This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2349 2461319.7349 11.16 05:17:34.42 +23:52:57.6
180.82192 -8.01554 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 1 1 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:34.42 +23:52:57.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:34.42 +23:52:57.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2349* 05 17 34.42 +23 52 57.6 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7349,11.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2349 11.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2349* 05 21 07.62 +23 38 20.1 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461319.7349,11.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261006.2349 11.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2349 2461319.7349 12.23 05:03:53.19 +26:03:34.9
177.20859 -9.27989 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 0 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:53.19 +26:03:34.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:53.19 +26:03:34.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2349* 05 03 53.19 +26 03 34.9 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7349,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2349 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2349* 05 21 07.62 +23 38 20.1 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461319.7349,11.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261006.2349 11.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2349 2461319.7349 13.07 05:15:13.31 +21:47:12.0
182.26013 -9.64872 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:13.31 +21:47:12.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:13.31 +21:47:12.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2349* 05 15 13.31 +21 47 12.0 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7349,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2349 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2349 2461319.7349 12.78 06:00:48.84 +24:56:12.3
185.16467 0.88444 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 -0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:48.84 +24:56:12.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:48.84 +24:56:12.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7349,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2349 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2349 2461319.7349 13.96 05:01:30.64 +25:06:02.7
177.66660 -10.28132 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -1 -1 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:30.64 +25:06:02.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:30.64 +25:06:02.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2349* 05 01 30.64 +25 06 02.7 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7349,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2349 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2349 2461319.7349 13.73 05:43:06.57 +19:43:03.3
187.57967 -5.29345 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla 1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:06.57 +19:43:03.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:06.57 +19:43:03.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2349* 05 43 06.57 +19 43 03.3 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7349,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2349 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461319.73521747 06.10.2026 05:38:32.789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20425
Objects passed selection criteria: 20361
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16769.2
Average stars matched: 16520.8 (98.5181 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250280 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 01:06:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461319.73521747 06.10.2026 05:38:32.789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 197
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 140 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 152267
Objects passed selection criteria: 151920
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 127169
Average stars matched: 123274 (96.9373 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 01:11:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.73463899
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.724 +21:56:58.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.724 +21:56:58.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.477 +21:56:25.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.477 +21:56:25.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.724 +21:56:58.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:22.477 +21:56:25.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01135 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5U0DiOzLB7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.msKuUELy1W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VlP5ogKPjj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LqIQv9qEBN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.5U0DiOzLB7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.msKuUELy1W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VlP5ogKPjj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=673, bad_region=1, passed=11795
Got 11795 stars (including 11110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4795 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4729 stars left (next iteration limit 5200)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=9.631 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.584 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.584 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.731 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.317 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.317 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.559 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.559 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4729 robust_rms_before=1.598 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.575 worst_region_rms_after=0.559 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.399 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.559
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.575 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.575 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.416 arcsec matched=4729
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=4729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=1000 n_q2=1381 n_q3=826 n_q4=1522 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LqIQv9qEBN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=688, bad_region=0, passed=11769
Got 11769 stars (including 11066 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4729 stars left (next iteration limit 5201)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=9.763 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.516 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.801 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.511 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.511 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.553 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4729 robust_rms_before=1.609 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.586 worst_region_rms_after=0.553 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.433 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.553
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.586 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.586 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.428 arcsec matched=4729
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=4729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1382 n_q3=821 n_q4=1523 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.145
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216_astrometric_residuals.png (4729 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217_astrometric_residuals.png (4729 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:53.19 +26:03:34.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:34.42 +23:52:57.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:53.19 +26:03:34.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:34.42 +23:52:57.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30919.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 30668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:29.69 +19:25:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30767_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 30767_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30773_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 30773_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 30831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.07 +19:58:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 30919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.50 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.02 +20:30:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.04 +20:10:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 24s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:17:34.42 +23:52:57.6
05:03:53.19 +26:03:34.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.724 +21:56:58.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.724 +21:56:58.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.477 +21:56:25.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.477 +21:56:25.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.724 +21:56:58.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:22.477 +21:56:25.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01135 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gyIMYF7WRU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jYezcbV5MD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BkBiScNv6u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9p0xTlPIXu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 183 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gyIMYF7WRU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jYezcbV5MD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BkBiScNv6u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=5596, bad_region=39, passed=89339
Got 89339 stars (including 83561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4725 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=9.850 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.186 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.186 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.735 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.276 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.560 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4725 robust_rms_before=1.585 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.549 worst_region_rms_after=0.560 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.350 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.560
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.549 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.549 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec matched=4725
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=4725 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=810 n_q4=1525 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9p0xTlPIXu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=5853, bad_region=40, passed=91374
Got 91374 stars (including 85344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 91374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=9.879 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.372 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.793 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.429 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.557 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=1.592 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.562 worst_region_rms_after=0.557 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.392 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.557
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.562 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.562 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.390 arcsec matched=4722
