This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.2339 2461320.7339 11.14 05:18:06.44 +23:49:51.4
180.93467 -7.94415 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:06.44 +23:49:51.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:06.44 +23:49:51.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.2340* 05 18 06.44 +23 49 51.4 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.7339,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.2339 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.2340* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.6 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461320.7339,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261007.2339 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.2339 2461320.7339 12.11 05:04:20.77 +26:04:29.4
177.25835 -9.18785 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:20.77 +26:04:29.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:20.77 +26:04:29.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.2340* 05 04 20.77 +26 04 29.4 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.7339,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.2339 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.2340* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.7 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461320.7339,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261007.2339 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.2339 2461320.7339 12.85 05:50:12.88 +16:43:58.9
191.02189 -5.37649 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso -2 -1 2 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:12.88 +16:43:58.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:12.88 +16:43:58.9: 15.31 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.28
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.2340* 05 50 12.88 +16 43 58.9 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.7339,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.2339 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.2339 2461320.7339 13.87 05:43:27.77 +19:41:23.3
187.64689 -5.23681 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla 1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:27.77 +19:41:23.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:27.77 +19:41:23.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.2340* 05 43 27.77 +19 41 23.3 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.7339,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.2339 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461320.73517008 07.10.2026 05:38:28.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20335
Objects passed selection criteria: 20274
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16418.2
Average stars matched: 16178.8 (98.5413 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245524 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 07:35:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461320.73517008 07.10.2026 05:38:28.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 140
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 345 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151271
Objects passed selection criteria: 150925
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 120570
Average stars matched: 116769 (96.8477 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 550696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 07:44:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.73272223
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:32.703 +21:59:26.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:32.703 +21:59:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:29.895 +21:59:32.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:29.895 +21:59:32.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:32.703 +21:59:26.12
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:29.895 +21:59:32.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01101 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RXybGifRvl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cx32OWxphZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JCdrdDX0dF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0p4cQ5oFfg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.RXybGifRvl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cx32OWxphZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JCdrdDX0dF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=0, passed=11274
Got 11274 stars (including 10757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4720 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=10.265 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.319 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=1.272 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.552 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.290 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=1.178 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.421 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.015 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4720 robust_rms_before=1.834 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.571 arcsec robust_rms_after=1.178 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.845 worst_region_rms_after=1.421 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.922 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.015
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.845 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.845 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.571 arcsec matched=4720
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4720 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.721 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.578 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1215 n_q3=913 n_q4=1552 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0p4cQ5oFfg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=624, bad_region=0, passed=10878
Got 10878 stars (including 10235 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4795 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4730 stars left (next iteration limit 5201)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4730 robust_rms=10.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.889 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.889 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4730 robust_rms=1.071 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.557 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4730 robust_rms=0.575 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.722 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4730 robust_rms_before=1.613 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.575 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.649 worst_region_rms_after=0.722 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.557 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.608
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.649 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.649 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.471 arcsec matched=4730
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits N_match=4730 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.437 n_q1=1030 n_q2=1327 n_q3=851 n_q4=1522 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.569 worst_q_ratio=1.265
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.241
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4720 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4730 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:20.77 +26:04:29.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:06.44 +23:49:51.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:20.77 +26:04:29.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:06.44 +23:49:51.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30742.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 29s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 30742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 30770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 30830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.04 +20:30:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.22 +17:53:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.52 +17:54:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.00 +20:10:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 35s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:18:06.44 +23:49:51.4
05:04:20.77 +26:04:29.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:32.703 +21:59:26.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:32.703 +21:59:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:29.895 +21:59:32.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:29.895 +21:59:32.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:32.703 +21:59:26.12
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:29.895 +21:59:32.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01101 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aXysInqX1q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RkpVkXnhFE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JniahQBif7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CcJMbgxs5o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 130 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aXysInqX1q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RkpVkXnhFE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JniahQBif7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=4166, bad_region=43, passed=69604
Got 69604 stars (including 65308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69604 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=10.574 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.783 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.783 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=1.232 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.560 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.232 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=1.168 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.408 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.019 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4711 robust_rms_before=1.844 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.566 arcsec robust_rms_after=1.168 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.843 worst_region_rms_after=1.408 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.926 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.019
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.843 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.843 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.566 arcsec matched=4711
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=1044 n_q2=1169 n_q3=949 n_q4=1549 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CcJMbgxs5o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=5015, bad_region=43, passed=84621
Got 84621 stars (including 79432 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4717 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=10.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.729 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.729 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=1.064 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.487 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.574 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.715 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4717 robust_rms_before=1.594 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.574 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.614 worst_region_rms_after=0.715 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.517 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.610
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.614 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.614 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.448 arcsec matched=4717
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits N_match=4717 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=1047 n_q2=1299 n_q3=836 n_q4=1535 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-34-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_023414_TTUQ1b1x1_935827_dEonWbJC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:14.69 +22:02:46.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:04.67 +26:55:06.7: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:04.47 +22:01:59.6: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:21:14.44 +21:59:16.2: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:52.26 +22:13:38.8: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:46.94 +26:22:22.2: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:14.69 +22:02:46.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:04.67 +26:55:06.7: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:04.47 +22:01:59.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:14.69 +22:02:46.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9080 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:52.26 +22:13:38.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:21:14.44 +21:59:16.2: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:04.67 +26:55:06.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7369 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:04.47 +22:01:59.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9298 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:52.26 +22:13:38.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4473 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:21:14.44 +21:59:16.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3463 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 04:59:20.54 +22:18:06.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:46.94 +26:22:22.2: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:46.94 +26:22:22.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7218 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.36 +24:41:59.8: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 04:59:20.54 +22:18:06.9: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:20.54 +22:18:06.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8349 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.36 +24:41:59.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.36 +24:41:59.8: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2380 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.70 +25:16:12.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.70 +25:16:12.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.70 +25:16:12.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.58 +25:20:29.4: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:24.07 +26:25:37.4: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.78 +22:34:32.0: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.78 +22:34:32.0: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.78 +22:34:32.0: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9739 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:24.07 +26:25:37.4: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.58 +25:20:29.4: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:24.07 +26:25:37.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8369 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.58 +25:20:29.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2430 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:12.88 +16:43:58.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.18 +21:09:55.9: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:12.88 +16:43:58.9: 15.31 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.28
