######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Gem-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 266820 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 266815 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits

renamed 'Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 630.2893
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 835.9389
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2511.8513
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 776.2813
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2461.3199
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 807.1321
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.98524
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.038
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T02:49:19.6427828' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T07:49:19.6427828' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.3259217823 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T07:49:29.5469888' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.3260364123 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 106.665159352544 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9998611573655 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.9094444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 84.8952777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.22121814256953 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 222.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.900232 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits :)
Spent 0.638430 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T02:50:24.8245458' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T07:50:24.8245458' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.3266762039 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T07:50:34.7247722' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.3267907868 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 106.665159241536 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9998611597558 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.1380555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 85.0419444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.18278236165198 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 222.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.900232 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits :)
Spent 0.674855 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits

fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.82603752
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 943.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:57.795 +13:57:14.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:57.795 +13:57:14.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0830 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 943.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:55.077 +13:56:42.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:55.077 +13:56:42.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0813 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:57.795 +13:57:14.32
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:55.077 +13:56:42.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01414 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zSglQNfHrD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dz6TiYjRZl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b3vOEG0NM4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ce7ZXKzfmM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zSglQNfHrD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dz6TiYjRZl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b3vOEG0NM4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=186, bad_region=0, passed=3540
Got 3540 stars (including 3352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3214 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3181 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3181 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3212 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3178 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3178 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 3178 stars left (next iteration limit 3499)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3178 robust_rms=8.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.570 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.570 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3178 robust_rms=0.830 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.932 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3178 robust_rms=0.676 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.827 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.714 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3178 robust_rms_before=1.132 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.673 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.676 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.763 worst_region_rms_after=0.827 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.111 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.714
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.763 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.763 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.673 arcsec matched=3178
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=3178 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.752 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=901 n_q2=957 n_q3=443 n_q4=877 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ce7ZXKzfmM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=238, bad_region=0, passed=4511
Got 4511 stars (including 4268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4119 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4066 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4065 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4121 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4067 stars left (next iteration limit 4471)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4067 robust_rms=9.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.973 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.973 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4067 robust_rms=0.770 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.891 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.817 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4067 robust_rms=0.660 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.788 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4067 robust_rms_before=1.089 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.615 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.660 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.696 worst_region_rms_after=0.788 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.057 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.687
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.696 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.696 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.615 arcsec matched=4067
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=4067 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.603 n_q1=1158 n_q2=1198 n_q3=703 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits sigma_overall=0.679 worst_q_ratio=1.108
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits sigma_overall=0.626 worst_q_ratio=1.068
