This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 00 44 10.50 +01 47 45.3 7.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.8376,7.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.3376 7.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 00 44 10.48 +01 47 45.3 7.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.8376,7.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.3376 7.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.3376 2461318.8376 12.13 01:12:11.18 -03:48:31.9
135.82808 -66.15973 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga 0 -1 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:12:11.18 -03:48:31.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:12:11.18 -03:48:31.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 01 12 11.18 -03 48 31.9 12.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.8376,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.3376 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.3376 2461318.8376 12.29 00:36:05.79 -02:25:50.7
113.82284 -65.03082 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.384 Burdigala -0 -0 0 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:36:05.79 -02:25:50.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:36:05.79 -02:25:50.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 00 36 05.79 -02 25 50.7 12.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.8376,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.3376 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.3376 2461318.8376 13.53 01:01:40.42 -04:51:07.3
129.63333 -67.59050 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.805 Hormuthia 0 -0 0 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:40.42 -04:51:07.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:40.42 -04:51:07.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 01 01 40.42 -04 51 07.3 13.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.8376,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.3376 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.3376 2461318.8376 13.56 01:11:24.42 +00:52:38.4
133.46795 -61.58524 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.522 Helga -0 0 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:11:24.42 +00:52:38.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:11:24.42 +00:52:38.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 01 11 24.42 +00 52 38.4 13.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.8376,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.3376 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.3376 2461318.8376 13.60 00:46:14.38 +00:33:03.9
120.13617 -62.29244 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1132 Hollandia -1 0 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:46:14.38 +00:33:03.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:46:14.38 +00:33:03.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 00 46 14.38 +00 33 03.9 13.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.8376,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.3376 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.3376 2461318.8376 14.61 00:51:10.70 +01:19:00.0
122.79570 -61.55501 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.7" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:51:10.70 +01:19:00.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:51:10.70 +01:19:00.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:51:10.70 +01:19:00.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.3376* 00 51 10.70 +01 19 00.0 14.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461318.8376,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261005.3376 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461318.83779624 05.10.2026 08:06:15.595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4023
Objects passed selection criteria: 4014
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3466
Average stars matched: 3414.75 (98.5214 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231120 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 03:14:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461318.83779624 05.10.2026 08:06:15.595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 323
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23093
Objects passed selection criteria: 23036
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20329
Average stars matched: 19716.8 (96.9883 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 03:16:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.83736991
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.412 -02:00:26.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.412 -02:00:26.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.921 -02:00:20.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.921 -02:00:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:25.412 -02:00:26.39
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:25.921 -02:00:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00271 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BnXfzJX3CA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uLnfZbaMo5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ebTHwjLaB3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FC0S4efSNg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.864150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.864150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3227 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3227 deg
Loaded 3971 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3212 out of 3360 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 5460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.BnXfzJX3CA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=1270, passed=5517
Got 5517 stars (including 3949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 3862 stars left (next iteration limit 4248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=3862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1232 n_q2=744 n_q3=1161 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uLnfZbaMo5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=1257, passed=5460
Got 5460 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 3794 stars left (next iteration limit 4173)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=3794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1201 n_q2=734 n_q3=1146 n_q4=713 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ebTHwjLaB3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, bad_region=633, passed=3286
Got 3286 stars (including 2490 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3286 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2446 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2443 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2443 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2446 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2443 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2443 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 2443 stars left (next iteration limit 2687)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2443 robust_rms=7.112 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.774 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.774 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2443 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.548 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2443 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.408 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2443 robust_rms_before=0.966 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.382 worst_region_rms_after=0.408 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.227 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.408
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.382 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.319 arcsec matched=2443
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits N_match=2443 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=910 n_q2=439 n_q3=831 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FC0S4efSNg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=214, bad_region=594, passed=3456
Got 3456 stars (including 2670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2620 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2618 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2618 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2620 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2618 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2618 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 2618 stars left (next iteration limit 2879)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2618 robust_rms=7.192 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.669 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.669 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2618 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.610 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2618 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.389 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2618 robust_rms_before=0.959 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.349 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.376 worst_region_rms_after=0.389 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.225 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.380
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.334 arcsec matched=2618
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits N_match=2618 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=946 n_q2=471 n_q3=876 n_q4=325 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.239
ref2=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.295
new1=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.111
new2=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.267
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (3862 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (3794 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338_astrometric_residuals.png (2443 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339_astrometric_residuals.png (2618 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 20186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.412 -02:00:26.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.412 -02:00:26.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.921 -02:00:20.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.921 -02:00:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:25.412 -02:00:26.39
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:25.921 -02:00:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00271 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hhoVZfbpyR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qi4Qhi910K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9dS7dNrMc2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KeFA9L8ejt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 30077 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3182 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 30077 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 191 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hhoVZfbpyR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1068, bad_region=5575, passed=29508
Got 29508 stars (including 23045 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1604 n_q2=899 n_q3=1497 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qi4Qhi910K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1115, bad_region=5717, passed=30066
Got 30066 stars (including 23434 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1593 n_q2=894 n_q3=1493 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9dS7dNrMc2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=558, bad_region=3044, passed=19090
Got 19090 stars (including 15620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19090 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=6.675 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.079 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.079 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.623 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.449 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.449 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4782 robust_rms_before=0.984 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.405 worst_region_rms_after=0.449 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.226 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.449
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.405 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.349 arcsec matched=4782
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1799 n_q2=834 n_q3=1679 n_q4=470 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KeFA9L8ejt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=631, bad_region=2833, passed=20275
Got 20275 stars (including 16960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=6.702 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.348 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.422 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=0.968 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.355 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.374 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.411 worst_region_rms_after=0.422 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.222 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.411 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.355 arcsec matched=4787
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=1741 n_q2=834 n_q3=1631 n_q4=581 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-05-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_030646_TTUQ2b1x1_1123052_uekDJs90/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:12:11.18 -03:48:31.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:44:51.56 -03:24:19.5: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:58:27.70 -02:31:01.4: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:58:27.70 -02:31:01.4: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:27.70 -02:31:01.4: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2082 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:44:51.56 -03:24:19.5: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:12:11.18 -03:48:31.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:51.56 -03:24:19.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8883 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:36:05.79 -02:25:50.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:36:05.79 -02:25:50.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:48:33.51 +00:21:49.2: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:48:33.51 +00:21:49.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:33.51 +00:21:49.2: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3362 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:40.42 -04:51:07.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:40.42 -04:51:07.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:11:24.42 +00:52:38.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:08.00 -04:05:08.3: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:11:24.42 +00:52:38.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:08.00 -04:05:08.3: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:08.00 -04:05:08.3: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.4995 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:46:14.38 +00:33:03.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:46:14.38 +00:33:03.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:18:33.75 -01:27:44.1: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:34:20.47 +01:40:24.2: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:51:10.70 +01:19:00.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:21.49 -01:19:51.8: 15.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:33.75 -01:27:44.1: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:34:20.47 +01:40:24.2: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:02:51.50 -01:33:27.3: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:51:10.70 +01:19:00.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:21.49 -01:19:51.8: 15.63 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:33.75 -01:27:44.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5066 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:01:21.49 -01:19:51.8: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6577 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:20.47 +01:40:24.2: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3271 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:09:41.48 -00:03:01.3: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:02:51.50 -01:33:27.3: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:51.50 -01:33:27.3: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5333 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:09:41.48 -00:03:01.3: 15.85 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:09:41.48 -00:03:01.3: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6445 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31923.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32050.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32083.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32227.