This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2577 2461319.7577 8.62 00:12:08.39 +08:43:01.7
106.69104 -52.91095 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa -1 0 1 8.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:12:08.39 +08:43:01.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:12:08.39 +08:43:01.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7577,8.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2577 8.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2577 2461319.7577 13.23 00:13:17.32 +07:04:33.2
106.45406 -54.57077 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -1 -0 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:13:17.32 +07:04:33.2: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:13:17.32 +07:04:33.2: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7577,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2577 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2577 2461319.7577 13.54 23:56:14.84 +09:12:17.7
100.82212 -51.28207 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.701 Oriola -0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:56:14.84 +09:12:17.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:56:14.84 +09:12:17.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7577,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2577 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2577 2461319.7577 14.64 00:14:45.69 +02:24:49.0
104.83685 -59.16353 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2386 Nikonov -0 -0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:14:45.69 +02:24:49.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:14:45.69 +02:24:49.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7577,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2577 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461319.75791473 06.10.2026 06:11:13.833 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 153 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6528
Objects passed selection criteria: 6508
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5122.75
Average stars matched: 4488.25 (87.6141 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232424 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 04:17:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461319.75791473 06.10.2026 06:11:13.833 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 217
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 396 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34873
Objects passed selection criteria: 34762
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28490.2
Average stars matched: 25137.8 (88.2328 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255088 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 04:29:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.75744385
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.164 +06:00:13.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.164 +06:00:13.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.768 +06:00:24.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.768 +06:00:24.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.164 +06:00:13.37
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.768 +06:00:24.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00730 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aJyjqJcYQb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oXhl4T2ias
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lsvbVdbraT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.68bZF5ublS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.657350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.657350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (aperture=6.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec +0.3478 to +11.6137 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec 0.3478 to 11.6137 deg
Loaded 4984 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3763 out of 3845 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3845 out of 6318 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
2.4 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aJyjqJcYQb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=1397, passed=6233
Got 6233 stars (including 4531 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0271 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0271
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4440 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0274 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0274
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4440 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4430 stars left (next iteration limit 4873)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits N_match=4430 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1463 n_q2=831 n_q3=1438 n_q4=698 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oXhl4T2ias (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=1317, passed=6318
Got 6318 stars (including 4746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8996 through 0 to 8.2591, gap 8.2591 to 351.8996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8998 through 0 to 8.2592, gap 8.2592 to 351.8998
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4629 stars left (next iteration limit 5091)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1576 n_q2=830 n_q3=1520 n_q4=703 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lsvbVdbraT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=422, bad_region=1733, passed=7124
Got 7124 stars (including 5056 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0598 through 0 to 7.9446, gap 7.9446 to 352.0598
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0601 through 0 to 7.9451, gap 7.9451 to 352.0601
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.579 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.767 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.767 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.696 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.696 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.324 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.370 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.370 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.899 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.324 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.375 worst_region_rms_after=0.370 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.146 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.370
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1448 n_q2=926 n_q3=1569 n_q4=930 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.68bZF5ublS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=426, bad_region=1739, passed=7125
Got 7125 stars (including 5041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0701 through 0 to 7.9448, gap 7.9448 to 352.0701
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0703 through 0 to 7.9452, gap 7.9452 to 352.0703
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=7.597 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.457 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.666 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.329 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.362 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.911 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.329 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.369 worst_region_rms_after=0.362 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.169 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.362
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.334 arcsec matched=4870
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1443 n_q2=935 n_q3=1564 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.166
ref2=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new1=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.050
new2=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.037
reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.132
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966_astrometric_residuals.png (4430 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (4629 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:02:16.60 +05:59:14.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:03:30.77 +04:49:47.0: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:12:08.39 +08:43:01.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:02:16.60 +05:59:14.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:16.60 +05:59:14.9: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1852 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:03:30.77 +04:49:47.0: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:12:08.39 +08:43:01.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:30.77 +04:49:47.0: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1910 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20557_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 20557_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21475_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 21475_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:51:22.73 +09:20:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21486_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 21486_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21510_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 21510_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 27s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:12:08.39 +08:43:01.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.164 +06:00:13.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.164 +06:00:13.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.768 +06:00:24.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.768 +06:00:24.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.164 +06:00:13.37
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.768 +06:00:24.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00730 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V2H8nc9Mxi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tOvaAAHyC4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.COisx40zZz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PHX5CHzWGz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits does not exist or is empty: waiting for solve_plate_with_UCAC5
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.V2H8nc9Mxi (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1340, bad_region=6060, passed=33617
Got 33617 stars (including 26420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9992 through 0 to 7.9160, gap 7.9160 to 351.9992
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9998 through 0 to 7.9161, gap 7.9161 to 351.9998
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1600 n_q2=917 n_q3=1535 n_q4=821 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tOvaAAHyC4 (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1193, bad_region=6398, passed=33748
Got 33748 stars (including 26330 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8996 through 0 to 8.2739, gap 8.2739 to 351.8996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8999 through 0 to 8.2739, gap 8.2739 to 351.8999
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1571 n_q2=894 n_q3=1615 n_q4=788 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.COisx40zZz (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1530, bad_region=7022, passed=36890
Got 36890 stars (including 28694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0570 through 0 to 7.9551, gap 7.9551 to 352.0570
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0573 through 0 to 7.9557, gap 7.9557 to 352.0573
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4856 robust_rms=7.408 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.076 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.076 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4856 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.736 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4856 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.359 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4856 robust_rms_before=0.891 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.374 worst_region_rms_after=0.359 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.143 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.359
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.374 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec matched=4856
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1459 n_q2=905 n_q3=1572 n_q4=920 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.026
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PHX5CHzWGz (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1526, bad_region=7013, passed=36873
Got 36873 stars (including 28675 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0584 through 0 to 7.9574, gap 7.9574 to 352.0584
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0586 through 0 to 7.9580, gap 7.9580 to 352.0586
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=7.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.921 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.921 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.675 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.675 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.350 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.361 worst_region_rms_after=0.350 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.173 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.350
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.361 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.324 arcsec matched=4852
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1461 n_q2=911 n_q3=1572 n_q4=908 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33634 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2656 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 3960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3960 out of 33634 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.535700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.535700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33634 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2656 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 3960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3960 out of 33634 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (aperture=4.9)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33762 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.8996 to 8.2739 deg, Dec +0.3067 to +11.6461 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.8996 to 8.2739 deg, Dec 0.3067 to 11.6461 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3715 out of 3975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3975 out of 33762 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 142 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
2.4 pix Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-10-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_014758_TTUQ2b1x1_500770_BOATCevz/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:08:34.45 +01:53:59.5: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:01:42.26 +09:27:41.7: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:01:42.26 +09:27:41.7: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:08:34.45 +01:53:59.5: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:42.26 +09:27:41.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6182 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:34.45 +01:53:59.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8230 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:13:17.32 +07:04:33.2: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:13:17.32 +07:04:33.2: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:13:17.32 +07:04:33.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2282 delta=1.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:51:50.37 +07:26:41.6: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:56:14.84 +09:12:17.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:51:50.37 +07:26:41.6: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:56:14.84 +09:12:17.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:50.37 +07:26:41.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4937 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:55:15.36 +02:26:09.6: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:55:15.36 +02:26:09.6: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:15.36 +02:26:09.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4298 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:09:44.56 +02:11:23.7: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:09:44.56 +02:11:23.7: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:44.56 +02:11:23.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6171 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:43:30.37 +07:26:36.9: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:14:45.69 +02:24:49.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:16:05.41 +02:28:57.6: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:43:30.37 +07:26:36.9: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:06:45.44 +10:05:13.4: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:30.37 +07:26:36.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7011 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:14:45.69 +02:24:49.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:16:05.41 +02:28:57.6: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:15:26.55 +05:14:27.9: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:17:45.20 +01:59:52.2: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:06:45.44 +10:05:13.4: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:42:40.19 +10:11:51.3: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:05.41 +02:28:57.