NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Gem-05-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits
Field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Gem-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 262937 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 262937 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits

renamed 'Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 630.2893 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 835.9389 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2274.4113 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 723.7136 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2234.5275 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 751.5578 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.60852 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.037 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.5100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T02:50:50.6030201' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T07:50:50.6030201' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.3269745717 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T07:51:00.5077072' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.3270892012 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 106.702583283322 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0321807429165 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.2138888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 85.0511111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.17024317371021 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20693 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20693 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.5100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.5100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 222.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.900232 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits :) Spent 0.765205 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T02:51:38.1026178' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T07:51:38.1026178' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.3275243286 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T07:51:48.0060131' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.3276389581 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 106.702583202525 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.032180744673 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.3797222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 85.1575 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.14317868946382 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20693 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20693 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 222.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.900232 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits :) Spent 0.719881 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits


fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.82709031 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Image size: 939.6'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:49.863 +14:03:07.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 Second-epoch image center 07:06:49.863 +14:03:07.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0559 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Image size: 939.6'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:50.258 +14:02:30.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 Second-epoch image center 07:06:50.258 +14:02:30.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0489 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:06:49.863 +14:03:07.88 Second-epoch second image center 07:06:50.258 +14:02:30.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01053 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J1O8UUTiaW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VjWeaMFgZ8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fYvWRr3UPR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0gBisT9GCj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.899900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.899900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 2.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.J1O8UUTiaW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=5272, passed=28861 Got 28861 stars (including 20681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5273) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1616 n_q2=831 n_q3=1614 n_q4=730 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.VjWeaMFgZ8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=6781, passed=25458 Got 25458 stars (including 16979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5273) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.fYvWRr3UPR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=285, bad_region=696, passed=4157 Got 4157 stars (including 3211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4157 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013050 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010440 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3094 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3057 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3095 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71" Excluding outliers - 3055 stars left (next iteration limit 3360) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3055 robust_rms=7.008 arcsec worst_region_rms=8.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.359 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3055 robust_rms=0.844 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.948 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.948 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3055 robust_rms=0.740 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.840 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.840 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3055 robust_rms_before=1.108 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.724 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.740 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.879 worst_region_rms_after=0.840 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.588 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.840 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.879 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.879 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.724 arcsec matched=3055 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits N_match=3055 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.767 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.863 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.651 n_q1=965 n_q2=836 n_q3=693 n_q4=561 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.0gBisT9GCj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=787, passed=4838 Got 4838 stars (including 3753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4838 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013050 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010440 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3620 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3567 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3567 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3622 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3562 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3562 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" Excluding outliers - 3562 stars left (next iteration limit 3923) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3562 robust_rms=7.374 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.399 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.399 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3562 robust_rms=0.845 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.955 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.955 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3562 robust_rms=0.737 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.831 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.831 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3562 robust_rms_before=1.118 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.709 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.737 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.902 worst_region_rms_after=0.831 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.477 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.831 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.902 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.709 arcsec matched=3562 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits N_match=3562 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.733 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.847 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.626 n_q1=1110 n_q2=974 n_q3=880 n_q4=598 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.171 ref2=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.514 worst_q_ratio=1.169 new1=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits sigma_overall=0.729 worst_q_ratio=1.185 new2=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits sigma_overall=0.733 worst_q_ratio=1.155 reference average sigma_overall=0.4975 worst_q_ratio=1.17 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 693 -> 880, 21.250% > 20%; fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits vs fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4791 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326_astrometric_residuals.png (3055 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327_astrometric_residuals.png (3562 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Image size: 939.6'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:49.863 +14:03:07.