This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.4221 2461319.9221 13.92 04:02:54.12 +00:55:25.1
189.57468 -36.13113 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.483 Seppina -0 0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:02:54.12 +00:55:25.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:02:54.12 +00:55:25.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.4220* 04 02 54.12 +00 55 25.1 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.9221,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.4221 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.4221 2461319.9221 13.83 04:21:52.39 -00:58:40.7
194.70040 -33.24036 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1326 Losaka 3 -0 3 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:21:52.39 -00:58:40.7: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:21:52.39 -00:58:40.7: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.4220* 04 21 52.39 +00 58 40.7 13.8 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.9221,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.4221 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.4220* 04 39 30.00 -04 36 01.7 13.2 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BF Eri,2461319.9221,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BF Eri 20261006.4221 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461319.92237229 06.10.2026 10:08:02.966 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9641
Objects passed selection criteria: 9627
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9094
Average stars matched: 8746.5 (96.1788 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 02:20:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461319.92237229 06.10.2026 10:08:02.966 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55463
Objects passed selection criteria: 55288
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52853
Average stars matched: 50295.2 (95.1606 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 272912 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 02:21:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.92173140
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:13.536 -02:00:22.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:13.536 -02:00:22.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:11.110 -02:00:56.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:11.110 -02:00:56.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0172 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:13.536 -02:00:22.91
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:11.110 -02:00:56.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01373 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qY9NKdrDOV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LUnCOfDkQP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y1jZPvl8yb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.idfgL1M4rn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to +3.3309 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to 3.3309 deg
Loaded 5822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5011 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5011 out of 9074 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.917800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.917800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to +3.3309 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to 3.3309 deg
Loaded 5822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5011 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5011 out of 9074 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 9104 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3933 to 72.2586 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3933 to 72.2586 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3286 deg
Loaded 5824 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5009 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5009 out of 9104 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.0 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.2 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
2.2 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
15.5 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.qY9NKdrDOV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=748, bad_region=0, passed=9074
Got 9074 stars (including 8321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1419 n_q2=915 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LUnCOfDkQP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, bad_region=0, passed=9104
Got 9104 stars (including 8332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1419 n_q2=919 n_q3=1459 n_q4=1100 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Y1jZPvl8yb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=659, bad_region=1, passed=9236
Got 9236 stars (including 8558 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=13.191 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.751 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.751 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.695 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.336 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.292 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.781 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.352 worst_region_rms_after=0.336 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.859 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.292
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.352 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.275 arcsec matched=4898
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1484 n_q2=906 n_q3=1430 n_q4=1078 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.idfgL1M4rn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=0, passed=9242
Got 9242 stars (including 8563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=13.237 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.250 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.250 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.673 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.673 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.281 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.350 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.790 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.281 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.362 worst_region_rms_after=0.350 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.846 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.362 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.282 arcsec matched=4905
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1478 n_q2=906 n_q3=1446 n_q4=1075 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.354
new1=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.349
new2=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.353
reference average sigma_overall=0.2725 worst_q_ratio=1.3155
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:54.45 -02:15:09.4: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:25:18.49 -01:44:34.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:39.05 -02:03:59.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:31:46.48 +00:00:34.9: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:28:25.65 -04:26:26.3: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:56:50.25 -00:52:38.2: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:24:07.53 -00:48:59.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:25:18.49 -01:44:34.7: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:31:46.48 +00:00:34.9: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:54.45 -02:15:09.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:56:50.25 -00:52:38.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:24:07.53 -00:48:59.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:39.05 -02:03:59.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:28:25.65 -04:26:26.3: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:18.49 -01:44:34.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2854 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:54.45 -02:15:09.4: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2019 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:46.48 +00:00:34.9: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3001 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:50.25 -00:52:38.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2698 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.05 -02:03:59.8: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2301 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:07.53 -00:48:59.9: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2501 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:25.65 -04:26:26.3: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2853 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20748_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20748_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20756_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20756_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20757_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20766_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20766_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20770_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20770_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20771_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20773_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20773_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:13.536 -02:00:22.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:13.536 -02:00:22.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:11.110 -02:00:56.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:11.110 -02:00:56.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0172 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:13.536 -02:00:22.91
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:11.110 -02:00:56.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01373 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k61nvbDdOR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.keK6xXzzgJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E9Z0kR8Y35
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HzNVENdVCU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 53209 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3357 deg
Loaded 5825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4456 out of 5076 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5076 out of 53209 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.806600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.806600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 53209 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3357 deg
