:45.37 +02:23:13.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:13:45.37 +02:23:13.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8765,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3765 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461320.87674999 07.10.2026 09:02:21.199 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6119
Objects passed selection criteria: 6105
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4850.5
Average stars matched: 4314.75 (88.9547 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 09:42:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461320.87674999 07.10.2026 09:02:21.199 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 224
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 82 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33354
Objects passed selection criteria: 33243
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27200.5
Average stars matched: 24303.2 (89.3485 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 09:45:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.87628758
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:20.744 +06:01:51.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:20.744 +06:01:51.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1003 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:19.677 +06:01:58.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:19.677 +06:01:58.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0969 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:20.744 +06:01:51.29
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:19.677 +06:01:58.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00481 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nLGQbmC1ze
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.21EHgTSb0m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fx3gexG67M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wcqzRmVyLM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.657350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.657350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (aperture=6.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec +0.3478 to +11.6137 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec 0.3478 to 11.6137 deg
Loaded 4984 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3763 out of 3845 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3845 out of 6318 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
2.4 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.nLGQbmC1ze (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=1397, passed=6233
Got 6233 stars (including 4531 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0271 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0271
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4440 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0274 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0274
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4440 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4430 stars left (next iteration limit 4873)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits N_match=4430 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1463 n_q2=831 n_q3=1438 n_q4=698 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.21EHgTSb0m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=1317, passed=6318
Got 6318 stars (including 4746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8996 through 0 to 8.2591, gap 8.2591 to 351.8996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8998 through 0 to 8.2592, gap 8.2592 to 351.8998
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4629 stars left (next iteration limit 5091)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1576 n_q2=830 n_q3=1520 n_q4=703 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fx3gexG67M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, bad_region=1494, passed=6362
Got 6362 stars (including 4568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1194 through 0 to 7.9957, gap 7.9957 to 352.1194
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4470 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1196 through 0 to 7.9959, gap 7.9959 to 352.1196
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4470 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4459 stars left (next iteration limit 4904)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4459 robust_rms=7.699 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4459 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.229 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.229 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4459 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.380 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4459 robust_rms_before=0.921 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.399 worst_region_rms_after=0.380 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.255 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.380
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.319 arcsec matched=4459
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits N_match=4459 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1325 n_q2=856 n_q3=1425 n_q4=853 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.010
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wcqzRmVyLM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, bad_region=1493, passed=6311
Got 6311 stars (including 4516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6311 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1188 through 0 to 7.9744, gap 7.9744 to 352.1188
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4419 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1190 through 0 to 7.9747, gap 7.9747 to 352.1190
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4419 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4411 stars left (next iteration limit 4852)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4411 robust_rms=7.751 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.123 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.123 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4411 robust_rms=0.530 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.787 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.787 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4411 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.434 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4411 robust_rms_before=0.952 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.356 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.399 worst_region_rms_after=0.434 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.195 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.434
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec matched=4411
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits N_match=4411 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1299 n_q2=854 n_q3=1405 n_q4=853 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.166
ref2=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new1=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.010
new2=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.060
reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.132
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966_astrometric_residuals.png (4430 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (4629 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398_astrometric_residuals.png (4459 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399_astrometric_residuals.png (4411 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:03:30.74 +04:49:47.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:53:31.09 +09:07:10.3: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:11:07.02 +08:43:17.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:03:30.74 +04:49:47.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:30.74 +04:49:47.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1728 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:53:31.09 +09:07:10.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:53:31.09 +09:07:10.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2340 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:11:07.02 +08:43:17.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20562_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 20562_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21509_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 21509_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21510_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 21510_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:51:22.74 +09:20:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21555_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 21555_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 22s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:11:07.02 +08:43:17.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:20.744 +06:01:51.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:20.744 +06:01:51.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1003 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:19.677 +06:01:58.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:19.677 +06:01:58.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0969 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:20.744 +06:01:51.29
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:19.677 +06:01:58.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00481 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KzZNDM6fQE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pzJOFGI3js
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kH6QZmFYf7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P1XLgDyFFW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33634 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2656 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 3960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3960 out of 33634 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.535700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.535700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33634 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2656 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 3960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3960 out of 33634 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (aperture=4.9)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33762 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.8996 to 8.2739 deg, Dec +0.3067 to +11.6461 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.8996 to 8.2739 deg, Dec 0.3067 to 11.6461 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3715 out of 3975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3975 out of 33762 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 155 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
2.4 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KzZNDM6fQE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1340, bad_region=6060, passed=33617
Got 33617 stars (including 26420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9992 through 0 to 7.9160, gap 7.9160 to 351.9992
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9998 through 0 to 7.9161, gap 7.9161 to 351.9998
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1600 n_q2=917 n_q3=1535 n_q4=821 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pzJOFGI3js (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1193, bad_region=6398, passed=33748
Got 33748 stars (including 26330 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8996 through 0 to 8.2739, gap 8.2739 to 351.8996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8999 through 0 to 8.2739, gap 8.2739 to 351.8999
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1571 n_q2=894 n_q3=1615 n_q4=788 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kH6QZmFYf7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1536, bad_region=5759, passed=32975
Got 32975 stars (including 26154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1141 through 0 to 8.0137, gap 8.0137 to 352.1141
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1143 through 0 to 8.0145, gap 8.0145 to 352.1143
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=7.324 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.297 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.303 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.303 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.385 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4848 robust_rms_before=0.916 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.412 worst_region_rms_after=0.385 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.293 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.385
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.412 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.318 arcsec matched=4848
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1467 n_q2=902 n_q3=1568 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.016
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P1XLgDyFFW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1497, bad_region=5759, passed=33148
Got 33148 stars (including 26325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33148 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1029 through 0 to 7.9981, gap 7.9981 to 352.1029
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1031 through 0 to 7.9985, gap 7.9985 to 352.1031
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=7.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.538 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.532 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.821 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.821 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.440 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.440 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4844 robust_rms_before=0.951 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.409 worst_region_rms_after=0.440 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.210 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.440
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.409 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec matched=4844
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=1457 n_q2=913 n_q3=1566 n_q4=908 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-01-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_093806_TTUQ2b1x1_3713105_up8BtnQH/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:01:42.25 +09:27:41.1: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:55:31.15 +09:28:54.4: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:08:34.44 +01:53:59.7: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:08:34.44 +01:53:59.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:01:42.25 +09:27:41.1: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:34.44 +01:53:59.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8461 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:42.25 +09:27:41.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5777 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:55:31.15 +09:28:54.4: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:31.15 +09:28:54.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6327 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:55:28.97 +09:05:12.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:12:25.90 +07:00:08.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:51:50.40 +07:26:41.5: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:55:28.97 +09:05:12.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:51:50.40 +07:26:41.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:50.40 +07:26:41.5: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4894 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:12:25.90 +07:00:08.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:17:45.15 +01:59:51.6: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:13:45.37 +02:23:13.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:17:45.15 +01:59:51.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:17:52.05 +03:22:30.1: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:45.15 +01:59:51.6: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.7299 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:52:52.46 +10:04:14.1: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:17:52.05 +03:22:30.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:16:05.43 +02:28:57.1: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:52.05 +03:22:30.1: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7801 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:06:45.49 +10:05:13.9: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:52:52.46 +10:04:14.1: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:52.46 +10:04:14.1: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7374 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:13:45.37 +02:23:13.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:06:45.49 +10:05:13.9: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:45.49 +10:05:13.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7185 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:55:48.29 +08:48:04.5: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:16:05.43 +02:28:57.1: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:05.43 +02:28:57.1: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7334 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:46:09.13 +07:06:00.5: 15.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:55:48.29 +08:48:04.5: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.29 +08:48:04.5: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8976 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:44:26.52 +03:30:23.4: 15.34 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:46:09.13 +07:06:00.5: 15.71 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:09.13 +07:06:00.5: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8689 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:44:26.52 +03:30:23.4: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:26.52 +03:30:23.