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 Second-epoch image center 07:06:49.863 +14:03:07.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0559 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Image size: 939.6'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:50.258 +14:02:30.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 Second-epoch image center 07:06:50.258 +14:02:30.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0489 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:06:49.863 +14:03:07.88 Second-epoch second image center 07:06:50.258 +14:02:30.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01053 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NjCK0BGn0L Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lY2bgQZdwB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A3ijztnSBl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.srEslEsmWi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.735100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.735100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6) Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 2.0 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 2.1 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.NjCK0BGn0L (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, bad_region=29686, passed=208495 Got 208495 stars (including 147891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1556 n_q2=875 n_q3=1578 n_q4=769 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.lY2bgQZdwB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, bad_region=33384, passed=173985 Got 173985 stars (including 122046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5255) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1377 n_q4=1097 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.A3ijztnSBl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2868, bad_region=6018, passed=47031 Got 47031 stars (including 38363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47031 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013050 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010440 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65" Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5263) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=6.926 arcsec worst_region_rms=8.934 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.934 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.835 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.950 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.950 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.725 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.840 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.840 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=1.115 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.649 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.725 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.787 worst_region_rms_after=0.840 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.641 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.840 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.787 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.787 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.649 arcsec matched=4783 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.718 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.770 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.622 n_q1=1506 n_q2=1363 n_q3=969 n_q4=945 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.srEslEsmWi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=3508, bad_region=6754, passed=52912 Got 52912 stars (including 42922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52912 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013050 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010440 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5255) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=7.250 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.238 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.238 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.849 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.009 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.009 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.736 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.866 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.866 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=1.137 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.677 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.736 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.865 worst_region_rms_after=0.866 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.617 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.866 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.865 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.677 arcsec matched=4780 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.887 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.610 n_q1=1478 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1083 n_q4=869 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:00.52 +13:02:14.7: 14.64 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:02.72 +12:33:27.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:48.42 +10:40:03.8: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:50.02 +14:45:48.8: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:45.50 +17:04:06.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:12:41.95 +10:51:15.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:02.72 +12:33:27.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:00.52 +13:02:14.7: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:02.72 +12:33:27.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5747 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:48.42 +10:40:03.8: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.52 +13:02:14.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1424 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:48.42 +10:40:03.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9922 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:38.23 +14:47:57.0: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:50.02 +14:45:48.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:50.02 +14:45:48.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1626 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:45.50 +17:04:06.8: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:12:41.95 +10:51:15.3: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:41.95 +10:51:15.3: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4628 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:45.50 +17:04:06.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2808 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:26.82 +11:58:06.3: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:35.81 +10:34:56.1: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:38.23 +14:47:57.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:38.23 +14:47:57.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0935 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:03.85 +16:54:56.7: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:44.11 +16:43:42.8: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:24.85 +14:55:35.4: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:26.82 +11:58:06.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:35.81 +10:34:56.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:26.82 +11:58:06.3: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0513 delta=-1.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:35.81 +10:34:56.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9947 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:03.85 +16:54:56.7: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:03.85 +16:54:56.7: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8980 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:41.58 +12:25:15.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:44.11 +16:43:42.8: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.11 +16:43:42.8: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0886 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:24.85 +14:55:35.4: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:02.96 +16:23:46.