This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2027 2461319.7027 11.78 22:05:47.24 -14:24:59.3
42.64207 -49.46140 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5 Astraea -0 -0 0 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:05:47.24 -14:24:59.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:05:47.24 -14:24:59.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7027,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2027 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2027 2461319.7027 13.70 22:09:31.63 -11:28:19.5
47.29512 -48.95057 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.303 Josephina 0 1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:09:31.63 -11:28:19.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:09:31.63 -11:28:19.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7027,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2027 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2027 2461319.7027 12.74 22:19:18.27 -11:53:28.5
48.50818 -51.25284 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.117 Lomia -0 -1 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:19:18.27 -11:53:28.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:19:18.27 -11:53:28.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7027,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2027 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2027 2461319.7027 13.22 21:54:45.26 -11:04:55.2
45.29592 -45.56948 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.78 Diana 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:54:45.26 -11:04:55.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:54:45.26 -11:04:55.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2027* 21 54 45.26 -11 04 55.2 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7027,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2027 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2027 2461319.7027 14.63 21:45:31.54 -14:07:41.8
40.00634 -44.88117 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1082 Pirola -1 -1 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:45:31.54 -14:07:41.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:45:31.54 -14:07:41.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 06.2027* 21 45 31.54 -14 07 41.8 14.6 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7027,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2027 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
First image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Last image: 2461319.70313971 06.10.2026 04:52:21.271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7577
Objects passed selection criteria: 7575
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7298.75
Average stars matched: 6942.5 (95.119 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 00:06:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
First image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Last image: 2461319.70313971 06.10.2026 04:52:21.271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 144 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46029
Objects passed selection criteria: 45914
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44830.2
Average stars matched: 42647.8 (95.1316 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 265864 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 00:09:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.70229539
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:50.671 -09:56:34.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:16:50.671 -09:56:34.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0626 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:48.736 -09:57:15.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:16:48.736 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0594 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:16:50.671 -09:56:34.87
Second-epoch second image center 22:16:48.736 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RWod6CBQBA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wQSe6z4VjH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lPN6EhAxST
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iLpkvPC4x8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Loaded 5569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4112 out of 4275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4275 out of 6925 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.673200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.673200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Loaded 5569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4112 out of 4275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4275 out of 6925 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 6918 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8535 to 342.3813 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2885 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8535 to 342.3813 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2885 deg
Loaded 5525 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4139 out of 4302 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4302 out of 6918 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
15.3 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.RWod6CBQBA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=496, bad_region=0, passed=6925
Got 6925 stars (including 6418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1030 n_q2=1223 n_q3=924 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wQSe6z4VjH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=479, bad_region=0, passed=6918
Got 6918 stars (including 6429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6918 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4316 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits N_match=4316 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1033 n_q2=1228 n_q3=924 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lPN6EhAxST (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=0, passed=7819
Got 7819 stars (including 7245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4343 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4343 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4750)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=14.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.577 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.571 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.281 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.307 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.291 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4318 robust_rms_before=0.944 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.281 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.340 worst_region_rms_after=0.307 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.933 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.291
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.308 arcsec matched=4318
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1042 n_q2=1217 n_q3=933 n_q4=1126 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iLpkvPC4x8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=573, bad_region=0, passed=7789
Got 7789 stars (including 7210 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7789 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4325 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4325 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4347 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4326 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4326 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4326 stars left (next iteration limit 4757)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4326 robust_rms=14.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.512 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.512 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4326 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.608 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4326 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.314 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4326 robust_rms_before=0.947 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.345 worst_region_rms_after=0.314 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.298
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.345 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.315 arcsec matched=4326
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=4326 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1227 n_q3=932 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.177
new1=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new2=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.134
reference average sigma_overall=0.3415 worst_q_ratio=1.146
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859_astrometric_residuals.png (4318 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860_astrometric_residuals.png (4316 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178_astrometric_residuals.png (4318 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4326 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:16:44.64 -08:12:17.4: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:26.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:15:23.52 -08:39:06.2: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:05:47.24 -14:24:59.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:04:05.88 -08:06:07.9: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:17:21.98 -09:35:11.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:22:11.89 -09:21:06.2: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.3: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:17:21.98 -09:35:11.3: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:22:11.89 -09:21:06.2: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:05:47.24 -14:24:59.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:26.8: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:04:05.88 -08:06:07.9: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:15:23.52 -08:39:06.2: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:16:44.64 -08:12:17.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.3: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9774 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:22:11.89 -09:21:06.2: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0173 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:26.8: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0447 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:04:05.88 -08:06:07.9: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0793 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:15:23.52 -08:39:06.2: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0935 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:16:44.64 -08:12:17.4: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0903 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:17:21.98 -09:35:11.3: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0307 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20422_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:39.84 -07:11:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 20426_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20434_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20434_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20435_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:41:31.52 -06:28:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20436_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20438_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20438_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20439_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20439_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20441_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20441_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20442_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20442_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20443_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20443_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
