Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.7191,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.2191 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1294444 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1294444 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits_preview.png'
Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits

renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits_preview.png'
Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 888.8278
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.8528
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1516.7404
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 534.8060
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1518.9314
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 536.0070
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.70645
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-07T00:14:53.6211262' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-07T05:14:53.6211262' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61320.2186761689 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-07T05:15:03.5247045' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61320.2187907868 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 12.855078864503 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -9.99955077015695 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 42.2536111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 152.245 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.48543410925285 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29488 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29488 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits :)
Spent 1.197990 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-07T00:15:51.2126749' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-07T05:15:51.2126749' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61320.2193427314 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-07T05:16:01.1153517' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61320.2194573497 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 12.8550788559577 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -9.99955075708073 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 42.3469444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 152.541944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.48278798228577 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29488 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29488 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits :)
Spent 0.972163 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits

fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.71879191
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:03.745 -09:58:24.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:03.745 -09:58:24.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0957 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:06.720 -09:58:13.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:06.720 -09:58:13.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0855 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:03.745 -09:58:24.60
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:06.720 -09:58:13.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01258 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0oSH0FOZpM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ohrLwfLPGq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qtDmJzcUQe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9WpPLOvH2b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.898500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.898500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Loaded 3953 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3150 out of 3266 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3266 out of 5085 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.3 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.0oSH0FOZpM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=0, passed=5092
Got 5092 stars (including 4723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1250 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ohrLwfLPGq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=0, passed=5085
Got 5085 stars (including 4722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1046 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1120 n_q4=1208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qtDmJzcUQe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, bad_region=0, passed=5042
Got 5042 stars (including 4789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4694 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4695 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4692 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4692 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4692 stars left (next iteration limit 5160)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4692 robust_rms=13.471 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.971 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4692 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.606 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.606 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4692 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.426 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4692 robust_rms_before=0.888 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.444 worst_region_rms_after=0.426 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.948 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.426
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.444 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.302 arcsec matched=4692
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=4692 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1193 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1278 n_q4=1136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9WpPLOvH2b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=244, bad_region=0, passed=5049
Got 5049 stars (including 4802 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5049 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4708 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4709 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5174)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4705 robust_rms=13.560 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.375 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4705 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.655 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4705 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.419 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4705 robust_rms_before=0.903 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.441 worst_region_rms_after=0.419 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.938 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.441 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.303 arcsec matched=4705
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1190 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1145 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.170
ref2=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.252 worst_q_ratio=1.229
new1=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new2=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.161
reference average sigma_overall=0.259 worst_q_ratio=1.1995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238_astrometric_residuals.png (4692 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.6: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.9: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1406 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.9: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1144 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 20256_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 9.10 | 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.1 | 1229 6097 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 9.09 | 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.2 | 1222 6095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20405_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 20405_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 12.11 | 00:54:41.45 -09:31:47.0 | 5311 3492 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 12.12 | 00:54:41.48 -09:31:46.8 | 5304 3490 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 20412_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 12.14 | 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.4 | 5670 4681 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 12.14 | 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.7 | 5663 4679 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:03.745 -09:58:24.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:03.745 -09:58:24.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0957 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:06.720 -09:58:13.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:06.720 -09:58:13.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0855 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:03.745 -09:58:24.60
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:06.720 -09:58:13.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01258 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P0MszAZ1GS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YpYNVFpppJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.klHLvbyZ6H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j7KUc17i56
