NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    13.03    00:21:29.66 -09:25:40.0   0347 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    13.03    00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0   0352 3263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 05.2454  2461318.7454  13.03  00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0
 99.75542 -70.93979 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
906 Repsolda                -0      0       0  13.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0:  15.59 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.30    00:23:55.55 -04:55:15.1   0495 6024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.33    00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.1   0500 6031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 05.2454  2461318.7454  14.31  00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6
105.26862 -66.84428 galactic  Psc  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
3133 Sendai                   1     -1       1  14.4     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6:  15.55 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319900 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319900 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits_preview.png'
Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits

renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits_preview.png'
Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 888.8278 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.8528 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1365.4631 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 519.5711 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1365.3513 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 520.9708 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.53625 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T00:52:48.8160646' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T05:52:48.8160646' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.2450094447 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T05:52:58.7165716' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.2451240276 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 12.8551370097657 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99957409651446 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.6977777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 161.911111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.42030943005244 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 88.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.79 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 221.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits :) Spent 0.826242 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T00:53:39.2512160' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T05:53:39.2512160' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.2455931827 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T05:53:49.1512472' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.2457077662 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 12.8551369826109 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99957409408941 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.7511111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 162.190833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.41898007005027 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 88.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.79 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 221.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits :) Spent 1.084839 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.74512519 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:07.043 -10:01:48.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 Second-epoch image center 00:51:07.043 -10:01:48.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:04.846 -10:02:28.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 Second-epoch image center 00:51:04.846 -10:02:28.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0925 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:51:07.043 -10:01:48.63 Second-epoch second image center 00:51:04.846 -10:02:28.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01437 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8VNCKiiGUa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rTxSdnvTkN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8RJ1Bx5wlJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.19BZBJZVhD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.898500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.898500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg Loaded 3953 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3150 out of 3266 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3266 out of 5085 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 15.3 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.8VNCKiiGUa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=0, passed=5092 Got 5092 stars (including 4723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1250 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rTxSdnvTkN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=0, passed=5085 Got 5085 stars (including 4722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1046 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1120 n_q4=1208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.8RJ1Bx5wlJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=268, bad_region=0, passed=5448 Got 5448 stars (including 5178 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5448 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=13.400 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.057 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.057 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.664 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.664 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.357 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.357 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4901 robust_rms_before=0.972 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.276 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.384 worst_region_rms_after=0.357 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.038 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.357 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.276 arcsec matched=4901 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1162 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.19BZBJZVhD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=263, bad_region=0, passed=5440 Got 5440 stars (including 5172 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5440 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=13.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.095 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.095 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.657 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.657 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.361 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.965 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.381 worst_region_rms_after=0.361 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.976 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.361 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.381 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.284 arcsec matched=4899 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1171 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.170 ref2=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.252 worst_q_ratio=1.229 new1=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.278 worst_q_ratio=1.130 new2=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.105 reference average sigma_overall=0.259 worst_q_ratio=1.1995 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:57:31.66 -07:35:30.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.7: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1028 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:57:31.66 -07:35:30.3: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:31.66 -07:35:30.