22:05:47.24 -14:24:59.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:50.671 -09:56:34.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:16:50.671 -09:56:34.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0626 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:48.736 -09:57:15.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:16:48.736 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0594 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:16:50.671 -09:56:34.87
Second-epoch second image center 22:16:48.736 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PLtCdvnQkV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aeSmQbEPxL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jM8hoiYps7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vsrybCoseo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits does not exist or is empty: waiting for solve_plate_with_UCAC5
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PLtCdvnQkV (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1813, bad_region=20, passed=43984
Got 43984 stars (including 42059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43984 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4331 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4332 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4311 stars left (next iteration limit 4744)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits N_match=4311 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1219 n_q3=934 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aeSmQbEPxL (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1714, bad_region=21, passed=43912
Got 43912 stars (including 42099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43912 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4334 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4333 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4314 stars left (next iteration limit 4746)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits N_match=4314 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1210 n_q3=924 n_q4=1125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jM8hoiYps7 (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2014, bad_region=47, passed=46445
Got 46445 stars (including 44313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46445 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4331 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46445 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4332 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46445 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46445 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4313 stars left (next iteration limit 4745)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4313 robust_rms=14.563 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.642 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.642 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4313 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.598 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.598 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4313 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.301 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.293 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4313 robust_rms_before=0.942 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.340 worst_region_rms_after=0.301 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.934 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.293
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.942 -> 0.273 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4313 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4135 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4135 pairs (4313 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4135 robust_rms=14.559 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.600 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4135 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.593 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4135 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.300 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.293 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4135 robust_rms_before=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.300 worst_region_rms_after=0.300 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.293 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.293
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.272 -> 0.272 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4135 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46445 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4135 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46445 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=4135 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=993 n_q2=1160 n_q3=915 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vsrybCoseo (1) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1969, bad_region=47, passed=46435
Got 46435 stars (including 44339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4339 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=14.613 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.459 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.621 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.309 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4318 robust_rms_before=0.942 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.338 worst_region_rms_after=0.309 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.944 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.298
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.338 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.306 arcsec matched=4318
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1042 n_q2=1220 n_q3=947 n_q4=1109 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Loaded 5591 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4073 out of 4476 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4476 out of 44007 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.570300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.570300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Loaded 5591 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4073 out of 4476 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4476 out of 44007 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 43933 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8257 to 342.4191 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2242 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8257 to 342.4191 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2242 deg
Loaded 5583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4085 out of 4489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4489 out of 43933 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
2.0 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
15.4 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_235323_TTUQ1b1x1_3873618_YqhqizKz/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:52:28.18 -05:11:38.9: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:48.26 -09:41:00.8: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:11:04.65 -08:09:04.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:46:55.53 -07:49:01.1: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:33.81 -08:32:42.6: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:11:04.41 -06:36:22.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:58:48.82 -09:15:55.1: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:28:49.22 -13:16:17.1: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:21:33.46 -11:06:35.1: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:00:40.67 -05:00:04.5: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:48.26 -09:41:00.8: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:52:28.18 -05:11:38.9: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:58:48.82 -09:15:55.1: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:33.81 -08:32:42.6: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:11:04.41 -06:36:22.2: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:48.26 -09:41:00.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6597 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:00:40.67 -05:00:04.5: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:28.18 -05:11:38.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2598 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:33.81 -08:32:42.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3134 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:28:49.22 -13:16:17.1: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:11:04.41 -06:36:22.2: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7657 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:58:48.82 -09:15:55.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5792 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:21:33.46 -11:06:35.1: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:00:40.67 -05:00:04.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6011 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:28:49.22 -13:16:17.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6171 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:11:04.65 -08:09:04.8: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:33.46 -11:06:35.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6688 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:46:55.53 -07:49:01.1: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:11:04.65 -08:09:04.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9525 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:46:55.53 -07:49:01.1: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3535 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:46:44.79 -14:18:23.0: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:48:01.45 -04:27:14.4: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:25.62 -11:55:10.3: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:19:18.27 -11:53:28.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:09:31.63 -11:28:19.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:54:45.26 -11:04:55.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:47:21.36 -11:55:55.2: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:47:37.17 -13:11:26.8: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:21:36.57 -12:32:25.5: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:25.62 -11:55:10.3: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:19:18.27 -11:53:28.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:09:31.63 -11:28:19.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:46:44.79 -14:18:23.0: 14.89 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:25.62 -11:55:10.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4129 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:48:01.45 -04:27:14.4: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:44.79 -14:18:23.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4491 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:54:45.26 -11:04:55.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:01.45 -04:27:14.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1421 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:47:21.36 -11:55:55.2: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:47:37.17 -13:11:26.8: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:37.17 -13:11:26.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2231 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:21.36 -11:55:55.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2817 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:53:09.79 -05:08:06.7: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:21:36.57 -12:32:25.5: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:36.57 -12:32:25.5: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3711 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:53:09.79 -05:08:06.7: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:09.79 -05:08:06.