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 901 -> 1158, 22.193% > 20%; fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits vs fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 957 -> 1198, 20.117% > 20%; fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits vs fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 443 -> 703, 36.984% > 20%; fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits vs fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350_astrometric_residuals.png (3178 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351_astrometric_residuals.png (4067 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 943.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:57.795 +13:57:14.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:57.795 +13:57:14.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0830 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 943.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:55.077 +13:56:42.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:55.077 +13:56:42.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0813 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:57.795 +13:57:14.32
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:55.077 +13:56:42.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01414 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pqDL8BqsVV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ko6DoAwsV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QfVRVybUyr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4GX5E5Bc2E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 36 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pqDL8BqsVV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8ko6DoAwsV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QfVRVybUyr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1698, bad_region=32, passed=34227
Got 34227 stars (including 32442 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5240)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=8.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.875 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.875 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.824 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.942 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.942 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.679 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.805 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4762 robust_rms_before=1.114 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.620 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.679 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.748 worst_region_rms_after=0.805 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.137 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.754
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.748 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.748 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.620 arcsec matched=4762
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=1336 n_q2=1348 n_q3=787 n_q4=1291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4GX5E5Bc2E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2380, bad_region=31, passed=42882
Got 42882 stars (including 40417 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=9.513 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.524 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.757 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.879 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.790 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.653 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.774 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.071 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.580 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.653 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.693 worst_region_rms_after=0.774 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.064 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.674
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.693 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.693 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.580 arcsec matched=4773
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.650 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.583 n_q1=1329 n_q2=1316 n_q3=928 n_q4=1200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.06 +16:15:57.6: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:31.31 +16:19:43.1: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:46:50.33 +11:42:21.0: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:51.10 +09:29:09.4: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:54.74 +18:09:57.1: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.06 +16:15:57.6: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:46:50.33 +11:42:21.0: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:51.10 +09:29:09.4: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.06 +16:15:57.6: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1083 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:31.31 +16:19:43.1: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:51.10 +09:29:09.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9272 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:50.33 +11:42:21.0: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8415 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:31.31 +16:19:43.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0639 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:54.74 +18:09:57.1: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:54.74 +18:09:57.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6390 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:37.16 +13:03:25.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:36.81 +11:24:50.8: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:28.90 +13:04:44.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:37.16 +13:03:25.2: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:37.16 +13:03:25.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8256 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:15.73 +15:08:39.4: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:04.56 +14:21:02.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:36.81 +11:24:50.8: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:36.81 +11:24:50.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7943 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:28.90 +13:04:44.7: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:28.90 +13:04:44.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0710 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:15.73 +15:08:39.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:15.73 +15:08:39.4: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9371 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:04.56 +14:21:02.9: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:04.56 +14:21:02.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3830 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:46.76 +16:50:45.9: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:46.76 +16:50:45.9: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:46.76 +16:50:45.