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2075 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20252_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 20252_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    9.09    00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3   1218 6132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    9.09    00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.5   1223 6139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20384_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 20384_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    12.10    00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.8   5301 3526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    12.10    00:54:41.47 -09:31:46.6   5306 3533   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20394_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 20394_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    12.19    00:57:31.66 -07:35:30.4   5660 4715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    12.22    00:57:31.65 -07:35:30.2   5665 4722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:07.043 -10:01:48.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 Second-epoch image center 00:51:07.043 -10:01:48.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:04.846 -10:02:28.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 Second-epoch image center 00:51:04.846 -10:02:28.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0925 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:51:07.043 -10:01:48.63 Second-epoch second image center 00:51:04.846 -10:02:28.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01437 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hB3lo691OU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mbh2BD5hDk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UXQCNYG6jv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p6JLApqdfM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 25987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg Loaded 3957 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3129 out of 3354 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3354 out of 25987 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 15.4 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.hB3lo691OU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1010, bad_region=3, passed=26243 Got 26243 stars (including 25198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26243 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1164 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.mbh2BD5hDk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=998, bad_region=3, passed=25977 Got 25977 stars (including 24935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25977 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.UXQCNYG6jv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=744, bad_region=46, passed=23608 Got 23608 stars (including 22795 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23608 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23608 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23608 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23608 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=13.485 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.787 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.787 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.669 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.669 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.353 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.353 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.967 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.372 worst_region_rms_after=0.353 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.018 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.353 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.270 arcsec matched=4880 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1132 n_q3=1334 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.p6JLApqdfM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=719, bad_region=47, passed=23574 Got 23574 stars (including 22789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23574 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23574 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23574 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23574 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=13.459 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.823 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.823 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.664 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.664 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.353 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.353 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.962 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.373 worst_region_rms_after=0.353 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.972 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.353 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.279 arcsec matched=4879 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1135 n_q3=1328 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:55.88 -09:08:02.4: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:15.12 -12:44:35.4: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:07:22.05 -13:35:09.0: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:36:19.18 -08:28:03.1: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:22:08.93 -05:49:05.0: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:31:01.79 -04:55:41.6: 15.19 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:36:19.18 -08:28:03.1: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:03:55.88 -09:08:02.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:06.04 -10:00:43.9: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:07:22.05 -13:35:09.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:15.12 -12:44:35.4: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:19.18 -08:28:03.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1900 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:55.88 -09:08:02.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4600 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:22.05 -13:35:09.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3070 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:15.12 -12:44:35.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2703 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:22:08.93 -05:49:05.0: 15.07 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:08.93 -05:49:05.0: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3916 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:31:01.79 -04:55:41.6: 15.12 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:06.04 -10:00:43.9: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:01.79 -04:55:41.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6170 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:06.04 -10:00:43.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4139 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:29.78 -05:43:31.7: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:26.25 -06:28:01.8: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:55.14 -09:56:31.7: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:53.76 -09:12:28.4: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:50.48 -07:29:49.4: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:50:22.60 -05:52:04.4: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:26.25 -06:28:01.8: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:55.14 -09:56:31.7: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:08:37.53 -05:31:08.0: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:53.76 -09:12:28.4: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:40:35.24 -12:23:57.9: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:29.78 -05:43:31.7: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:50.48 -07:29:49.4: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:26.25 -06:28:01.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6534 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:55.14 -09:56:31.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5212 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:53.76 -09:12:28.