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:50:12.88 +16:43:58.9: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.28 new_mean_mag=12.8452 delta=2.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.83 +21:33:02.4: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.18 +21:09:55.9: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.18 +21:09:55.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6618 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.83 +21:33:02.4: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.83 +21:33:02.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7473 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:27.77 +19:41:23.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:27.77 +19:41:23.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:59:15.25 +22:50:21.6: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:15.25 +22:50:21.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:15.25 +22:50:21.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9774 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192099.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:10.09 +26:28:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190576_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190576_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.38 +23:56:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:30.28 +19:22:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:48.94 +24:13:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.39 +18:25:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.14 +18:20:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:20.64 +18:14:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190609_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190609_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:58.87 +17:05:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.72 +25:17:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.08 +22:41:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:11.04 +18:32:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.67 +16:41:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.92 +26:19:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190691_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190691_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:06.42 +23:49:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190718_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 190718_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190782_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190782_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:20.78 +26:04:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190860_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190860_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.74 +26:44:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.11 +22:38:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190903_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190903_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.87 +25:55:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.94 +26:25:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190960_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190960_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.67 +22:27:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190973_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 190973_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191017_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191017_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.73 +23:02:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191027_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191027_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.70 +19:34:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.01 +18:33:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.94 +23:48:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191047_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191047_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.94 +25:05:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.27 +18:59:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191165_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191165_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.24 +18:33:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.77 +22:40:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191201_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191201_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.59 +25:09:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.93 +20:10:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191218_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191218_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.12 +26:25:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191230_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191230_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.17 +23:12:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191238_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191238_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.68 +21:46:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.10 +20:26:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191273_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191273_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.20 +22:45:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.17 +23:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.01 +18:33:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191310_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191310_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.65 +20:02:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191314_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191314_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.24 +18:33:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.65 +18:25:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191323_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191323_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.80 +25:24:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191333_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191333_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.35 +25:47:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191354_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191354_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.45 +25:08:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.41 +20:26:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191376_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191376_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.78 +19:32:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191423_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191423_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.51 +24:25:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191429_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191429_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.51 +18:29:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191431_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191431_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.28 +20:53:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.04 +19:35:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191459_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191459_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.50 +26:44:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191471_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191471_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.44 +20:09:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.27 +18:40:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.59 +25:22:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191513_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191513_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.27 +23:07:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191516_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191516_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:56.28 +26:13:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191529_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191529_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.42 +26:25:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.86 +17:11:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191536_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191536_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.55 +20:05:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.83 +23:11:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.51 +22:29:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:46.66 +22:17:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.13 +25:25:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.27 +26:18:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.60 +25:41:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 191580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.68 +18:46:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.25 +24:57:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191650_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191650_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.25 +18:44:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.02 +22:58:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:22.02 +24:21:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.01 +24:22:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191773_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191773_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191774_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191774_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.27 +25:18:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.63 +22:45:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191784_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191784_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:43.19 +24:06:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191795_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191795_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.75 +17:59:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191826_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191826_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.88 +20:00:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.00 +24:06:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191859_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191859_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.19 +22:06:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191902_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191902_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.72 +21:26:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:09.46 +18:20:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 191987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.88 +24:22:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 192075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.71 +21:19:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192099_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 192099_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.01 +20:08:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.41 +23:51:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.20 +17:53:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:25.33 +17:43:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.29 +25:40:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 03289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.10 +24:59:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.81 +23:10:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.48 +26:13:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17752_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 17752_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.04 +22:46:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 99603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 48897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.41 +24:45:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.39 +21:44:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:53.28 +20:56:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73025_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 73025_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:05.14 +22:25:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.32 +23:16:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.54 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.12 +17:45:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141022_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 141022_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.42 +19:25:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.16 +21:51:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:58.87 +23:30:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.93 +21:13:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.99 +20:10:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.40 +20:16:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.00 +23:15:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_00-38-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
