NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Aur-06-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Aur-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aur-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Aur-06-Q1b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 56658 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 56658 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits_preview.png'
Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits

renamed 'Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits_preview.png'
Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 633.4791 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 806.5614 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1647.0946 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 688.7980 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1642.7002 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 688.8567 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.60008 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T00:43:35.2079644' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T05:43:35.2079644' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.2386019328 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T05:43:45.1119362' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.2387165623 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.9959614187396 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9997362229378 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0038888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.6725 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.80960289306845 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.89 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 349.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits :) Spent 0.839693 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T00:44:31.2032374' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T05:44:31.2032374' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.2392500346 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T05:44:41.1044992' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.2393646296 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.9959613267835 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.999736213416 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1783333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.7794444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.76808547695817 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.89 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 349.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits :) Spent 0.850602 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits


fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.73871767 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:04.445 +29:57:45.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 Second-epoch image center 06:00:04.445 +29:57:45.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:07.508 +29:57:06.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 Second-epoch image center 06:00:07.508 +29:57:06.65 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0525 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 06:00:04.445 +29:57:45.92 Second-epoch second image center 06:00:07.508 +29:57:06.65 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01553 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sqrSgBcRNp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3dLn3yJgzV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6U4N5EGuo5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3xN3pXmNRG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.sqrSgBcRNp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193 Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3dLn3yJgzV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141 Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6U4N5EGuo5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1029, bad_region=0, passed=14850 Got 14850 stars (including 13812 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14850 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5270) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=10.229 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.488 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.488 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.722 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.282 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.103 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.448 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=1.607 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.519 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.997 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.448 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.519 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec matched=4796 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1548 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3xN3pXmNRG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1049, bad_region=0, passed=14974 Got 14974 stars (including 13908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14974 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5271) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=10.395 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.605 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.605 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.699 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.048 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.048 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.377 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.456 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.446 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4795 robust_rms_before=1.567 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.377 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.525 worst_region_rms_after=0.456 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.083 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.446 verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Image size: 945.7'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:07.614 +29:57:05.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 14974 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1121134.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.567 -> 0.377 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4795 pairs from the initial matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4590 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4590 pairs (4795 from the initial matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4590 robust_rms=10.088 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.646 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.646 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4590 robust_rms=0.690 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.017 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.017 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4590 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.452 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.432 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4590 robust_rms_before=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.450 worst_region_rms_after=0.452 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.432 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.452 vs 0.450 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4590 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4590 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits N_match=4590 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1138 n_q2=1003 n_q3=1486 n_q4=963 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304 ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242 new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.195 new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.140 reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222_astrometric_residuals.png (4796 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223_astrometric_residuals.png (4590 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.25 +34:48:47.2: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:56.83 +29:43:31.3: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.25 +34:48:47.2: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:56.83 +29:43:31.3: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.63 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.25 +34:48:47.2: ref_mag=9.