NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Lep-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits
Field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Lep-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lep-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Lep-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 436216 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 436216 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.png' -> 'transient_report/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits_preview.png'
Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits

renamed 'Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.png' -> 'transient_report/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits_preview.png'
Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1078.5795 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 664.3714 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1689.1612 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 734.9962 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1684.8436 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 735.0765 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.5661 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T05:41:57.7084678' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T10:41:57.7084678' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.4458068055 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T10:42:07.6091200' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.4459214006 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 79.9962273702381 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995346449035 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.9063888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 172.078333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.62510588855671 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lep-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 20 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 80.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits :) Spent 1.022560 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T05:43:12.8879314' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T10:43:12.8879314' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.4466769327 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T10:43:22.7947199' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.4467915972 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 79.9962272716918 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995346398298 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.9411111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 172.448333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.62384862897737 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lep-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 20 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 80.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits :) Spent 0.915244 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits


fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.94592255 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:20:21.122 -18:00:28.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 Second-epoch image center 05:20:21.122 -18:00:28.74 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0927 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:20:18.780 -18:01:09.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 Second-epoch image center 05:20:18.780 -18:01:09.55 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0838 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:20:21.122 -18:00:28.74 Second-epoch second image center 05:20:18.780 -18:01:09.55 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01465 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4p6xiOvdet Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oigjETemQV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nAbNUb1wWM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fik7ONoweC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh has not found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat wait wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg Loaded 9860 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6881 out of 7251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7251 out of 9607 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 25 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 2.9 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits 2.9 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4p6xiOvdet (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=819, bad_region=0, passed=9993 Got 9993 stars (including 9160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1398 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.oigjETemQV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=851, bad_region=0, passed=9607 Got 9607 stars (including 8741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1417 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.nAbNUb1wWM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=624, bad_region=0, passed=10702 Got 10702 stars (including 10067 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10702 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10702 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10702 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10702 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=12.988 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.112 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.112 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.724 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.724 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.387 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.387 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=0.737 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.418 worst_region_rms_after=0.387 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.858 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.387 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.418 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.418 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.267 arcsec matched=4920 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1070 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1116 n_q4=1369 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Fik7ONoweC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=629, bad_region=0, passed=10694 Got 10694 stars (including 10059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10694 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10694 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10694 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10694 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=12.896 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.377 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.377 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.689 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.689 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.391 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.391 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.764 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.411 worst_region_rms_after=0.391 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.856 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.391 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.411 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.275 arcsec matched=4918 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1071 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1123 n_q4=1374 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.317 ref2=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.356 new1=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.196 new2=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.181 reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.3365 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:29:28.15 -16:09:01.8: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:36:10.57 -16:26:26.5: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:24:14.67 -14:06:03.0: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:38.55 -17:39:39.2: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:01.24 -17:17:23.9: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:00.66 -16:32:34.0: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:17:00.01 -19:34:37.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:20:39.56 -16:13:38.