This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.3811* 04 12 32.58 +20 59 08.0 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.8811,7.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.3811 7.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.3811 2461319.8811 11.96 03:40:47.00 +21:31:25.6
167.31816 -26.40484 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 12.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:47.00 +21:31:25.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:47.00 +21:31:25.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.3811* 03 40 47.00 +21 31 25.6 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.8811,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.3811 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.3811 2461319.8811 12.32 03:29:29.49 +17:31:40.2
168.08499 -31.15785 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia 0 -0 0 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:29.49 +17:31:40.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:29.49 +17:31:40.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.3811* 03 29 29.49 +17 31 40.2 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.8811,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.3811 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461319.88158358 06.10.2026 09:09:18.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 22
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12715
Objects passed selection criteria: 12703
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12031
Average stars matched: 11396.8 (94.7282 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238640 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 13:01:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 after completing the measurements (memory cleanup crash); the transient search continues.
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461319.88158358 06.10.2026 09:09:18.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
############################################################
***** PLATE SOLVE PROCESSING ERROR *****
***** cannot find wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits *****
############################################################
***** PLATE SOLVE PROCESSING ERROR *****
***** cannot find wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits *****
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.88071231
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:43.061 +22:00:14.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:43.061 +22:00:14.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.961 +22:00:43.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:45.961 +22:00:43.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:43.061 +22:00:14.76
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:45.961 +22:00:43.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01373 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rcRj1PXRvT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A9RUFgkmHL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jULcqdIUiA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xa7gApo0pT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rcRj1PXRvT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A9RUFgkmHL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jULcqdIUiA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=740, bad_region=0, passed=12838
Got 12838 stars (including 12083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=12.116 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.626 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.626 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.018 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.018 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.271 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.410 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.410 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.286 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.271 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.463 worst_region_rms_after=0.410 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.052 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.410
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:43.088 +22:00:13.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12838 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3718967.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.286 -> 0.271 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4921 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4747 pairs (4921 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4747 robust_rms=11.925 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.466 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.466 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4747 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.936 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.936 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4747 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.402 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4747 robust_rms_before=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.403 worst_region_rms_after=0.402 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.403 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.402
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:43.088 +22:00:13.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12838 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3728891.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.268 -> 0.269 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits N_match=4747 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1007 n_q3=1208 n_q4=1473 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xa7gApo0pT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=735, bad_region=0, passed=12889
Got 12889 stars (including 12141 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12889 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=12.115 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.514 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.900 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.900 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.401 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.401 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4922 robust_rms_before=1.336 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.472 worst_region_rms_after=0.401 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.078 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.401
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.992 +22:00:41.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12889 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3718692.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.336 -> 0.275 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4922 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4739 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4739 pairs (4922 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4739 robust_rms=11.944 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.457 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4739 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.830 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4739 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.393 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4739 robust_rms_before=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.394 worst_region_rms_after=0.393 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.394 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.393
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:45.992 +22:00:41.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12889 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3728892.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.273 -> 0.273 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1465 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits sigma_overall=0.282 worst_q_ratio=1.210
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.223
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398_astrometric_residuals.png (4747 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399_astrometric_residuals.png (4739 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:34.2: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:29.49 +17:31:40.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:47.00 +21:31:25.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.97 +20:05:27.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.7: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:36.77 +25:43:26.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.97 +20:05:27.7: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:29.49 +17:31:40.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:34.2: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:55.05 +23:27:16.0: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.90 +22:50:49.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:47.00 +21:31:25.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.7: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:34.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1253 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.97 +20:05:27.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3219 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.7: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2973 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:55.05 +23:27:16.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:36.77 +25:43:26.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:55.05 +23:27:16.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4401 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.90 +22:50:49.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:42.42 +23:30:09.1: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.55 +21:12:57.8: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:07.6: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.2: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3555 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:36.77 +25:43:26.8: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3978 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.90 +22:50:49.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4309 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:42.42 +23:30:09.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:07.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.55 +21:12:57.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:42.42 +23:30:09.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4917 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.55 +21:12:57.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4131 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:07.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4518 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.44 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:34.20 +23:05:27.1: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:37.89 +21:30:45.7: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4356 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.44 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.44 +20:11:23.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4955 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:34.20 +23:05:27.1: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:34.20 +23:05:27.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4875 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:37.89 +21:30:45.7: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:37.89 +21:30:45.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4953 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20587_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 20587_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.78 +24:29:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 20705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20722_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20722_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20737_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20737_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20739_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20739_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20742_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20742_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.06 +18:01:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 20745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:05.07 +25:42:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20755_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20755_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20756_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20756_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20769_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20769_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.86 +23:09:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20789_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20789_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20799_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20799_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 4s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 26s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:40:47.00 +21:31:25.6
03:29:29.49 +17:31:40.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Last image: 2461319.88071231 06.10.2026 09:08:03.544 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues.