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2815 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:56.83 +29:43:31.3: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9920 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 31901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.43    05:52:07.31 +32:33:00.4   3690 4709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:52:07.34 +32:32:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31902_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 31902_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.28    05:52:14.60 +32:34:52.6   3705 4728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:52:14.58 +32:34:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 31903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.32    05:52:08.62 +32:31:58.5   3693 4698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:52:08.93 +32:31:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 31904_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.28    05:52:15.79 +32:31:06.5   3709 4690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:52:15.80 +32:31:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 31905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.23872    2461319.73872    11.00    06:05:56.84 +29:43:31.5   5560 3102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    10.98    06:05:56.82 +29:43:31.2   5553 3108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31907_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 31907_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.12    05:52:18.05 +32:31:16.7   3714 4692   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:52:18.06 +32:31:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31908_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 31908_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.23872    2461319.73872    10.32    05:37:11.32 +34:48:47.5   1786 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    10.25    05:37:11.19 +34:48:46.8   1779 6048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32039_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 32039_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.41    05:42:12.30 +32:03:14.4   2434 4377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:42:12.30 +32:03:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32066_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 32066_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.58    05:52:16.43 +32:35:31.1   3709 4735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:52:16.32 +32:35:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 32103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.62    06:07:00.38 +32:13:10.8   5587 4615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 06:07:00.37 +32:13:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32115_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 32115_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.97    05:52:02.65 +32:33:00.7   3680 4708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:52:02.67 +32:32:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    11.29    06:04:17.16 +28:29:02.4   5384 2348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 06:04:17.17 +28:29:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02510_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 The candidate 02510_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 06.23937    2461319.73937    8.43    05:27:07.68 +34:08:57.1   0507 5661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits **** FOUND 05:27:07.64 +34:08:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Last image: 2461319.73871767 06.10.2026 05:43:35.207 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues. ____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Waiting for thread 2 to finish... Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.2,5.2,5.7,6.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.3,5.2,5.7,6.2 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 163 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T02:52:31.3611032 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T02:52:31.3611032 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-02-22T02:52:31.361 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Exposure 20 sec, 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461093.61992316 mid. exp. The reference image star 1153.957 916.599 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 1200.058 1174.577 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 3616.907 1439.272 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 355.093 1873.433 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 727.972 2729.014 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9334.141 3591.093 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 2342.712 4750.533 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 498.805 5915.071 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 500.519 5911.056 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 2862.421 5867.341 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 211682, (211679 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 79 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 11 * rejected close to frame edge: 1042 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.5 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 13 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.12 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.1 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.9 Selected detection limit= -7.9 Final detection limit= -7.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.5 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 211528 * detected, using 499/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.018991, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4020 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=192203 inliers=192203 rms 0.33 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.019114, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4046 192203 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=192203 inliers=192203 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.019114, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4046 192203 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=192203 inliers=192203 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.019114, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4046 192203 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.006 211528 stars detected, 192203 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 157812, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 157812 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 157810 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00244 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 151673 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.12 231007 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 375712 kB used, 405484 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM Total number of measurements 423210 (423210 measurements stored in RAM) sorting the measurements cached in memory, writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T05:43:35.2079644 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T05:43:35.2079644 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T05:43:35.207 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits The star 1158.009 136.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1809.999 166.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8497.993 872.004 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1151.995 918.993 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 191.001 1040.013 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1200.533 1173.619 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 6864.004 1184.012 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 4001.159 1319.186 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 883.999 1377.004 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8274.789 1398.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 120232 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 20 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 44 * rejected close to frame edge: 539 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 118 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 120232 * detected, using 283/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.005762, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1331 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=112270 inliers=112270 rms 2.02 -> 1.02 pix, max corner correction 8.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001818, number_of_ambiguous_matches=420 115305 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=115305 inliers=115305 rms 0.88 -> 0.62 pix, max corner correction 6.7 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001537, number_of_ambiguous_matches=355 117102 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=117102 inliers=117102 rms 0.63 -> 0.42 pix, max corner correction 5.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001359, number_of_ambiguous_matches=314 117702 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 178.160 120232 stars detected, 117702 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 92897, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 92897 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 92734 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00007*X_pix -0.00003*Y_pix -0.17808 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 32419 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.44 233537 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 521540 kB used, 654248 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T05:44:31.2032374 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-06T05:44:31.2032374 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-06T05:44:31.203 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits The star 1157.988 136.