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:23:03.79 -18:46:07.0: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:00.66 -16:32:34.0: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:29:28.15 -16:09:01.8: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:36:10.57 -16:26:26.5: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:38.55 -17:39:39.2: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:01.24 -17:17:23.9: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:24:14.67 -14:06:03.0: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:00.66 -16:32:34.0: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7827 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:28.15 -16:09:01.8: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7516 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:10.57 -16:26:26.5: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8411 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:01.24 -17:17:23.9: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9005 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:38.55 -17:39:39.2: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9283 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:14.67 -14:06:03.0: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9011 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:17:00.01 -19:34:37.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:20:39.56 -16:13:38.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:00.01 -19:34:37.6: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9775 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:39.56 -16:13:38.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9290 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9432 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:23:03.79 -18:46:07.0: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:03.79 -18:46:07.0: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9327 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:22:04.71 -18:02:28.9: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:23:50.58 -20:21:30.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:22:12.97 -17:36:37.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:35:40.81 -13:17:51.2: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:34.85 -18:16:08.1: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:50.58 -17:18:18.4: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:30:13.91 -16:56:51.9: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:23:50.58 -20:21:30.3: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:22:04.71 -18:02:28.9: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:50.58 -20:21:30.3: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9245 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:22:12.97 -17:36:37.3: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:04.71 -18:02:28.9: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9607 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:12.97 -17:36:37.3: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9959 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:35:40.81 -13:17:51.2: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:34.85 -18:16:08.1: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:40.81 -13:17:51.2: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9865 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:50.58 -17:18:18.4: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:34.85 -18:16:08.1: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0172 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:50.58 -17:18:18.4: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0014 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:30:13.91 -16:56:51.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:13.91 -16:56:51.9: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0033 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20382_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.86    05:36:10.55 -16:26:26.5   7023 4242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.82    05:36:10.59 -16:26:26.5   7028 4249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20383_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.88    04:56:01.59 -19:50:35.8   1404 1844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 04:56:01.61 -19:50:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20443_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20443_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    9.98    05:21:44.63 -15:55:33.9   4926 4464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 05:21:44.63 -15:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20448_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20448_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    10.01    04:59:04.30 -16:22:02.3   1662 3978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 04:59:04.30 -16:22:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20594_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.48    05:39:22.46 -17:51:19.1   7518 3411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 05:39:22.45 -17:51:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20649_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20649_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.75    05:31:00.68 -16:32:34.0   6277 4151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.81    05:31:00.65 -16:32:34.0   6283 4158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20650_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20650_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.75    05:29:28.17 -16:09:01.9   6045 4377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.75    05:29:28.13 -16:09:01.7   6050 4384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20678_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20678_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.89    05:31:01.24 -17:17:24.1   6297 3701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.92    05:31:01.23 -17:17:23.8   6302 3708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20685_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20685_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.90    05:24:14.64 -14:06:02.9   5228 5577   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.90    05:24:14.70 -14:06:03.1   5233 5584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20686_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20686_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.92    05:27:38.54 -17:39:39.3   5821 3456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.94    05:27:38.57 -17:39:39.2   5827 3464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20690_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20690_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.93    05:20:39.57 -16:13:38.8   4774 4267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.93    05:20:39.55 -16:13:38.4   4779 4274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20691_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20691_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.93    05:23:03.80 -18:46:06.9   5200 2759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.93    05:23:03.78 -18:46:07.2   5205 2766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20698_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20698_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.94    05:25:18.15 -19:17:40.3   5534 2459   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.94    05:25:18.12 -19:17:40.3   5539 2466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20700_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20700_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.96    05:17:00.02 -19:34:37.5   4367 2225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    12.00    05:17:00.00 -19:34:37.6   4372 2232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20703_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20703_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.96    05:22:04.71 -18:02:29.0   5037 3188   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.96    05:22:04.72 -18:02:28.9   5042 3196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20704_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20704_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.99    05:21:24.75 -17:04:11.5   4915 3774   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 05:21:24.76 -17:04:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20705_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    12.02    05:41:27.13 -21:32:11.7   7880 1191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 05:41:27.13 -21:32:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20708_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20708_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    11.99    05:23:50.59 -20:21:30.1   5360 1808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.87    05:23:50.58 -20:21:30.5   5365 1815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20709_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20709_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.99    05:20:13.03 -18:11:15.6   4781 3093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 05:20:13.05 -18:11:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20710_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20710_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    12.00    05:22:12.96 -17:36:37.3   5043 3448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.99    05:22:12.97 -17:36:37.2   5048 3456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20711_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20711_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    12.00    05:35:40.81 -13:17:51.4   6887 6143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    11.97    05:35:40.82 -13:17:51.1   6893 6150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20712_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20712_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    12.01    05:31:34.84 -18:16:08.0   6401 3115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    12.03    05:31:34.85 -18:16:08.3   6407 3122   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20713_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20713_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    12.00    05:27:50.59 -17:18:18.4   5841 3672   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    12.00    05:27:50.57 -17:18:18.4   5846 3679   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20715_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 20715_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.44592    2461319.94592    12.00    05:30:13.91 -16:56:51.8   6175 3902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    12.00    05:30:13.91 -16:56:52.0   6180 3909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 The candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 06.44679    2461319.94679    7.47    04:59:36.49 -14:48:24.0   1661 4927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits **** FOUND 04:59:36.48 -14:48:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Last image: 2461319.94592255 06.10.2026 10:41:57.708 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues. ____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. _277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Waiting for thread 2 to finish... The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits The above guess is bExcluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) ased on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.6,5.6,5.0,6.2,6.7,7.3 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.6,5.6,5.0,6.1,6.7,7.3 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 43 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-18T04:42:58.3810017 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-18T04:42:58.3810017 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-01-18T04:42:58.381 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Exposure 20 sec, 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461058.69662478 mid. exp. The reference image star 2634.968 2105.294 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 2318.031 4332.074 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 63907, (63904 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 24 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2 * rejected close to frame edge: 311 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 93 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.38 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.9 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -8.1 Selected detection limit= -8.1 Final detection limit= -8.1 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 82 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 63706 * detected, using 498/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014192, number_of_ambiguous_matches=907 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=58774 inliers=58774 rms 0.34 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014146, number_of_ambiguous_matches=904 58775 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=58775 inliers=58775 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013332, number_of_ambiguous_matches=852 58772 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=58772 inliers=58772 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.005868, number_of_ambiguous_matches=375 58724 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -0.044 63706 stars detected, 58724 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 55006, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 55006 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 55002 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix -0.00286 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 51438 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.39 68889 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 239880 kB used, 280280 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T10:41:57.7084678 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T10:41:57.7084678 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T10:41:57.708 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits The star 1158.004 136.009 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1809.992 167.006 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8498.003 871.998 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1151.996 918.997 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 191.007 1039.985 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1199.008 1171.976 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 6864.203 1183.842 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 883.998 1376.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8274.991 1397.981 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 3619.005 1436.994 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 54084 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 14 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 46 * rejected close to frame edge: 284 * rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>5.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 106 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 54084 * detected, using 423/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002076, number_of_ambiguous_matches=143 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=51224 inliers=51224 rms 0.62 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 1.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002047, number_of_ambiguous_matches=141 51224 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=51224 inliers=51224 rms 0.29 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002047, number_of_ambiguous_matches=141 51224 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=51224 inliers=51224 rms 0.29 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000740, number_of_ambiguous_matches=51 51213 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 175.201 54084 stars detected, 51213 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 47113, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 47113 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 47098 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00001*X_pix -0.00003*Y_pix +0.03252 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 28488 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.62 71760 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 277916 kB used, 280280 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T10:43:12.8879314 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T10:43:12.8879314 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T10:43:12.887 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits The star 1158.021 135.994 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1809.980 167.011 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8226.253 235.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8498.000 872.003 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1152.009 918.