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4744 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:29.78 -05:43:31.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6145 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:50.48 -07:29:49.4: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6166 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:50:22.60 -05:52:04.4: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:22.60 -05:52:04.4: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6195 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:08:37.53 -05:31:08.0: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:37.53 -05:31:08.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6251 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:40:35.24 -12:23:57.9: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:35.24 -12:23:57.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5246 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:29:35.52 -09:49:59.9: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:08.16 -07:19:05.3: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:15.59 -06:11:10.9: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:15.59 -06:11:10.9: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:08.16 -07:19:05.3: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:15.59 -06:11:10.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5860 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:08.16 -07:19:05.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5900 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:29:35.52 -09:49:59.9: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:35.52 -09:49:59.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7253 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31956.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32438.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31610_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 31610_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.23    00:23:44.15 -09:37:43.1   0701 3167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits **** FOUND 00:23:44.19 -09:37:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31616_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 31616_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    13.34    01:07:22.04 -13:35:09.0   7297 1172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    13.28    01:07:22.05 -13:35:09.0   7302 1179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31618_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 31618_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    13.25    00:26:15.15 -12:44:36.5   1218 1305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    13.30    00:26:15.10 -12:44:34.4   1223 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31632_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 31632_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    9.22    00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3   1218 6132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    9.23    00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.4   1223 6139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31856_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 31856_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    12.52    00:43:47.39 -12:02:37.0   3786 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits **** FOUND 00:43:47.39 -12:02:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31956_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 Preparing report for the candidate 31956_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32062_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32062_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    13.42    00:33:29.48 -06:43:51.9   2038 5024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits **** FOUND 00:33:29.48 -06:43:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32135_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32135_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    13.51    01:03:55.87 -09:08:02.6   6661 3835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    13.42    01:03:55.88 -09:08:02.2   6666 3842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32155_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32155_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    13.59    00:51:17.24 -08:35:48.9   4770 4065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits **** FOUND 00:51:17.14 -08:35:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32372_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32372_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.12    00:36:19.18 -08:28:03.8   2532 3997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.29    00:36:19.18 -08:28:02.4   2537 4004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32435_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32435_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.25    00:33:24.53 -06:43:52.9   2026 5023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits **** FOUND 00:33:24.54 -06:43:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32438_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 Preparing report for the candidate 32438_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32494_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32494_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.29    01:22:08.85 -05:49:03.0   9337 5978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.58    01:22:09.01 -05:49:07.0   9343 5984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32504_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32504_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.12    00:40:54.02 -07:13:49.1   3171 4794   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits **** FOUND 00:40:54.05 -07:13:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32558_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32558_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.54    00:31:01.80 -04:55:42.6   1580 6088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.78    00:31:01.77 -04:55:40.6   1585 6096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32571_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32571_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.41    00:21:06.06 -10:00:41.3   0316 2897   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.42    00:21:06.01 -10:00:46.4   0321 2903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32592_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32592_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.57    00:26:29.84 -05:43:32.3   0928 5558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.68    00:26:29.72 -05:43:31.2   0932 5565   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32610_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32610_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.57    00:24:26.23 -06:28:01.0   0650 5085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.80    00:24:26.28 -06:28:02.5   0655 5092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32612_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32612_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.53    00:21:55.17 -09:56:29.9   0437 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.51    00:21:55.11 -09:56:33.4   0442 2956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32621_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32621_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.54    00:25:23.64 -06:34:32.9   0806 5036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits **** FOUND 00:25:23.75 -06:34:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32625_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32625_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.47    00:30:53.78 -09:12:27.3   1753 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.48    00:30:53.74 -09:12:29.5   1758 3501   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32641_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.59    00:30:50.51 -07:29:48.9   1668 4527   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.64    00:30:50.46 -07:29:49.8   1673 4534   