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 25987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Loaded 3957 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3129 out of 3354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3354 out of 25987 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.P0MszAZ1GS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1010, bad_region=3, passed=26243
Got 26243 stars (including 25198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1164 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YpYNVFpppJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=998, bad_region=3, passed=25977
Got 25977 stars (including 24935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.klHLvbyZ6H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=666, bad_region=45, passed=21114
Got 21114 stars (including 20381 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=13.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.513 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.618 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.618 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.415 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=0.885 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.426 worst_region_rms_after=0.415 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.930 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.415
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.426 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4884
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1230 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1346 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.j7KUc17i56 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=684, bad_region=45, passed=21079
Got 21079 stars (including 20332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=13.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.276 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.674 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.414 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.425 worst_region_rms_after=0.414 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.931 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.414
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.425 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.425 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1339 n_q4=1200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:06.09 -05:59:20.3: 14.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:15.18 -12:44:36.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:10:00.51 -06:40:16.7: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:38.25 -13:30:05.8: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:06.09 -05:59:20.3: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:15.18 -12:44:36.7: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:06.09 -05:59:20.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1456 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:38.25 -13:30:05.8: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:15.18 -12:44:36.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3213 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.25 -13:30:05.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9118 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:10:00.51 -06:40:16.7: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:24.49 -06:32:16.0: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:32:46.78 -05:45:50.9: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:00.51 -06:40:16.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5867 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.4: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.4: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8832 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:51.99 -04:55:42.3: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:26.21 -06:28:02.1: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:03:24.49 -06:32:16.0: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:24.49 -06:32:16.0: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6948 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:51.99 -04:55:42.3: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:32:46.78 -05:45:50.9: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:46.78 -05:45:50.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4813 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:26.21 -06:28:02.1: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:26.21 -06:28:02.1: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6166 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:08.27 -07:19:06.6: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:06:45.24 -07:23:42.0: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:39:19.36 -05:19:29.2: 15.36 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:50.53 -07:29:48.3: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:42:47.31 -05:42:29.0: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:02:17.76 -06:13:35.2: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:39:19.36 -05:19:29.2: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:50.53 -07:29:48.3: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:19.36 -05:19:29.2: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6398 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:50.53 -07:29:48.3: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6639 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:08.27 -07:19:06.6: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:02:17.76 -06:13:35.2: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:08.27 -07:19:06.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4058 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:17.76 -06:13:35.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6451 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:06:45.24 -07:23:42.0: 15.63 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:42:47.31 -05:42:29.0: 15.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:45.24 -07:23:42.0: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8123 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:47.31 -05:42:29.0: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6738 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32507.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31599_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31599_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.62 | 01:10:00.60 -06:40:17.6 | 7517 5334 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.56 | 01:10:00.42 -06:40:15.8 | 7509 5332 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.09 | 00:28:38.26 -13:30:06.4 | 1616 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 13.82 | 00:28:38.25 -13:30:05.2 | 1609 0838 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31607_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31607_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.14 | 00:26:06.08 -05:59:19.8 | 0891 5359 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.16 | 00:26:06.10 -05:59:20.9 | 0883 5357 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31611_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31611_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 13.44 | 00:26:15.25 -12:44:36.4 | 1228 1271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 13.24 | 00:26:15.11 -12:44:36.9 | 1221 1268 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31612_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31612_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 13.22 | 00:40:21.29 -05:00:07.1 | 2997 6095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
**** FOUND 00:40:21.30 -05:00:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31628_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31628_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 9.25 | 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.2 | 1229 6097 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 9.23 | 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.3 | 1222 6095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31864_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31864_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 12.53 | 00:43:47.42 -12:02:36.7 | 3784 1883 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
**** FOUND 00:43:47.41 -12:02:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 31934_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 12.88 | 00:42:44.61 -09:55:01.2 | 3556 3154 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 12.89 | 00:42:44.57 -09:55:01.7 | 3548 3152 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32025_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32025_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 13.40 | 00:33:29.51 -06:43:51.3 | 2036 4981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
**** FOUND 00:33:29.51 -06:43:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32136_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32136_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 13.59 | 00:51:17.10 -08:35:46.4 | 4767 4022 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
**** FOUND 00:51:17.04 -08:35:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32171_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32171_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 13.69 | 01:03:24.43 -06:32:16.1 | 6519 5365 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 13.70 | 01:03:24.55 -06:32:15.9 | 6512 5362 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32324_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32324_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.08 | 00:33:24.62 -06:43:54.1 | 2024 4980 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
**** FOUND 00:33:24.61 -06:43:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32428_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32428_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.23 | 00:40:54.09 -07:13:47.5 | 3169 4751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
**** FOUND 00:40:54.08 -07:13:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32488_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32488_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.43 | 00:32:46.77 -05:45:52.9 | 1893 5562 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.56 | 00:32:46.79 -05:45:48.8 | 1886 5561 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32507_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 32507_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32535_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32535_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.55 | 00:24:26.27 -06:28:00.7 | 0660 5051 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.73 | 00:24:26.16 -06:28:03.6 | 0653 5049 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32539_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32539_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.53 | 00:39:19.38 -05:19:30.0 | 2863 5891 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.87 | 00:39:19.34 -05:19:28.5 | 2855 5889 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32540_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.39 | 01:17:08.28 -07:19:05.1 | 8612 4993 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.42 | 01:17:08.27 -07:19:08.2 | 8605 4990 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32567_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32567_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.62 | 00:30:50.45 -07:29:48.6 | 1678 4493 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.75 | 00:30:50.60 -07:29:48.1 | 1671 4491 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32575_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32575_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.65 | 00:42:47.28 -05:42:30.6 | 3399 5690 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.72 | 00:42:47.34 -05:42:27.5 | 3392 5689 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32632_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32632_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.65 | 01:02:17.81 -06:13:35.6 | 6343 5544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 14.64 | 01:02:17.71 -06:13:34.9 | 6335 5542 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32660_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32660_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 07.21879 | 2461320.71879 | 14.69 | 01:06:45.30 -07:23:41.3 | 7046 4872 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 07.21946 | 2461320.71946 | 15.05 | 01:06:45.18 -07:23:42.6 | 7038 4870 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_023837_TTUQ1b1x1_1583655_ch0j0jlu/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-15-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:21:51.99 -04:55:42.3
########### Completed Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:21:51.99 -04:55:42.3
###################################################################################
00:21:51.99 -04:55:42.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461320.71879191 -observatory V36
14:19:36.78 -16:30:44.5 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:11:25.09 -21:10:41.7 Venus (-4.7mag)
08:30:07.91 +20:07:41.6 Mars (1.1mag)
09:31:37.10 +15:17:57.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:38.84 +01:44:31.3 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:29.11 +20:58:59.1 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:45.43 -00:22:57.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:14.49 -23:43:28.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:12:45.45 +10:17:10.5 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 7 08:29 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461320.71879191:
09:31:43.40 +15:17:23.9 Io (6.1mag)
09:31:37.69 +15:17:53.9 Europa (6.2mag)
09:31:30.03 +15:18:36.4 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:31:23.33 +15:19:12.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:31:03.32 +15:39:21.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:31:35.94 +15:18:03.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:30:00.79 +15:38:35.1 Elara (17.5mag)
09:34:18.32 +14:40:40.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:30:31.31 +15:43:57.8 Carme (18.8mag)
00:43:43.89 +01:44:42.4 Titan (8.2mag)
00:43:39.96 +01:44:31.1 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:43:01.81 +01:41:55.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:43:30.98 +01:44:51.4 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:42:00.58 +01:32:19.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 7 08:29 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461320.71879191:
02:21:02.66 +21:09:24.9 JWST
19:21:25.63 -05:03:44.9 Chandra
10:49:25.19 -58:38:57.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 7 08:29 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461320.71879191 -observatory V36
03:47:06.10 +20:10:23.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:21:06.91 -33:35:40.9 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:38:00.88 -72:07:43.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:16.09 +34:31:45.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:02:06.43 +48:19:55.8 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:28:26.88 +25:30:12.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:50.25 +35:14:31.9 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:05.09 +41:43:06.4 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:49.17 -13:31:57.0 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:09:23.09 +16:20:18.8 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:46:49.23 -02:22:15.8 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:25:33.47 +66:47:12.5 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:40:45.89 +43:51:14.0 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:41:38.86 +13:51:07.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1
00:37:00.55 +19:32:01.5 17.7mag 2P/Encke
22:53:46.20 -32:34:10.2 14.3mag 10P/Tempel
02:04:56.42 +39:17:29.5 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:08:25.79 -07:49:24.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:25:09.01 -08:43:47.8 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:30:02.91 +16:27:15.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:04:01.61 +14:31:45.2 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:23:42.67 +39:01:26.2 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:52:43.38 +15:37:12.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:32:24.11 +14:12:54.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:56:18.93 -31:00:36.4 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:47:44.05 +19:29:22.0 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:35:26.98 +00:24:41.7 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:18:35.12 -00:18:14.6 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:10:01.68 +35:39:20.8 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:08:10.26 +02:40:03.8 13.9mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:15.71 +05:07:48.0 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:56:41.27 +44:17:11.2 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:20:45.46 +25:44:44.6 18.0mag 266P/Christensen
09:51:57.56 +31:53:21.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 7 08:29 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 7 08:29 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 7 08:29 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
05:02:52.706 -06:20:44.84 AT 2026acmr 2026-09-17.47 20.0414
07:57:22.784 +52:36:35.29 AT 2026acmq 2026-09-16.46 19.4468
06:30:56.944 -31:36:42.11 AT 2026acmp 2026-09-18.78 19.8
05:10:14.652 -25:53:20.15 AT 2026acmo 2026-09-17.77 20.23
03:26:20.881 +22:27:21.51 AT 2026acmn 2026-09-16.38 18.1297
01:21:22.899 +18:24:15.58 AT 2026acmm 2026-09-18.38 19.4129
02:59:47.145 +03:53:41.77 AT 2026acml 2026-09-20.40 19.7959
01:12:22.273 -08:29:32.90 AT 2026acmk 2026-09-14.32 20.4256
12:37:20.669 +41:36:44.25 AT 2026acmj 2026-04-14.94 19.81
09:35:04.931 -21:14:54.15 AT 2026acmi 2026-04-19.39 20.25
12:53:36.157 -17:01:48.97 AT 2026acmh 2026-04-16.49 20.22
10:50:24.066 -15:39:14.03 AT 2026acmg 2026-04-21.44 19.82
22:39:05.762 -19:39:55.66 AT 2026acmf 2026-09-20.42 19.79
16:10:59.860 +42:59:12.75 AT 2026acme 2026-09-16.63 20.51
00:16:07.120 +18:47:32.54 AT 2026acmd 2026-09-10.72 21.46
22:30:40.202 +13:00:30.35 AT 2026acmc 2026-09-10.71 21.46
23:31:53.580 +29:50:47.83 AT 2026acmb 2026-09-10.67 21.8
21:09:02.990 +15:01:07.86 AT 2026acma 2026-09-08.65 21.5
23:28:50.644 +22:53:43.23 AT 2026aclz 2026-09-03.67 20.54
22:18:34.118 +15:43:36.90 AT 2026acly 2026-08-31.60 21.23
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 7 08:29 tns_transients_list.txt