____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
The above guess is 08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
The above guess is bautodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
ased on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.6,5.6,5.0,6.1,6.7,7.2 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.5,5.5,5.0,6.1,6.6,7.2 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 118 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-09T04:15:49.4128510
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-09T04:15:49.4128510
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-01-09T04:15:49.412
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461049.67777097 mid. exp.
The reference image star 8498.011 872.011 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 4000.945 1322.008 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 3619.128 1437.042 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 351.990 1876.029 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1457.629 3129.811 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 5377.000 4998.007 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 6852.012 4571.994 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 2317.998 4331.997 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 70728, (70727 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 24
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 8
* rejected close to frame edge: 353
* rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 66
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.97
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.0 (4.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.5
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.7
Selected detection limit= -7.7
Final detection limit= -7.7 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 52
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
71069 * detected, using 502/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013424, number_of_ambiguous_matches=954
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=65430 inliers=65430 rms 0.34 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013395, number_of_ambiguous_matches=952
65431 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=65431 inliers=65431 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013395, number_of_ambiguous_matches=952
65431 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=65431 inliers=65431 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.005586, number_of_ambiguous_matches=397
65357 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -0.004
71069 stars detected, 65357 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 60869, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 60869 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 60866 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00323
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 58059 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.97
76440 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 251704 kB used, 286172 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T09:08:03.5443607
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T09:08:03.5443607
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T09:08:03.544
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
The star 1158.000 135.996 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1808.636 163.759 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1809.994 166.990 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8225.994 235.020 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1329.993 616.010 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8497.996 872.002 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1152.000 919.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 191.007 1039.996 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1199.007 1171.995 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 6864.016 1183.993 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 64559
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 21
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 50
* rejected close to frame edge: 339
* rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 51
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
64559 * detected, using 456/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003205, number_of_ambiguous_matches=245
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=61564 inliers=61564 rms 0.71 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 2.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003205, number_of_ambiguous_matches=245
61564 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=61564 inliers=61564 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003205, number_of_ambiguous_matches=245
61564 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=61564 inliers=61564 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001347, number_of_ambiguous_matches=103
61538 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 177.541
64559 stars detected, 61538 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 55915, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 55915 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 55890 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00002*X_pix -0.00002*Y_pix -0.04681
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 24430 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.14
79461 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 244020 kB used, 286172 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 206356 (206356 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T09:09:18.8210525
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T09:09:18.8210525
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T09:09:18.821
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
The star 1158.005 136.004 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1810.000 167.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8225.995 234.995 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1329.993 615.996 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8497.999 871.998 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1151.998 918.995 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 191.001 1040.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1198.998 1172.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 6864.004 1183.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 3999.883 1318.749 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 65060
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 19
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 49
* rejected close to frame edge: 339
* rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.5 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 62
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
65060 * detected, using 459/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002769, number_of_ambiguous_matches=220
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=63263 inliers=63263 rms 0.57 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 1.9 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002681, number_of_ambiguous_matches=213
63262 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=63262 inliers=63262 rms 0.32 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002681, number_of_ambiguous_matches=213