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:24.85 +14:55:35.4: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6000 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:41.58 +12:25:15.4: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:41.58 +12:25:15.4: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5299 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:13.59 +11:02:15.1: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:02.96 +16:23:46.0: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:02.96 +16:23:46.0: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3412 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:13.59 +11:02:15.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:13.59 +11:02:15.1: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8632 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:13:57.99 +11:51:46.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:33.21 +10:49:59.7: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:33.21 +10:49:59.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:13:57.99 +11:51:46.6: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:33.21 +10:49:59.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1587 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:57.99 +11:51:46.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2003 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:29.13 +15:27:50.4: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:25.50 +11:10:32.8: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:27.92 +11:02:41.2: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:50.39 +15:28:02.5: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:29.13 +15:27:50.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:29.13 +15:27:50.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2984 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:25.50 +11:10:32.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:50.39 +15:28:02.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:27.92 +11:02:41.2: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:25.50 +11:10:32.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4883 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:50.39 +15:28:02.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3198 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:27.92 +11:02:41.2: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5487 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248971_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248971_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    14.11    07:06:00.56 +13:02:15.2   4656 2585   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    14.22    07:06:00.47 +13:02:14.1   4655 2591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248976_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248976_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    14.00    07:19:48.39 +10:40:03.9   6677 1125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.99    07:19:48.46 +10:40:03.7   6676 1131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248977_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248977_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    14.20    07:16:20.10 +12:03:27.7   6167 1978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:16:20.08 +12:03:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248981_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248981_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.74    07:01:43.50 +12:58:42.8   4025 2569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:01:43.52 +12:58:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248993_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248993_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.58    07:19:02.77 +12:33:27.0   6571 2271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.57    07:19:02.68 +12:33:27.3   6570 2278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248996_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248996_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.70    07:02:51.35 +09:54:05.9   4146 0701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:02:51.37 +09:54:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248997_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248997_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.43    06:42:37.91 +10:50:32.1   1141 1359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:42:37.86 +10:50:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 248998_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 248998_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.30    07:13:01.47 +09:50:45.8   5661 0642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:13:01.46 +09:50:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249002_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249002_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.32    07:03:07.04 +12:58:50.0   4230 2565   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:03:06.90 +12:58:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249003_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249003_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.33    07:13:45.18 +10:26:09.7   5774 0999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:13:45.27 +10:26:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249004_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249004_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.42    07:15:05.43 +11:20:13.0   5979 1544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:15:05.45 +11:20:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.36    07:14:11.39 +18:07:46.6   5895 5655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:14:11.42 +18:07:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249014_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249014_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.46    07:12:41.95 +10:51:16.0   5621 1249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.46    07:12:41.94 +10:51:14.6   5620 1255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249019_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249019_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.26    06:43:50.10 +14:45:48.4   1430 3730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.10    06:43:49.94 +14:45:49.2   1429 3736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249022_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249022_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.26    07:19:45.50 +17:04:06.1   6694 5001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.30    07:19:45.49 +17:04:07.5   6693 5008   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249025_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249025_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.18    07:21:33.07 +13:49:04.6   6944 3039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:21:33.10 +13:49:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249028_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249028_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.51    07:10:37.36 +10:51:56.5   5312 1266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:10:37.35 +10:51:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249030_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249030_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.13    06:43:38.15 +14:48:00.4   1402 3753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.07    06:43:38.31 +14:47:53.5   1401 3758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249031_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249031_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.27    07:24:38.34 +14:33:32.1   7399 3487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:24:38.33 +14:33:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249032_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249032_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.35    07:23:12.16 +12:44:24.7   7185 2386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:23:12.21 +12:44:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249034_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249034_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.76    07:19:05.69 +13:23:36.7   6581 2783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:19:05.68 +13:23:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249039_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249039_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.06    06:42:26.76 +11:58:06.8   1146 2040   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.04    06:42:26.88 +11:58:05.8   1146 2046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249040_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249040_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.08    06:39:35.80 +10:34:56.5   0676 1211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.93    06:39:35.83 +10:34:55.7   0675 1217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249041_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249041_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.27    07:07:58.18 +10:57:03.5   4920 1324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:07:58.14 +10:57:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249047_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249047_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    12.86    07:23:03.77 +16:54:56.6   7173 4909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.96    07:23:03.94 +16:54:56.8   7173 4915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249055_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249055_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.44    07:17:53.70 +11:05:28.8   6393 1391   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:17:53.68 +11:05:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249057_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249057_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    12.11    07:23:44.09 +16:43:43.6   7270 4796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.07    07:23:44.12 +16:43:42.1   7270 4802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249062_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249062_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    11.55    07:22:24.84 +14:55:35.6   7074 3703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    11.67    07:22:24.87 +14:55:35.2   7073 3709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249077_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249077_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    11.25    06:40:49.51 +09:53:22.6   0840 0786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:40:49.51 +09:53:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    11.10    07:16:40.77 +16:09:07.2   6241 4453   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:16:40.79 +16:09:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249109_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249109_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.05    07:13:09.78 +16:09:34.3   5731 4461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:13:09.79 +16:09:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249137_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249137_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.44    07:03:50.15 +12:33:43.5   4330 2310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:03:50.09 +12:33:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249145_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249145_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    12.53    07:18:41.59 +12:25:16.3   6518 2189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.53    07:18:41.57 +12:25:14.5   6517 2195   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249146_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249146_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    12.46    07:25:02.99 +16:23:46.4   7462 4595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.26    07:25:02.92 +16:23:45.7   7460 4601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249151_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249151_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.41    07:13:25.70 +16:11:55.3   5770 4485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:13:25.72 +16:11:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249168_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249168_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.91    06:40:46.98 +09:46:07.7   0830 0712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:40:46.99 +09:46:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.63    07:14:29.10 +12:08:46.2   5894 2034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:14:29.12 +12:08:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249176_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249176_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    12.83    06:41:13.59 +11:02:15.9   0936 1480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.91    06:41:13.60 +11:02:14.2   0935 1486   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249178_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249178_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.96    07:07:50.40 +11:33:01.3   4907 1688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:07:50.36 +11:33:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249182_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249182_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.56    07:16:38.49 +16:09:35.8   6236 4458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:16:38.52 +16:09:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249191_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249191_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.30    07:00:53.98 +12:25:23.3   3895 2236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:00:54.03 +12:25:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249213_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249213_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.98    06:43:38.25 +10:55:20.7   1295 1402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:43:38.23 +10:55:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.92    07:08:31.38 +10:56:42.7   5002 1319   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:08:31.42 +10:56:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249216_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249216_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.05    06:43:15.89 +09:43:20.2   1204 0671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:43:15.82 +09:43:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249234_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249234_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.84    07:08:50.73 +16:55:30.6   5113 4933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:08:50.72 +16:55:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.16    07:23:35.55 +15:19:08.6   7246 3947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:23:35.55 +15:19:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249239_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249239_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.17    06:42:33.18 +10:50:01.8   1130 1348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.15    06:42:33.23 +10:49:57.6   1129 1353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249244_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249244_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.19    07:13:58.00 +11:51:46.7   5817 1858   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.21    07:13:57.99 +11:51:46.5   5816 1864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249255_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249255_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.17    07:15:06.04 +11:00:46.9   5978 1347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:15:06.06 +11:00:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.17    07:18:11.85 +16:34:23.5   6464 4707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:18:11.84 +16:34:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249263_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249263_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.12    07:14:42.84 +10:43:41.4   5919 1175   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:14:42.77 +10:43:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.26    07:03:39.85 +10:58:34.8   4282 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:03:39.87 +10:58:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249273_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249273_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.52    06:40:39.50 +09:48:39.8   0812 0739   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:40:39.45 +09:48:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249282_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249282_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.38    07:20:59.49 +13:05:48.0   6859 2602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:20:59.49 +13:05:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249288_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249288_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.32    06:45:29.25 +15:27:49.8   1692 4144   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.28    06:45:29.02 +15:27:51.0   1690 4150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249289_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249289_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.28    07:24:11.44 +16:01:51.4   7335 4379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:24:11.43 +16:01:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249299_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249299_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.50    06:40:25.52 +11:10:32.1   0819 1569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.47    06:40:25.49 +11:10:33.6   0818 1575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249300_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249300_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.54    07:08:27.93 +11:02:40.7   4995 1373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.56    07:08:27.90 +11:02:41.8   4994 1380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249301_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249301_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.12    06:42:19.85 +14:34:12.0   1201 3628   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:42:19.59 +14:34:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249304_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249304_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.32709    2461318.82709    13.38    06:43:50.29 +15:28:03.1   1449 4157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0326.