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3021 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.52 | 06:43:31.25 +10:25:53.5 | 1429 0913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:43:31.28 +10:25:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.05 | 06:40:50.18 +11:39:03.1 | 1006 1639 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:40:50.27 +11:39:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227476_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227476_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.23 | 07:15:37.37 +10:40:00.7 | 6182 1302 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:15:37.36 +10:40:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227480_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227480_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 13.06 | 06:53:31.31 +16:19:43.1 | 2770 4528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.07 | 06:53:31.31 +16:19:43.2 | 2776 4534 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227481_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227481_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.86 | 06:39:35.74 +10:34:56.7 | 0836 0982 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:39:35.75 +10:34:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 12.95 | 06:46:50.32 +11:42:19.7 | 1894 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.79 | 06:46:50.34 +11:42:22.2 | 1900 1706 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 12.93 | 06:39:51.16 +09:29:08.6 | 0884 0308 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.92 | 06:39:51.03 +09:29:10.2 | 0891 0314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227488_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227488_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.72 | 07:11:58.46 +16:35:48.7 | 5429 4833 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:11:58.46 +16:35:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227490_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227490_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.81 | 07:08:28.79 +15:41:32.1 | 4957 4258 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:08:28.82 +15:41:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227491_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227491_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 12.11 | 07:20:02.03 +16:15:57.3 | 6597 4708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.11 | 07:20:02.08 +16:15:58.0 | 6604 4714 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 11.68 | 07:23:44.12 +16:43:43.0 | 7119 5034 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:23:44.09 +16:43:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227707_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227707_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.26 | 06:41:04.44 +09:51:51.2 | 1070 0552 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:41:04.41 +09:51:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227867_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227867_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.57 | 06:43:37.73 +10:34:17.6 | 1442 0998 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:43:37.75 +10:34:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227875_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227875_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.32 | 07:10:02.86 +09:18:01.4 | 5407 0425 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:10:02.86 +09:18:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227876_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 227876_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.64 | 06:40:46.98 +09:46:07.1 | 1027 0492 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:40:46.98 +09:46:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228009_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228009_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 12.61 | 07:25:54.78 +18:09:57.9 | 7364 5924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.68 | 07:25:54.71 +18:09:56.3 | 7370 5930 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228027_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228027_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.80 | 06:39:31.34 +13:59:05.4 | 0772 3049 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:39:31.29 +13:59:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228078_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228078_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.86 | 07:20:13.42 +16:09:38.1 | 6635 4652 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:20:13.44 +16:09:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228093_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228093_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.71 | 07:09:51.69 +09:15:49.9 | 5381 0401 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:09:51.71 +09:15:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228114_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228114_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 12.83 | 07:25:37.10 +13:03:26.6 | 7549 2839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.82 | 07:25:37.23 +13:03:23.7 | 7555 2844 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228169_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228169_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.81 | 06:39:35.14 +11:24:42.0 | 0822 1487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:39:35.11 +11:24:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228176_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228176_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.85 | 07:10:45.64 +09:23:04.5 | 5510 0482 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:10:45.58 +09:23:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 13.10 | 06:39:36.86 +11:24:51.5 | 0820 1483 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.71 | 06:39:36.76 +11:24:50.1 | 0826 1488 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228221_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228221_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 13.02 | 07:25:28.94 +13:04:44.4 | 7528 2850 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.14 | 07:25:28.87 +13:04:45.0 | 7534 2856 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228255_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228255_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 12.99 | 07:15:15.68 +15:08:39.3 | 5951 3985 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.91 | 07:15:15.79 +15:08:39.5 | 5958 3990 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228258_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228258_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.09 | 07:15:05.97 +11:00:47.0 | 6092 1506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:15:06.00 +11:00:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228315_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228315_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.03 | 06:37:43.55 +13:46:28.8 | 0508 2914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:37:43.58 +13:46:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228359_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228359_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.15 | 07:11:43.39 +16:56:53.9 | 5380 5042 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:11:43.34 +16:56:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228397_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228397_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 13.42 | 06:41:04.54 +14:21:04.3 | 0990 3272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.36 | 06:41:04.58 +14:21:01.5 | 0996 3277 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228406_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 228406_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.61 | 07:07:19.59 +15:47:36.9 | 4787 4309 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:07:19.59 +15:47:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 10.85 | 07:22:50.04 +12:12:20.8 | 7183 2301 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:22:50.05 +12:12:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.14 | 07:21:44.13 +11:24:40.0 | 7055 1811 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:21:44.14 +11:24:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102321_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 102321_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 12.49 | 06:43:42.41 +13:33:56.7 | 1400 2814 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194731_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 194731_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.32604 | 2461318.82604 | 13.19 | 07:11:46.63 +16:50:46.4 | 5385 4976 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-49-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 13.46 | 07:11:46.89 +16:50:45.4 | 5392 4981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 11.76 | 06:44:57.23 +09:50:48.9 | 1654 0566 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 06:44:57.20 +09:50:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 05.32679 | 2461318.82679 | 8.07 | 07:08:42.57 +10:01:26.4 | 5184 0851 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_025109_TTUQ1b1x1_2858231_MqtudbKJ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_02-50-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits |
**** FOUND 07:08:42.60 +10:01:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Gem-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.82603752 -observatory V36
14:10:59.16 -15:34:31.7 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:12:27.71 -21:09:33.1 Venus (-4.7mag)
08:25:37.17 +20:21:17.6 Mars (1.1mag)
09:30:20.22 +15:23:49.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:44:11.65 +01:48:01.3 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:39.05 +20:59:24.3 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:56.77 -00:21:44.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:16.79 -23:43:24.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
08:34:17.23 +20:32:36.2 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 5 02:52 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.82603752:
09:30:27.43 +15:23:11.1 Io (9.6mag)
09:30:22.98 +15:23:36.4 Europa (6.2mag)
09:30:35.96 +15:22:24.2 Ganymede (8.1mag)
09:30:26.18 +15:23:18.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:29:38.28 +15:45:29.3 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:30:17.67 +15:24:03.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:28:39.09 +15:43:56.9 Elara (17.5mag)
09:33:07.84 +14:46:33.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:29:22.63 +15:49:19.9 Carme (18.9mag)
00:44:22.98 +01:47:54.0 Titan (8.2mag)
00:44:10.81 +01:47:42.0 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:43:33.07 +01:45:36.5 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:44:13.22 +01:48:19.4 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:42:34.53 +01:35:52.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 5 02:53 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.82603752:
02:06:19.09 +20:54:12.6 JWST
14:53:12.40 +52:25:05.6 Chandra
12:03:33.38 -61:26:43.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 5 02:52 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.82603752 -observatory V36
03:47:22.79 +20:09:15.7 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:19:33.39 -33:38:15.6 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:37:07.52 -72:00:20.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:24.64 +34:28:28.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:03:32.68 +48:15:07.9 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:27:35.29 +25:31:35.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:40.57 -18:04:37.4 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:58:48.16 +35:03:29.0 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:25:54.49 +41:48:36.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:33.27 -13:30:11.1 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:15:36.61 +12:29:18.8 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
12:05:56.01 +16:29:42.6 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:44:57.55 -02:12:43.3 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:17:54.03 +67:26:23.5 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:42:48.95 +44:05:22.5 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:39:49.80 +13:40:22.3 17.7mag A/2026 E1
00:41:19.66 +19:44:04.7 17.8mag 2P/Encke
22:51:46.19 -32:56:02.8 14.3mag 10P/Tempel
02:02:12.26 +39:27:21.7 16.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:07:09.15 -07:40:11.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:26:24.98 -08:39:20.3 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
07:27:19.41 +16:39:12.5 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:05:41.04 +14:36:22.8 17.5mag 88P/Howell
07:16:47.65 +38:26:55.2 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:48:06.35 +16:16:39.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:28:27.73 +14:38:51.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:51:39.51 -30:26:59.7 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:46:13.35 +19:34:16.4 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:36:25.39 +00:32:03.4 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:38:21.78 -02:09:38.3 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:05:42.43 +35:47:21.3 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:03:35.30 +03:08:48.9 13.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:55.07 +05:22:21.0 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:53:19.10 +43:51:11.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:17:51.87 +25:47:29.2 18.0mag 266P/Christensen
15:46:37.30 -03:16:22.4 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski
09:49:57.86 +32:00:48.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 5 02:52 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 5 02:52 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 5 02:52 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:31:39.890 +26:57:49.20 AT 2026acdw 2026-07-03.81 20.42
01:05:50.440 +05:28:35.30 AT 2026acdv 2026-09-10.89 22.53
01:53:01.660 +02:28:41.42 AT 2026acdu 2026-09-10.77 22.18
01:22:01.920 +00:36:31.93 AT 2026acdt 2026-09-08.83 22.48
23:33:58.210 +06:07:36.61 AT 2026acds 2026-09-08.81 22.17
02:16:03.060 +01:41:26.32 AT 2026acdr 2026-08-23.90 21.76
22:47:27.540 -00:19:34.44 AT 2026acdq 2026-06-30.84 21.55
22:51:18.337 +04:28:40.71 AT 2026acdp 2026-09-16.74 22.12
02:30:40.630 +02:46:53.02 AT 2026acdo 2026-09-15.85 21.95
02:09:16.870 +01:28:36.92 AT 2026acdn 2026-09-15.84 22.4
01:52:25.390 -01:02:18.80 AT 2026acdm 2026-09-15.84 21.59
01:26:00.430 +05:11:07.70 AT 2026acdl 2026-09-13.85 22.3
00:59:21.730 +05:19:21.52 AT 2026acdk 2026-09-12.90 22.44
01:52:37.109 +00:19:05.30 AT 2026acdj 2026-09-12.77 22.53
01:45:08.290 +04:57:01.83 AT 2026acdi 2026-09-12.77 22.56
23:52:08.000 +02:30:09.80 AT 2026acdh 2026-09-12.74 22.38
23:00:43.000 +00:08:30.74 AT 2026acdg 2026-09-12.73 22.19
23:43:16.060 +01:40:02.02 AT 2026acdf 2026-09-10.84 22.6
01:56:12.660 +01:50:37.08 AT 2026acde 2026-09-10.77 22.48
01:20:44.400 +06:02:00.40 AT 2026acdd 2026-09-10.77 21.86
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 5 02:52 tns_transients_list.txt