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31853_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31853_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31856_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31856_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31860_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 31860_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31867_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31867_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31873_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31873_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31874_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31874_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31875_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31875_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31878_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31878_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31879_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31879_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31882_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31882_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31888_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 31888_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31890_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31890_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31896_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31896_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31897_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31897_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31899_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31899_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31901_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31901_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31902_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31902_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31904_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31905_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31905_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31909_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31909_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31910_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31910_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31911_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31911_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31914_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31914_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31918_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31918_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31919_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31919_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31920_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31920_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31923_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 31923_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31924_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31924_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31926_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31926_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31928_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31928_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31933_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31933_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31934_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31935_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31935_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31938_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31938_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31940_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31940_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31941_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31941_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31943_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31943_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31944_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31944_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31945_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31945_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31946_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31946_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31947_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31947_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31950_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31950_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31951_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31951_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31955_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31955_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31956_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31956_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31958_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31958_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31960_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31960_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31961_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31961_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31965_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31965_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31970_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31970_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31971_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31971_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31976_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31976_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31977_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31977_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31979_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31979_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31980_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31980_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31982_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31982_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31984_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31984_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31986_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31986_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31989_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31989_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31991_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31991_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31992_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31992_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31993_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31993_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31994_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31994_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31997_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 31997_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32001_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32001_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32002_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32002_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32004_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32004_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32006_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32006_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32008_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32008_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32009_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32009_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32011_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32011_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32014_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32014_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32015_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32015_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32016_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32016_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32019_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32019_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32021_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32021_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32024_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32024_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32025_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32025_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32026_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32026_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32027_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32027_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32028_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32028_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32029_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32029_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32032_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32032_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32034_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32034_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32035_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32035_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32037_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 32037_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32038_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32038_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32039_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32039_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32040_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32040_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32041_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32041_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32043_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32043_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32044_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32044_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32047_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32047_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32049_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32049_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32050_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 32050_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32051_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32051_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32052_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32052_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32053_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32053_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32056_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32056_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32058_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32058_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32062_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32062_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32065_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32065_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32067_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32067_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32068_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32068_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32071_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32071_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32072_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32072_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32074_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32074_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32076_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32076_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32078_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32078_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32080_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32080_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32083_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 32083_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32084_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32084_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32087_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32087_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32094_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32094_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32097_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32097_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32098_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32098_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32099_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32099_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32101_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32101_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32103_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32103_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32106_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32106_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32107_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32107_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32108_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32108_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32110_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32110_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32111_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32111_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32114_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32114_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32115_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32115_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32116_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32116_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32118_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32118_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32121_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32121_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32122_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32122_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32123_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32123_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32125_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32125_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32127_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32128_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32128_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32129_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32129_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32131_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32131_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32134_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32134_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32136_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32136_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32137_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32139_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32139_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32142_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32142_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32145_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32145_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32151_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32153_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32153_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32155_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32155_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32156_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32156_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32158_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32163_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32163_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32167_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32167_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32168_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32168_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32169_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32169_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32171_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32171_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32173_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32173_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32178_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32178_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32181_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32190_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32190_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32193_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32193_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32194_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32194_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32204_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32204_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32206_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32206_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32207_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32207_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32212_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32212_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32214_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32214_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32217_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32217_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32229_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32229_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32230_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32230_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32231_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32231_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32234_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32234_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32245_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32245_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32246_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32246_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32248_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32248_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32249_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32249_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32250_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32250_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32265_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32265_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32270_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32270_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 32272_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07574_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 07574_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339
The candidate 17268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_03-06-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0339 did not pass the final checks