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8656 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55399.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58309.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52816_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52817_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52824_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52867_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:11:07.02 +08:43:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 53113_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 53219_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 53234_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54032_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54032_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54052_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54131_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54131_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54201_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54201_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54253_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54253_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54331_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54331_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54448_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54448_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54481_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54481_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54520_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54520_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54736_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54736_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54776_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54776_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54778_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54778_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54834_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54834_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54850_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54850_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54853_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54853_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54894_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54894_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54907_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54907_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54908_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54908_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54934_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54934_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54936_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54936_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54962_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54962_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54982_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 54982_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55161_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55161_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55163_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55163_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55171_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55171_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55179_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55179_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55204_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55204_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55238_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55238_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55287_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55287_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55391_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55391_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55393_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55393_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55399_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 55399_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55428_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 55428_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55462_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55462_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55463_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55463_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55503_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55503_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55506_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55506_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55519_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55519_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55540_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55540_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55545_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55545_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55580_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55580_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55623_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55623_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55729_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55729_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55789_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55789_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55829_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55829_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55858_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55858_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55967_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55967_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55970_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55970_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55980_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 55980_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56008_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56008_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56022_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56022_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56031_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56031_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56033_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56033_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56061_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56061_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56123_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56123_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56195_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56195_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56247_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56247_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56268_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56268_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56384_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56384_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56388_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56388_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56393_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56393_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56408_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56408_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56432_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56432_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56474_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56474_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56496_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56496_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56508_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56508_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56531_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56531_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56543_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56543_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56546_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56546_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56574_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56574_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56579_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56579_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56584_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56584_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56595_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56595_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56596_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56596_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56618_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56618_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56655_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56655_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56690_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56690_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56702_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56702_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56709_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56709_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56787_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56787_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56800_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56800_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56834_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56834_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56851_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56851_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56854_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56854_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56880_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56880_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56881_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56881_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56889_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56889_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56895_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56895_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56899_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56899_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56918_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56918_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56923_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56923_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56951_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56951_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56961_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 56961_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57007_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57007_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57037_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57037_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57062_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57062_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57088_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57088_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57217_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57217_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57285_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57285_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57299_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57299_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57333_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57333_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57379_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57379_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57396_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57396_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57433_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57433_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57436_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57436_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57460_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57460_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57482_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57482_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:24.30 +08:55:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57493_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57493_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57543_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57543_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57594_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57594_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57612_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57612_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57613_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57613_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57622_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57622_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57735_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57735_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57774_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57774_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57819_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57819_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57827_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57827_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57830_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57830_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57973_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 57973_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58012_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58012_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58037_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58037_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58061_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58061_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58082_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58082_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58096_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58096_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58102_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58102_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58115_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58115_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58133_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58133_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58152_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58152_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58183_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58183_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58223_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58223_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58240_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58240_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58284_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58284_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58309_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 58309_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58316_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58316_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58381_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58381_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58382_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58382_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58400_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58400_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58445_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58445_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58472_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58472_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58502_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58502_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58509_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58509_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58579_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58579_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58624_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58624_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58684_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58684_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58719_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58719_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58761_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58761_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58793_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58793_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58851_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 58851_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks