This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,8.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 8.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,8.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 8.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2529 2461319.7529 12.60 23:32:02.76 -04:48:08.5
79.13769 -60.73354 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -1 0 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:02.76 -04:48:08.5: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:02.76 -04:48:08.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2529 2461319.7529 13.62 00:00:19.42 +00:01:17.3
96.50383 -60.20099 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud -0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:00:19.42 +00:01:17.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:00:19.42 +00:01:17.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2529 2461319.7529 14.31 00:15:08.55 +00:28:07.5
103.91431 -61.05572 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1735 ITA 0 -0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:15:08.55 +00:28:07.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:15:08.55 +00:28:07.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2529 2461319.7529 14.39 23:38:53.53 -04:30:53.8
82.32216 -61.52698 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa -0 0 0 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:53.53 -04:30:53.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:53.53 -04:30:53.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2529 2461319.7529 14.38 00:30:47.41 -03:13:21.7
110.37768 -65.58991 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4212 Sansyu-Asuke 0 0 0 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:47.41 -03:13:21.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:47.41 -03:13:21.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2529* 00 30 47.41 -03 13 21.7 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2529 2461319.7529 14.43 00:22:52.18 -04:55:33.2
104.62295 -66.77669 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3133 Sendai 1 0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:22:52.18 -04:55:33.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:22:52.18 -04:55:33.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2529 2461319.7529 14.67 23:43:56.60 -06:26:50.9
82.09022 -63.82987 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.864 Aase 0 0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:43:56.60 -06:26:50.9: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:43:56.60 -06:26:50.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7529,14.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2529 14.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461319.75329972 06.10.2026 06:04:35.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6365
Objects passed selection criteria: 6360
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5967
Average stars matched: 5577.5 (93.4724 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 01:07:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461319.75329972 06.10.2026 06:04:35.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 156
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33646
Objects passed selection criteria: 33552
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31899.2
Average stars matched: 29328.5 (91.941 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 260120 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 01:10:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.75255381
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:10.179 -01:58:32.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:10.179 -01:58:32.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0501 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:13.326 -01:58:00.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:13.326 -01:58:00.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0658 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:10.179 -01:58:32.07
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:13.326 -01:58:00.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01575 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.diCNZv2Py7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.548GxCh4j6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dJzAkL2OV9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OJFR3KLYaC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.diCNZv2Py7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.548GxCh4j6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dJzAkL2OV9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, bad_region=0, passed=6527
Got 6527 stars (including 6091 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8569 through 0 to 8.1738, gap 8.1738 to 351.8569
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8563 through 0 to 8.1744, gap 8.1744 to 351.8563
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=13.842 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.047 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.047 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.727 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.727 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.311 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.289 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=0.946 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.333 worst_region_rms_after=0.311 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.083 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.289
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.285 arcsec matched=4884
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1229 n_q2=1242 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OJFR3KLYaC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6531
Got 6531 stars (including 6099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8650 through 0 to 8.1768, gap 8.1768 to 351.8650
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8648 through 0 to 8.1773, gap 8.1773 to 351.8648
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=13.827 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.006 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.006 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.683 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.317 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=0.935 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.335 worst_region_rms_after=0.317 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.063 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.280
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.335 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.287 arcsec matched=4883
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1233 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1177 n_q4=1232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.163
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.178
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-03-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_010523_TTUQ1b1x1_1284588_G9EwO4sU/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:01:53.61 -00:48:58.2: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:01:53.61 -00:48:58.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:53.61 -00:48:58.2: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1325 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.8: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1312 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 20273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.97 +00:47:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20282_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 20282_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20462_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 20462_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32840_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32840_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32842_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32842_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32845_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32845_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32846_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32846_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:34:54.47 +01:50:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32855_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32855_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32859_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32859_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32860_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32860_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32862_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32862_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32863_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32863_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32865_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32865_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32867_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32867_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32868_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 32868_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32875_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 32875_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33175_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33175_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33180_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33180_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 33190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33295_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33295_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33439_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33439_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33545_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 33545_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33572_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33572_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33591_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33591_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33595_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33595_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33726_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33726_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33829_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33829_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33864_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33864_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33883_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33883_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33897_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33897_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33898_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 33898_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33913_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33913_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33922_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33922_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33930_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33930_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33936_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33936_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33938_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33938_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33958_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33958_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33960_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33960_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33963_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33963_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:45.28 +02:34:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33967_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33967_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33968_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 33968_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33998_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33998_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34010_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 34010_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34032_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34032_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34040_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34040_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34044_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34044_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34047_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34047_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34050_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34050_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34054_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34054_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 34063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34070_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34070_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34088_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34088_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34094_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34094_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34096_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34096_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34101_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34101_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34105_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34105_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34118_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34118_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34122_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34122_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34126_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34126_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34135_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34135_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34136_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34136_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34140_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34140_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34145_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34145_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34150_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34150_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34151_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34151_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34171_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34171_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34174_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34178_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34178_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34184_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34184_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34185_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34185_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34189_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34189_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34194_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34194_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34198_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34198_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34200_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34200_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34202_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34202_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34215_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34215_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34224_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34224_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34226_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34226_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34230_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34230_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34238_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34238_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34247_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34247_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34250_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34250_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34253_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34253_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34257_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34257_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34260_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34260_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34274_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34274_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34279_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34279_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34282_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34282_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34287_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34287_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34289_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34289_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34291_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34291_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34305_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34305_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34311_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34311_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34336_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34336_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34345_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34345_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34349_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34349_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34355_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34355_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34356_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34356_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34357_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34357_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34368_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34368_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34373_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34373_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34379_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34379_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34388_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 34388_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34391_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34391_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34430_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34430_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34463_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34463_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34498_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34498_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34521_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 34521_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_01-04-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