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32652_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32652_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.62    00:50:22.55 -05:52:04.0   4533 5695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.62    00:50:22.64 -05:52:04.8   4539 5702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32678_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32678_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.62    01:08:37.49 -05:31:08.2   7268 6058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.63    01:08:37.56 -05:31:07.8   7273 6065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32684_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32684_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.51    00:40:35.24 -12:23:58.9   3324 1673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.53    00:40:35.25 -12:23:56.9   3329 1681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32704_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32704_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.67    00:29:35.61 -09:49:58.5   1585 3103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.81    00:29:35.44 -09:50:01.3   1590 3110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32705_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32705_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.58    01:17:08.14 -07:19:05.4   8601 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.60    01:17:08.18 -07:19:05.2   8607 5033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32736_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 The candidate 32736_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.24513    2461318.74513    14.66    01:19:15.52 -06:11:11.0   8901 5731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-52-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.24571    2461318.74571    14.54    01:19:15.67 -06:11:10.8   8907 5738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_005423_TTUQ1b1x1_2100109_dxz6nqLt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0 00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6 ########### Completed Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0 00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6 ################################################################################### 00:21:29.65 -09:25:40.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:23:55.54 -04:55:14.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.74512519 -observatory V36 14:10:36.42 -15:32:02.9 Mercury (-0.0mag) 14:12:28.88 -21:09:25.7 Venus (-4.7mag) 08:25:25.46 +20:21:51.4 Mars (1.1mag) 09:30:16.86 +15:24:04.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:44:13.08 +01:48:10.3 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:39.46 +20:59:25.3 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:57.27 -00:21:41.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:16.91 -23:43:24.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 08:28:56.62 +20:46:35.9 Moon (-9.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 5 01:01 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.74512519: 09:30:24.05 +15:23:26.4 Io (9.6mag) 09:30:21.03 +15:23:43.8 Europa (6.2mag) 09:30:33.03 +15:22:36.9 Ganymede (8.1mag) 09:30:23.69 +15:23:29.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:29:34.59 +15:45:44.9 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:30:14.67 +15:24:16.1 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:28:35.54 +15:44:10.6 Elara (17.5mag) 09:33:04.76 +14:46:49.0 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:29:19.64 +15:49:33.7 Carme (18.9mag) 00:44:24.55 +01:48:02.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:44:11.60 +01:47:51.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:43:34.46 +01:45:46.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:44:15.06 +01:48:28.1 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:42:36.02 +01:36:02.1 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 5 01:01 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.74512519: 02:06:10.03 +20:52:29.3 JWST 14:12:56.09 +53:39:51.6 Chandra 11:03:16.48 -59:20:29.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 5 01:01 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.74512519 -observatory V36 03:47:23.48 +20:09:12.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:19:29.44 -33:38:22.7 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:37:05.16 -72:00:01.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:24.98 +34:28:20.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:36.24 +48:14:50.0 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:27:33.02 +25:31:38.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:40.03 -18:04:12.6 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:58:45.40 +35:03:00.7 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:25:54.14 +41:48:51.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:32.54 -13:30:06.2 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:15:37.03 +12:30:26.7 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:05:47.12 +16:30:06.7 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:44:52.75 -02:12:18.8 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:17:34.43 +67:28:03.2 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:42:54.27 +44:05:57.3 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:39:45.07 +13:39:55.0 17.7mag A/2026 E1 00:41:30.78 +19:44:33.5 17.8mag 2P/Encke 22:51:41.50 -32:56:58.8 14.3mag 10P/Tempel 02:02:05.83 +39:27:41.3 16.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:07:05.84 -07:39:47.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:26:28.35 -08:39:08.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 07:27:12.30 +16:39:42.5 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:05:45.32 +14:36:33.9 17.5mag 88P/Howell 07:16:29.89 +38:25:23.5 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:47:54.34 +16:18:19.2 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:28:17.52 +14:39:57.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:51:27.51 -30:25:33.1 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:46:09.39 +19:34:28.5 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:36:28.02 +00:32:22.5 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 22:39:14.33 -02:14:28.8 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:05:31.14 +35:47:41.3 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:03:23.45 +03:10:03.5 13.7mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:56.76 +05:22:58.0 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:53:10.31 +43:50:01.8 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:17:44.37 +25:47:35.4 18.0mag 266P/Christensen 15:46:33.06 -03:15:52.8 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:49:52.65 +32:01:07.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 5 01:01 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 5 01:01 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 5 01:01 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 02:30:40.630 +02:46:53.02 AT 2026acdo 2026-09-15.85 21.95 02:09:16.870 +01:28:36.92 AT 2026acdn 2026-09-15.84 22.4 01:52:25.390 -01:02:18.80 AT 2026acdm 2026-09-15.84 21.59 01:26:00.430 +05:11:07.70 AT 2026acdl 2026-09-13.85 22.3 00:59:21.730 +05:19:21.52 AT 2026acdk 2026-09-12.90 22.44 01:52:37.109 +00:19:05.30 AT 2026acdj 2026-09-12.77 22.53 01:45:08.290 +04:57:01.83 AT 2026acdi 2026-09-12.77 22.56 23:52:08.000 +02:30:09.80 AT 2026acdh 2026-09-12.74 22.38 23:00:43.000 +00:08:30.74 AT 2026acdg 2026-09-12.73 22.19 23:43:16.060 +01:40:02.02 AT 2026acdf 2026-09-10.84 22.6 01:56:12.660 +01:50:37.08 AT 2026acde 2026-09-10.77 22.48 01:20:44.400 +06:02:00.40 AT 2026acdd 2026-09-10.77 21.86 01:13:31.990 +04:24:23.63 AT 2026acdc 2026-09-10.76 22.79 01:15:03.600 +05:10:37.90 AT 2026acdb 2026-09-08.89 22.67 01:07:11.080 +05:05:45.33 AT 2026acda 2026-09-08.89 22.57 02:31:08.610 -00:16:42.93 AT 2026accz 2026-09-08.85 22.57 02:03:05.540 +01:55:47.58 AT 2026accy 2026-09-08.84 22.4 01:59:22.490 +00:05:02.08 AT 2026accx 2026-09-08.84 22.22 01:21:28.510 +02:30:23.28 AT 2026accw 2026-09-08.83 22.18 01:06:56.650 +00:08:23.74 AT 2026accv 2026-09-08.82 22.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 5 01:01 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 94 C