63262 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=63262 inliers=63262 rms 0.32 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001258, number_of_ambiguous_matches=100
63233 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 177.553
65060 stars detected, 63233 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 56168, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 56168 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 56151 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00002*X_pix -0.00002*Y_pix -0.04803
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 29594 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.12
81288 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 433348 kB used, 522556 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 7710 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 271416 (65060 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 4706 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
An ERROR has occured while processing file out38639.dat
ERROR: Can't open file lightcurve.tmp
ERROR running lib/select_aperture_with_smallest_scatter_for_each_object
_____________________
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041008_TTUQ1b1x1_4187401_eUET3s2W/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-08-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_04-09-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Last image: 2461319.88071231 06.10.2026 09:08:03.544 UTC
ERROR found an unsoved plate in the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1
########### Completed Tau-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels': No such file or directory
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
exclusion_list_index_html.txt NOT FOUND
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.88071231 -observatory V36
14:15:50.12 -16:06:19.0 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:11:57.85 -21:10:44.2 Venus (-4.7mag)
08:28:08.43 +20:13:46.0 Mars (1.1mag)
09:31:03.27 +15:20:32.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:53.32 +01:46:04.1 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:33.59 +20:59:10.6 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:50.43 -00:22:25.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:15.44 -23:43:26.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
09:31:59.56 +15:15:02.9 Moon (-9.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 6 13:01 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.88071231:
09:30:59.31 +15:20:55.2 Io (6.1mag)
09:30:53.80 +15:21:24.8 Europa (6.2mag)
09:31:07.83 +15:20:08.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:30:57.90 +15:21:02.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:30:25.85 +15:42:04.2 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:31:06.75 +15:20:15.4 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:29:24.80 +15:40:57.3 Elara (17.5mag)
09:33:47.34 +14:43:16.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:30:01.10 +15:46:20.1 Carme (18.9mag)
00:44:01.79 +01:46:07.8 Titan (8.2mag)
00:43:57.78 +01:45:50.7 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:43:15.50 +01:43:32.8 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:43:49.53 +01:46:24.7 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:42:15.56 +01:33:53.4 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 6 13:02 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.88071231:
02:13:57.25 +21:04:21.4 JWST
17:39:56.77 +33:25:27.1 Chandra
06:55:54.68 -00:32:38.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 6 13:02 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.88071231 -observatory V36
03:47:14.05 +20:09:56.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:20:25.20 -33:36:48.9 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:37:37.62 -72:04:27.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:20.05 +34:30:18.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:02:46.35 +48:18:01.0 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:28:04.33 +25:30:49.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:47.35 -18:10:02.5 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:23.15 +35:09:36.6 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:25:59.82 +41:45:30.7 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:42.52 -13:31:11.0 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:07:51.28 +16:24:28.5 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:45:59.71 -02:18:02.4 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:22:09.67 +67:04:46.5 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:41:40.50 +43:57:35.8 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:40:50.65 +13:46:20.3 17.7mag A/2026 E1
00:38:56.04 +19:37:33.2 17.7mag 2P/Encke
22:52:52.34 -32:43:57.9 14.3mag 10P/Tempel
02:03:43.03 +39:22:15.8 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:07:51.92 -07:45:19.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:25:42.38 -08:41:51.9 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
07:28:51.05 +16:32:34.1 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:04:46.08 +14:33:50.9 17.5mag 88P/Howell
07:20:38.93 +38:46:17.8 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:50:41.30 +15:54:44.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:30:39.70 +14:24:24.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:54:15.10 -30:45:47.0 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:47:04.34 +19:31:33.1 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:35:52.50 +00:27:56.3 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:27:11.96 -01:07:03.9 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:08:07.57 +35:42:53.7 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:06:08.10 +02:52:42.5 13.8mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:33.87 +05:14:14.9 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:55:12.82 +44:05:47.1 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:19:28.93 +25:45:59.0 18.0mag 266P/Christensen
15:47:32.42 -03:22:47.7 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski
09:51:04.85 +31:56:38.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 6 13:02 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 6 13:01 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 6 13:01 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:07:01.527 +32:58:35.10 AT 2026acjn 2026-09-20.12 19.1971
06:15:51.241 +70:45:44.78 AT 2026acjm 2026-09-19.37 19.809
07:09:35.125 +54:23:03.49 AT 2026acjl 2026-09-15.43 19.1229
07:35:10.862 +03:59:19.95 AT 2026acjk 2026-09-16.52 19.5005
08:45:06.960 +44:36:28.20 AT 2026acjj 2026-09-19.92 18.55
02:21:31.130 +31:02:14.60 AT 2026acji 2026-09-19.33 20.6
02:34:10.583 -19:22:41.81 AT 2026acjh 2026-09-19.77 20.24
06:46:43.903 -38:54:42.13 AT 2026acjg 2026-09-19.78 19.91
05:52:15.129 -40:52:08.71 AT 2026acjf 2026-09-18.76 19.95
06:18:05.216 -23:26:26.19 AT 2026acje 2026-09-18.78 19.85
05:32:54.071 -50:30:37.56 AT 2026acjd 2026-09-14.78 20.29
05:52:10.278 -11:07:36.45 AT 2026acjc 2026-09-19.79 19.85
21:11:43.571 -34:47:00.19 AT 2026acjb 2026-04-19.72 19.81
21:30:35.847 -42:23:12.51 AT 2026acja 2026-04-19.72 19.77
12:52:55.617 -22:48:16.26 AT 2026aciz 2026-04-12.49 20.12
12:53:00.838 -24:03:29.29 AT 2026aciy 2026-04-09.57 20
21:27:27.506 -44:49:25.74 AT 2026acix 2026-04-19.72 19.66
20:20:25.760 -33:16:52.27 AT 2026aciw 2026-04-14.80 19.61
21:43:08.932 -27:21:49.22 AT 2026aciv 2026-04-19.75 20.08
02:43:34.909 -53:24:14.98 AT 2026aciu 2026-09-18.62 19.99
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 6 13:01 tns_transients_list.txt