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 190.998 1040.006 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1199.016 1171.993 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 6863.869 1183.979 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 884.004 1377.003 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8274.996 1397.993 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 54642 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 10 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 46 * rejected close to frame edge: 274 * rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>5.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 65 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 54642 * detected, using 427/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002104, number_of_ambiguous_matches=151 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=53563 inliers=53563 rms 0.53 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 1.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002076, number_of_ambiguous_matches=149 53560 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=53560 inliers=53560 rms 0.29 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002076, number_of_ambiguous_matches=149 53560 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=53560 inliers=53560 rms 0.29 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000822, number_of_ambiguous_matches=59 53546 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 175.209 54642 stars detected, 53546 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 47464, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 47464 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 47449 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00001*X_pix -0.00003*Y_pix +0.02955 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 29406 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.61 72856 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 284248 kB used, 284284 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM Total number of measurements 236339 (236339 measurements stored in RAM) sorting the measurements cached in memory, writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 60 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 236339 (0 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source An ERROR has occured while processing file out50307.dat ERROR: Can't open file lightcurve.tmp ERROR running lib/select_aperture_with_smallest_scatter_for_each_object _____________________ SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_061404_TTUQ1b1x1_277875_JrqmUNIc/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-41-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_05-43-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Last image: 2461319.94592255 06.10.2026 10:41:57.708 UTC ERROR found an unsoved plate in the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 ########### Completed Lep-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels': No such file or directory # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES exclusion_list_index_html.txt NOT FOUND The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.94592255 -observatory V36 14:16:08.10 -16:08:14.9 Mercury (-0.0mag) 14:11:56.25 -21:10:47.3 Venus (-4.7mag) 08:28:17.71 +20:13:18.5 Mars (1.1mag) 09:31:05.92 +15:20:20.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:43:52.17 +01:45:56.9 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:33.23 +20:59:09.8 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:50.03 -00:22:27.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:15.36 -23:43:26.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:35:17.52 +14:58:21.5 Moon (-9.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 6 20:22 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.94592255: 09:31:03.07 +15:20:37.2 Io (6.1mag) 09:30:56.60 +15:21:11.9 Europa (6.2mag) 09:31:09.56 +15:20:01.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:30:59.86 +15:20:54.5 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:30:28.77 +15:41:51.7 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:31:07.72 +15:20:12.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:29:27.61 +15:40:46.3 Elara (17.5mag) 09:33:49.77 +14:43:04.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:30:03.46 +15:46:09.1 Carme (18.9mag) 00:44:00.41 +01:46:01.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:43:56.62 +01:45:44.5 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:43:14.41 +01:43:25.2 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:43:48.06 +01:46:17.5 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:42:14.37 +01:33:46.1 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 6 20:22 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.94592255: 02:14:04.72 +21:04:01.6 JWST 17:49:43.87 +31:43:06.8 Chandra 07:08:17.87 -09:53:04.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 6 20:22 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.94592255 -observatory V36 03:47:13.35 +20:09:58.5 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:20:28.46 -33:36:43.3 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:37:39.38 -72:04:42.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:19.73 +34:30:25.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:02:42.87 +48:18:12.0 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:28:06.11 +25:30:46.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:25.27 +35:09:59.9 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:00.25 +41:45:18.9 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:43.00 -13:31:14.9 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:07:58.45 +16:24:09.2 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:46:03.60 -02:18:22.1 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:22:25.72 +67:03:24.2 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:41:36.17 +43:57:06.4 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:40:54.43 +13:46:42.7 17.7mag A/2026 E1 00:38:46.92 +19:37:07.0 17.7mag 2P/Encke 22:52:56.40 -32:43:10.2 14.3mag 10P/Tempel 02:03:48.39 +39:21:53.6 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:07:54.57 -07:45:38.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:25:39.74 -08:42:01.1 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 07:28:56.62 +16:32:09.7 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:04:42.51 +14:33:41.2 17.5mag 88P/Howell 07:20:53.06 +38:47:30.4 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:50:50.81 +15:53:23.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:30:47.86 +14:23:31.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:54:24.80 -30:46:56.5 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:47:07.40 +19:31:23.2 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:35:50.44 +00:27:41.0 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 22:26:31.16 -01:03:14.0 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:08:16.50 +35:42:38.0 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:06:17.60 +02:51:43.3 13.8mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:32.29 +05:13:44.8 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:55:19.50 +44:06:41.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:19:34.87 +25:45:53.7 18.0mag 266P/Christensen 09:51:08.97 +31:56:23.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 6 20:22 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 6 20:22 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 6 20:22 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:14:19.450 +04:46:52.92 AT 2026ackh 2026-09-08.83 22.2 01:01:48.240 +03:30:17.04 AT 2026ackg 2026-09-10.76 22.36 02:11:13.220 +00:36:17.37 AT 2026ackf 2026-09-08.84 21.43 02:31:53.457 +02:19:06.32 AT 2026acke 2026-08-28.80 20.73 02:24:11.420 -00:13:18.77 AT 2026ackd 2026-09-08.91 22.92 01:03:59.810 +06:15:19.53 AT 2026ackc 2026-08-21.84 22.54 18:57:17.643 +41:09:07.56 AT 2026ackb 2026-09-19.18 19.9818 22:02:16.323 +39:49:46.54 SN 2026acka 2026-09-20.19 18.637 02:08:19.378 -07:08:21.59 AT 2026acjz 2026-09-19.75 20.07 00:49:35.044 -04:36:08.99 AT 2026acjy 2026-09-10.58 20.1 07:54:16.503 +20:01:25.42 SN 2026acjx 2026-09-20.25 19.11 07:47:22.677 +17:49:24.51 AT 2026acjw 2026-09-20.25 18.31 22:00:52.012 +34:22:25.34 AT 2026acjv 2026-09-15.94 19.87 22:53:42.463 -03:35:19.51 AT 2026acju 2026-09-15.01 20 19:36:24.152 -58:11:10.48 AT 2026acjt 2026-09-19.39 19.5 18:54:32.379 -62:51:31.29 SN 2026acjs 2026-09-20.40 17.87 21:58:21.903 +22:26:56.46 AT 2026acjr 2026-09-18.29 19.9649 16:30:23.245 +26:31:29.53 AT 2026acjq 2026-09-15.18 19.7488 18:01:45.934 +22:25:44.28 AT 2026acjp 2026-09-17.47 19.22 15:54:58.434 +07:57:18.63 SN 2026acjo 2026-09-19.12 17.7197 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 6 20:22 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 51 C