Loaded 5825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4456 out of 5076 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5076 out of 53209 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 53499 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3874 to 72.2632 deg, Dec -7.3133 to +3.3329 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3874 to 72.2632 deg, Dec -7.3133 to 3.3329 deg
Loaded 5831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4443 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 53499 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
1.9 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.1 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
2.1 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
15.6 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.k61nvbDdOR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2903, bad_region=3, passed=53195
Got 53195 stars (including 50206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53195 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.210 n_q1=1384 n_q2=918 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1115 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.keK6xXzzgJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2925, bad_region=5, passed=53480
Got 53480 stars (including 50454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.228 n_q1=1403 n_q2=921 n_q3=1488 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E9Z0kR8Y35 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2492, bad_region=46, passed=53082
Got 53082 stars (including 50450 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53082 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=13.322 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.330 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.265 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.325 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.293 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.777 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.265 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.342 worst_region_rms_after=0.325 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.859 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.293
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.267 arcsec matched=4897
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1471 n_q2=904 n_q3=1437 n_q4=1085 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HzNVENdVCU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2547, bad_region=47, passed=53044
Got 53044 stars (including 50365 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53044 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=13.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.616 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.719 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.719 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.337 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.782 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.343 worst_region_rms_after=0.337 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.844 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.275 arcsec matched=4904
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1459 n_q2=896 n_q3=1458 n_q4=1091 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.362
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_3314095_QOS1m5JM/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:13:38.30 -00:13:54.9: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:14:54.01 -02:04:33.8: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:18:12.07 +00:49:27.5: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:58:08.36 +02:32:47.6: 14.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:39:33.76 +00:41:59.0: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:18.91 -01:13:08.4: 14.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:44:14.20 -02:44:54.4: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:01:23.82 -00:42:35.7: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:35:48.97 -00:15:59.2: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:41:15.75 +02:08:08.1: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:18.91 -01:13:08.4: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:58:08.36 +02:32:47.6: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:13:38.30 -00:13:54.9: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:14:54.01 -02:04:33.8: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:18.91 -01:13:08.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6126 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:18:12.07 +00:49:27.5: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:08.36 +02:32:47.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7421 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:38.30 -00:13:54.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5700 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:44:14.20 -02:44:54.4: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:35:48.97 -00:15:59.2: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:01:23.82 -00:42:35.7: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:39:33.76 +00:41:59.0: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:54.01 -02:04:33.8: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7035 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:12.07 +00:49:27.5: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8880 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:14.20 -02:44:54.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8229 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.76 +00:41:59.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6985 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:48.97 -00:15:59.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8213 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:23.82 -00:42:35.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8670 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:41:15.75 +02:08:08.1: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:15.75 +02:08:08.1: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5127 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:06:10.06 +01:33:12.5: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:39:47.70 -01:41:57.1: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:48:13.54 +02:23:47.6: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:23:53.97 +00:18:46.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:18:07.09 +00:37:45.0: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:05:59.57 -02:25:48.3: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:26:35.30 -00:48:18.7: 11.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:45:49.84 -06:32:38.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:21:16.78 -01:50:03.6: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:39:47.70 -01:41:57.1: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:06:10.06 +01:33:12.5: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:23:53.97 +00:18:46.5: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:18:07.09 +00:37:45.0: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:48:13.54 +02:23:47.6: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:05:59.57 -02:25:48.3: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:47.70 -01:41:57.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1220 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:10.06 +01:33:12.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9862 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:53.97 +00:18:46.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0126 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:07.09 +00:37:45.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8596 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:26:35.30 -00:48:18.7: 11.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:13.54 +02:23:47.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5284 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:59.57 -02:25:48.3: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3879 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:35.30 -00:48:18.7: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6598 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:06:08.81 -02:56:34.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:45:49.84 -06:32:38.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:49.84 -06:32:38.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:21:16.78 -01:50:03.6: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:16.78 -01:50:03.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6798 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:06:08.81 -02:56:34.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:08.81 -02:56:34.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7438 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:33:41.72 -06:43:32.9: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:38:36.10 -00:02:55.8: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:02:54.12 +00:55:25.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:21.33 +00:35:07.3: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:12:14.06 +00:43:02.0: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:35:53.69 -06:54:49.1: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:38:36.10 -00:02:55.8: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:33:41.72 -06:43:32.9: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:02:54.12 +00:55:25.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:21.33 +00:35:07.3: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:36.10 -00:02:55.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1128 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:12:14.06 +00:43:02.0: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:41.72 -06:43:32.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2673 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:14:24.42 -02:06:14.7: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:10:50.14 +00:52:57.0: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:21.33 +00:35:07.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9455 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:14.06 +00:43:02.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9707 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:20.09 +01:08:49.7: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:28.06 +01:06:10.9: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:35:53.69 -06:54:49.1: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:53.69 -06:54:49.