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.28    06:43:50.49 +15:28:02.0   1449 4163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.52    07:09:02.06 +12:10:30.8   5091 2063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:09:02.21 +12:10:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.75    07:18:34.36 +15:53:23.9   6515 4293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:18:34.44 +15:53:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249315_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249315_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.46    07:19:52.38 +13:23:01.4   6695 2777   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:19:52.28 +13:23:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249317_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249317_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.14    07:18:13.06 +16:31:53.6   6467 4682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:18:13.09 +16:31:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249326_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249326_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.62    07:15:03.76 +11:01:40.0   5973 1356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:15:03.91 +11:01:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249339_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249339_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.76    07:22:11.81 +14:48:21.2   7041 3636   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:22:11.89 +14:48:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249397_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 249397_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.82    07:17:05.04 +11:07:43.5   6273 1414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:17:04.95 +11:07:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 194492_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 194492_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    13.23    06:49:24.61 +16:38:36.9   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.08    06:44:57.32 +09:50:48.6   1463 0739   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 06:44:57.31 +09:50:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 148067_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 148067_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    12.38    06:47:53.09 +15:48:58.1   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 05.32764    2461318.82764    8.19    07:08:42.56 +10:01:27.5   5020 0760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_2962249_ZV23ljF5/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-51-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits **** FOUND 07:08:42.59 +10:01:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Gem-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.82709031 -observatory V36 14:10:59.45 -15:34:33.6 Mercury (-0.0mag) 14:12:27.70 -21:09:33.2 Venus (-4.7mag) 08:25:37.32 +20:21:17.2 Mars (1.1mag) 09:30:20.26 +15:23:49.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:44:11.63 +01:48:01.2 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:39.04 +20:59:24.3 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:56.77 -00:21:44.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:16.79 -23:43:24.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 08:34:21.08 +20:32:25.6 Moon (-9.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 5 02:54 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.82709031: 09:30:27.47 +15:23:10.9 Io (9.6mag) 09:30:23.00 +15:23:36.3 Europa (6.2mag) 09:30:35.99 +15:22:24.0 Ganymede (8.1mag) 09:30:26.21 +15:23:18.5 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:29:38.33 +15:45:29.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:30:17.72 +15:24:02.7 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:28:39.13 +15:43:56.7 Elara (17.5mag) 09:33:07.88 +14:46:33.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:29:22.67 +15:49:19.7 Carme (18.9mag) 00:44:22.96 +01:47:53.9 Titan (8.2mag) 00:44:10.80 +01:47:41.9 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:43:33.05 +01:45:36.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:44:13.20 +01:48:19.3 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:42:34.51 +01:35:52.8 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 5 02:54 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.82709031: 02:06:19.18 +20:54:13.5 JWST 14:53:40.81 +52:24:06.0 Chandra 12:04:24.13 -61:27:57.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 5 02:54 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.82709031 -observatory V36 03:47:22.78 +20:09:15.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:19:33.44 -33:38:15.5 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:37:07.55 -72:00:20.4 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:24.64 +34:28:28.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:32.63 +48:15:08.1 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:27:35.32 +25:31:34.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:40.58 -18:04:37.7 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:58:48.19 +35:03:29.4 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:25:54.50 +41:48:36.4 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:33.28 -13:30:11.2 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:15:36.60 +12:29:17.9 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:05:56.12 +16:29:42.3 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:44:57.61 -02:12:43.6 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:17:54.28 +67:26:22.3 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:42:48.89 +44:05:22.1 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:39:49.86 +13:40:22.7 17.7mag A/2026 E1 00:41:19.51 +19:44:04.3 17.8mag 2P/Encke 22:51:46.26 -32:56:02.1 14.3mag 10P/Tempel 02:02:12.35 +39:27:21.4 16.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:07:09.20 -07:40:11.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:26:24.94 -08:39:20.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 07:27:19.51 +16:39:12.1 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:05:40.99 +14:36:22.7 17.5mag 88P/Howell 07:16:47.88 +38:26:56.4 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:48:06.51 +16:16:37.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:28:27.87 +14:38:50.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:51:39.67 -30:27:00.8 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:46:13.40 +19:34:16.2 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:36:25.36 +00:32:03.2 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 22:38:21.10 -02:09:34.6 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:05:42.57 +35:47:21.0 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:03:35.46 +03:08:47.9 13.7mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:55.05 +05:22:20.5 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:53:19.21 +43:51:12.6 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:17:51.97 +25:47:29.1 18.0mag 266P/Christensen 15:46:37.36 -03:16:22.8 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:49:57.93 +32:00:48.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 5 02:54 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 5 02:54 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 5 02:54 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:31:39.890 +26:57:49.20 AT 2026acdw 2026-07-03.81 20.42 01:05:50.440 +05:28:35.30 AT 2026acdv 2026-09-10.89 22.53 01:53:01.660 +02:28:41.42 AT 2026acdu 2026-09-10.77 22.18 01:22:01.920 +00:36:31.93 AT 2026acdt 2026-09-08.83 22.48 23:33:58.210 +06:07:36.61 AT 2026acds 2026-09-08.81 22.17 02:16:03.060 +01:41:26.32 AT 2026acdr 2026-08-23.90 21.76 22:47:27.540 -00:19:34.44 AT 2026acdq 2026-06-30.84 21.55 22:51:18.337 +04:28:40.71 AT 2026acdp 2026-09-16.74 22.12 02:30:40.630 +02:46:53.02 AT 2026acdo 2026-09-15.85 21.95 02:09:16.870 +01:28:36.92 AT 2026acdn 2026-09-15.84 22.4 01:52:25.390 -01:02:18.80 AT 2026acdm 2026-09-15.84 21.59 01:26:00.430 +05:11:07.70 AT 2026acdl 2026-09-13.85 22.3 00:59:21.730 +05:19:21.52 AT 2026acdk 2026-09-12.90 22.44 01:52:37.109 +00:19:05.30 AT 2026acdj 2026-09-12.77 22.53 01:45:08.290 +04:57:01.83 AT 2026acdi 2026-09-12.77 22.56 23:52:08.000 +02:30:09.80 AT 2026acdh 2026-09-12.74 22.38 23:00:43.000 +00:08:30.74 AT 2026acdg 2026-09-12.73 22.19 23:43:16.060 +01:40:02.02 AT 2026acdf 2026-09-10.84 22.6 01:56:12.660 +01:50:37.08 AT 2026acde 2026-09-10.77 22.48 01:20:44.400 +06:02:00.40 AT 2026acdd 2026-09-10.77 21.86 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 5 02:54 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C