######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
And-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting And-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing And-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 246936 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 246936 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.png' -> 'transient_report/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits_preview.png'
And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits

renamed 'And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.png' -> 'transient_report/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits_preview.png'
And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 387.8851
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 545.1472
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 939.2685
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 662.1281
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 941.5948
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 652.5066
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.42151
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.015
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T01:54:22.1337176' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T06:54:22.1337176' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.2877561687 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T06:54:32.0329465' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.2878707405 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.999885541722 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0002744708265 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 76.0955555555555 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 293.132222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.03006086699545 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'And-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.89 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/d_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits :)
Spent 2.794121 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/d_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T01:55:32.7868166' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T06:55:32.7868166' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.2885739119 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T06:55:42.6889347' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.2886885186 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.987409296494 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0624966890828 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 75.8413888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 293.146666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.03120051254721 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'And-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.89 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/d_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits :)
Spent 1.202121 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/d_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits

fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.78787191
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.515 +38:00:04.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Image size: 941.1'x625.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:08.946 +38:03:31.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.515 +38:00:04.52
Second-epoch image center 00:00:08.946 +38:03:31.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0637 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:06.433 +38:02:48.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.515 +38:00:04.52
Second-epoch image center 00:00:06.433 +38:02:48.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0496 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:08.946 +38:03:31.21
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:06.433 +38:02:48.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AMqZZPWGmB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JLplaMmAMS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qfoj64nvnc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7pgtb6Ayep
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 349.3058 to 10.5986 deg, Dec +32.4287 to +43.2657 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 349.3058 to 10.5986 deg, Dec 32.4287 to 43.2657 deg
Loaded 11349 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8509 out of 8946 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8946 out of 15977 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 349.3058 to 10.5986 deg, Dec +32.4287 to +43.2657 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 349.3058 to 10.5986 deg, Dec 32.4287 to 43.2657 deg
Loaded 11349 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8509 out of 8946 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8946 out of 15977 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 17176 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 349.7082 to 10.9504 deg, Dec +32.0541 to +43.3918 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 349.7082 to 10.9504 deg, Dec 32.0541 to 43.3918 deg
Loaded 11829 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8607 out of 9086 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9086 out of 17176 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.4 pix And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
2.2 pix fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
2.1 pix fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
15.6 mag. And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
15.7 mag. fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
15.7 mag. fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AMqZZPWGmB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=961, bad_region=0, passed=15977
Got 15977 stars (including 14999 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.3058 through 0 to 10.5986, gap 10.5986 to 349.3058
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.3061 through 0 to 10.5985, gap 10.5985 to 349.3061
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=1158 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1340 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JLplaMmAMS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> 'wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1094, bad_region=0, passed=17176
Got 17176 stars (including 16062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17176 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7082 through 0 to 10.9504, gap 10.9504 to 349.7082
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7083 through 0 to 10.9504, gap 10.9504 to 349.7083
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1147 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1385 n_q4=1302 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Qfoj64nvnc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1398, bad_region=0, passed=17812
Got 17812 stars (including 16400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7252 through 0 to 10.9983, gap 10.9983 to 349.7252
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3300 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3050 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.08"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7235 through 0 to 10.9994, gap 10.9994 to 349.7235
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3320 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3054 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.02"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 3046 stars left (next iteration limit 3342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 3046 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1356/1344/182/164 per quadrant, need 190 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits N_match=3046 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=26.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=29.147 n_q1=1356 n_q2=1344 n_q3=182 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=47.395
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7pgtb6Ayep (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1278, bad_region=0, passed=17085
Got 17085 stars (including 15785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7145 through 0 to 10.9987, gap 10.9987 to 349.7145
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7140 through 0 to 10.9996, gap 10.9996 to 349.7140
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=14.166 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.178 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.178 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.683 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.340 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.308 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.856 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.365 worst_region_rms_after=0.340 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.887 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.308
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.365 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.323 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1341 n_q3=1056 n_q4=1116 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.615 worst_q_ratio=47.395
new2=fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.130
reference average sigma_overall=0.3585 worst_q_ratio=1.163
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits) flagged: sigma=0.615 (ref avg 0.3585), ratio=47.395 (ref avg 1.163), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 17492 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3396698.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3396698.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
log-odds ratio 108.5 (1.32138e+47), 24 match, 0 conflict, 70 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (357.021,38.1658), pixel scale 5.97357 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---------++-----+++--++------+---++-----+----++------+--+++-----++---++----------+----------++(best)------
Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3396698.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3396698.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (357.006807, 38.163307) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:48:01.634, +38:09:47.904).