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5029 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:14:24.42 -02:06:14.7: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:24.42 -02:06:14.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5045 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:10:50.14 +00:52:57.0: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:20.09 +01:08:49.7: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:20.09 +01:08:49.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5540 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:50.14 +00:52:57.0: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5100 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:28.06 +01:06:10.9: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:28.06 +01:06:10.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5049 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:21.48 +01:42:57.7: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:13:37.24 +01:55:17.7: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:11:38.92 -05:22:05.4: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:10:54.87 -06:50:52.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:11:00.19 +01:56:25.3: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:10:54.87 -06:50:52.1: 15.96 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:21.48 +01:42:57.7: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.96 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:10:54.87 -06:50:52.1: ref_mag=15.96 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=14.6073 delta=1.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:21.48 +01:42:57.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6437 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:13:37.24 +01:55:17.7: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:11:38.92 -05:22:05.4: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:57:29.86 +03:11:48.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:54:17.43 -06:10:34.9: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:18:25.19 +02:27:53.6: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:37.24 +01:55:17.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6116 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.92 -05:22:05.4: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6096 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:31:51.38 -02:11:21.6: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:11:00.19 +01:56:25.3: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:00.19 +01:56:25.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6406 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:18:25.19 +02:27:53.6: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:57:29.86 +03:11:48.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:29.86 +03:11:48.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:54:17.43 -06:10:34.9: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:25.19 +02:27:53.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7196 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:17.43 -06:10:34.9: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7061 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:31:51.38 -02:11:21.6: 14.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:51.38 -02:11:21.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5111 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:15:19.43 -04:21:11.9: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:15.79 -01:13:45.1: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:00:22.41 +03:00:10.2: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:06:14.25 +02:50:53.5: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:15:19.43 -04:21:11.9: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:19.43 -04:21:11.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6278 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:49.22 +02:40:35.3: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:00:22.41 +03:00:10.2: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:23:19.31 -00:59:33.1: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:22.41 +03:00:10.2: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7816 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:43:08.69 +00:44:43.7: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:15.79 -01:13:45.1: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:15.79 -01:13:45.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7320 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:40:38.35 +02:22:15.2: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:06:14.25 +02:50:53.5: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:14.25 +02:50:53.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7959 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:49.22 +02:40:35.3: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:23:19.31 -00:59:33.1: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:49.22 +02:40:35.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6952 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:19.31 -00:59:33.1: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8560 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:43:08.69 +00:44:43.7: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:40:38.35 +02:22:15.2: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:08.69 +00:44:43.7: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7817 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:38.35 +02:22:15.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8274 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:40:53.53 +01:42:09.3: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:04.38 +01:21:29.4: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:56:33.13 -05:20:46.2: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:56:41.35 -05:38:31.5: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:04:41.70 -01:10:38.0: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:04.38 +01:21:29.4: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:40:53.53 +01:42:09.3: 15.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:56:41.35 -05:38:31.5: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:56:33.13 -05:20:46.2: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:52:46.72 -05:01:00.7: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:51:29.42 -00:56:21.9: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:07:06.48 -02:06:50.5: 14.61 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:04.38 +01:21:29.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9396 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:53.53 +01:42:09.3: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9791 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:41.35 -05:38:31.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7874 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:33.13 -05:20:46.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8379 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:04:41.70 -01:10:38.0: 15.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:41.70 -01:10:38.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9836 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:02:09.51 +01:24:43.4: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:07:06.48 -02:06:50.5: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:06.48 -02:06:50.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6978 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:52:46.72 -05:01:00.7: 15.78 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:46.72 -05:01:00.7: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8483 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:51:29.42 -00:56:21.9: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:29.42 -00:56:21.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8849 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:02:09.51 +01:24:43.4: 15.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:09.51 +01:24:43.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9641 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:10:28.49 -06:38:57.6: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:49:04.71 -04:30:58.0: 15.25 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:28:04.30 -07:09:53.2: 15.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:18:41.32 -06:11:46.1: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:38:00.32 -05:16:31.9: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:10:28.49 -06:38:57.6: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:49:04.71 -04:30:58.0: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:58:24.26 -03:15:07.0: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:28.49 -06:38:57.6: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8416 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:38:00.32 -05:16:31.9: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:04.71 -04:30:58.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9071 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:00.32 -05:16:31.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8797 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:28:04.30 -07:09:53.2: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:48:56.58 -01:57:00.1: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:05:23.16 -04:50:22.5: 15.43 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:18:41.32 -06:11:46.1: 15.64 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:04.30 -07:09:53.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8604 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:41.32 -06:11:46.1: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9887 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:49:35.90 -02:55:56.4: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:58:24.26 -03:15:07.0: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:48:56.58 -01:57:00.1: 15.51 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:24.26 -03:15:07.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8584 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:56.58 -01:57:00.1: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9296 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:05:23.16 -04:50:22.5: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:23.16 -04:50:22.5: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0312 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:49:35.90 -02:55:56.4: 15.