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7395 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:45.44 +10:05:13.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7810 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:15:26.55 +05:14:27.9: 15.75 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:17:45.20 +01:59:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:26.55 +05:14:27.9: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.9271 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:42:40.19 +10:11:51.3: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:45.20 +01:59:52.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.7000 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:40.19 +10:11:51.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9123 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:57:57.69 +02:57:11.2: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:57:57.69 +02:57:11.2: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:57.69 +02:57:11.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7611 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54975.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 48s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52841_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 52841_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 52842_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 52847_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 52850_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 52889_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:12:08.39 +08:43:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 53157_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53202_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 53202_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 53271_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54141_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54141_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54272_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54272_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54293_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54293_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54304_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54304_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54393_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54393_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54522_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54522_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54598_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54598_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54699_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54699_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54718_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54718_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54854_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54854_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54914_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54914_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54944_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54944_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54975_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 54975_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54977_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 54977_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55030_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55030_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55048_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55048_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55094_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55094_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55109_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55109_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55152_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55152_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55169_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55169_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55174_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55174_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55183_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55183_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55238_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55238_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55319_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55319_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55344_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55344_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55346_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55346_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55348_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55348_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55404_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55404_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55496_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55496_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55501_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55501_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55525_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 55525_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55589_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55589_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55639_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55639_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55689_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55689_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55720_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55720_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55733_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55733_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55741_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55741_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55751_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55751_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55785_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55785_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55808_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55808_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55838_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55838_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55917_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55917_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55993_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 55993_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56036_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56036_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56070_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56070_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56072_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56072_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56162_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56162_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56168_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56168_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56179_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56179_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56200_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56200_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56218_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56218_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56285_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56285_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56358_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56358_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56374_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56374_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56377_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56377_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56414_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56414_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56456_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56456_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56471_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56471_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56512_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56512_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56575_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56575_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56679_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56679_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56716_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56716_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56814_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56814_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56851_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56851_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56863_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56863_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56887_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56887_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56895_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56895_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56927_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56927_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56932_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56932_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56987_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56987_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56996_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 56996_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57007_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57007_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57069_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57069_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57078_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57078_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57093_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57093_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57136_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57136_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57189_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57189_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57192_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57192_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57203_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57203_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57244_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57244_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57258_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57258_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57270_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57270_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57276_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57276_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57354_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57354_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57428_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57428_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57443_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57443_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57450_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57450_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57466_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57466_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57484_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57484_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57514_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57514_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57530_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57530_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57562_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57562_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57573_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57573_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57584_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57584_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57625_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57625_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57654_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57654_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57659_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57659_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57681_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57681_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57709_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57709_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57758_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57758_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57790_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57790_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57821_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57821_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57822_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57822_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57848_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57848_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57850_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57850_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57879_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57879_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57906_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 57906_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58004_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58004_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58034_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58034_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58056_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58056_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58067_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58067_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58083_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58083_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58096_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58096_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58102_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58102_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58107_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58107_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58150_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58150_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58153_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58153_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58294_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58294_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58323_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58323_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58331_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58331_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58364_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58364_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58415_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58415_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58439_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 58439_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58477_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58477_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58481_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58481_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58485_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58485_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58514_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58514_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58531_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58531_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58621_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58621_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58628_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58628_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58651_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58651_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58690_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58690_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58698_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58698_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58700_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293
The candidate 58700_fd_Psc-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_01-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0293 did not pass the final checks