Field size: 15.7619 x 10.5525 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -178.173 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits' -> 'fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 6 12:58 fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Oct 6 12:58 out3396698.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits (fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3396698.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3396698.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7067 degrees of RA,Dec (357.006,38.1625)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 34.4392 (9.05239e+14), 10 match, 0 conflict, 29 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (0.044259,38.0661), pixel scale 5.96983 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-----++---+-----------++------+---+-+(best)----------------+-----------+-----+------------------------+-
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3396698.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3396698.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.040262, 38.060372) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:09.663, +38:03:37.339).
Field size: 15.7974 x 10.5831 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.585 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 6 12:58 fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Oct 6 12:58 out3396698.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Generating wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Image size: 942.1'x630.0' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.92"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:09.396 +38:03:34.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 17812 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3400081.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1398, bad_region=0, passed=17812
Got 17812 stars (including 16400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7161 through 0 to 11.0124, gap 11.0124 to 349.7161
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.09"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.7226 through 0 to 11.0075, gap 11.0075 to 349.7226
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3304 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3059 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.87"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3053 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.45"
Excluding outliers - 3053 stars left (next iteration limit 3215)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 3053 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1353/1344/180/176 per quadrant, need 190 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits N_match=3053 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.022 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.796 sigma_q3_arcsec=29.100 sigma_q4_arcsec=29.539 n_q1=1353 n_q2=1344 n_q3=180 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=23.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits): sigma 0.615->1.268, ratio 47.395->23.290; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: re-stating the kept diagnostic for fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits below, so the last WCS_QUALITY_DIAG line matches the restored WCS
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits N_match=3046 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=26.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=29.147 n_q1=1356 n_q2=1344 n_q3=182 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=47.395
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 182 -> 1056, 82.765% > 20%; fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits vs fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 164 -> 1116, 85.305% > 20%; fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits vs fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=47.395 -- 40.75x the reference average (1.163); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (3046 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 00:17:28.98 +37:56:38.6: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 00:04:26.84 +42:07:38.8: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 00:02:54.81 +41:32:02.7: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 23:56:01.45 +38:41:59.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 00:22:59.42 +38:48:14.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits at 00:22:59.42 +38:48:14.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits at 00:02:54.81 +41:32:02.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:59.42 +38:48:14.5: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4122 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits at 00:04:26.84 +42:07:38.8: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits at 23:56:01.45 +38:41:59.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:54.81 +41:32:02.7: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3717 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:26.84 +42:07:38.8: ref_mag=10.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6923 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits at 00:17:28.98 +37:56:38.6: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:01.45 +38:41:59.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4311 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:28.98 +37:56:38.6: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7096 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22176_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287
The candidate 22176_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 06.28869 | 2461319.78869 | 12.07 | 00:34:48.17 +39:57:25.3 | 0856 1601 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits |
**** FOUND 00:34:48.16 +39:57:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22177_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287
The candidate 22177_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 06.28787 | 2461319.78787 | 11.71 | 00:17:29.08 +37:56:37.4 | 2733 3089 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 06.28869 | 2461319.78869 | 11.71 | 00:17:28.88 +37:56:39.9 | 2729 3081 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23413_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287
The candidate 23413_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 06.28787 | 2461319.78787 | 10.66 | 00:04:26.81 +42:07:38.6 | 4460 0713 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 06.28869 | 2461319.78869 | 10.73 | 00:04:26.87 +42:07:38.9 | 4456 0706 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27488_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287
The candidate 27488_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 06.28787 | 2461319.78787 | 12.34 | 00:02:54.80 +41:32:02.7 | 4606 1083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 06.28869 | 2461319.78869 | 12.41 | 00:02:54.81 +41:32:02.7 | 4603 1076 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27545_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287
The candidate 27545_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 06.28787 | 2461319.78787 | 12.42 | 00:22:59.41 +38:48:14.4 | 2143 2497 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 06.28869 | 2461319.78869 | 12.41 | 00:22:59.42 +38:48:14.5 | 2139 2490 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27939_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287
The candidate 27939_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 06.28787 | 2461319.78787 | 12.43 | 23:56:01.45 +38:41:59.4 | 5296 2837 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 06.28869 | 2461319.78869 | 12.43 | 23:56:01.44 +38:41:58.9 | 5292 2830 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10204_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287
The candidate 10204_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 06.28869 | 2461319.78869 | 8.10 | 23:23:40.31 +39:43:35.2 | 9098 2229 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits |
**** FOUND 23:23:40.32 +39:43:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Last image: 2461319.78787191 06.10.2026 06:54:22.133 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field And-04-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues.
____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
The above guess is bb1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
ased on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.1,5.1,5.5,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.2,5.1,5.5,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 134 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-13T10:18:38.0096860
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-13T10:18:38.0096860
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-07-13T10:18:38.009
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 13.07.2026 10:18:38.009 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461234.92972233 mid. exp.
The reference image star 1961.311 3334.731 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9339.700 3594.040 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1977.820 6114.008 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 2321.091 4332.933 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 93933, (93932 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 27
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 4
* rejected close to frame edge: 476
* rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 150
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.87
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -6.9 (4.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.4
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.6
Selected detection limit= -7.6
Final detection limit= -7.6 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.05.0 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 74
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
100301 * detected, using 533/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014955, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1500
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=85618 inliers=85618 rms 0.75 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 2.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014955, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1500
85633 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=85633 inliers=85633 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014945, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1499
85633 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=85633 inliers=85633 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008225, number_of_ambiguous_matches=825
85580 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -3.628
100301 stars detected, 85580 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 78131, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 78131 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 78113 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00001*X_pix +0.00001*Y_pix +0.02147
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 64347 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.92
108654 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 266372 kB used, 307528 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 194234 (194234 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T06:54:22.1337176
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T06:54:22.1337176
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T06:54:22.133
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
The star 1158.002 136.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1809.995 166.997 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8226.009 234.985 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1329.992 615.996 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8498.028 871.988 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1151.998 919.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 191.001 1040.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1199.001 1172.005 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 6863.994 1184.012 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 884.006 1377.004 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 113315
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 1
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 44
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 21
* rejected close to frame edge: 523
* rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 113
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
113315 * detected, using 603/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.017597, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1994
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=63181 inliers=63181 rms 2.12 -> 1.57 pix, max corner correction 3.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015805, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1791
63381 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=63381 inliers=63381 rms 1.49 -> 1.48 pix, max corner correction 0.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015735, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1783
63385 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=63385 inliers=63385 rms 1.48 -> 1.48 pix, max corner correction 0.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009725, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1102
61470 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 176.207
113315 stars detected, 61470 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 48697, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 48697 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 46368 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00003*X_pix +0.00001*Y_pix -0.17741
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 15800 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.89
160499 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
The transient candidate (new frame position 4620.576 3986.245 ; ref frame position: 4921.327 2427.375) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
memory: 461528 kB used, 544908 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T06:55:32.7868166
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T06:55:32.7868166
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T06:55:32.786
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
The star 1157.998 135.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1809.996 167.006 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8225.999 234.994 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1329.999 615.996 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8498.001 872.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1151.995 919.004 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 191.003 1039.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1199.003 1171.992 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 6863.998 1183.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 4004.070 1320.062 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 111795
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 40
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 51
* rejected close to frame edge: 599
* rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 72
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
111795 * detected, using 595/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.004953, number_of_ambiguous_matches=795
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=104623 inliers=104623 rms 0.55 -> 0.39 pix, max corner correction 1.8 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.004872, number_of_ambiguous_matches=782
104633 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=104633 inliers=104633 rms 0.39 -> 0.39 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.004879, number_of_ambiguous_matches=783
104633 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=104633 inliers=104633 rms 0.39 -> 0.39 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.004879, number_of_ambiguous_matches=783
104633 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 176.202
111795 stars detected, 104633 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 74315, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 74315 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 74288 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00003*X_pix +0.00001*Y_pix -0.22341
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 29718 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.89
167661 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 472712 kB used, 544908 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 419344 (225110 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 208 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 419344 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
An ERROR has occured while processing file out06708.dat
ERROR: Can't open file lightcurve.tmp
ERROR running lib/select_aperture_with_smallest_scatter_for_each_object
_____________________
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_And-04-Q1b1x1_015623_TTUQ1b1x1_556522_8RCW7Y7k/fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-18-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_04-41-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-54-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Last image: 2461319.78787191 06.10.2026 06:54:22.133 UTC
ERROR found an unsoved plate in the field And-04-Q1b1x1
########### Completed And-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels': No such file or directory
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
exclusion_list_index_html.txt NOT FOUND
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.78787191 -observatory V36
14:15:24.47 -16:03:34.0 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:11:59.97 -21:10:41.5 Venus (-4.7mag)
08:27:55.12 +20:14:25.1 Mars (1.1mag)
09:30:59.47 +15:20:49.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:54.97 +01:46:14.4 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:34.09 +20:59:11.8 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:51.00 -00:22:21.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:15.57 -23:43:26.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
09:26:22.72 +15:38:40.7 Moon (-9.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 6 12:56 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.78787191:
09:30:54.39 +15:21:18.4 Io (6.1mag)
09:30:50.01 +15:21:42.0 Europa (6.2mag)
09:31:05.32 +15:20:18.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:30:55.10 +15:21:14.5 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:30:21.66 +15:42:22.1 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:31:03.53 +15:20:29.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:29:20.77 +15:41:12.9 Elara (17.5mag)
09:33:43.87 +14:43:33.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:29:57.71 +15:46:35.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:44:03.76 +01:46:17.2 Titan (8.2mag)
00:43:59.36 +01:45:59.7 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:43:17.07 +01:43:43.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:43:51.64 +01:46:34.9 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:42:17.26 +01:34:03.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 6 12:56 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.78787191:
02:13:49.63 +21:03:25.4 JWST
17:27:25.54 +35:59:44.2 Chandra
06:29:07.45 +15:56:48.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 6 12:56 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.78787191 -observatory V36
03:47:15.03 +20:09:52.5 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:20:20.56 -33:36:57.1 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:37:35.01 -72:04:05.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:20.49 +34:30:09.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:02:51.11 +48:17:43.1 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:28:01.81 +25:30:52.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:46.67 -18:09:34.0 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:20.08 +35:09:03.4 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:25:59.25 +41:45:47.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:41.79 -13:31:05.6 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:07:41.05 +16:24:55.9 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:45:54.18 -02:17:34.3 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:21:46.96 +67:06:44.0 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:41:46.68 +43:58:17.3 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:40:45.23 +13:45:48.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1
00:39:09.03 +19:38:09.3 17.8mag 2P/Encke
22:52:46.80 -32:45:04.9 14.3mag 10P/Tempel
02:03:35.74 +39:22:45.0 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:07:48.12 -07:44:52.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:25:46.21 -08:41:38.9 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
07:28:43.06 +16:33:08.7 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:04:51.17 +14:34:04.3 17.5mag 88P/Howell
07:20:18.64 +38:44:33.7 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:50:27.68 +15:56:40.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:30:28.03 +14:25:40.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:54:01.26 -30:44:08.1 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:46:59.93 +19:31:47.1 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:35:55.46 +00:28:18.0 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:28:10.44 -01:12:31.8 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:07:54.78 +35:43:16.3 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:05:54.42 +02:54:06.8 13.8mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:36.09 +05:14:57.5 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:55:03.12 +44:04:28.0 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:19:20.45 +25:46:06.2 18.0mag 266P/Christensen
15:47:27.51 -03:22:13.9 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski
09:50:58.94 +31:57:00.2 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 6 12:56 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 6 12:56 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 6 12:56 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:07:01.527 +32:58:35.10 AT 2026acjn 2026-09-20.12 19.1971
06:15:51.241 +70:45:44.78 AT 2026acjm 2026-09-19.37 19.809
07:09:35.125 +54:23:03.49 AT 2026acjl 2026-09-15.43 19.1229
07:35:10.862 +03:59:19.95 AT 2026acjk 2026-09-16.52 19.5005
08:45:06.960 +44:36:28.20 AT 2026acjj 2026-09-19.92 18.55
02:21:31.130 +31:02:14.60 AT 2026acji 2026-09-19.33 20.6
02:34:10.583 -19:22:41.81 AT 2026acjh 2026-09-19.77 20.24
06:46:43.903 -38:54:42.13 AT 2026acjg 2026-09-19.78 19.91
05:52:15.129 -40:52:08.71 AT 2026acjf 2026-09-18.76 19.95
06:18:05.216 -23:26:26.19 AT 2026acje 2026-09-18.78 19.85
05:32:54.071 -50:30:37.56 AT 2026acjd 2026-09-14.78 20.29
05:52:10.278 -11:07:36.45 AT 2026acjc 2026-09-19.79 19.85
21:11:43.571 -34:47:00.19 AT 2026acjb 2026-04-19.72 19.81
21:30:35.847 -42:23:12.51 AT 2026acja 2026-04-19.72 19.77
12:52:55.617 -22:48:16.26 AT 2026aciz 2026-04-12.49 20.12
12:53:00.838 -24:03:29.29 AT 2026aciy 2026-04-09.57 20
21:27:27.506 -44:49:25.74 AT 2026acix 2026-04-19.72 19.66
20:20:25.760 -33:16:52.27 AT 2026aciw 2026-04-14.80 19.61
21:43:08.932 -27:21:49.22 AT 2026aciv 2026-04-19.75 20.08
02:43:34.909 -53:24:14.98 AT 2026aciu 2026-09-18.62 19.99
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 6 12:56 tns_transients_list.txt