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4278 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:01:22.75 -14:20:14.2: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:30:33.17 -13:23:15.0: 15.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:00:32.35 -04:46:05.9: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:31:46.24 -11:59:12.3: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:31:43.71 -15:06:46.0: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:45:39.56 -14:40:38.6: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:00:32.35 -04:46:05.9: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:00:32.35 -04:46:05.9: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3682 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:01:22.75 -14:20:14.2: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:30:33.17 -13:23:15.0: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:01:22.75 -14:20:14.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4098 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:30:33.17 -13:23:15.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5470 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:31:43.71 -15:06:46.0: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:31:43.71 -15:06:46.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4766 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:31:46.24 -11:59:12.3: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:45:39.56 -14:40:38.6: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:31:46.24 -11:59:12.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5037 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:49:58.32 -11:35:59.5: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:39.56 -14:40:38.6: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5049 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:47:46.92 -09:49:27.7: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:58:16.73 -07:33:55.6: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:49:56.93 -10:25:32.4: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:49:58.32 -11:35:59.5: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:58.32 -11:35:59.5: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5114 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:39:42.43 -12:31:03.4: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:47:46.92 -09:49:27.7: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:46.92 -09:49:27.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6103 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:58:16.73 -07:33:55.6: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:43:23.22 -14:43:31.8: 14.71 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:58:16.73 -07:33:55.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5557 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:49:56.93 -10:25:32.4: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:56.93 -10:25:32.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5134 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:15.08 -13:37:01.5: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:39:42.43 -12:31:03.4: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:43:23.22 -14:43:31.8: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:47:40.04 -10:07:07.7: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:23.22 -14:43:31.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5428 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:47:40.04 -10:07:07.7: 15.27 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:15.08 -13:37:01.5: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:42.43 -12:31:03.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6365 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:40.04 -10:07:07.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6977 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:15.08 -13:37:01.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7230 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:42:48.07 -09:35:36.5: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:06:43.30 -12:18:18.6: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:10:01.47 -14:49:49.6: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:42:48.97 -13:32:19.7: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:33:00.94 -13:08:36.8: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:42:52.50 -14:57:41.8: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:42:48.07 -09:35:36.5: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:48.07 -09:35:36.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6993 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:10:01.47 -14:49:49.6: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:06:43.30 -12:18:18.6: 15.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:10:01.47 -14:49:49.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5519 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:06:43.30 -12:18:18.6: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7150 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:42:52.50 -14:57:41.8: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:33:00.94 -13:08:36.8: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:52.50 -14:57:41.8: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4624 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:33:00.94 -13:08:36.8: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6755 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:42:48.97 -13:32:19.7: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:48.97 -13:32:19.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6040 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:45:14.64 -10:47:01.9: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:45:14.64 -10:47:01.9: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:45:14.64 -10:47:01.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4901 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:38:21.64 -14:24:03.8: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:53:35.36 -10:09:11.5: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:24.69 -14:55:47.6: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:54:24.47 -14:06:38.1: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:01.62 -04:53:28.8: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:34:51.55 -13:33:40.3: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:38:21.64 -14:24:03.8: 15.00 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:21.64 -14:24:03.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5332 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:24.69 -14:55:47.6: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:23:24.69 -14:55:47.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6192 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:54:24.47 -14:06:38.1: 15.07 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:53:35.36 -10:09:11.5: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:01.62 -04:53:28.8: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:24.47 -14:06:38.1: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5630 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:35.36 -10:09:11.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7281 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:01.62 -04:53:28.8: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6426 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:34:51.55 -13:33:40.3: 15.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:34:51.55 -13:33:40.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7453 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:21:16.59 -14:39:56.7: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:21:16.59 -14:39:56.7: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:16.59 -14:39:56.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6966 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:35:40.46 -12:59:10.7: 15.56 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:49:16.45 -13:02:36.0: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:35:55.24 -12:52:06.3: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:45:10.37 -11:22:04.2: 15.20 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:31:06.97 -14:16:05.9: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:35:40.46 -12:59:10.7: 15.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:40.46 -12:59:10.7: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7557 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:48:00.57 -06:45:14.8: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:45:10.37 -11:22:04.2: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:35:55.24 -12:52:06.3: 14.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:49:16.45 -13:02:36.0: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:55.24 -12:52:06.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7473 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:31:06.97 -14:16:05.9: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:16.45 -13:02:36.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7198 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:45:10.37 -11:22:04.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5365 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:31:06.97 -14:16:05.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7459 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:45:28.76 -10:49:29.5: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:48:00.57 -06:45:14.8: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:00.57 -06:45:14.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7106 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:45:28.76 -10:49:29.5: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:28.76 -10:49:29.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6832 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:42.80 -08:46:13.9: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:42.80 -08:46:13.9: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:45:31.54 -14:07:41.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:28:52.05 -13:55:07.2: 15.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:42.80 -08:46:13.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7098 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:52:27.78 -06:09:21.9: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:28:52.05 -13:55:07.2: 15.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:28:52.05 -13:55:07.2: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7559 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:45:31.54 -14:07:41.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:40:09.08 -13:11:47.6: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:52:27.78 -06:09:21.9: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:27.78 -06:09:21.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7392 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:10.64 -10:41:10.1: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:45.33 -14:14:42.8: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:40:09.08 -13:11:47.6: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:09.08 -13:11:47.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5969 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:10.64 -10:41:10.1: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:10.64 -10:41:10.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7149 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:11:22.37 -12:00:13.9: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:45.33 -14:14:42.8: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:45.33 -14:14:42.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7269 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:50:55.59 -06:42:35.2: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:11:22.37 -12:00:13.9: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:11:22.37 -12:00:13.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7025 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:50:55.59 -06:42:35.2: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:55.59 -06:42:35.2: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7263 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:39:53.48 -14:56:23.4: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:48:16.39 -05:18:38.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:39:53.48 -14:56:23.4: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:53.48 -14:56:23.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7226 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:02.11 -10:41:00.2: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:48:16.39 -05:18:38.5: 15.20 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.28