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1809.999 166.988 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8225.271 234.985 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1330.000 615.725 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8497.998 872.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1152.004 918.992 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 191.006 1039.981 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1199.030 1171.973 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 884.014 1377.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 887.111 1379.545 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 120730 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 14 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 45 * rejected close to frame edge: 489 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 139 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 120730 * detected, using 285/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.006183, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1444 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=112716 inliers=112716 rms 2.15 -> 1.01 pix, max corner correction 5.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001571, number_of_ambiguous_matches=367 115968 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=115968 inliers=115968 rms 0.95 -> 0.73 pix, max corner correction 7.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001430, number_of_ambiguous_matches=334 118188 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=118188 inliers=118188 rms 0.76 -> 0.51 pix, max corner correction 6.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001079, number_of_ambiguous_matches=252 119720 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 178.171 120730 stars detected, 119720 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 93222, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 93222 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 93087 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00007*X_pix -0.00003*Y_pix -0.17426 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 33097 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.44 234547 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 522200 kB used, 654248 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM Total number of measurements 664172 (240962 measurements stored in RAM) sorting the measurements cached in memory, writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 12326 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 664172 (0 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source An ERROR has occured while processing file out116785.dat ERROR: Can't open file lightcurve.tmp ERROR running lib/select_aperture_with_smallest_scatter_for_each_object _____________________ SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_004523_TTUQ1b1x1_3939428_UxZCxDmA/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-43-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-44-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Last image: 2461319.73871767 06.10.2026 05:43:35.207 UTC ERROR found an unsoved plate in the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 ########### Completed Aur-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels': No such file or directory # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES exclusion_list_index_html.txt NOT FOUND The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.73871767 -observatory V36 14:15:10.89 -16:02:06.7 Mercury (-0.0mag) 14:12:01.12 -21:10:41.0 Venus (-4.7mag) 08:27:48.03 +20:14:45.9 Mars (1.1mag) 09:30:57.45 +15:20:59.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:43:55.84 +01:46:19.9 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:34.34 +20:59:12.4 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:51.30 -00:22:19.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:15.63 -23:43:26.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:23:02.13 +15:51:47.0 Moon (-9.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 6 04:22 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.73871767: 09:30:52.03 +15:21:29.3 Io (6.1mag) 09:30:48.11 +15:21:50.6 Europa (6.2mag) 09:31:03.97 +15:20:23.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:30:53.60 +15:21:20.8 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:30:19.43 +15:42:31.6 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:31:00.80 +15:20:42.5 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:29:18.63 +15:41:21.2 Elara (17.5mag) 09:33:42.02 +14:43:42.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:29:55.91 +15:46:44.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:44:04.80 +01:46:22.1 Titan (8.2mag) 00:44:00.16 +01:46:04.5 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:43:17.90 +01:43:49.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:43:52.76 +01:46:40.3 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:42:18.16 +01:34:09.5 Phoebe (16.4mag) ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.73871767: -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 6 04:22 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.73871767 -observatory V36 03:47:15.52 +20:09:50.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:20:18.14 -33:37:01.4 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:37:33.61 -72:03:53.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:20.71 +34:30:03.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:02:53.48 +48:17:32.9 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:28:00.46 +25:30:54.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:46.32 -18:09:18.9 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:18.44 +35:08:46.0 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:25:58.97 +41:45:56.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:41.38 -13:31:02.7 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:07:35.63 +16:25:10.6 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:45:51.25 -02:17:19.4 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:21:35.02 +67:07:46.2 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:41:49.94 +43:58:39.0 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:40:42.35 +13:45:31.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1 00:39:15.91 +19:38:28.0 17.8mag 2P/Encke 22:52:43.93 -32:45:39.7 14.3mag 10P/Tempel 02:03:31.85 +39:22:59.1 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:07:46.11 -07:44:37.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:25:48.25 -08:41:31.9 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 07:28:38.79 +16:33:27.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:04:53.83 +14:34:11.2 17.5mag 88P/Howell 07:20:07.81 +38:43:38.6 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:50:20.43 +15:57:41.2 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:30:21.83 +14:26:20.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:53:53.94 -30:43:15.9 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:46:57.57 +19:31:54.5 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:35:57.03 +00:28:29.4 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 22:28:41.56 -01:15:25.6 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:07:47.98 +35:43:28.5 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:05:47.12 +02:54:51.6 13.8mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:37.21 +05:15:20.1 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:54:57.90 +44:03:45.8 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:19:15.92 +25:46:10.0 18.0mag 266P/Christensen 15:47:24.91 -03:21:56.0 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:50:55.80 +31:57:11.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 6 04:22 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 6 04:22 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 6 04:22 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:37:30.470 -04:19:22.67 AT 2026acgg 2026-04-18.80 18.9 22:37:37.648 -05:44:38.93 AT 2026acgf 2026-04-18.79 18.97 21:35:35.054 -52:16:15.19 AT 2026acge 2026-09-17.46 19.94 03:07:14.346 -13:52:08.25 AT 2026acgd 2026-09-14.63 20.2 20:50:27.138 -28:50:01.17 AT 2026acgc 2026-09-11.46 20.22 01:07:11.321 -22:35:49.57 AT 2026acgb 2026-09-08.59 20.15 21:57:49.232 -47:01:59.67 AT 2026acga 2026-09-13.47 20.01 23:45:25.816 -53:33:25.78 AT 2026acfz 2026-09-13.56 20.29 03:26:48.462 -20:09:57.64 AT 2026acfy 2026-09-06.65 20.41 05:50:23.732 +31:54:28.07 AT 2026acfx 2026-09-17.19 19.29 20:23:48.311 -47:30:13.60 AT 2026acfw 2026-09-14.44 20.17 21:02:26.779 -25:04:19.23 AT 2026acfv 2026-09-08.48 20.35 22:24:29.868 -48:04:31.58 AT 2026acfu 2026-09-14.50 20.23 21:59:32.457 -58:04:38.65 AT 2026acft 2026-09-17.50 19.8 00:48:44.150 -12:05:15.03 AT 2026acfs 2026-09-16.58 20.09 20:34:06.261 -37:39:54.95 AT 2026acfr 2026-09-17.56 20.28 23:24:16.652 -29:09:40.81 AT 2026acfq 2026-09-17.61 20.45 02:10:14.980 -30:57:25.53 AT 2026acfp 2026-09-17.71 19.85 22:19:09.857 -13:04:12.52 AT 2026acfo 2026-09-10.44 19.95 20:43:01.070 -30:31:29.70 AT 2026acfn 2026-09-17.10 18.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 6 04:22 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 72 C