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1019 n_q2=1360 n_q3=820 n_q4=1523 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-37-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003923_TTUQ1b1x1_3376801_w9RgHdYE/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:09.14 +18:24:29.6: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:50.93 +24:48:22.3: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:17.58 +17:21:36.8: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:46.20 +20:46:31.8: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:27.56 +18:49:34.9: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:17.58 +17:21:36.8: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:27.56 +18:49:34.9: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:09.14 +18:24:29.6: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:17.58 +17:21:36.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0325 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:09.14 +18:24:29.6: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2093 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:50.93 +24:48:22.3: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:27.56 +18:49:34.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1451 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:46.20 +20:46:31.8: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:50.93 +24:48:22.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9964 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:46.20 +20:46:31.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7293 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:28.36 +18:08:57.9: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:57.06 +17:17:10.4: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:28.36 +18:08:57.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:28.36 +18:08:57.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5782 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:57.06 +17:17:10.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:57.06 +17:17:10.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2362 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:17.65 +19:09:07.5: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:25.99 +19:06:30.2: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:29.77 +21:15:12.6: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.11 +19:55:45.5: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:17.65 +19:09:07.5: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:17.65 +19:09:07.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6115 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:25.99 +19:06:30.2: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:25.99 +19:06:30.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4093 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:29.77 +21:15:12.6: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:29.77 +21:15:12.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9457 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.11 +19:55:45.5: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.11 +19:55:45.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3663 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:54.82 +26:08:40.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:16.11 +26:53:44.5: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:20.38 +19:01:43.9: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:16.11 +26:53:44.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:54.82 +26:08:40.9: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:54.82 +26:08:40.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0265 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:16.11 +26:53:44.5: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1996 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:20.38 +19:01:43.9: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:20.38 +19:01:43.9: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1429 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:12.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:12.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:12.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:48.84 +24:56:12.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:13.31 +21:47:12.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:48.84 +24:56:12.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:13.31 +21:47:12.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.66 +25:20:29.4: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.80 +22:34:31.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.66 +25:20:29.4: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.66 +25:20:29.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2808 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.80 +22:34:31.1: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.80 +22:34:31.1: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0586 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:37.92 +18:57:27.9: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:37.92 +18:57:27.9: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:37.92 +18:57:27.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4429 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:15.30 +22:17:59.8: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:23.11 +21:25:45.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:18.06 +19:46:07.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:23.11 +21:25:45.4: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:15.30 +22:17:59.8: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:23.11 +21:25:45.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5603 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:15.30 +22:17:59.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7471 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:18.06 +19:46:07.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:03.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:18.06 +19:46:07.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5578 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:30.64 +25:06:02.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:03.0: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:03.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8361 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:39.82 +21:50:26.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:30.64 +25:06:02.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:54:00.37 +22:08:33.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:39.82 +21:50:26.9: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:37.96 +22:58:43.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:39.82 +21:50:26.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4512 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:00.48 +20:57:17.5: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:54:00.37 +22:08:33.7: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:00.37 +22:08:33.7: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5718 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:37.96 +22:58:43.5: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:37.96 +22:58:43.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6193 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:00.48 +20:57:17.5: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:00.48 +20:57:17.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7963 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:36.47 +22:50:25.8: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.08 +21:09:55.9: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:36.47 +22:50:25.8: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.08 +21:09:55.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:36.47 +22:50:25.8: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9507 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.08 +21:09:55.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8436 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:01.94 +17:20:34.2: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:09.19 +17:13:49.4: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:01.94 +17:20:34.2: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:01.94 +17:20:34.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3918 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:09.19 +17:13:49.4: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:09.19 +17:13:49.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3100 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:06.57 +19:43:03.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:06.57 +19:43:03.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192804.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out149955.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191391.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192181.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:28.29 +21:30:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:48.56 +20:15:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:17.69 +20:39:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:28.01 +22:20:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:06.95 +21:31:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:01.87 +20:10:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:11.81 +21:11:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190609_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190609_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:55.03 +24:31:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.23 +25:14:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.09 +22:19:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:55.53 +23:05:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:12.72 +17:46:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:16.59 +25:47:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:42.17 +20:52:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190629_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190629_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.60 +21:59:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:07.12 +18:02:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190637_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190637_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:38.31 +25:51:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:30.30 +19:22:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:48.96 +24:13:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:20.67 +18:14:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190649_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190649_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:21.64 +24:25:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190650_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190650_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.36 +18:25:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.71 +25:17:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:16.15 +17:13:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:31.25 +20:21:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190666_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190666_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.24 +17:57:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.08 +22:41:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190670_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190670_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.18 +18:20:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190676_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190676_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:11.05 +18:32:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190677_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190677_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:44.80 +22:11:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190679_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190679_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.67 +17:48:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:54.35 +18:06:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190682_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190682_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.43 +17:17:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.89 +20:08:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190690_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190690_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.68 +16:41:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.92 +26:19:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190779_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190779_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.43 +23:52:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190786_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 190786_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190828_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190828_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.01 +19:58:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:53.14 +26:03:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 190952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.80 +25:55:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191146_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191146_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.92 +26:25:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191229_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191229_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.71 +23:02:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191244_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191244_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.56 +21:37:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191246_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191246_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.24 +18:59:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.96 +20:10:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.44 +18:33:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191372_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 191372_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 191391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191413_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191413_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.82 +25:24:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191418_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191418_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.29 +22:45:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191461_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191461_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.25 +23:00:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.82 +19:32:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191518_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191518_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:11.95 +18:29:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.97 +18:33:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.59 +20:02:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.65 +25:09:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.23 +18:33:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.32 +25:47:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.81 +18:25:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191576_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191576_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.67 +21:46:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.50 +18:29:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.95 +19:35:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.48 +20:26:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.29 +18:40:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.44 +25:08:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.27 +20:53:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:56.30 +26:13:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191710_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191710_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.87 +17:11:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191711_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191711_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.31 +23:15:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.26 +23:07:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191730_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191730_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.14 +24:24:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.50 +24:25:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.31 +20:56:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:56.64 +18:21:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191791_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191791_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.58 +20:05:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191801_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191801_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.75 +17:02:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191810_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191810_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.76 +23:11:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:57.48 +19:43:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191859_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191859_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:56.39 +18:54:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.54 +22:29:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.46 +20:45:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.05 +20:15:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.36 +26:18:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191908_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191908_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.13 +22:58:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:06.91 +24:22:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191922_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191922_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.21 +18:44:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:52.70 +24:33:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191937_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191937_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:15.15 +17:43:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.46 +21:47:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.37 +18:11:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.61 +25:41:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191968_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191968_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.26 +22:06:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.59 +21:24:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191991_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 191991_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:03.88 +19:09:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.37 +20:09:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192001_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192001_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.50 +20:26:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.90 +24:21:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.03 +21:58:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:01.70 +23:19:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192053_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192053_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.70 +18:46:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192055_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192055_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:36.40 +18:27:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:27.29 +21:40:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.79 +22:39:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:28.36 +26:15:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:05.39 +23:57:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192094_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192094_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:44.07 +26:10:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192151_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192151_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.44 +24:22:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192158_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192158_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.64 +26:44:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192181_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 192181_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.01 +24:06:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192206_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192206_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.84 +21:26:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192229_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192229_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.97 +20:00:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.75 +17:59:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.34 +22:27:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:21.77 +17:17:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192254_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192254_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:02.12 +19:21:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192255_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192255_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.23 +25:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:40.11 +21:15:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:37.21 +23:37:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.26 +19:46:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192332_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192332_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:20.47 +17:15:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192338_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192338_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:26.13 +22:48:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192366_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192366_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:20.94 +23:52:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192392_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192392_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.91 +24:22:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192403_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192403_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:33.65 +24:02:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192419_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192419_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192434_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192434_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192461_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192461_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:30.53 +17:24:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192485_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192485_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:31.32 +18:39:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:25.01 +22:00:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:42.29 +22:49:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.74 +21:19:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192755_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192755_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:18.02 +22:36:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:37.72 +18:57:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192804_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192804_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:01.94 +17:20:34.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.644 3407000197876753664 076.00823443346 +17.34272771198 14.5200 13.7727 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.644#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192810_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192810_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:48.53 +16:42:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192840_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 192840_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.52 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.22 +25:59:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.23 +24:10:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.42 +26:13:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.81 +23:10:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143470_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 143470_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149955_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 149955_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.37 +20:19:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.52 +24:45:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 14625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.73 +22:47:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.02 +20:22:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.12 +21:51:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.42 +23:51:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 72221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