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:48:16.39 -05:18:38.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.28 new_mean_mag=14.7018 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:52.19 -10:59:50.7: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:21.41 -13:20:59.4: 15.35 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:02.11 -10:41:00.2: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:02.11 -10:41:00.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6870 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:52.19 -10:59:50.7: 15.22 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:52.19 -10:59:50.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6926 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:52:49.11 -05:24:06.0: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:21.41 -13:20:59.4: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:23:21.41 -13:20:59.4: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7542 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:52:49.11 -05:24:06.0: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:46:30.16 -12:09:16.6: 15.05 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:49.11 -05:24:06.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7548 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:04:39.31 -14:07:40.4: 15.64 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:58:32.41 -13:47:12.0: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:46:30.16 -12:09:16.6: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:04:39.31 -14:07:40.4: 15.35 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:46:30.16 -12:09:16.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5628 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:04:39.31 -14:07:40.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.8362 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:53:26.23 -12:59:35.3: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:50:08.36 -05:15:07.0: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:30.89 -11:01:39.7: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:58:32.41 -13:47:12.0: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:58:32.41 -13:47:12.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7891 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:46:14.14 -09:20:12.7: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:53:26.23 -12:59:35.3: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:26.23 -12:59:35.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7580 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:30.89 -11:01:39.7: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:30.89 -11:01:39.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7080 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:50:08.36 -05:15:07.0: 15.50 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:08.36 -05:15:07.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8316 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:46:14.14 -09:20:12.7: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:46:14.14 -09:20:12.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7995 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53549.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53621.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54129.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53429_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53429_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53431_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53431_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53433_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53433_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53434_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53442_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53442_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53443_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53443_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53446_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53446_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53451_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53451_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53453_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53457_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53458_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53462_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53462_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53494_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53494_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:47.24 -14:24:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53549_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53549_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53621_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53873_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53873_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53893_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53901_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53904_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53919_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53919_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53932_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53932_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53933_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53933_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53941_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53941_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53948_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53951_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53951_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53960_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53966_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53966_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53968_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53968_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53985_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53985_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53986_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53986_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53993_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53993_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53995_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53998_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53998_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54024_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54024_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54027_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54027_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54028_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54028_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54029_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54029_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54031_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54035_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54035_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54043_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:14:17.80 -12:38:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54044_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54044_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54049_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54050_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54055_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54058_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54062_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54065_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54071_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54080_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54080_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54083_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54083_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54086_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54091_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54092_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54093_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54093_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:12:32.56 -14:12:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54109_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54114_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54115_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54120_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54126_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54126_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54129_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54130_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54130_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54131_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54131_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54134_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54134_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54141_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54141_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54142_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54143_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54143_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54144_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54145_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54145_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54146_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54157_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54157_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54162_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54162_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54163_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54163_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54166_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54166_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54173_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54173_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54194_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54194_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54201_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54201_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54204_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54204_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54213_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54213_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54219_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54219_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54220_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54220_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54224_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54224_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12218_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 12218_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:39.83 -07:11:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06918_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 06918_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_23-52-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