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:35.90 -02:55:56.4: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9723 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:47:46.99 -06:29:10.6: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:01:59.01 -06:06:11.0: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:21:52.39 -00:58:40.7: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:47:46.99 -06:29:10.6: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:01:59.01 -06:06:11.0: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:46.99 -06:29:10.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8313 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:59.01 -06:06:11.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9056 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:21:52.39 -00:58:40.7: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:21:52.39 -00:58:40.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8285 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out69123.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21283.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68512.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67385_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67385_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67388_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67388_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67389_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67389_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67397_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67397_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67399_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67399_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67400_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67400_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67401_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67401_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67405_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67405_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67408_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67408_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67410_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67410_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:00.74 +01:20:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67417_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67417_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67419_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67419_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67423_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67423_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67429_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67429_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67430_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67430_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67431_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67431_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67432_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67432_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:48.71 -02:35:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67438_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67438_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67439_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67439_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:29.50 +02:38:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67440_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67440_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67945_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67945_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68099_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68099_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:41.99 -01:51:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68298_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68298_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68307_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68307_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68335_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68335_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:38.67 +00:06:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68435_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68435_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68474_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68474_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68512_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
Preparing report for the candidate 68512_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68588_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68588_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68743_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68743_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68776_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68776_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:13.86 +03:04:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68817_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68817_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68820_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68820_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:17.98 -01:50:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68916_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68916_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:40.68 -01:00:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68961_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68961_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68980_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68980_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68993_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68993_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69032_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69032_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69055_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69055_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69103_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69103_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69121_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69121_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69123_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69123_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:54.87 -06:50:52.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.458 3196269586003380608 062.72875229967 -06.84779230409 15.3882 14.8648 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.458#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69148_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69148_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69155_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69155_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69187_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69187_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69191_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69191_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69197_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69197_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69202_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69202_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69249_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69249_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69267_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69267_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69282_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69282_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69317_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69317_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69329_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69329_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69361_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69361_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69397_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69397_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69423_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69423_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69432_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69432_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69452_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69452_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69459_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69459_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69461_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69461_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69464_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69464_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69474_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69474_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69476_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69476_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69482_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69482_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69490_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69490_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69508_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69508_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69512_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69512_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69518_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69518_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69525_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69525_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69529_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69529_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69537_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69537_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69573_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69573_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69580_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69580_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69591_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69591_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69609_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69609_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69623_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 69623_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-08-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks